Expert Answers

Instructions In order to complete this journal, you need to watch the documentary linked below (True Justice) and answer the following questions. Please note that the video provides a history of slavery and lynching. Graphic images may be shown. Link: https://youtu.be/JfZPl4CFEUc What surprised you most after watching the documentary? Or, what did you learn? How did lynching become a normalized form of racial terror in the United States, and what societal norms or legal structures allowed it to persist? Discuss how racial terror led to the Great Migration of black people from the American South to other parts of the country. How can we understand the conditions in marginalized communities in these areas today as a direct result of this period of history? Reflect on the following quote and explain what it means to be complicit. "The people who perpetrated these lynchings weren't people wearing white hoods, there was no need to wear a hood. You could actually pose with the victim's body. You could carve their body up and collect souvenirs. This was actually a point of pride. Everybody was complicit."—Bryan Stevenson How do you understand the links between the legacy of slavery, racial terror, and lynching to the current policy of mass incarceration?

Instructions: Read the following case study carefully and answer the questions that follow. Your answers should demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of dehydration's implications in radiographic practice, drawing directly from the provided document. Ensure you cite all information from the document using the "" format. Case Study: Mr. John Doe, a 78-year-old male, is admitted to the emergency department with symptoms of dizziness, confusion, and a rapid heart rate. His family reports that he has had a reduced fluid intake for the past few days and has been experiencing increased sweating due to a recent heatwave. A physical examination reveals dry mucous membranes and decreased skin turgor. The attending physician suspects severe dehydration and orders several radiographic imaging studies, including an abdominal X-ray, a CT scan of the kidneys, and an MRI of the brain. The radiology technologist notes Mr. Doe's disorientation and general weakness when attempting to position him for the X-ray. Questions: Based on the clinical features presented in the case study, what classification of dehydration is Mr. Doe likely experiencing, and what specific symptoms support this classification? [2 points] Explain how Mr. Doe's dehydration might affect the quality of the ordered radiographic images (abdominal X-ray, CT scan, and MRI). What specific challenges might the radiology technologist face during the imaging procedures due to his dehydration? [4 points] Discuss the potential risks associated with administering contrast media to Mr. Doe for his CT scan, considering his dehydrated state. What preventive measure should be taken before the procedure to mitigate these risks? [3 points] According to the provided document, what specific findings might the physicians expect to see on Mr. Doe's CT scan of the kidneys and MRI of the brain that would confirm organ damage related to dehydration? [3 points] Beyond the technical aspects of imaging, why is early identification and intervention for dehydration, as highlighted in the document, crucial for Mr. Doe's overall health and safety? [3 points] Rubric: Criteria 0 Points (Not Met) 1 Point (Beginning) 2 Points (Developing) 3 Points (Proficient) 4 Points (Exemplary) Question 1: Dehydration Classification & Symptoms No attempt to classify or symptoms are incorrect/unsupported. Attempts to classify but lacks supporting symptoms or cites incorrectly. Correctly classifies dehydration, lists some supporting symptoms but misses some key details or cites partially. Correctly classifies dehydration and lists relevant supporting symptoms with accurate citations. Correctly classifies dehydration and provides a comprehensive list of all relevant supporting symptoms from the case study, accurately citing all information. Question 2: Impact on Image Quality & Challenges No explanation of impact or challenges, or explanations are incorrect. Provides a vague or partial explanation of how dehydration affects image quality or lists some challenges without clear connection to dehydration. Explains some impacts on image quality and challenges, but lacks depth or specific examples from the document, or citations are incomplete. Clearly explains how dehydration affects image quality and identifies specific challenges for the technologist, with good supporting details from the document and accurate citations. Provides a thorough explanation of how dehydration impacts image quality (tissue density, blood volume, patient discomfort, poor perfusion, poor contrast enhancement, poor visualization of vascular structures and organ perfusions) and details specific challenges for the technologist (weakness, tiredness, poor cooperation, positioning stability), all with precise citations. Question 3: Contrast Media Risks & Prevention No mention of risks or prevention, or information is incorrect. Mentions some risks or preventive measures, but the connection to dehydration is unclear, or information is incomplete/inaccurate. Discusses some risks of contrast media with dehydration and a preventive measure, but lacks a complete explanation or sufficient citation. Clearly explains the risks of contrast media in dehydrated patients and provides the correct preventive measure with accurate citations. Clearly explains the increased risks of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and renal dysfunction in dehydrated patients, and correctly identifies preprocedural hydration as the crucial preventive measure, providing comprehensive citations. Question 4: Expected Radiographic Findings No expected findings, or findings are incorrect/unsupported. Lists some findings but they are not specific to dehydration-related organ damage, or citations are missing/incorrect. Lists some relevant findings for the kidneys and brain, but misses some details or citations are incomplete. Accurately identifies expected findings for both kidney and brain imaging related to dehydration, with appropriate citations. Accurately identifies expected findings for the kidneys (reduced urine output, concentrated urine, kidney stones, acute kidney injury, impaired kidney functioning) and brain (brain contraction, neurological problems, memory loss) as detectable by CT and MRI, respectively, with precise citations. Question 5: Importance of Early Intervention No explanation of importance, or explanation is incorrect/irrelevant. Provides a general statement about the importance of hydration but doesn't connect it to the specific benefits highlighted in the document for Mr. Doe's case. Explains some benefits of early intervention but doesn't fully elaborate on why it's crucial for overall health and safety as per the document. Explains the importance of early intervention for dehydration, linking it to patient safety and overall health outcomes as described in the document. Comprehensively explains the crucial role of early identification and intervention in preventing severe complications, improving diagnostic accuracy, ensuring patient safety, protecting kidney function from CIN, and maintaining overall health, with thorough justification from the document.

Instructions: Please create an informational handout or short slide presentation to educate a new employee (e.g., nurse, front office staff, or technician) about the role and scope of practice of health information professionals. Your final product should include: A brief definition of the HIM field. At least 3 specific roles or responsibilities of HIM professionals. Why HIM matters to patients, providers, and the organization. At least one myth or misconception about HIM—debunked. Format Options: One-page flyer (PDF or Word) Two-slide PowerPoint or Google Slides

The Assignment: For this week’s assignment you are to evaluate your current clinical site (if not currently in a practicum course consider a previous site) and identify a patient education need. Develop a one-page flier for the patient education material. It should be eye catching and written at a fifth grade reading level. There are many current references that point to creative assignments or tasks improving memory and retention of information for learners. Examples of topics: Can use abdominal, urological and gynecological conditions such as IBS, prostate cancer, constipation, UTI, or breast cancer for example. Or you may pick any topic that you have identified as important to your practicum site, some examples include: Intimate partner violence – what it is and identify the resources in your community. Diabetic foot care Medical Power of Attorney – what it is and how to set up. Resources for caregivers – National and specific to your community. Exercise for Older Adults – general guidelines, list anything that may be unique to your community, for example some parks or community groups may have walking clubs or Tai chi. Please see the Week 7 rubric while developing the flier. You can check the reading level with several sources online. In Word you can go to Home, then Editor, thenbDocument stats, then Readability Stats (will pop up) Flesch-Kinkaid Grade Level. Reference the source of information for your flier on a separate sheet to be uploaded with the flier, for example page 1 of the document is the flier and page 2 are the references.

Dear freelancer, please highlight in the linked PDFs below the correct answers from the attached archive. You can transform the PDFs into a docx if that is more helpful. What is needed is to just look at the already correct answers from the attached docx files and highlight them in the corresponding PDF file from the link below. https://we.tl/t-T091fj8UUC

A role that all nurse practitioners should take seriously is advocating and protecting our patients from harm. You may witness practices that are unethical or illegal in your healthcare career. Reporting these behaviors takes moral courage. Discuss the following: What is whistleblowing? Are there requirements that need to be met to report waste, fraud, or abuse? What happens to the whistleblower? Can they be prosecuted if they are incorrect or their reports cannot be proven? Choose one case of whistleblowing in health care and discuss the unethical or illegal practices involved.

Task summary: Dear Freelancer, please complete the following task: 1-page (300 words, APA-style) overview of the case study of Microsoft. Do not use any outside sources. Please add 1-2 graphs and one table. • Analyze database architecture in a cloud environment • Learn about the security controls needed for a national database Full order description:???? MAIN DETAILS:https://www.microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1441829997936468295-ncsbn-nonprofit-azure-en-united-states???? ATTACHED:- instructions

For this assignment, you will choose a healthcare organization, research its quality and safety metrics, and create a video presentation. Your presentation should include the following: A brief introduction to the chosen healthcare organization. An overview of the quality and safety metrics the organization uses. Analysis of the effectiveness of the metrics. Opportunities for improvement. Include visual aids like images, graphs, and charts to make your presentation visually appealing and engaging. You can use PowerPoint or any other presentation software to design the presentation. Your video presentation should be 3-5 minutes in length. Tips: Keep your slides concise; your narration will provide the details. Record in a quiet space with minimal background noise. Rehearse and time yourself to ensure you stay within the time limit. Refer to the rubric for details on how this assignment will be graded. Resources Creating a Narrated PowerPoint PresentationLinks to an external site. Saving your PowerPoint Presentation as a VideoLinks to an external site. Submitting Video Assignments in CanvasLinks to an external site.

This assignment requires you to investigate how the political and the social determinants of health may relate to a specific health disparity in a state or county within the United States. You will use the Health Equity Tracker website to compare disparities between two geographically defined areas. Instructions Identify a health disparity in the United States. If you need help identifying one, you can review the Health Equity Tracker. Please be careful to identify a disparity for which you can locate plenty of relevant data. Once you have identified a health disparity, locate specific data comparing two populations, two geographical areas, or some other comparative factor. Be alert for instances in which there is a clear relationship between one or more of the social determinants of health and the health disparity. Then try to establish whether there is a possible connection between that health disparity and the political determinants of health. Write up your findings in an MS Word document or Google doc, making sure to include at least four relevant data tables. In an introductory paragraph, explain what health disparity you are analyzing, and explain how you are defining the geography and demographics of your comparison. Then explain which of the specific social and political determinants of health may be related to the health disparity you are analyzing. Use the data tables to explain and illustrate your thinking, and make sure to explain the relevance of each data table you include. Aside from the text included in data tables, your data analysis paper should be about 800–1000 words in length.

Locate a peer-reviewed journal article published within the last 3-5 years related to quality and process improvement in healthcare organizations and complete an article critique. Your critique should include the following: Introduction Summary of the research, including its main question or objective Methodology Discuss the study design and its appropriateness for addressing the research question. Comment on participant selection and potential biases. Share thoughts on the measurement tools used in the study. Findings Summarize the main findings. Share observations on the data analysis and any results that stood out. Discussion Explain how the authors interpreted their findings. Offer your perspective on any alternative explanations the authors might have missed. Implications Explore how the findings contribute to the field and suggest areas for future research. Strengths and Limitations Discuss the strengths of the study. Highlight potential limitations and their implications. Conclusion Assess the research’s rigor and significance to the field. Add two possible replies to peers