Read and follow the instructions one by one. Check guidelines as well. Discussion Post Topic: Identifying Perspectives: Two Middle-Range Theories in Relation to a Phenomenon of Interest. Two Theories: Theory of uncertainty in Illness and Theory of Symptoms Management Instructions: Select Your Theories and Phenomenon: Begin by clearly stating the phenomenon of interest you wish to explore. Identify two middle-range theories from the course that provide distinct lenses for understanding this phenomenon. Ensure that your choice is well grounded in the literature and relevant to the phenomenon you are addressing. Explain Each Theory: For each selected middle-range theory, provide a concise explanation of its core concepts, assumptions, and purpose. Discuss the theoretical framework and how the theory is typically applied in nursing practice or research. Compare and Contrast the Perspectives: Comparison: Explain the similarities between the two theories regarding their approach to the phenomenon. Identify any overlapping concepts, shared assumptions, or common outcomes they may emphasize. Contrast: Highlight the differences between them. Discuss how each theory uniquely shapes the understanding of the phenomenon, addressing aspects such as: The theoretical constructs used to describe the phenomenon. The implications for nursing practice or research that result from using one theory over the other. Potential strengths and limitations of each theoretical perspective in capturing the nuances of the phenomenon. Incorporate Evidence-Based Support: Use at least two scholarly references (peer-reviewed articles, textbook chapters, or reputable sources) that detail how these middle-range theories have been applied or studied in relation to similar phenomena. Summarize the key findings of these sources to support your analysis, and ensure that all citations follow APA 7th Edition guidelines. Organize Your Post: Introduction: Briefly introduce the phenomenon you will be discussing and state the two middle-range theories you have chosen. Provide context for why these theories are pertinent to your phenomenon. Body: Describe each theory individually, explaining its concepts and relevance to the phenomenon. Include a section that directly compares and contrasts how each theory shapes your understanding of the phenomenon. Use subheadings or bullet points if needed to enhance clarity. Conclusion: Summarize your key points, emphasizing how each theoretical perspective contributes a unique understanding of the phenomenon and its implications for practice or further research. Final Considerations: Make sure your discussion is clear, evidence-based, and reflective of graduate-level critical analysis. Use proper APA formatting throughout your post, including in-text citations and a reference list. Engage with any assigned rubrics or additional guidelines provided by your instructor to ensure your post meets all expected criteria. By following these detailed instructions, you will create a comprehensive discussion post that not only identifies two middle-range theories relevant to your chosen phenomenon but also critically compares and contrasts their unique contributions. References must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years. Please ensure you can LOOK UP your reference from your citation submission. REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up-
Please follow instructions below. Please attached references use for this discussion. Minimum 350 words (not including references ). References must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years. REFERENCES Must have DOI NumbersThe kidneys are highly vascular organs that filter the blood, removing wastes for excretion and returning the rest of the blood to the vascular system. The functional units of the kidneys are nephrons, each composed of a glomerulus and a tubule. How is the GFR measured? What are the strengths and limitations of methods of determining GFR? Often an incidental finding in children during a urinary tract infection workup, in vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), urine flows from the bladder back up the ureters. Could you explain the mechanism of action of this abnormality in children?
IHP 604 Module Five Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric Overview For your course project, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, the parties affected, and the importance of addressing the issue. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if your implementation was successful. The first step to completing your course project is to select a healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. In Module Three, you selected an organization and identified a publicly available set of data. For this assignment, you will need to choose an area that needs to be improved, a way to improve it, and a framework to utilize in your quality improvement initiative. You may change your selection of the initiative or the framework in your final project submission, which is due in Module Nine. This assignment helps you focus on this aspect of the final project and also maps to the second learning objective of this module. Prompt Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Selection of area of improvement: Describe an area of improvement related to your previously selected healthcare organization and its public-facing data that you will utilize for your course project. Selection of method of improvement: Describe the method of improvement that you will utilize in your course project. Selection of framework to use in improvement initiative: Identify which of the four problem-solving frameworks (tracers, root cause analyses [RCA], failure mode effect analysis [FMEA] studies, or plan-do-study-act [PDSA]) you will utilize for your course project by applying it to your improvement initiative. Discuss your selections: Discuss why you selected the area of improvement, method of improvement, and framework. Report sections: Describe the report sections you will include in your course project to describe your healthcare quality improvement initiative in a compelling and informative way. Throughout your paper, provide specific evidence from at least two scholarly sources. What to Submit Submit this assignment as a 1-page Microsoft Word document. You should cite at least two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.
make a presentation about “ Differentiate between gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer“ last slide before sources “ write two short questions and their short answers” Total 3 to 4 slides are enough
To prepare: Consider what type of professional group, HSO board, or governing body should hear your results. Determine what information is pertinent for the professionals, board members, or governing body members to know and what information they do not need to know. Review best practices for presentations for a professional audience. The Assignment: 12- to 15-slide presentation Prepare and deliver a slide presentation on your integrative review for your selected audience. You will submit your slide presentation to the board. Use the following as a guide for creating your presentation: Slide 1: Title Slide Slides 2–3: Review Question Background Slide 4–5: The Review Slides 6–7: Thematic Results Slides 8–9: Conclusions Slides 10–11: Recommendations/Next Steps (include applications to social change/social determinants of health) Slide 12: References Note: The number of slides given are a recommendation, but you may need additional slides to adequately present the information. You may go over 12 slides, but do not exceed 15 in your final submission. Include visual elements (e.g., charts, tables) where appropriate to help support your arguments. Slides should be clear, visually appealing, and in line with best practices for a presentation (see Learning Resources for more information).
Need PowerPoint, 10-12 slides. Read instructions below: Course Objectives: CLO #1: Assess elements of contemporary leadership theories and models CLO #2: Analyze qualities and skills of a highly effective, ethical leader. CLO#3: Examine the role of the healthcare administrator in leading a high reliability organization. CLO #4: Critique management principles and skills required for effective operational management of a healthcare organization. CLO #5: Develop a personal philosophy of ethical leadership in health care. For the assignment: Provide an overview of two leadership theories (Transformational leadership theory and Servant leadership theory) Provide an overview of 5 topics discussed in the discussions in relation to one of the leadership theories. (Either tranformation or servant) Topic 1 : Communication Topic 2: Team Dynamics Topic 3 : Conflict Management Topic 4 : Ethical Leadership Topic 5 : Decision Making Choose which leadership theory you would choose to use and explain why it is best suited for you. Powerpoint must be 10-12 slides total ( not including title and reference slide) with atleast 5 scholarly sources. Also, add notes for presentation. I have attached some of the powerpoint that's completed so include all into the new PowerPoint so it's all just one. Use some of the references in the powerpoint i've attached Note: make the style of the powerpoint minimalistic with black and white style and colors.
Submit your e-portfolio that includes the following deliverables from your CPE record on your field experience page: Phase 1 - a CPE schedule table with tasks and a timeline - a completed copy of the “Project Report Template” supporting document - three screenshots to document your Phase 1 GoReact video reflection, including one image of your reflection video and an image for each of your two peer responses - a written summary of your Phase 1 video reflection
Review the following article from JAMA Network and discuss your impressions. Compare the findings of the article to other EHR satisfaction surveys (i.e., the second link listed below). Discuss similarities and differences. What insights did you gain with regard to EHR assessment and utilization? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2791439Links to an external site. http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/ehr-satisfaction-survey-2017-after-years-frustrations-user-wish-list-turns-positive inks to an external site. 300 Words minimum
Using the Care Plan Template you will have the opportunity to create a Respiratory Therapy Care Plan to be executed in an Alternative Setting. You will create a PowerPoint Presentation with audio (video is optional) and share your Care Plan and educational script with your peers. The presentation should include all of the information located on the Care Plan Template. The presentation should not exceed 15 minutes but should address all categories of the care plan and educational script. After completing your presentation you will complete a peer review on 2 of your fellow students. The review will include the grading rubric and additional comments you have regarding their presentation. Step-by-Step Instructions: View the assignment rubric before beginning Review the video resources located in the Resources section below Using your completed Care Plan Template create a PowerPoint Presentation showcasing your Care Plan Highlight the rationale for selecting the alternative setting for your PPOP Include a short description of the education needs in that alternative setting and include a method to check for patient comprehension Upload your Panopto/zoom video to this assignment
