Expert Answers

please respond to. Edgar with. 150 words I believe the right to freedom of speech under the 1st Amendment is eroding due to the growing trend of censorship and suppression of dissenting voices on social media platforms and universities. The increasing polarization and intolerance for opposing viewpoints have led to a culture of silencing and ostracizing those who express unpopular opinions. Laws and regulations aimed at combating hate speech and misinformation often blur the lines between protection and suppression, potentially chilling free speech. The rise of "cancel culture" and online mobs further intimidates individuals from expressing their genuine thoughts and opinions. Ultimately, these factors undermine the foundational principle of free speech as a cornerstone of democracy, threatening the exchange of ideas and the pursuit of truth. The example from the video is that when people post about Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ hot it taken down, limited freedom of speech. This suppression of marginalized voices restricts individuals from expressing opinions and raising awareness about social injustices. Censorship of these topics undermines the fundamental right to free speech, stifling essential discussions on systemic racism, inequality, and human rights. By taking down content, platforms risk perpetuating the very injustices these movements seek to address. Ultimately, this erosion of free speech hampers progress toward a more inclusive and equitable society. The rights imposed by other Constitutional Amendments, such as the 2nd, 4th, and 8th Amendments, are indeed eroding due to various factors. For instance, the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms is increasingly restricted through gun control laws and regulations, while the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures is compromised by surveillance state measures and warrantless searches. The 8th Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment is also undermined by prolonged solitary confinement, mass incarceration, and excessive sentencing. Furthermore, the War on Terror and the USA PATRIOT Act have led to increased government overreach, undermining these constitutional protections. However, ongoing legal challenges, advocacy efforts, and public awareness campaigns aim to safeguard these fundamental rights and prevent further erosion.

Review the policy discussion in the following:  Box 3.2, 3.4 and 3.5.  Chose one of these discussion and complete the following: Risk for children and teens Summarize current policies Research if the discussion you chose is an issue where you live.  ("It is not" as your only response will not suffice.)

part 1 In 4 paragraphs, discuss the following items: How have you have observed the major risk factors for school failure? Which of the risk factors described in your text do you believe should receive the most attention in educational policy and why? Part two: The case study "A Case for Integrated Service Delivery" found on p. 119 in your text illustrates how services can lack integration and coordination and is followed by information on the uses of cross-system funding. In 4 paragraphs, discuss the following: What is your reaction to the information presented in this case study? Do you think the case study scenario is rare? Explain your answer.

Summarize the post . For each discussion activity, you are responsible for posting a reply to at least to one postings made by your classmates. After you have made your original post, read some of the posts from your classmates and construct one reply post of 100-150 words that responds to one of your group-mate’s original posts. Your reply post should be written such that it does one or more of: identifies something that you find especially interesting or insightful about your classmate’s original post; poses an engaging and relevant question and/or builds on the ideas from your classmate’s original post; raises a real-life experience or observation that you feel would be relevant to illustrate or help further develop an idea or point in your classmate’s original post. Please note that you will need to make an original post before you can read and respond to your peers’ posts. Some points to keep in mind: Be clear and to the point in your postings. Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling. Keep postings to 100-150 words. Quality is better than quantity. Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read. Support your thoughts by referencing the readings used, and references used in post below or other outside literature. Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion. If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution. Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions. Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings. When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA 7 Style. Show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs. You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions. Taking a role in online discussion. Taking a Role in Online Discussions Below are some roles that anyone in an online discussion can fulfill in order to help move an online discussion forward in productive ways. See if you can determine what role is required in your online discussion and then write a message that takes on that role. Devil's Advocate • Takes opposing points of view to those currently under discussion Pollinator • Travels to other groups, reads their postings and summarizes points made in other groups not made in home group. Facilitator • Comments on the groups process (e.g. “Perhaps we should all remember to put a subject line in our messages.”) • Encourages others to participate, • Starts a thread or an idea on the topic, if the discussion lags. Summarizer / Discussion Weaver • Summarizes the discussion for the group at specific intervals in 1 or 2 short paragraphs. Usually summarizes twice per week or if the discussion lags • Reminds others about what has already been discussed. • Asks the group what issues have been concluded and what ones are still to be discussed. • Relates ideas in posted messages to one another. Researcher • Assumes responsibility for looking at what is available on the net, journals etc. and brings ideas back to the group. Responder • Replies to others and builds on the ideas of others. This is a role that everyone in the group must perform for every discussion. POST -1 Homicide is widely perceived as a crime and criminal justice issue as outlined in Unit 01 of the course. Society often focuses on the individual punishment and legal process of these crimes, and not always the broader health implications of homicides. I find that media and pop culture plays a role in glorifying the criminal details of homicides only, which impacts society's view on this type of violence. Emphasizing a sociological understanding of homicide has many benefits (Barkan, 2015). Analyzing the social background, behaviours, influences and attitudes of murderers can aid in determining the structural roots of crime (Barkan, 2015). The inequality, poverty,gender and community concepts of homicide are also understood through the sociological view (Barkan, 2015). Prevention is another benefit of the Public Health approach (Pridemore, 2003). By following the 4 stages of the public health approach (1. Define and monitor the problem, 2. Identify risk and protective factors, 3. Develop and test prevention strategies & 4. Ensure widespread adoption of effective approaches) the rates of homicide can be decreased (Association, 1999). Overall, with the knowledge of the negative health and wellbeing effects of homicide, society's outlook of the issue could be improved (Pridemore, 2003). References Association, O. P. H. (1999). Violence prevention: Continued call to action for Ontario. Ontario Public Health Association. https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?Action=10&Type=10&Value=343506 Barkan, S. E. (2016). Criminology: A sociological understanding (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?Action=10&Type=10&Value=343450 Pridemore, W. (2003). Recognizing Homicide as a Public Health Threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence. Homicide Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767903251105 POST - 2 Homicide is traditionally viewed as a crime, with societal norms and media portrayals reinforcing this narrow perspective. The criminal justice system, focused on police, courts, and corrections dominates the public’s understanding of how to handle homicide, primarily through punishment and deterrence. This focus is deeply rooted in the way society perceives moral and legal wrongs, where offenders are held accountable for their actions, often to the exclusion of other considerations such as the well-being of victims and their families. The media plays a significant role in shaping these perceptions. By dramatising violent crimes, especially in news reports, TV shows, and documentaries, the media tends to frame homicide as a criminal justice issue, centering the narrative on the criminal act itself and the process of capturing and punishing the perpetrator. This reinforces the public belief that legal mechanisms are the primary and most effective response to homicide (Barkan, 2015). Additionally, the criminal justice approach often frames homicide as an isolated incident, focusing on the morality of the act and the potential danger the perpetrator poses to society. The broader impacts such as the trauma inflicted on the families of victims and the effects on community health, are frequently overlooked. This limited view fails to address the social and environmental conditions that contribute to homicide, such as poverty, systemic inequality, and lack of access to resources like education and healthcare. Historically, homicide and other forms of violence have been managed primarily through legal frameworks, with punishment seen as the ultimate form of justice. Over time, this punitive approach has become entrenched, and the concept of rehabilitation or prevention has taken a back seat. The idea of addressing the root causes of violence is often seen as secondary to the immediate goal of deterrence and retribution (OPHA, 1999). As aforementioned, this focus on punishment aligns with a cultural emphasis on individual accountability, where the crime is seen as a personal moral failure rather than a symptom of broader societal issues. As a result, the system overlooks how factors like socioeconomic status, mental health, and community infrastructure contribute to violent behaviour. The criminal justice system, in its traditional form, is reactive, addressing crime after it happens, rather than proactive in preventing it. This limitation is part of why society continues to see homicide primarily through the lens of crime and punishment, rather than as an issue intertwined with public health (Pridemore, 2003). A public health perspective that focuses on improving the well-being of communities affected by homicide, offering psychological support to victims' families and helping to restore a sense of safety and cohesion in neighbourhoods would be extremely beneficial (Barkan, 2015). This holistic approach would combine criminal justice measures with public health strategies, creating a more comprehensive solution to homicide. It not only addresses the immediate crime but also works to mitigate the long-term societal factors that contribute to violence. In this way, broadening our view of homicide allows for more effective prevention strategies and improved overall societal well-being. Citations Association, O. P. H. (1999). Violence prevention: Continued call to action for Ontario. Ontario Public Health Association. Barkan, S. E. (2016). Criminology: A sociological understanding (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. Pridemore, W. (2003). Recognizing Homicide as a Public Health Threat: Toward an Integration of Sociological and Public Health Perspectives in the Study of Violence. Homicide Studies Label post -1 as (Ava Matsumoto) Post -1 summary reply WRITE in 8-12 lines also add personal opnion it should be personal opnion about other post and also add ceative atttrcative question.Donot use AI AND CHATGPT AS MAM HAS SOFTWARE TO DETECT EACH AND EVERY LINE . She has software to detect each and every single word. THEN WRITE POST-2 LABEL POST -2 AS (Alyssa Speyer) Post -2 summary reply WRITE  in 8-12 lines also add personal opnion it should be personal opnion about other post and also add cReative atttrcative question.Donot use AI AND CHATGPT AS MAM HAS SOFTWARE TO DETECT EACH AND EVERY LINE . She has software to detect each and every single word.

Write and submit a brief autobiography describing who you are and what influences (e.g., your race (Chaldean/Arabic), Sex (female), age (23), religion (Christian Catholic), social class (middle class) , education (taking courses to join hygiene program), experiences (make up good traveling ones of your own) that have helped to shape your identity. Also include a statement about your "philosophy of life". That is, what words do you live by? 

For these article analyses assignments (and the final project for the course) we’re going to focus on school discipline in the US. I chose this topic because I think it’s one most of us can relate to in one way or another. Many of us attended schools in the US where discipline is a regular part of school life. Also, you may have children (or expect to have children) who will be involved in schools and who will experience discipline through conformity and/or deviance. And, how schools handle discipline is a common topic of public discussion and political advocacy. Because this topic is so ubiquitous and relatable, I thought it would be a good one to explore through  The first article you will read on this topic is a study conducted by Aaron Kupchik in which he compared school discipline in four high schools from two states and with varying demographics. 

Recoding Lab This is a Group Data Exercise. I did (or will do) a short demo recoding in-state tuition into even fourths. You will recode out-of-state tuition into even thirds , and print a frequency table of your new variable. Dataset (right-click to save, then use FILE - OPEN - DATA in SPSS!): colleges.sav (did you just click directly on that even though I reminded you to right-click?)

This is a video case study report. It has to be a minimum of 550 words without the title and reference page. APA citations a minimum of two scholarly/academic sources not included the video must include and introduction and conclusion be sure to cite the case study video, the link is provided in the document attached the document below also includes the rubric at the end the paper should summarize the conflict, analyze communication methods, and apply an alternative approach the document attached outlines what needs to be included in the paper which is: Analyze the conflict seen in the video case study. Identify the conflict or topic(s) being discussed. Identify and evaluate the specific communication methods and strategies seen in the video case study. Explain whether you think the characters in this case study used the most effective communication strategies for the given conflict/situation. Imagine you are one of the characters in this video. Summarize how you might have handled the situation differently to reach your interpersonal goals. Evaluate how the individuals in the video might handle and approach their communication differently to reach their interpersonal goals.

Chapters 4 Social Structure and 5 Power Make a list of all of your statuses (student, worker, friend, etc.) and label whether these are ascribed or achieved statuses. What status symbols do they carry? Do you perform differently with different status expectations or roles? Is there role conflict? Make a list of famous people who fall into Weber’s three types of legitimate authority (traditional, rational-legal, and charismatic) and illegitimate authority. How successful have these leaders been? Why? What would happen if they tried to use a different type of authority? Discuss the ways in which various institutions constrain the behavior of individuals. How do religious, economic, political, educational, and other institutions try to influence how we behave? 7. How do we try to change or work against institutional expectations? How have the expectations of institutions changed over time?

Instructions: After going through each and every reading in detail  QUESTION: Check out some online newspapers from large urban cities (e.g., Toronto Star) and read the headlines for recent homicides. Often headlines may be the only part of the story that many members of the public will read. This gives them their basic knowledge about homicide in our society. Discuss what you see or read in terms of the following questions: What facts do the headlines emphasize? What messages are they sending about homicide? The purpose of the discussion forums is to have students engage with course material and then demonstrate their understanding of course materials by expressing/explaining an idea, responding to other group members’ ideas, and/or developing a thread of ideas together as a group. In this way, students learn from the instructor, the course materials, and each other. It further provides students with ongoing opportunities to review, reflect upon, and apply new knowledge such as concepts, theories, or research findings. This will help when students are working on their two major writing assignments for this course which also requires knowledge of and engagement with course materials.There will be diverse perspectives and that is o.k. However, all students must strive to be constructive and considerate if they disagree with any of their group members. It is okay to challenge and disagree with each other but only if it is done in a respectful manner. Note: There is no single ‘right answer’ and the approach you describe need not reflect all of the tactics! The goal here is to generate discussion and share ideas about how best to engage in challenging conversations about climate change.After you have made your original post, read some of the posts from your classmates and construct one reply post of 100-150 words that responds to one of your group-mate’s original posts. Your reply post should be written such that it does one or more of: identifies something that you find especially interesting or insightful about your classmate’s original post; poses an engaging and relevant question and/or builds on the ideas from your classmate’s original post; raises a real-life experience or observation that you feel would be relevant to illustrate or help further develop an idea or point in your classmate’s original post.Please note that you will need to make an original post before you can read and respond to your peers’ posts¨write in 260 words. follow proper guidelines as given in beginning. Use AP7 STYLE OWL PURDE. Provide reference. Write in on own words.¨Some points to keep in mind: Be clear and to the point in your postings. Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling. Keep postings to 250-300 words. Quality is better than quantity. Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read. Support your thoughts by referencing the video and docx provided and other outside literature. Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution. Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions. Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings. When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA Style. Show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs. You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions. PREPARING TO WRITE1. Read assigned material—critically—and take notes as you read: Who wrote this material (a respected expert? an activist with a specific aim or belief?) Do they have any possible biases? Are studies reliable and valid? (What kind of research was performed?) When was this material written? Are the definitions/conditions/opinions described still accur vant? ate/rele Is an opinion expressed? How might someone disagree? How does this material relate to other concepts and theories you are studying? (Remember, instructors choose readings with a plan in mind—try to imagine why they have assigned this reading) Does the article complement other things you have learned? Is it in opposition? 2. Read and understand the discussion question or topic provided by your instructor • What are you asked to do? (Formulate an opinion? Respond to a question? Explain a concept or theory?) • How are you asked to do this? What kind of information are you expected to include (e.g., supporting quotations or references, examples, etc.) Do you need to bring in outside research? 3. Sort out the finer details • Is there a word maximum? Minimum? (Most posts will be 1?2 paragraphs maximum). • How many times are you expected to post? (Find out if you are required to post a certain number of times per question, per week, etc.) • How much of your grade is this component worth? Each post? Budget your time accordinglyAre you expected to respond to other students’ posts? What proportion of original posts versus responses are you asked to provide?ORIGINSL REESERCH INITIAL POSTS - An initial post is a response to the original question presented by the course instructor, or the opening post on a particular topic (i.e., not responding to other students’ posts). Consider each post a “mini?thesis,” in which you state a position and provide support for it. If you are responding to a question, be sure to 1. Take a position: Provide a clear answer to the question (incorporate some of the wording of the question in your answer if possible). 2. Offer a reasoned argument: Provide an explanation for your point of view, and use evidence from your text, notes, or outside research (where appropriate) to support your point. 3. Stay focused: End with a summary comment to explain the connection between your evidence and the question (how your evidence proves your point). Your post might also introduce a question or idea that others can follow up on. But make sure you have answered the question first!