Expert Answers

hello ! I have written an essay about Housing market financialization and its Effects on Monetary Policy: A Comparison between Turkey and Sweden. all i need you to do is to check for any plagiarism and AI detected text , if so i need you to humanize it and remove the plagerisim ( has to be under 8%). Also if theres a need to fix any part of the essay as in add any additional text and information id appreciate it! I dont want it to be too advanced tho. There’s not limit in the answer length , just write if its needed. And please check if the recources are relevant or not , and if you can add recources if needed! If graphs and tables are needed you can add it too . But my main focus is to check for plagiarism and AI detection and adjusting it. ( please send me the percentage and actual report that plagiarism is under 8% and AI is 0%)

Please see attached files for details. png files are the assignment instructions and zip files are class readings

Hello, please see the research file for instructions. by the way, you did the Annotated Bibliography for research see my professor feedback for your work it is included in the files. This is final research paper so its worth most of the class grades please please do your best here as this will be my final research for graduation

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have ramped up investigations into companies like Google, Amazon and Facebook, alleging anti-competitive practices. These investigations aim to assist whether these companies engage in unfair market behavior that stifles competition and harms consumers. How do antitrust laws ensure a fair market? Do you think they need updates to address the current digital economy? Please be sure to support your answer with facts and evidence, not mere opinion. Your essay must be 375-500 words and does not need to be in APA format. Title Legal Environment of Business, 12th edition Author Miller and Cross ISBN ISBN: 9780357985700 Publisher Cengage Publication Date January 1, 2024 Page Count 0 Type Print

As part of the application process for the Regulations Coordinator position, we are asking you to demonstrate your ability to create clear, structured Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that facilitate communication and workflow across teams. In this role, you will be responsible for coordinating the submission and review of regulation changes across various divisions, ensuring that all proposed amendments are thoroughly vetted and comply with department policies and legal requirements. This process involves working closely with division leadership, managing timelines, and collaborating with a diverse range of stakeholders. Task: Please draft a sample Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) that outlines the process for colleagues to submit regulation change requests for your review. The SOP should: Establish steps for initial review by division leadership before submission to you, the Regulations Coordinator. Outline clear roles and responsibilities, including your role in reviewing and making recommendations on the proposed changes. Include timeframes and deadlines for the submission, review, and finalization of regulatory changes. Describe how department leadership provides the final approval for all submissions. Take into account the need to work with a diverse group of individuals throughout the process. Key Points to Consider: The importance of maintaining a clear, organized workflow for regulatory changes. How to communicate expectations and deadlines to staff submitting proposals. Ensuring clarity in your role as Regulations Coordinator and how you interact with both division leadership and department leadership. The role of department leadership in giving final approval for all regulatory changes. Length: Your draft SOP should be between 1-2 pages and include a clear structure with headings and subheadings.

Refer to Chapter 15 in your course textbook for this discussion. Respond to the following: Explain the types of intellectual property rights today pursuant to the chapter reading. Discuss one lawsuit involving intellectual property within the last three years. Summarize the facts, the law in dispute, and the decision/reasoning by the court. Did you agree with the decision? Why or why not? Note: Use the NEXIS-Uni database. Please do not use an article, find a lawsuit in the database. Also, do not write about Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, or Google. Try to find a case example in your home state. Be sure to respond to one of your classmates' posts. Please provide answers to the discussion questions that are researched, informed, and substantiated by citing sources following Strayer Writing Standards. CLASSMATE POST: Reply from Latifa Winters Hi All, The types of intellectual property rights are patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Patents last 20 years from the filing date and 15 years for design patents. They are exclusive rights to use and profit from and they must be nonobvious, novel, and useful. Using patent ideas without consent constitutes infringement. Copyrights protect authors of books, magazine articles, plays, movies, songs, dances, and photographs. They also protect you against vicarious infringement third parties who facilitate infringement. Trademarks are words, pictures, designs, or symbols used to identify a product. Trade secrets are customer lists, customer information, and data processed a certain way. In the case of Aviator LLC wins $330 million trademark and copyright lawsuit against gambling operators, the court ruling found copyright and trademark infringement and invalidated trademark registrations based on bad faith registration and copyright infringement and awarded the plaintiff $330 million in damages. “Aviator LLC filed a lawsuit against Spribe OÜ, claiming that the trademarks should be invalidated on two grounds: 1) the trademarks were registered in bad faith because SPRIBE OÜ knew about the plaintiff's rights while using the plaintiff's image and trademark for its Crash game; and 2) the trademark registrations infringed the plaintiff's copyright in the above-mentioned image. On August 20, 2024, the Court of First Instance issued its decision and granted all of the plaintiff's claims. The Court ruled that Spribe OÜ's trademarks were registered in bad faith and that Spribe OÜ's trademarks infringed the plaintiff's copyright on his image. With this ruling, the Court invalidated the contested trademark registrations for the reasons stated above.” I agree with the court’s ruling because you cannot use someone’s intellectual property without permission and without compensation. You must have permission and be sure that you are giving them all the credit that is due to them and the partition of your earnings for using their property. There must be a binding contract before using someone’s intellectual property. Sources 1. Jennings, Marianne M. Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment. Available from: Strayer University Bookshelf, (12th Edition). Cengage Learning US, 2021. 2. "Aviator LLC wins $330 million trademark and copyright lawsuit against gambling operators". Impact Financial News, August 29, 2024 Thursday. advance-lexis-com.libdatab.strayer.edu/api/document?collection=news&id=urn%3acontentItem%3a6CVD-FMK1-JDG9-Y0M3-00000-00&context=1519360&identityprofileid=XG7R2Q51703. Accessed October 31, 2024.

Find a litigated case (business law topic, any time period) and prepare a case brief in the format shown in the attached assignment. Please ask me after any class if you have any questions about the case you have selected. facts (couple sentences, 2 paragraphs maximum ) issue (what the judge been asked to rule for) decision (who won) holding (couple paragraphs, well developed, how the ruling came out) no more than 2 pages

Overview In this assignment, you apply contract and product liability law to a business scenario. Scenario Mowers, Inc., a fictional company, has a flourishing lawn care business. The business has two full-time employees who have been with the company for five years. All employees are trained on using the lawn equipment and, upon being hired signed a waiver-of-liability contract limiting liability for the company. The owner, Brian, tells his employees "Not to worry - the company will protect you!" One employee, Lori, was on the job cutting a lawn. Lori was riding a mower, a Ferrari 2000, which was three years old and in good working condition. The step-up on the mower had writing on it with a warning sticker to replace the sandpaper liner for traction every three years due to normal wear and tear. It was replaced every three years as required. Lori stepped down off the rider, slipped because of moisture from the grass, and severed her pinky toe on the mower blade. When she fell to the ground, the mower continued through the grass and proceeded by itself to cut and mulch a neighbor's prize roses. Peta, the neighbor, was preparing for a rose competition with a potential grand prize of $10,000. Instructions Consider the above scenario and write 3–4 pages in which you make the following determinations. Make sure to cite and explain the law for each determination. Pursuant to contract law requirements, determine whether the waiver of liability signed by Lori is a valid contract and whether verbal assurances by Brian become part of the contract. Support your response. Determine whether Peta, the plaintiff, has a product liability case against the manufacturer for each of the following defects. Support your response. Design. Manufacturing. Failure-to-warn. Determine whether Lori, the employee, has a claim for injuries and whether the employee can recover pain and suffering damages per tort or worker's compensation law. Support your response. Note: Remember, you are demonstrating your understanding of the law, so explain the law first and then make your determination. Be informative and show what you know! References should be from credible and reputable legal sources. Requirements 3–4 pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), 1-inch margins on all sides. Include at least three quality references. The textbook for this class is a required source for this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not count as quality references. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the Sources list are not included in the required assignment page length. Resources Use the Strayer Library to conduct your research. In addition to your textbook, you have access to Nexus Uni through the Strayer Library. You are encouraged to use the Strayer Library to conduct your research. The textbook for this class is a required source for this assignment. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows: Analyze the legal standing and situation of a specific business to achieve a defined result. View Rubric Week 5 Assignment - Management Liability Scenario Week 5 Assignment - Management Liability Scenario Criteria Ratings Pts Cite the most relevant governing law for each question with a plausible explanation of why each is applicable. 37.5 to >33.74 pts Exemplary Cited the most relevant governing law for each question with a plausible explanation of why each is applicable. 33.74 to >29.99 pts Competent Cited relevant governing law for each question, but explanations lack plausibility or support. 29.99 to >26.24 pts Needs Improvement Cited irrelevant governing laws for 1-2 questions or did not explain why each was applicable. 26.24 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not cite relevant governing law. / 37.5 pts Determine the legality of the waiver and whether verbal assurances become part of the written contract, pursuant to contract law requirements. Provide support from a professional legal source. 30 to >26.99 pts Exemplary Pursuant to contract law requirements, determined whether the waiver of liability is a valid contract and whether verbal assurances become part of the contract. Response is supported by scholarly sources. 26.99 to >23.99 pts Competent Determined the legality of the waiver and whether verbal assurances become part of the written contract but fails to apply applicable law and support from a reputable professional legal source. 23.99 to >20.99 pts Needs Improvement Determined either the legality of the waiver or whether verbal assurances become part of the written contract but fails to apply applicable law and support from a professional legal source. 20.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not submit or did not determine the legality of the waiver or whether verbal assurances become part of the written contract. / 30 pts Determine whether the plaintiff has a viable product liability case against the manufacturer for all specified defects by applying applicable law and support from a reputable professional legal source. 37.5 to >33.74 pts Exemplary Determined whether the plaintiff has a viable product liability case against the manufacturer for all specified defects by applying applicable law and support from a reputable professional legal source. 33.74 to >29.99 pts Competent Determined whether the plaintiff has a viable product liability case against the manufacturer for all specified defects by applying applicable law but provides little or no support from a reputable professional legal source. 29.99 to >26.24 pts Needs Improvement Incorrectly determined whether the plaintiff has a viable product liability case against the manufacturer or fails to apply applicable law to a correct determination. 26.24 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not submit or did not determine whether the plaintiff has a viable product liability case against the manufacturer. / 37.5 pts Determine whether the employee has a viable claim for injuries and pain and suffering damages per tort or worker’s compensation law with support from a reputable professional legal source. 30 to >26.99 pts Exemplary Determined whether the employee has a viable claim for injuries and pain and suffering damages per tort or worker’s compensation law with support from a reputable professional legal source. 26.99 to >23.99 pts Competent Determined whether the employee has a viable claim for injuries and pain and suffering damages per tort or worker’s compensation law but provides little support from a reputable professional legal source. 23.99 to >20.99 pts Needs Improvement Determination is inaccurate as to whether the employee has a viable claim for injuries and pain and suffering damages per tort or worker’s compensation law. 20.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not submit or did not determine whether the employee has a viable claim. / 30 pts Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. 15 to >13.49 pts Exemplary 0–2 errors present. 13.49 to >11.99 pts Competent 3–4 errors present. 11.99 to >10.49 pts Needs Improvement 5–6 errors present. 10.49 to >0 pts Unacceptable More than 6 errors present. / 15 pts Total Points: 0

Chapter 16 The Writing Requirement and Electronic Records Review the following hypothetical and answer the question below by typing your response in the space provided. On January 2, Wabash Construction Company, a general contractor, executed a written contract with Anderson Brick, Inc., a subcontractor. The contract relates to a major “strip mall” building project in Morgantown , and Wabash faces a deadline of October 31 in its contract with The Mackie Consortium, L.L.C., the owners of the new mall. In the agreement between Wabash and Anderson , the parties stipulate that “time is of the essence” in terms of performance of the bricklaying work, and that the deadline for Anderson ’s completion of the bricklaying work is July 15. There is also a “liquidated damages” clause in the contract between Wabash and Anderson , indicating that if the work is not completed by July 15, Anderson will pay $2,000 in damages for every day the bricklaying is not completed beyond July 15. Anderson does not complete the bricklaying work by July 15. In fact, the project is not finished until August 30, and Wabash now claims liquidated damages from Anderson in the amount of $92,000 (representing 46 days beyond the July 15 deadline, multiplied by $2,000 per day.) Anderson refuses to pay the $92,000, and Wabash sues. At trial, Anderson’s attorney seeks to introduce the following evidence: 1) the testimony of Henry Anderson, Anderson’s owner, who is willing to testify under oath that at the time of the signing of the contract, Wabash’s general manager, Fred Stein, said “Pay no attention to the July 15 deadline in the contract; if you need more time, all you have to do is ask;” and 2) a crumpled index card, purportedly in Fred Stein’s handwriting, indicating “no ‘hard and fast’ deadline on Anderson brick work.” 1. Should the trial court judge admit the foregoing evidence? Explain your answer. Chapter 16 (Third Party Rights) Instructions: Review the questions below and type your responses into a MICROSOFT WORD DOCUMENT. Remember to individually number each response. Upload the document into Blackboard. NOTE: Please do not upload documents in any other format as Blackboard will not recognize them. Facts : Ralph calls Pendrake's Pest Control and schedules an appointment on Friday to have his home and yard treated for termites. However, on Thursday, Pendrake realizes that he has overbooked his appointments for Friday and simply doesn't have time to treat Ralph's home. Instead, he calls a competing pest control service, Mandrake's Termite Control, and delegates the job to them. On Friday, Mandrake arrives at the house and begins treating it for termites. Ralph walks outside and demands to know why Pendrake isn't there doing the work. Mandrake shrugs and says, "he gave the job to us" and completes his work. 1. When Pendrake sends the termite treatment bill, Ralph refuses to pay on the grounds that he signed an agreement with Pendrake - not Mandrake. Further, Ralph argues, if Pendrake wanted to give the job to someone else, "you should have asked for my permission!" If Pendrake sues Ralph for breach of contract, what is the likely result? Explain your response. 2. Suppose Mandrake used an inferior grade pesticide and, as a result, killed nearly all of the decorative landscaping (flowers, shrubbery, etc.) around Ralph's house. If Ralph sues Pendrake for the damages, what is the likely result? Explain.

Week 3 - Assignment Due Monday by 11:59pm Points 3 Submitting an external tool Final Paper Proposal [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 5] Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapter 12 in the textbook, and review the assignment instructions for the Final Paper in Week 5. For this assignment, you will be developing an outline for your Week 5 Final Paper. For detailed information regarding outlines, see the Writing Center’s Outlining resource. Submit an outline for your Final Paper that includes the following: Develop an introduction with a thesis statement for the Final Paper. For assistance, see the Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. and Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources. Create an outline of the major headings with a two- to three-sentence description of what you will discuss under each heading. See the APA Style ElementsLinks to an external site. resource for assistance with headings. Provide a references page for the sources you will use in the Final Paper (the Final Paper has a minimum requirement of five scholarly sources in addition to the course text). State the complete bibliographic citation for the scholarly source, which should include the reference entry as well as a short summary of the source. Follow APA Style guidelines, and see the Annotated Bibliography resource for assistance. The Final Paper Proposal paper must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site. resource. must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper in bold font Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page. Student’s name Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus) Course name and number Instructor’s name Due date must utilize academic voice. See the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance. must include an introduction. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. must use at least five credible and/or scholarly sources in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source. To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view Quick and Easy Library ResearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips. must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site. guide. must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References ListLinks to an external site. resource in the Writing Center for specifications. Carefully review the Grading RubricLinks to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.