Expert Answers

This journal assignment is an opportunity for you to reflect on the imperative need to enhance LGBTQ+ care within the wider umbrella of healthcare as a whole. The narrative explored in the assigned reading emphasizes the necessity of implementing LGBTQ+ health curricula, shaping communication for diverse audiences, and integrating research elements to bridge the gaps in existing healthcare programs. There is no set structure for writing a reflective journal, except to include your thoughts and comprehension of the learning resource for this module. Instructions In your journal, address the following prompts: After reading the required resources for this module, reflect on your current understanding of LGBTQ+ health and the potential impact of health disparities within this community. How might your awareness and recognition of these disparities influence your approach to patient care, advocacy, or healthcare policy in your professional setting? Consider any personal biases or assumptions you may hold regarding LGBTQ+ health. How can actively addressing and challenging these biases contribute to fostering a more inclusive and equitable healthcare environment, particularly in the context of reducing health disparities within the LGBTQ+ community? Your reflection should demonstrate your thoughts and understanding of the required reading. Blau, S., & Burak, K. (2017). Writing in the works (4th ed.). Cengage. Ruedas, N. G., Wall, T., & Wainwright, C. (2021, July 25). Combating LGBTQ+ health disparities by instituting a family medicine curriculum. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 56(5), 364-373. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0091...

Evaluate the use of digital health technologies in Saudi Arabia that would support expanding patient access to medical care by researching a minimum of five peer-reviewed articles on this topic and then creating a brochure or infographic using appropriate templates available online. Discuss how these information technology innovations can benefit the Saudi population and how they align with the MOH strategic plans. What barriers or challenges prevent the adoption of these technologies, and what would you recommend to remove those barriers or challenges? Demonstrate how this recommendation will increase patient access to care and support the achievement of Saudi Vision 2030. Elements to be explained: Digital health expanding access to medical care Information technology innovation benefits Barriers and challenges to adoption Recommendations to remove barriers and challenges Achieving Saudi Vision 2030 Conclusion summary Create a brochure or infographic using appropriate templates available online that the Ministry of Health could use to support Saudi healthcare organizations in their adoption of Telehealth to provide greater access to healthcare services for their patients. brochure should meet the following structural requirements: A two-page brochure that includes all the elements detailed above. Follow APA 7th edition writing standards. Be sure to cite any statistics or other information as appropriate. Review this video for an overview of how to create infographics:

Many of the nurses and allied health professionals in Saudi health facility are expatriates. You have been asked by the Board of Directors in a healthcare facility to research and draft a presentation concerning communication barriers between nurses and patients in your facility. Review the following case study to aid in your findings: Alshammari, M., Duff, J., & Guilhermino, M. (2019). Barriers to nurse-patient communication in Saudi Arabia: An integrative review. BMC Nursing, 18(1), 61. Retrieved from https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-019-0385-4 Be sure to include the following substantive information in a presentation: The importance of communication and professionalism in your facility. Evaluation of the barriers between nurses and patients in your facility. How these barriers impact your ability to meet your facility’s goals. Recommendations to remove these barriers. Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements: Organized, using professional themes and transitions. It should consist of 11 slides, not including the title and reference slides. Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes, with a minimum of 100 words per slide. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials, with references. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of 10 scholarly articles. Follow APA 7th edition writing standards.

IHP 525 Module Three Activity Guidelines and Rubric Overview This hands-on activity will solidify the concepts you learned in this module and encourage you to think like a biostatistician. The resources in this module support your work on this activity. The Supporting Materials section provides a modified data set with 1,091 observations from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Refer to these histograms for your response to the last critical element. Figure 1. Age distribution of adults with depression Figure 2. Age distribution of adults with diabetes Figure 3. Age distribution of adults with high blood pressure Prompt Upload the Data Analysis Data Set from the Supporting Materials section to StatCrunch and address the following critical elements: Define the concept of complement of an event. If the probability of a person having diabetes in data set sample (n = 1091) is 0.202, determine the complement of having depression in the sample. Use the RecordsOnline_Send3rdParty variable to determine the probability of an adult using the online medical record or patient portal to send medical information to a third party. Use the RecordsOnline_ViewNotes variable to determine the probability of an adult using the online medical record or patient portal to view clinical notes. Use the RecordsOnline_ViewResults variable to determine the probability of an adult using the online medical record or patient portal to look up test results. Describe each histogram's shape, center, and spread using proper statistical language. What to Submit Submit your work in a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use the rubric criteria to label your responses. Supporting Materials The following resources may support your work on the project: Webpage: About HINTS Learn more about the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey. Resource: Data Analysis Data Description This resource describes the data you will analyze for this assignment. Resource: Data Analysis Data Set Upload this data set to StatCrunch to analyze it for this assignment. Resource: Loading Data in StatCrunch Instructions This resource includes screenshots of the steps for loading your data file to StatCrunch.

I need help with a 3000-word assignment. The assignment brief, lecture note, and worksheet have been attached below. And it should be answered in the worksheet attached below. The referencing style is Harvard, and there should be 30 references above, and ensure that all references listed in the bibliography have corresponding in-text citations within the content. Must avoid incorporating in-text citations in the introduction part. Please also follow the required formatting style: Calibri (Body) font, size 11 for text, size 13 (Bold) for headings, and size 12 (Bold) for subheadings. Lastly, incorporating relevant figures and smart art to make it more visually engaging.

IHP 525 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview In the Final Project Data Analysis, you will demonstrate your skill at selecting and calculating appropriate biostatistical measures. In Milestone Two, you will select and calculate summary statistics to describe the data set. Prompt One way to describe data is to describe its shape, location, and spread. In Milestone Two, you will select summary statistics to calculate for your data. You will also describe the source of the data and the sampling technique you think might have been used. You also need to consider the limitations of the data set and the impact such limitations might have on the findings you will share later in the project. Refer to the Data Analysis Data Description document in the Supporting Materials section for the data set provided and uploaded in Module One. Specifically, you must address the following critical elements: Introduction Assess the collected data. Use this section to lay out the source, parameters, and any limitations of your data. Specifically, you should: Describe the population the data represents and how the sample was chosen. Analyze the sample data set’s limitations and how those limitations might affect your findings. Justify your response. Identify the variables in your data set by calculating and presenting descriptive statistics for each one. Assess how these descriptive statistics affect your analysis. Also complete the table in the Milestone Two Steps document in the What to Submit section to show the summary statistics you selected and the calculations. Review the Final Project Data Analysis Template to understand how this milestone fits into the final project. What to Submit In a Microsoft Word document, create a table of the summary statistics you will run on your data set using the table in the Milestone Two Steps document. Include 1–2 paragraphs describing the sample and limitations of the data set. The document should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA format for citations. Supporting Materials The following resources may support your work on the project: Resource: Data Analysis Data Description This resource describes the data you will analyze for this assignment.

Clinical significance plays a crucial role in determining the real-world impact of research findings and treatment interventions in healthcare. In this discussion, we will explore the concept of clinical significance and its importance in healthcare research and practice. 1.Discuss how patient preferences, quality of life, functional outcomes, and symptom improvement contribute to determining the clinical relevance of research findings. Some ideas and guiding questions include... oDefine clinical significance in your own words. How does it differ from statistical significance, and why is it important to distinguish between the two in research? oDiscuss the role of patient-centered outcomes, such as patient preferences, quality of life, functional outcomes, and symptom improvement, in evaluating clinical significance. How do these factors contribute to understanding the real-world impact of treatments and interventions? oWhat are some common methods or approaches used to determine clinical significance in healthcare research? How do researchers assess the practical relevance of their findings beyond statistical measures? 2.Write 2-3 paragraphs with your thoughts.

Health Barriers create non-adherence to the care plan. For asthmatics, non-adherence is a significant issue and leads to increased utilization of emergency services and unnecessary costs. Students are asked to read the following article and choose one of the factors related to non-adherence to discuss. Students are asked to find one peer-reviewed reference to support their discussion and upload the pdf document of the article. Response posts are to provide evidential support for their posts.

Answer the following assigned questions based on the topics from Chapter 20 from your (Health Information Management : Concepts, Principles, and Practice) book and from external sources. (You may use your secondary book as an external source) --------------------- From Chapter 20 from your 2nd primary textbook: Q1. How does quasi-experimental research differ from experimental research? Q2. When would researchers choose to conduct a meta-analysis? Q3. What common mistake(s) do researchers make in data collection? ---------------------- Read & Research your answers from your 1st primary textbook and external sources only for the following last three questions below: (You may use your secondary book as an external source, but best to use other external sources.) Q4. What is Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)? and what is "Knowledge Discovery” Data mining (KDD)? Provide detail information. Q5. With regards to Data Mining Models, What is SEMMA? Q6. What are legal and ethical implications of data mining? Please pay attention to the Assignment Grading Rubric: Note: Assignment 5, regarding answering questions on Chapter 20, please incorporate "1 or more" external sources for every question answered for full points. (You may use your secondary book as an external source) Minimum 500 words applies to the total minimum number of words for all the questions answered within the assignment. Not necessarily minimum 500 words per question answered within assignment. Turnitin Requirements: For each assignment, your similarity score must meet a threshold of no more than 20% and 0% and clear from any AI. Assignments with greater than 20% similarity must be revised and resubmitted to Turnitin until the 20% threshold is achieved.

Individual: Authoritative Sources & Links Assignment Guidelines & Requirements: Submission/Proof of Submission of FIU Writing Center Review is required. Meeting with a tutor from the writing center virtually is available by scheduling an appointment at: https://writingcenter.fiu.edu/resources/online-tutoringLinks to an external site. 1.1 Each student shall submit their draft assignment submission (i.e., complete narrative, citations, references and links), either in person or online, to an FIU Writing Center tutor for their input on the narrative as well as APA Style for the citations and references. 1.2 Either graduate or undergraduate tutor is acceptable. 1.3 It is strongly recommended that students seek to schedule an appointment with the FIU Writing Center as soon as possible since slots tend to fill up fast. Students may ask to share appointment time but that decision is up to the writing center. Book early! 1.4 Proof of submission must accompany the assignment submission. Submission to faculty via canvas email is not permitted. 1.5 Failure to attain and post confirmation of review with the assignment submission will result in a 10% deduction on the score for the assignment. 2. Assignment Requirements: Each student shall; 2.1 Find then read and review two (2) articles meeting the definition of “External Authoritative Sources” (noted below), that discuss state or local issues in healthcare policy in the US or other country (Chapter 3); and 2.2 Provide a paragraph of narrative (one paragraph required for each of the two (2) required “External Authoritative Sources” noted above); and 2.2.1 Each source shall be substantively used and cited in a narrative paragraph using proper APA style; and 2.2.2 Following each narrative paragraph full and complete reference for the source is required; and 2.2.3 A link to the full article for each of the two (2) required external authoritative sources is required immediately following each reference. 2.3 Points will be lost if the reference(s) for the first source does not follow the paragraph narrative substantively citing the first source along with the link. Then the second source narrative shall be presented also with proper citation(s), reference and link. 3. Each assignment shall be submitted by each student on or before the designated due date shown on the course schedule and Canvas. 4. “External Authoritative Sources” for purposes of this course shall mean: recent articles (within the past 5 years) from peer reviewed journals or published book chapters that are not textbooks. Education and government sites as well as non-partisan national or international organizations (such as WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS etc.,) may also be used. Provided, however each article selected has the following: 4.1 Authors; and 4.2 In text citations and references to external sources that support statements made therein. 4.3 Under no circumstances are newspapers (e.g., the Wall Street Journal), blogs (regardless of source), editorials, panel discussions, definition of terms, the assigned case study, “dot com” sites, and text books from the course or other courses to be used. The foregoing are not considered authoritative external sources for this course but may be used as additional sources. String citations are not allowed. 5.Late submissions are not accepted. 6. Grading Rubric Proficient/Excellent Competent/Good Advanced Beginner/Fair Basic/Poor Assigned Issue Narrative (up to 3 points) All the submission narrative is fully responsive to the issue identified and evaluates, examines, analyzes and discusses legal and or ethical issues presented. Most of the submission narrative is responsive to the issue identified and evaluates, examines, analyzes and discusses legal and or ethical issues presented. Some of the submission narrative is responsive to the issue identified and evaluates, examines, analyzes and discusses legal and or ethical issues presented. Few if any of the submission narrative is responsive to the issues identified or evaluate, examine, analyze and discuss legal and or ethical issues presented. Grammar (up to 1 points) All the submission narrative uses proper English; most of the narrative is in the students’ own words with limited direct quotes. Most of the submission narrative uses proper English; most of the narrative is in the students’ own words with limited direct quotes. Some of the submission narrative uses proper English; with some of the narrative is in the students’ own words with limited direct quotes. Few to none of the submission narrative uses proper English; and little of the narrative is in the students’ own words or with many direct quotes. Sources (up to 3 points) Each submission narrative contains one (1) proper “external authoritative source” and the source is substantively and properly used, cited and referenced. Each submission narrative contains one (1) proper “external authoritative source” but the source is not substantively and properly used or cited and referenced. At least one submission narrative contains one (1) proper “external authoritative source” but the source is either not substantively and properly used or cited and referenced. Each submission narrative does not contain one (1) proper “external authoritative source” and the source is not substantively and properly used or cited and referenced. REQUIRED FORMATTING FOR SUBMISSION: Narrative # 1 Narrative must substantively use and properly place citation when material from the source first appears At least one citation to an "authoritative external source" is required. Textbook and other sources are permitted as additional sources. Reference(s) for Narrative #1 Link to full article#1 Narrative #2 Narrative must substantively use and properly place citation when material from the source first appears At least one citation to an "authoritative external source" is required. Textbook and other sources are permitted as additional sources. Reference(s) for Narrative #2 Link to full article#2 Rubric Individual Authoritative Sources Rubric Individual Authoritative Sources Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFIU Writing CenterEach assignment was submitted and reviewed by FIU Writing Center as well as posted in the proper discussion board submission folder 1 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrative ParagraphsTwo SEPARATE narrative paragraphs using proper English. One paragraph for each source. 2 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExternal Authoritative SourcesTwo “external authoritative sources” each one substantively used and properly cited in each narrative paragraph using APA Style 2 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA StyleTwo complete and proper APA Style references to ”external authoritative sources.” Each reference to immediately follow each narrative paragraph 1 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete LinksTwo complete links to each of the full article for each of the two (2) “external authoritative sources” required. The link shall be placed at the end of each reference. 1 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks 1 pts Total Points: 7