Expert Answers

Please read the assignment carefully and provide full answer and avoid plagiarism.

Part 1: All of this is part two from week 2: (I included the initial discussion board below. Each team will create a presentation (Google Draw) to share one of the recent event articles from this week’s discussion. Your team will post your Google Draw presentation in the Week 4 discussion board; Week 2 discussion: (Ethical Purchasing Decisions in Developing B2B Markets The article by Rasheed et al. (2023) explores ethical decision-making in purchasing channels within developing B2B markets. This paper looks at the factors that shape ethical decisions in such contexts and the implications that arise for managerial practices. Summary: This study aims to understand the ethical issues involved in the purchase decisions in new B2B markets, the problems the businesses face, and the opportunities therein. Using information discussed in the course, this work relates to Business ethics and social responsibility. This is done to emphasize the significance of ethical decision-making in supply chain management, especially for emerging markets often characterized by low levels of legal compliance. The work is essential because it raises concerns regarding ethical issues beyond the business bottom line. This feature shows the increasing awareness of the organizational responsibility of business organizations in the global market. This ethical challenge affects the workplace in several ways. Increased complexity in decision-making: Ethical decision-making, in particular, is complex, and purchasing managers in developing B2B markets, in particular, are faced with sophisticated ethical challenges where business objectives and cost and moral issues have to be considered. It can cause more stress and a need for enhanced training programs among the employees. Potential for reputational risks: Ethical misconduct in purchasing can lead to high attrition, loss of business, and a negative reputation as perceived by society. On the other hand, ethical practices can increase the company’s reputation, making the employees proud to be associated with the company while attracting socially responsible associates. Cultural sensitivity and adaptation: The fact that the study is divided between developed and developing markets demonstrates that ethical standards for business must be tailored according to the culture of the respective countries. This requires more focus on cultural sensitivity in training and a more usable yet robust ethical framework for employees working in different parts of the world. These implications further show how ethical decisions are a significant factor in current business environments, especially in growing markets. These issues demonstrate that moral matters are essential to cater in organizations, not only from an ethical but also from a business perspective.)

Chapter Two Case: SWOT Your Job Read the case study in chapter 2 in ordrer to perform a personal SWOT analysis for your career plan, based on your current skills, talents, and knowledge. Be sure to focus on your personal career goals, including the functional business area in which you want to work and the potential industry you are targeting, such as health care, telecommunications, retail, or travel.After completing your personal SWOT analysis, answer the following questions in at least 250 words (total): 1. Take a look at the table of contents in this text, does this course eliminate any of your weaknesses or create new strengths? 2. Determine whether you can find new opportunities or mitigate threats based on the material we cover over the next several weeks. For example, project management is a key skill for any business professional who must run a team. Learning how to assign and track work status will be a key tool for any new business professional. Where would you place this great skill in your SWOT analysis? 3. Did it help eliminate any of your weaknesses? When you have finished this exercise, share your SWOT with those of your peers to see what kind of competition you will encounter when you enter the workforce. Your original response should follow APA formatting, and should include at least one (1) properly cited reference. After answering the questions above, be sure to reply to two classmates. Each reply should be at least 100 words in length. Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Dimension 1: Original response to prompt 27 to 30 points The student appropriately and clearly responded to the discussion prompt with an exceptional amount of detail. 24 to 26.99 points The student appropriately responded to the discussion prompt with a sufficient amount of clarity and detail. 21 to 23.99 points The student responded to the discussion prompt with an average amount of clarity and detail. 0 to 20.99 points The student did not appropriately respond to the discussion prompt, and/or provided a below-average amount of clarity and detail. Dimension 2: Response to classmate 1 9 to 10 points The student’s first response to a classmate added noteworthy perspective and/or value to the discussion, and contained an exceptional amount of detail. 8 to 8.99 points The student’s first response to a classmate added sufficient perspective and/or value to the discussion, and contained a reasonable amount of detail. 7 to 7.99 points The student’s first response to a classmate added limited perspective and/or value to the discussion, and contained an average amount of detail. 0 to 6.99 points The student did not properly respond to their classmate, and did not add perspective or value to the discussion. The post contained a below average amount of detail. Dimension 3: Response to classmate 2 9 to 10 points The student’s second response to a classmate added noteworthy perspective and/or value to the discussion, and contained an exceptional amount of detail. 8 to 8.99 points The student’s second response to a classmate added sufficient perspective and/or value to the discussion, and contained a reasonable amount of detail. 7 to 7.99 points The student’s second response to a classmate added limited perspective and/or value to the discussion, and contained an average amount of detail. 0 to 6.99 points The student did not properly respond to their classmate, and did not add perspective or value to the discussion. The post contained a below average amount of detail. Dimension 4: APA Formatting and citation 9 to 10 points The student can use APA writing conventions to complete their original post. The responses contain a total of no more than two (2) APA, spelling, or grammatical errors. The post contains a relevant peer-reviewed citation. 8 to 8.99 points The student’s discussion contribution was above average in quality, and/or included 3-4 APA, spelling or grammatical errors. The post contains a peer-reviewed citation. 7 to 7.99 points The student’s discussion contribution was of average quality, and/or included 5-6 APA, spelling or grammatical errors. The post contains a citation that may or may not be peer-reviewed. 0 to 6.99 points The student’s discussion contribution was of poor quality and included more than six (6) APA, spelling or grammatical errors. The post is missing a citation or may include a citation that is irrelevant to their discussion board post.

Instructions Using APA format, write 2-3 pages on the following: Describe and discuss the information systems’ STRENGTHS indicators, as they relate to (a) the Four Domain Architectures, and (b) the organization’s environment. Think: How do information systems help the selected organization deliver products and/or services? Describe and discuss major stakeholder’s roles in each of the four Architecture domains, and how these roles relate to the organization’s competitive advantage (see the chapter in the textbook regarding competitive advantage). Think: How do information systems help the selected organization sustain a competitive advantage? Describe and discuss how information systems help the selected organization operate more effectively. Criteria Exemplary (4) Accomplished (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1) Architecture Considerations 15 PointsThe student described and discussed ALL FOUR Domain Architectures and their impact on one of the Information Systems’ indicators (i.e., Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Risks, or Deployment), as they related to the organization’s environment. 13 PointsThe student described and discussed ONLY THREE Domain Architectures and their impact on the Information Systems’ Indicators, as they related to the organization’s environment. 11 PointsThe student described and discussed ONLY TWO Domain Architectures and their impact on the Information Systems’ Indicators, as they related to the organization’s environment. 9 PointsThe student's DID NOT DISCUSS ANY of the Domain Architectures or their impact on the Information Systems’ Indicators, as they related to the organization’s environment. Strategy Implications 15 PointsThe student’s submission was of exceptional quality, and effectively discussed the implications of competitive advantage, strategy, process, risk mitigation, or deployment on the organization’s core goals. 13 PointsThe student’s submission was average in quality, and adequately discussed the implications of competitive advantage, strategy, process, risk mitigation, or deployment on the organization’s core goals. 11 PointsThe student’s submission was below average in quality, and vaguely discussed the implications of competitive advantage, strategy, process, risk mitigation, or deployment on the organization’s core goals. 9 PointsThe student did not discuss the implications of competitive advantage, strategy, process, risk mitigation, or deployment on the organization’s core goals. Design Implications 15 PointsThe student masterfully described and discussed a plan that could enhance the design / structure of the information system, with significant detail. 13 PointsThe student adequately discussed a plan that could enhance the design / structure of the information system, with average detail. 11 PointsThe student mentioned a plan that could enhance the design / structure of the information system, with little to no detail. 9 PointsThe student did not describe, discuss or mention a plan that could enhance the design / structure of the information system. APA Formatting and Professionalism 5 PointsThe student completed an assignment that included no more than two APA or formatting-related errors/typos. 4 PointsThe student used average APA formatting, and included 3-4 errors/typos. 3 PointsThe student used below average APA formatting, and included 5-6 errors/typos. 2 PointsThe student used improper APA formatting, and included more than six (6) errors/typos.

StudentDiscussion Thread: Writing a Letter to a Prospective Doctoral Student At this point in the course, you should be getting pretty familiar with the topic of doctoral persistence. As you think about your experience and the articles you have read, summarized, and synthesized as a part of your literature review, you now have quite a bit more information on doctoral persistence than a few weeks ago. For this assignment, consider your experience and knowledge obtained over the last few weeks on the topic. As this is a written letter, there is no need to draw from other sources or cite. For your thread, respond to the following: Write a letter to a student considering enrolling in a Doctoral Program in the School of Business here at Liberty. What do you recommend that the prospective enrollee consider? What advice do you have for the person?

Explain the various communication styles and identify your own style. Discussion Instructions (Initial Post is Require before “Viewing” Peer Posts):  You are required to submit a substantial response. A substantial response is one that stays on topic and fully addresses the assignment in a clear, concise, and meaningful manner.  Substantial Content refers to providing relevant content toward the actual topic of the discussions. This includes quality input, questions and information in your discussion posts and responses to peers. The deliverable length of initial posting must be at least 150 words.  After the initial posting, students are required to respond to at least two (2) peers responses.  Peer responses must be at least 50 words for each response, in order to receive full credit.  Discussions must be the students original thoughts based on the topics from the "Open Educational Resource" (OER) Course Textbook and/or other referenced sources.  Direct quotes from references must be less than 10 words.  Please review postings for sentence structure, grammar and punctuation errors.

Instructions Covering Chapter 3 (See attached PDF)Homework #2 is due by Sunday (Day 7).See the attached PDF file.Complete each homework assignment in two (2) parts.First, complete the mathematical requirements for each assigned question and subpart in a separate Excel tab. Save your file as HW #[x] - LastName, FirstInitial.xlsx. So, for HW #2 Jane Doe should save her Excel file as "HW 2 - Doe, J.xlsx".Second, complete the narrative description requirements of the assignment in a Word document. Complete the narrative in the Word document. When the question asks for calculations, make reference to the appropriate tab in the Excel file for reference. You may also copy and paste a picture or spreadsheet link within the body of the narrative as well. Save your file as HW #[x] - LastName, FirstInitial.docx. So, for HW #2 Jane Doe should save her Word file as "HW 2 - Doe, J.docx".Submit your files through the BlackBoard assignment to receive credit. Show mathematical steps in detail to receive full credits Refer to rubric Homework 2 Guideline WebEx Video: #1 - Page numbers and week mentioned in this video does not match with page numbers shown in the attached file, but this is because I recorded this video a while ago before the course was revised. I said week 3 assignment in the video because this question was in week 3 assignment in the past. So, stick to page numbers shown in the attached file. Other than that, the content is the same so you will not face any confusions. Question #1 Homework Explanation Video#2 Question #2 Homework Explanation Video Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Model Formulas 9 to 10 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven 6 to 8 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven (1 to 2 errors) 3 to 5 pointsModels are formula driven but have several errors in the formulas (3 to 5 errors) 0 to 2 pointsModels are not formula drive. Numbers that should be formula driven are typed in cells. Numerous errors in the formulas (6+ errors) Model Accuracy 9 to 10 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven. Correct answers on virtually all aspects of the models (1 to 2 errors) 6 to 8 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven. Answer are correct on most aspects of the models (3 to 5 errors) 3 to 5 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven. Answer are correct on some aspects of the models (6 to 8 errors) 0 to 2 pointsModels are not formula drive. Answers are typed into cells. Few answers are correct in the models (9+ errors) Model/Spreadsheet Formatting 17 to 20 pointsEasy to understand and follow the logic of the model. Cells are appropriately color coded to highlight cell meanings. Excel sheets are appropriately named by problem number. 12 to 16 points2 to 3 deficiencies 6 to 11 points4 to 5 deficiencies 0 to 5 points6+ deficiencies Narrative Discussion 9 to 10 pointsuestions are answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language are used where appropriate/necessary. 6 to 8 pointsMost questions are answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Mostly complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language are used where appropriate/necessary (2 to 3 deficiencies) 3 to 5 pointsSome questions are answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Limited use of complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language (4 to 5 deficiencies) 0 to 2 pointsQuestions are not answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language are not used. Spreadsheet answers are not described, only the spreadsheet itself is referenced (6+ deficiencies) BUS542 - Homework2.pdf

Narrative DesignAssignment Instructions Each qualitative design is slightly different from the others; these differences are important for researchers to consider when selecting a design that is most appropriate for exploring their research problem. After reviewing the Learn material for the module, address the following in a paper in current APA format. The submission should be between 1,000 – 1,250 words. 1. Provide a description of the narrative design and when it is appropriate to use this design. 2. Describe 2 problems or challenges you might encounter when using this design, and how these may be addressed by the researcher. 3. Provide a problem statement pertaining to doctoral persistence/attrition of business students. 4. Craft 2 qualitative research questions that align with exploring the stated problem and are appropriate for narrative design. 5. Compose a purpose statement to address one of these research questions that aligns with a narrative design.

Write a 650 word response to the following: Analyze how the SPL model and the concept of doctoral demeanor contribute to development as a doctoral student. Begin by identifying and describing the components of the SPL model and its significance in learning and development. Then, discuss how embodying a doctoral demeanor—characterized by professional language, behavior, and accountability—complements the SPL model to support the academic, professional, and personal growth. Reflect on the impact of these principles in shaping a doctoral identity and enhancing an academic journey, especially in preparing for increased accountability throughout a dissertation process. Highlight the importance of adhering to these standards in all forms of communication within the College of Doctoral Studies community and explain how this commitment will facilitate the growth as a scholar-practitioner-leader. *References. Citations. APA Format.*

Assignment 1: Cost of Debt Purpose: This assignment aims to help students examine how the cost of capital is calculated within healthcare infrastructures. Instructions: The cost of debt is calculated based on the interest rate (return) that lenders require borrowers to pay, also known as debt financing. When a healthcare organization engages in debt financing, the process can help alleviate potential medical and healthcare-driven expenses. For this assignment, you are to write a 2-4 page APA formatted paper discussing the following key points: What is the difference between debt financing and equity financing? Discuss how debt financing can alleviate medical debt within healthcare institutions? Should health organizations aim to have zero debt? Discuss the pros and cons of having long-term and short-term debt. Should you use external scholarly articles to support your responses, do ensure to use appropriate APA format and include a references page. Resources Reiter, K. L., & Song, P. H. (2018). Gapenski's fundamentals of healthcare finance (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press. Assignment 2: Pay Sources in Long-Term Care Purpose: To distinguish the differences in pay sources utilized in long-term care. Instructions: There are several options when it comes to paying for long-term care. First, review the required materials about Competition, Integration, External Control and Payment, utilize the information from the text, previous chapters read, and your own external research to evaluate currently available long-term care payment options. Take note of the pay sources located in Chapter 11 of your textbook. Next, prepare a 5-7 slide presentation using a resource of choice (PowerPoint, Google slides, Prezi, etc.) to showcase each of the available long-term care payment options (Chapter 11). Your presentation should be designed for an audience of seniors and their family members. Please keep this in mind as you develop your assignment. The presentation should be clear and easy to follow, without the use of medical jargon or acronyms. Be sure to include speaker notes for your presentation. This can be done in either the speaker notes section of the powerpoint slides or on a separate document. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for your presentation including in-text citations and a reference slide (not counted towards minimum slide number). If you use Google slides, Prezi, or another software be sure to download the file and submit it to Canvas. Do not submit a URL. Resources FACHCA, S.C.M.H. L. (2020). Pratt's Long-Term Care (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://reader2.yuzu.com/books/9781284229615