Expert Answers

Think about a change you know of in a healthcare organization in Saudi Arabia. How was the change received and what was the outcome? What were the resistance points? Provide and discuss suggestions to deal with resistance to change processes. Use what you have learned in this class to analyze how the change was managed. Use specific terminology learned in this class. Was the change radical or incremental? Who led and managed the change? Embed at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed references in support. Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

What are the essential qualifications, educational requirements, certification processes, clinical skills, and personal attributes needed to become a successful Hospice and Palliative Nurse Practitioner, and what are the typical salary ranges, benefits, and ongoing professional development opportunities in this role?

Assume you are the information systems leader at a community clinic in the Kingdom that serves patients who are geographically remote. The clinic is planning to implement digital technologies to increase access to healthcare services. Explain and justify which digital technologies that you would recommend to support your patients.

Research Topic Draft Study Topic: The impact of Electronic Health Records on Nursing Documentation Accuracy and patient safety Create four research questions for the EHR topic above Find Dataset Source and Download URL: Locate a downloadable dataset from one of the following approved websites for the following research. CDC.gov CMS.gov AHRQ.gov Note: The dataset must include raw data, not aggregated or summarized data.

This week, let's take some time to reflect on what we've learned in this class and consider how we can apply evidence-based practice in our own interactions with research. Please choose one or more of the guiding questions below to share your thoughts and experiences: Challenges in Implementing Evidence-Based Practice Changes: Have you personally experienced or witnessed any attempts to implement evidence-based practice changes? What were the challenges encountered during this process? How did those experiences shape your understanding of evidence-based practice and its application in real-world settings? Proposing an Evidence-Based Practice Change: Identify an evidence-based practice change that you would like to implement in your workplace or field of interest. What challenges do you anticipate facing while trying to implement this change? Are there any potential solutions or strategies you can think of to address these challenges effectively? Meaningful Takeaways from the Class: As you reflect on your journey through this course, what do you believe will be the most meaningful thing you take away from it? How has this course influenced your perspective on evidence-based practice and research, and why do you think it will be significant in your future endeavors? Advice for Improving Research Reading Skills: Reading and understanding research papers can be daunting. Based on what you've learned in this class, what advice would you give to someone who wants to get better at reading and critically evaluating research? Share any tips, strategies, or resources that you have found helpful in your own research exploration. Write 2-3 paragraphs with your thoughts. Feel free to share personal anecdotes, specific examples, or insights gained from the course materials to support your responses.

NRNP-6675C-56 Assignment 1 WK 3: To Prepare Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing and diagnosing anxiety, obsessive compulsive, and trauma-related disorders. Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations. Review the video, Case Study: Dev Cordoba (Walden University. (2021). Case study: Dev Cordoba . Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com ) . You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient. Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient. The Assignment Develop a Focused SOAP Note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?? Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 -TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy. Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you could follow up with this patient.?Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.). Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). Assignment 2 To Prepare Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations. Review the video, Case Study: Sherman Tremaine . (Walden University. (2021). Case study: Sherman Tremaine . Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com) You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient. Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient. The Assignment Develop a focused SOAP note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?? Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, and list them in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy. Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you were able to follow up with this patient.?Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.). Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).

Instructions Instructions: Submit your work as a Microsoft Word document. It should be double-spaced, 12 point font and either Times or New Roman. 100 -word minimum. For this journal, you will connect to the chapters on social inequality. Play the game SPENT (http://playspent.org/html/) two times. At the end of each game, take a screen shot of the amount of money in your bank. You will not receive credit for #1 without the screen shots. You can embed the screen shots into your paper as pictures. Answer the following questions/prompts: Give a summary of your experiences playing SPENT. Give a summary of your living conditions, employment, bills, ethical/moral issues you faced and how you ended the month -- remember that ending one month also means you are approaching a new month, with new bills. Connect the game to 3 terms from the chapters on inequality (chapters 6-9). Define the terms and explain how they apply to your situations in the game or real life poverty situations. Put a citation for each term (page number in your textbook or e-book). Don't forget your screen shots. The book for this class is Race and Racisms a critical approach by tanya golash boza

Discussion Board Directions: Answer the required questions and/or choose accordingly from the options below. You should answer 7 questions in total. Each answer should be 150 words maximum. Answers to questions should cite information and concepts discussed in: Chapter 1, Chapter 2, and Chapter 3 Articles and Video Clips: Chapter 1 Articles and Video Clips: Chapter 2 Articles and Video Clips: Chapter 3 Review the Discussion Rubric before submitting your work. Chapter 1 CHOOSE ANY TWO QUESTIONS: After viewing the video clips about what men say and what women want, how much do you agree or disagree with these views? How are these views shaped? Compare the views presented in this video to the ideas views presented in the WAP video (there's a link to the WAP video in the Articles and Video Clips page). What do the textbook authors mean by “sexual intelligence?” Be sure to discuss the four components as defined in the text. Do you agree with this definition? Give examples of specific psychological, scientific, and social changes within the last century that have affected sexual values and behavior in today’s society and assess their impact. How have the internet and social media shaped sexual expression during the last decade? Chapter 2 ALL REQUIRED: What is your reaction to the Why Have Sex study? When you took the test, did your results match the results of the survey? Was there anything that surprised you about your results? This study was initially conducted as an online survey, what does the text say about the pros and cons of sex research in Cyberspace? What is sexology? What are its goals? Do you agree with those goals? Think about a study you would like to conduct. Which method of research would you be most likely to use: The methods used by Masters and Johnson or the method used by Kinsey, or some other method mentioned in the chapter? Briefly describe what your study would be it using the information found in Chapter 2. Read at least one student discussion, commenting on whether or not you agree with their chosen research method and why. Chapter 3 CHOOSE ANY TWO QUESTIONS: According to the Anatomy of Sex video, what role has evolution played in mate selection? How has media shaped beauty standards in men and women? How has the definition of "womanhood" changed in your lifetime, or has it? List the reasons why women should perform a genital self-exam. Discussion Grading Rubric Category >0.0-2 >2.0-4 >4.0-6 >6.0-8 Critical Thinking 8 points Discussion displays no insight or analysis. Generally competent, however, information presented is superficial. Substantial Information, thought, insight, and analysis has taken place. Rich in content: full of thought, insight, analysis, and original thinking. Delivery of Post 8 points Utilizes poor spelling and grammar. Post appears “hasty.” Many errors in spelling and grammar are evident. Few grammatical or spelling errors are noted in post. Grammatically correct post with no misspellings. Relevance of Post 8 points Discussion post does not relate to material, makes irrelevant remarks. Post is short in length and offers no further insight into the topic. Post is insightful and related to discussion topic. Post is insightful, related to discussion topic and contributes to a new understanding of the topic. Expression within the post 8 points Does not clearly express opinions or ideas. Minimal expression of opinions or ideas. Opinions and ideas are stated clearly but lacks depth and/or detail. Expresses opinions and ideas in a clear and concise manner demonstrating depth of understanding. Reference to assigned material 9 points No reference to assigned material. Minimal reference to assigned material; all sources may not be referenced. Reference to all assigned material is seen throughout post. You must cite the Crooks & Baur text as source material both in the body of your responses as well as at the end. (6-9 points) Discussion cites additional scholarly sources that provide greater depth of understanding. If additional scholarly resources are used, you must cite them within the body of your responses and at the end of the entire submission. Scholarly does not mean Wikipedia of the first item that shows up on a Google Search. Scholarly does mean academic journals or well-researched informational sites like The Guttmacher InstituteLinks to an external site. Scholarship 9 points No evidence of cognitive processing of course material or analyzing own experience through the lens of assigned material. Minimal cognitive processing of assigned material is evident. Discussion is thoughtful synthesizing own experience with assigned material. You must cite the Crooks & Baur text as source material both in the body of your responses as well as at the end. (6-9 points) Discussion is thoughtful and stimulating reflecting a synthesis of course material, additional scholarly material, and own experience. If additional scholarly resources are used, you must cite them within the body of your responses and at the end of the entire submission. Scholarly does not mean Wikipedia of the first item that shows up on a Google Search. Scholarly does mean academic journals or well-researched informational sites like The Guttmacher InstituteLinks to an external site. Evidence 8 points Either no evidence is provided for any response or there are numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications. Not enough evidence is provided to support most of the responses. The evidence is incomplete, incorrect, or oversimplified. Provides necessary evidence to support most responses, but not all. The importance/relevance of some evidence presented may not be totally clear. Provides compelling and accurate evidence in answering all questions. The importance/ relevance of all pieces of evidence are clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoning—i.e., the reader does not need to assume anything or do additional research to accept. Total: 58 points

In this final week, you will create an infographic demonstrating a disease management strategy for your Patient Population of Practice (PPoP) within your local context. Essentially, you want to outline how care should be provided for a patient who is moved from one point to another. For example, your PPoP's disease management strategy might highlight a discharge plan from ICU to the floor, acute care to home care, ICU to a long-term care facility, or other reasonable transitions commonly experienced by your PPoP. This infographic will also serve as a roadmap for you to develop an evidence-based approach to disease management. CanvaLinks to an external site. VengageLinks to an external site. more! Instructions: To prepare for the development of an infographic, follow the steps below: Outline your goals of the infographic. What are you trying to accomplish? Collect data for your infographic (data will be added over the course of the program and/or the graphic will grow) Clearly communicate data with visualizations Create your layout using a template Add style to make the infographic appealing

Supporting Lecture: Review the following lecture: Public Health Policy Review THIS WEEK'S project is to write the section of your final capstone paper that gives examples of POLICIES related to the public health problem in your population. These can be local policies, organizational policies, state policies, or federal policies. For example, policies to fight childhood obesity could include: A local school district banning soda machines in the schools A USDA (federal) policy improving the quality of school lunches A city passing a fast-food zoning ordinance to improve the built environment A state law creating more parks and playgrounds in low SES areas A national ban on child-directed junk food advertising A soda tax at the local or state level Create a 3-4 page report discussing at least three (3) policies that address your health issue. For each, be sure you are addressing: Goal of the policy Description of the policy Where, when, and how was it implemented? Source of funding Impact Political context—Was it a struggle to get the law passed? It is widely supported? Use at least five(5) reputable sources (the text, South University library resources, government websites, peer-reviewed research articles) that you cite in the text and at the end in APA format Submission Details Name your document SU_PHE4200_W5_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc. Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned. Support your responses with examples. Cite any sources in APA format.