Expert Answers

PowerPoint Presentation: Operant Conditioning Assignment Overview Now that you have thoroughly investigated and gathered research through the previous two assignments PowerPoint Presentation: Title Page and Reference Page Assignment and PowerPoint Presentation: Annotated Bibliography Assignment, you are ready to create a PowerPoint presentation addressing Operant (Instrumental) Conditioning. This culminating assignment will provide a research foundation for your work in the field as a professional.The creation of a PowerPoint presentation will allow you to practice creating presentation materials.Understanding foundational theories of learning is imperative to providing the best opportunities for learning in various settings. Completion of this assignment will improve your research and communication skills while increasing your knowledge of these theories. Instructions Create a professional PowerPoint presentation to explain the foundations and applications of Operant Conditioning in various settings and in the Biblical narrative.This will look like a research paper formatted into a PowerPoint Presentation.See example in PowerPoint Presentation Sample. In your PowerPoint you must include: (each point should have at least one slide, though most will need more than one slide): Title page Introduction to your presentation Explain the origins of Operant Conditioning (OC) Explain the key elements of Operant Conditioning (OC) Explain 2 original research studies that used OC including: What was the research project designed to study? How did they go about studying their topic? What did they find out? Explain how the findings from each study might be applied to a classroom setting. Explain 2 stories in the Bible that are examples of OC. Discuss the future trends you found in your research articles (what needs to be studied in the future?) Share the most important thing you learned from taking this class on learning and how you will apply it in your life. (You can use first person in this section only.) Conclusion References Create a PowerPoint Presentation using the following specifications and the required outline listed above. The PowerPoint presentation should be a minimum of 15 slides (not including title page or references). FULLY explain each section, as you would in a traditional research paper. Do NOT use bullet points. The current APA style is required on each slide. Minimum of 10 scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles addressing original research using (Operant) Conditioning, published within the most recent 5 years, as well as the textbook, and the Bible, must be included in both in-text citations and the reference page. Websites are not acceptable sources. Do not include direct quotes. Instead, paraphrase information from scholarly sources (using in-text citations) in order to demonstrate your mastery of each concept. Do not use the first person. Write in a formal college-level essay style. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Lesson 07 - Case Study Assignment Refer to the Case Study in Chapter 7 of the text and answer the following: List the signs and symptoms that point to a mental health diagnosis in the case. Describe the other case details you would need to know for treatment planning and explain your reasoning. List and describe the treatment interventions you would use for this case and explain your reasoning.

Instructions Your instructor will share the Mentalism and Radical Behaviorism Template you will use to complete this assignment. Complete the following in the provided table: Column 1: Identify whether the statement is mentalistic or behavioristic for each scenario. Column 2: Explain the reasoning behind your choices. Some of the scenarios are similar and you may reuse your justification in multiple scenarios—but you must restate the explanation for each scenario. Column 3: Provide a behavioristic explanation as an alternative for each of the mentalistic explanations you identify. Answer the following questions below the table. Each answer should be no more than two paragraphs. How does a behavior analytic approach differ from other fields of psychology? What is the problem with a behavior analyst using a mentalistic approach? Why is it important for a behavior analyst to use a behavioristic approach and not use a mentalistic approach in their practice? Refer to the Mentalism and Radical Behaviorism rubric to ensure you understand the grading criteria for this assignment. Additional Requirements Your assignment should also meet the following requirements: Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message. Resources: You are not expected to include references other than your textbook. Length: 2–3 double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and references page. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 3: Distinguish between different branches in the field of behavior analysis. Identify correctly four or five of the statements as either mentalistic or behavioristic. Explain the reasons for the behaviors chosen. Describe alternative behavioristic explanations for the mentalistic statements. Explain how the behavior analytic approach is different from most other psychology fields. Explain the problem with a behavior analyst using a mentalistic approach. Explain why it is important for a behavior analyst to use a behavior analytic approach. Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology. Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines. Demonstrate compliance with APA style and referencing guidelines. Assignment Template:: PSY5260 Week 6 Assignment Q1 2025-1.docx Week 6 Powerpoint: Here is the Week 6 Powerpoint: Week 06 Powerpoint PSY5260. Learner 02.2025.pptx And here is a Week 6 Assignment Breakdown (please note, the examples in this video will look different than the ones in your template):

Please answer the following questions: Explain how researchers typically measure attitudes. Evaluate how nature and nurture interact to form particular attitudes. Explain the most common approach to changing attitudes. Explain how cognitive dissonance motivates self-justification and attitude change. Analyze two distinct paths to persuasion (central and peripheral routes). 2. Persuade me to give you a good grade in Intro to Social Psychology. Be creative--you may advertise, use photos or drawings, flashy lettering, videos or whatever. You are basically making an advertisement for yourself and I am the audience. I will not be grading your artistic ability, just your creative effort and application of what you've learned. *Use your knowledge of central and peripheral route persuasion tactics, likeability, mere exposure, similarity, reciprocity, vividness, humor, etc. (Please do not use threats--and checks stapled to the advertisement will be returned. Cash only, just kidding on that, too). Write a summary of the tactics that you tried to use to persuade your audience (this is the important part). For example, you might say that you used mostly peripheral route approach by using humor and similarity, but you also used some legitimate arguments on why it would be cool to give you a good grade. *keep in mind your audience. What do you know about me? What tactics would you try to use to persuade a mother? A faculty member? Try what you think will work.

Overview For this Performance Task Assessment, you will submit a 2- to 3-page narrative based on analyses conducted on variables in a dataset. The narrative will consist of the conclusions drawn from the analysis, limitations of the research, and implications for social change and further research. Submission Length: A 2- to 3-page narrative. Professional Skills: Written Communication, and Interpreting Data and Quantitative Fluency are assessed in this Competency. Your response to this Assessment should: Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric. Adhere to the required assignment length. Use the APA course paper template available here. This Assessment requires submission of one (1) document that includes your research interpretation. Save this file as PS003_firstinitial_lastname (for example, PS003_J_Smith). You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu. Instructions Access the following to complete this Assessment:? APA course paper template Your Quantitative Research Project Worksheet from PS001 and PS002 Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission, and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. Rubric Quantitative Research Project Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. PART 3: DATA INTERPRETATION Part 3 of your Quantitative Research Project continues your exploration of the same dataset chosen in Part 1 and analyzed in Part 2. For this Performance Task, you will explain what the findings of your analyses mean in terms of causality, generalizability and reliability, social change, and future research. To prepare for the Performance Task Assessment: Review your Part 2 submission (PS002 Assessment) Follow the steps in the PS003 section of the Quantitative Research Project Worksheet to consider what conclusions you can draw from your data analysis results. Take notes as needed. To complete the Performance Task Assessment: Develop a 2- to 3-page Discussion section, which includes the interpretation of your research findings. Add the following section to the end of the same document as your Part 1 and Part 2 submissions: Discussion Explain whether your findings answered your research question. Describe whether you can draw causal conclusions based on the data and explain why (or why not). Explain any limitations that can limit the reliability or generalizability of your findings (i.e., sample size, sampling strategy, ethical issues, threats to internal and/or external validity, or any other flaws). Discuss the implications of your findings regarding how they might effect positive social change. Based on your findings, explain the possibilities for future research regarding your research question and topics. Be specific, provide examples, and justify your response with citations from the resources in your Learning Activities or from your search from the literature and/or the Walden Library.

Overview For this Performance Task Assessment, carefully read “The Case of Mrs. C,” the clinical case study. Then, analyze Mrs. C’s case from the various theoretical orientations, which are grounded in the personality theories you have studied in this Competency. Specifically, you will write eight different theoretical analyses, each analysis based on one theory from each of the following theoretical orientations: Psychoanalytic Neo-Psychoanalytic/Psychodynamic Humanistic and Existential Trait Biological and Evolutionary Behavioral Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Integrative Once you complete all eight analyses, you select the theoretical analysis that you believe offers the best analysis of Mrs. C’s history and symptoms, and offers the most relevant assessments and interventions for her case. Be sure to justify your answer. In summary, your analyses of Mrs. C will integrate scholarly materials from the textbook, related articles in the course, and other scholarly materials you find during your own research. You will use these scholarly materials to support your analyses of Mrs. C. Cite and reference your work in APA format. Include one Reference page at the end of your document. Enjoy putting your new knowledge to work analyzing Mrs. C. Submission Length: 17–19 pages (in addition to title page and References) in a Personality Theory Case Study Analysis paper and Personality Theory Matrix. Professional Skills: Written Communication, Information Literacy, and Engaging Multiple Social and Cultural Perspectives are assessed in this Competency. Instructions To complete this Assessment, do the following: Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length. Download the APA course paper template available here. Download the Personality Theories Matrix Template (Note: Please use the Personality Theories Matrix spreadsheet you originally created during your Module 1 Learning Activities. If you have not done so yet, you may download the template here: PZ001_Personality_Theories_Matrix_Template Download and review the case study,“The Case of Mrs. C,” accessible in Module 2. Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. Rubric All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring. This Assessment requires submission of two (2) files: 1) your Personality Theory Case Study Analysis file and 2) your completed Personality Theories Matrix. Save each file as follows: Personality Theory Case Study Analysis file: save as?PZ001_analysis_firstinitial_lastname?(e.g., PZ001_response_J_Smith) Personality Theory Matrix” save as PZ001_matrix_firstinitial_lastname (e.g., PZ001_matrix_J_Smith) You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu. Personality Theory Case Study Analysis Based on the information you gain from reading the Module 2 Learning Resource personality case study, “The Case of Mrs. C,” complete the following parts to generate a single paper in narrative form. Use your completed Personality Theory Matrix to support your analysis. Integrate Learning Activity resources and scholarly materials from your own research in your analyses and provide citations and references in APA format. References should be combined in one list at the end of the document. Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. PART 1: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—PSYCHOANALYTIC (2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the psychoanalytic theoretical orientation. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the psychoanalytic theoretical orientation. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the psychoanalytic theoretical orientation. PART 2: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—NEO-PSYCHOANALYTIC/PSYCHODYNAMIC (2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the neo-psychoanalytic/psychodynamic theoretical orientation. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the neo-psychoanalytic/psychodynamic theoretical orientation. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the neo-psychoanalytic/psychodynamic theoretical orientation. PART 3: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—HUMANISTIC AND EXISTENTIAL (2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the humanistic or existential theoretical orientations. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the humanistic or existential theoretical orientations. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the humanistic or existential theoretical orientations. PART 4: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—TRAIT (2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the trait theoretical orientation. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the trait theoretical orientation. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the trait theoretical orientation. PART 5: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—BIOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY (1–2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the biological or evolutionary theoretical orientations. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the biological or evolutionary theoretical orientations. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the biological or evolutionary theoretical orientations. PART 6: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—BEHAVIORAL (2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the behavioral theoretical orientation. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the behavioral theoretical orientation. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the behavioral theoretical orientation. PART 7: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—COGNITIVE AND SOCIAL COGNITIVE (2 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the cognitive or social cognitive theoretical orientations. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the cognitive or social cognitive theoretical orientations. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the cognitive or social cognitive theoretical orientations. PART 8: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE—INTEGRATIVE (2–3 PAGES) Analyze Mrs. C’s history, including cultural considerations, from the perspective of one theory you choose from the integrative theoretical orientation. Analyze Mrs. C’s symptoms from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the integrative theoretical orientation. Offer suggestions for assessments and interventions to use with Mrs. C from the perspective of the one theory you chose from the integrative theoretical orientation. PART 9: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE JUSTIFICATION (2 PAGES) Based on the eight analyses you completed in Parts 1 through 8 of this assessment, select and justify the theoretical analysis that you believe offers the best analysis of Mrs. C’s history (including cultural considerations) and symptoms, and offers the most relevant assessments and interventions for her case. Support your analyses and justification by integrating scholarly materials from the Learning Activity resources for this Competency, as well as other scholarly materials you find during your own research. PART 10: REFERENCES Cite and reference your work in APA format.

THIS IS A TWO PART ASSIGNMENT! PART ONE: In Chapter 3, Kottler and Carlson discuss the importance of connecting with clients as a mechanism of change. How do we connect with our clients? How do we show deep compassion and caring when we have heard the same story over and over just from a different perspective? How do we "break the script" so that we do not become robotic and void of emotion? After you have finished reading Chapter 3, I ask you to read the article posted in this week's module by Jon Allen. This article talks of integrating attachment and mentalizing as agents of change within therapy. Discussion Prompts: - On page 48, the authors state, "Whether you prefer to call it empathy, compassion, a holding environment, therapeutic alliance, or anything else, master therapists excel at creating connections with their clients that appear intrinsically healing." How do you consciously create connections with your clients? Give examples of these actions. For me, I say "I hear what you are saying" a lot of the times because it alerts the person that I am present in the moment and I am hearing them. I may not understand or agree with what they are saying completely, but I am actively listening and acknowledging. How do you do this with your clients and do you always mean what you say? - Upon finishing reading the Allen article, explain your interpretation of what he means by "mentalizing" and give examples of how this can be done. - Conclude your original posting with a closing question for your classmates to prompt further discussion. - ALL ORIGINAL POSTS MUST BE AT LEAST 300 WORDS! PART TWO: For this reflection journal we are going to hear from the "Master of Empathy" himself...Carl Rogers. This segment provided is a small portion of an interview Carl Rogers gave in the 70s on how he defined empathy and the importance of empathy in therapy. Click on the link below to watch this segment: https://fod-infobase-com.ezproxy.mc.edu/p_ViewVide... What scares you most about being empathetic with clients? To be honest, what Carl Rogers is describing is somewhat intimidating. How do you feel about this? How do you approach cases where it can be hard to empathize with the person sitting across form you?

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, Review Chapters 8 and 9 in your textbook, A Biopsychosocial Approach to Health: From Cell to Society. Review the article, Disparities in Diabetes Care: Differences Between Rural and Urban Patients Within a Large Health SystemLinks to an external site.. Review the article, Diabetes Complications in Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in the USALinks to an external site.. Please elaborate on the following prompts as you complete your discussion. Identify census data on the demographic makeup of a city, county, state, or region of interest. Use the United States Census Bureau’s ProfilesLinks to an external site. to access a data profile for the selected geographic area. Conduct a search to identify available healthcare options, such as doctors’ offices for specialized or non-specialized care, dentists, psychologists, counselors or psychiatrists, and hospitals. Compare costs, public transportation access, and other inequities that may emerge in access to health care. Conduct research on health disparities for minority or underserved groups located in your selected region. Reflect on the following questions: How accessible are healthcare options in the selected region? What was the experience like when researching a community's demographics and the availability of mental and physical healthcare options? How do the results of your research compare with the disparities discussed in this week’s readings? What strategies would you propose to address any identified disparities? Textbook: Summer, R. C. (2023). A biopsychosocial approach to health: From cell to society. SAGE Publications. Chapter 8: Epidemiological Perspectives: Public Health Chapter 9: The Social Determinants of Public Health

Define each of the differential reinforcement procedures, noting how the two components of each procedure affects the occurrence of problem and desired behaviors. Then, choose a personal behavior, or the behavior of someone in your environment (maintaining confidentiality, of course!). Choose a Differential Reinforcement procedure and explain how you would apply that procedure to decrease the problem behavior and increase a desired behavior, taking into consideration the thoughts on schedules of reinforcement or matching law covered last week. Use APA citations and references.

Morrie Discussion 1. Who do you think got more out of their Tuesday meetings, Mitch or Morrie? In what ways? How do you think each would answer this question? 2. On "Nightline," Morrie spoke to Ted Koppel of the pain he still felt seventy years after his mother's death. Is your experience with loss similar or different? Does what you've read in this book help ease any of the pain?