Expert Answers

Description Introduction Issue identified. 2 sides delineated. Side 1 Thoroughly analyzed by considering multiple prompt questions. Side 2 Thoroughly analyzed by considering multiple prompt questions. Solid conclusion. Comparative evaluation complete. Evidence of proofreading Contains minimal grammatical errors, misspellings, and typos. Effective citation Contains proper citation page and cites works in text. Just need my finals paper written about Oil and Plastic in the ocean with citations and evidence. User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description I have a paper that is due today on marine plastic pollution. The paper needs to be double spaced, 12 size font, and Times New Roamn font. Link to word document to write the paper on: Issues in the environment Final Paper.docx This paper is about marine plastic pollution and needs to have two sides one side that agrees tht plastic pollution is bad and another that tells some good things that come from plastic pollution. Teacher says: two sources in disagreement over marine plastic pollution. Basically, everyone thinks pollution is bad. To do this assignment, you need a debate to focus on. You might, for instance, look into single use plastics and whether they ought to be banned. There will be clear positions taken on such an issue, both for and against. This paper should be about a page long. Link to website that is against plastic pollution: https://www.unep.org/topics/ocean-seas-and-coasts/... Link to website that is against/has benefits form plastic pollution: https://oceanbites.org/the-other-side-of-plastic-p... If you cannot access the word document from the link I provided please let me know. User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description Philanthropy plays a major role in addressing conservation, climate, and humanitarian issues and improving our world. For this project, you will be acting as an advisor to a donor willing to pledge $10 Million towards conservation efforts but who does not have the time to investigate how their donations will be best spent. The donor would like to split their donation among at least five organizations and give at least $1 Million to each organization. Your project has the following components: 1) Investigate how other advising organizations determine how to select the best non-profits. Do they look for low overhead, big potential impact, transformative projects, efficiency in spending? Write a section detailing the philosophy of these organizations, how they determine what causes to support, how they choose specific organizations to support, and the role they play in philanthropy. [250-350 words]. Two organizations you should investigate are Founder's Pledge (https://www.founderspledge.com) and GiveWell (https://www.givewell.org). 2) You need to select a specific area to target for Section 2; this could be based on a: A) a group of wildlife (e.g. bird conservation, conservation of wild cats, supporting insect populations, etc), B) a specific region of the world (e.g. the tropics, the Arctic circle, Europe, etc.), C) a specific habitat (e.g. forests, coastal areas, marine, savannas, etc.), or some combination (e.g. tropical forest birds). There are many organizations that aim to help conservation efforts. Foci include: climate change, land preservation, habitat connectivity, community development, sustainable agriculture, hunter education, sustainable fisheries, etc. Do some research on the factors that have the biggest negative effect on wildlife populations. Identify at least five sectors within the conservation field that you think the donor should support. Come up with some method of quantifying which sectors are most important or could make the biggest impact to conservation. [300-450 words; generate at least one figure; cite at least 3 peer-reviewed, scientific articles for this section; Note: section 2 is not the place to identify particular organizations, but a place to identify more general issues/sectors.] 3) Identify at least five non-profit organizations that you recommend receive funding from the donor and split the $10 Million donation among them (these 5 NGOs should be linked to the 5 sectors you identified in part 2). For each organization that you select, identify which conservation issue they address and detail why the organization was selected. Also, for each organization you select, identify two organizations with a similar mission that you chose not to recommend for funding and briefly explain why they were not recommended for funding. [1250 word minimum] 4) Summarize your recommendations [100-150 words] User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. Chose a processed product (e.g., computer, Styrofoam product, plastic product, diapers, or vehicle tires) and create a 15-slide PowerPoint to answer the following questions: History: what is the product, where has it been used, who used it first? How is it made?: include items needed for production and steps in the process What impact does making the product have on the environment? Hint look at: pollution of air, water, habitat loss… What is being done to making the product sustainable? (Hint: Is there a company with a sustainability plan? Look for efforts on reusing, recycling, plans to replant if product components are renewable, etc.) What is the future outlook of the product? Create a campaign slide to encourage sustainable use of the product Note: Please make sure to include additional information in the speaker notes for each slide. Each student is to include their name in the notes section of the slides that they worked on. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description Please watch all the videos and read the article to complete the assignmnet. UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Chapter 23 Paying It Forward What you could do to pay what you have learned and done in this workbook forward and pass it on to other people and causes you care about? Who would you most like to share something you learned or one of the activities you benefited from? What would you like share and how could you do it? How could you make expressing gratitude and kindness to others an increasing and more regular and routine part of your life? Chapter 23 Reflection Questions What you think are the most meaningful things that you learned as a part of this challenge? How do you think you might use them to change your life for the better? Chapter 23 The Benefits of a Meaningful Life How might your life be different if you focused more time and energy on what can bring meaning and purpose to your life? What would you be focusing on and doing?  Purchase answer to see full attachment User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Chapter 24 Reflection Questions How can you remember and remind yourself about the most important and meaningful things that you have learned about and done as a part of this challenge? Some examples of ways may be to return to, review, or redo parts of the workbook at regular intervals, create computer or smart phone reminders of the most important lessons for you, or make a schedule for continuing to practice the activities that were most beneficial to you. 2 What can you do to help you follow through in achieving your best possible life and the goals that you set for yourself in the PATH process? Some examples of what you could do might include creating a schedule for working towards specific goals, meeting regularly with members of your PATH “dream team” to report progress and get their support, and identifying ways to celebrate and reward yourself for the progress that you make. 3 1 Chapter 24 Complete the Well-Being Survey Complete and score the survey below. This is the same survey that you may have completed at the end of the first chapter. If you completed that initial survey, then you can now compare your scores at the beginning and end of the challenge. (There is an additional copy of this survey that you can complete as many times as you want in Appendix E). Instructions: First, circle the number that best indicates your response for each question. Second, add up your scores for the five elements of well-being (positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment) and for negative emotions. Third, see what the scores mean in the table below and compare these to your earlier scores. Then compare with the Well-Being Survey that you completed the first week of class. How do they compare? What changes do you see? What are your thoughts about the changes or lack of changes that you see? Write a minimum of 500 words in answer to these questions. Submit to the appropriate assignment Dropbox. 1. In general, to what extent do you lead a purposeful and meaningful life? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 2. How much of the time do you feel you are making progress towards accomplishing your goals? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 3. How often do you become absorbed in what you are doing? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 4. In general, how often do you feel joyful? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5. To what extent do you receive help and support from others when you need it? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 6 7 8 9 10 Always 6. In general, how often do you feel anxious? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 7. How often do you achieve the important goals you have set for yourself? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 8. In general, to what extent do you feel that what you do in your life is valuable and worthwhile? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 6 7 8 9 10 Always 9. In general, how often do you feel positive? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 10. In general, to what extent do you feel excited and interested in things? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 2 3 11. In general, how often do you feel angry? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 8 9 10 Always 12. To what extent have you been feeling loved? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 13. How often are you able to handle your responsibilities? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14. To what extent do you generally feel you have a sense of direction in your life? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 15. How satisfied are you with your personal relationships? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Completely 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 16. In general, how often do you feel sad? Never 0 1 2 3 4 17. How often do you lose track of time while doing something you enjoy? Never 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Always 7 8 9 10 Completely 18. In general, to what extent do you feel contented? Not at all 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Add up the total for each of the three questions for following: Positive Emotions (4, 9, 18) Engagement (3, 10, 17) Relationships (5, 12, 15) Meaning (1, 8, 14) Accomplishment (2, 7, 13) Negative Emotions (6, 11, 16) Level of Well-Being Very high High Average Low Ranges for Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning & Accomplishment 27-30 24-26 20-23 15-19 Ranges for Negative Emotions 0-3 4-9 10-15 16-19 4 Very low 0-14 20-30 If you like, you can take the survey online and read more about it at the following address: https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/questionnaires/perma Chapter 24 Celebrate Completing the Challenge! Write about what you can do to celebrate and reward yourself for having completed this challenge. Then take the time to do it!  Purchase answer to see full attachment User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description Reinforcement is the cornerstone of behavior analysis. How frequently, or not frequently, reinforcement is delivered has a large impact on how quickly a person will respond. This is the case for all behavior. For example, someone who sells cars may be paid on a fixed interval schedule (every two weeks after at least one car is sold, regardless of how many are sold after that one) or fixed ratio schedule (100 dollars for every car sold). As you can imagine, based on the pay schedule, the response rate of car selling by the individual who is paid every two weeks, regardless of the number of cars, is likely to be much lower than that of the individual who is paid per car sold. This type of reinforcement schedule and rate of responding translates the same when you may be teaching a client a skill. Choosing the appropriate reinforcement schedule allows us to support our clients in achieving those successes. Instructions For this assignment, use the Schedules of Reinforcement Template [DOCX] to write a paper that includes the following: Identify the reinforcement schedule for each example presented. (Enter the information into the table.) Explain how each of the four schedules work to evoke a behavior and the type of responding that results. Describe a naturally occurring reinforcement schedule you have identified in everyday life Write a short conclusion. Assignment Requirements Your assignment should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style guidelines. Use Academic WriteLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the Writing Center Links to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level. Resources: 2–3 scholarly or professional resources. Length: 2–3 double-spaced pages, excluding the title page and reference page. Refer to the MS in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Research Guide Links to an external site. for help finding resources. Refer to the Reinforcement Schedules rubric to ensure you understand the grading criteria for this assignment. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Distinguish the principles of behavior analysis associated with increasing and decreasing behavior. Identify the main types of reinforcement schedules. Explain how each schedule works to evoke a behavior and the type of responding that results. Describe a naturally occurring reinforcement schedule found in everyday life. Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology. Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines. Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW 1 Paper Title Your name Capella University PSY5280: Advanced Concepts in Applied Behavior Analysis Dr. Lisa Sabato Due date 2 Name the schedule in the example: Example: Name the schedule: Arjun gets a sticker for the first correct response after a two-minute interval has passed. Cristina gets to pick a prize after an average of four homework papers are turned in. One star is earned every three times Juan raises his hand. Kiana gets five minutes of iPad if they answer correctly at the end of an interval, which lasts five minutes on average. Schedules of Reinforcement Fixed interval: Fixed ratio: Variable ratio: Variable interval: 3 Schedules in Everyday Life 4 References  Purchase answer to see full attachment User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description This coursework is associated with Learning Objectives 1-3 stated in the Module Guidance, it will assess the following: ?Demonstrate knowledge and critical awareness of the theoretical basis, problems, and issues involved in quantitative and qualitative research methods in forensic psychology. ?Evidence an advanced and critical understanding of the ethical and practice related issues involved in carrying out forensic psychological research. ?Design and conduct complex studies of forensic psychology topics, determining the appropriate analytical approach for quantitative and qualitative data (e.g., multi-factorial designs). The total word count for this whole assignment is 3500 words; there is no 10% leeway. This coursework assignment is designed to assess your knowledge of both Quantitative and Qualitative research methods. The first part requires you to conduct statistical analyses on different data sets and present the results of each analysis in a format suitable for publication in an academic journal, therefore pay close attention to APA formatting guidelines. You should also use Figures to support your analyses where appropriate. You are then presented with a hypothetical scenario and asked to answer a question related to good ethical research practice. The second part requires you to watch any 3 of 6 videos from the website ‘Media-Caring for Ex-Offenders’, transcribe the interviews, formulate a qualitative research question, and write-up the results and discussion section of a report. Part 1: Quantitative research methods assessment It is suggested that you aim to write approximately 1500 words in total for part 1, and is worth 40% of this assignment. Part 1(a): The questions are as follows: Question 1 A clinical investigation was conducted into the effect of three different treatment regimens (control, psychotherapy, and drug treatment) for patients with anxiety. Patients were randomly allocated to receive one of the three treatments and measures of their anxiety symptoms were taken before and after the intervention. High scores on the anxiety measure indicate more severe symptoms. The file containing these data (Q1.sav) can be found on the CT7057PY CW2 folder, on the EClass platform. It was hypothesised that anxiety severity would be lower after the intervention compared to before the intervention. It was also hypothesised that patients in the drug therapy group would show a larger decrease in anxiety compared to those in the psychotherapy group and the control group. Perform the appropriate analysis on these data and report whether the hypotheses were supported in the data. Question 2 An investigation was conducted to determine what factors predict the amount of time people are willing to spend helping a friend with a problem. The file containing these data (Q2.sav) can be found on the CT7057PY CW2 folder, on the EClass platform. The dependent variable is zhelp. This is the length of time participants said they would be willing to spend helping a friend, expressed as z-scores. The predictor variables are as follows: ?Sympathy – Feelings of sympathy aroused in the helper by the friend ?Anger – Feelings of anger or irritation aroused in the helper by the friend’s need ?Efficacy – Self efficacy of the helper in relation to the friend’s need ?Severity – Helper’s rating of how severe the friend’s problem was ?Empathy – Empathic tendency of the helper, measured as a personality trait Predictor variables were measured on a 7-point scale, with 1 indicating very little and 7 indicating very much. Empathy is a total score of the level of empathy reported by the participant. It was hypothesised that only empathy, sympathy and severity the amount of time spent helping the friend. Perform the appropriate analysis of these data would predict and report the findings with regard to the hypotheses. Question 3(a) The Depression, Anxiety & Stress Scale 21 (DASS21) is frequently used to examine mental health. The scale has 21 items, 7 for each sub-scale (stress, anxiety and depression). It is a Likert scale, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress. The results from this scale are frequently used to identify needs and promote well-being. Thus, it is important to ensure that the questionnaire has very good internal reliability. Your task is to examine whether the questionnaire has good internal reliability and comment on the findings and whether it would be possible to improve its reliability. The file containing these data (Q3.a.sav) can be found on the CT7057PY CW2 folder, on the EClass platform. Question 3(b) The stages of change scale (soc) is a Likert type scale which is based on the Transtheoretical model (TTM), which supports that behaviour change takes place through moving across five adjacent stages: pre-contemplation (not thinking about changing behaviour), contemplation (thinking about it), preparation (preparing to take action), action (behaviour change takes place) and maintenance (maintaining behaviour change for at least 6 months). The model has been frequently used to predict alcohol consumption/ reduction. However, health professionals and researcher do not agree with regard to the number of stages the individual has to go through to achieve the behaviour change. Your task is to conduct the appropriate analysis to examine the construct validity of the SoC scale and comment on the number of stages that seem to appear. The file containing these data (Q3.b.sav) can be found on the CT7057PY CW2 folder, on the EClass platform. Some general guidance on completing Part 1(a) To complete this part of the assignment successfully you will need to identify the research designs used in each of the studies and the correct tests required to analyse the data. You will also need to enter data into SPSS in the correct format, run the required analyses, and interpret the output. Lastly, you will need to write-up the results of the analyses in a format resembling the Results section of a journal article. This means, for example, Figures and Tables should be appropriately edited and statistics should be reported in APA format. In your workshops, we have been emphasising a systematic approach to conducting quantitative analyses. We have pursued our analyses as a series of steps, beginning with a hypothesis and a visual inspection of the data and progressing gradually through descriptive analysis, inferential analysis, and analysis of effect size. It is recommended that you take this same approach when conducting and writing-up the analyses for the coursework. You will find the micro-lectures and workshop resources helpful in completing your work, but it is strongly recommended that you also consult your relevant SPSS textbooks. Finally, I would advise you to study examples of Results sections from published research papers to gain insight into how to structure your write-up in a logical way. Below, presented in no particular order, you will find a handful of more specific tips. These are based upon common mistakes made by former students: ?A Results section should be written as prose, just like any other section of a journal article. Your goal is to provide a clearly written summary of the analyses that have been conducted and whether or not they support the hypotheses. Write in complete sentences and paragraphs and use the statistical values to support the conclusions that you draw in the text, much like you would use a reference to support a claim made in an Introduction section ?Think carefully about the structure of your answers. A Results section should begin by reminding the reader what was done in the experiment and what we expect to find. Your answer should identify the type of design used, the independent and dependent variables, and the hypotheses. Following this, your answer should summarise the analyses in a logical sequence, with descriptive analyses (Means, 95% CIs, SDs), followed by evidence of data screening, inferential analyses (e.g., ANOVA, Regression), effect sizes, and post-hoc tests ?Try to keep your hypotheses in mind when you are writing your Results section and use these to guide your analyses. Make it clear how the different findings are interpreted in relation to the hypotheses and draw clear conclusions. Also, it is a good idea to address the hypotheses in the same order that they were stated in the question ?Descriptive statistics can be reported in the text using parentheses in many cases. For example, ‘Depression scores were lower post-treatment (M =19.63 95% CI [17.41, 21.99], SD = 2.68] compared to pre-treatment (M = 27.91, 95% CI [24.22, 31.80, SD = 4.01)’. However, when giving an overview of a complex design with many conditions, it can be difficult for the reader to assimilate information presented in the text. In these situations a table or figure is more effective ?That said, you should be careful to avoid repetition of the same information. Means and SD’s should be reported in the text, a table, or a figure, not all three! ?Tables should be drawn from scratch in Word or Excel and only contain the most relevant information. It is never appropriate to copy and paste tables direct from your SPSS output. These are poorly formatted and they contain lots of redundant information. Graphs can be copied and pasted from SPSS but, as mentioned above, they should be edited appropriately. Please ensure you look up the APA formatting guidelines. ?Tables are for presenting descriptive data (Means, SDs etc.). They should not be used to present the results of your inferential analyses, such as ANOVA or t-tests. These statistics should be presented at appropriate points in the text using correct formatting, e.g., ‘ F (3, 29) = 2.99, p < .05’ ?When describing your inferential analyses, you can assume a certain degree of statistical knowledge in the reader. For example, there is no need to explain what a p-value is, or how they are interpreted. You should simply state what test was used and what the results showed (i.e., that an effect was significant, or non-significant) Part 1(b): Please read through the following scenario very carefully and answer the question that follow: You are an Assistant Psychologist in training and currently work in a Category B prison in the UK. An important part of your role is to facilitate treatment and intervention groups run in the prison for offenders. There are a number of different groups that you help facilitate, one of which is Anger Management for violent offenders. Following a conversation with one of your colleagues, you decide that it would be a good idea to conduct qualitative research on one of the groups you run for violent offenders. This research would help inform your professional practice in the prison and build on your current skills. Before approaching your superior, you decide to draft up a proposal for a research study focused on the locus of control and emotions offenders have pre and post completion of a 6 week group treatment session. Question 1) what ethical guidelines and practical considerations would apply in the proposed study that you would need to consider when completing an ethics application to carry out this project? This should be approximately 300 words in total, and is worth 10% of this assignment. ______________ Part 2: Qualitative research methods assessment Part 2(a): Handling, Analysing and reporting qualitative data The second part requires you to watch any 3 of 6 videos from the website ‘Media-Caring for Ex-Offenders’, transcribe the interviews, formulate a qualitative research question, and write-up the Methods, Results and Discussion section of a report. The results and discussion section would typically be presented as one section where you report the findings and discuss them interchangeably, in line with each theme that has emerged. You can also include a table or visual representation in your write-up (e.g., thematic map), and this must be formatted according to APA guidelines. The videos have to be in sequence (e.g., 1,2 and 3 or 2,3 and 4 etc.). You can choose any of the qualitative methods you have learnt in this module, however, your methodology has to be suitable to the research question you have formulated. It is suggested that you aim to write approximately 1200 words in total, and is worth 40% of this assignment. Some general guidance on completing Part 2(a) Method (approx. 300 words) – Details how the data were collected, information about participants if available, clear outline of analytic methods/procedures (What steps did you follow when coding the data, identifying themes? Can you describe your methods so clearly that even a reader without training in IPA, TA or DA will understand the method?) Results & Discussion (approx. 900 words) – (1) Present each theme/discourse, (2) Provide illustrative extracts for each theme (look at published papers to see how researchers usually present their findings – if you like a specific author’s style, feel free to use it in your own work), (3) Summarize key findings drawn from the data and connect them to the broader research literature, (4) discuss strengths and weaknesses of your work, (5) Discuss implications of your findings, (6) Brief concluding paragraph which re-states key findings and suggestions for future research. Part 2(b): Reflection For this part you need to reflect on key aspects related to this assignment (approx. 500 words), and is worth 10% of this assignment. You must address the following: 1. Briefly, describe what you did for your assignment. 2. Evaluation and analysis of what you learned from this process 3. Action plan: How will you apply this learning to your future? More information about part 2(b): The Reflective component WHY am I being asked to reflect? As a Practitioner Psychologist, it is essential to have an analytical approach to your work. You are expected to take on board new developments in the field and integrate contemporary psychological theory into practice. This means being able to dispassionately analyse your own thinking and behaviour in relation to those around you and your work performance. You need to get into the good habit of recognising your own biases, strengths and development needs in every aspect of your working life. This way of thinking facilitates learning from experience and feeds forward into an outlook that enables you to strive for continuous development in your professional and personal life. This is the type of thinking that supervisors will be looking for in supervised practice, as a supervisee taking responsibility for your own learning and development, whilst also being open to advice and new experiences. Have a look at this short clip about metacognition, explaining the rationale for this approach to higher education learning: WHAT am I being asked to do in my reflective assignments? As a foundation for becoming a reflective practitioner, during the MSc Forensic Psychology, our aim is to help you develop and nurture this skill of reflective thinking about your performance, to prepare you to go forward into your professional life as an inquisitive, reflective learner. On each Module of the course, you’ll be encouraged to think not only about what you’re learning, but also why it’s important and how best to apply that learning going forward. This is the rationale for the reflective elements woven in to the course assessment strategy. The idea is that each piece of feedback on your assignments can be used to feed forward into the next. Using this approach, modules are not just stand-alone elements of the course, but come together as part of your overall learning and development journey. You’ll be reflecting on the psychological theories you’re learning, but also their practical application, as well as your strengths and development areas in communicating that psychological knowledge within your assignments. Have a look at this Journal article. In particular, in the results section, there are a lot of examples of reflective diary entries by the participant in this study and also a narrative about their journey towards being a more reflective practitioner, to show some concrete examples of the concept. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13505... HOW can I write reflectively? Reflective writing is a skill that can be learned. As a beginner, it is usual for people to write quite descriptively about what they did, the process they went through and the outcome. However, this is only the first step in the process of reflection. After summarising what’s been done, it’s imperative to convey the learning and insights gained from that experience, and how that can feed forward into a change in behaviour in the future. Reflective thinking can be structured and written in a number of different ways. However, the following structure is suggested to enable you to clearly work through a reflective cycle and gain the most from this process. 1. Briefly, describe what you did for your assignment. You can focus on a specific aspect of the work, the process, the content, or your experience of the assignment. It is a good idea to describe an area of activity that you focussed on when completing this assignment. This might be something you’ve not done well on previous assessments. Suggestions are given below, however feel free to choose your own if its more relevant. Remember the point of this component of this assignment is you reflect on something YOU can learn and improve from. This is only one element of the reflective process, so keep it short. For example: ?Understanding the requirements of the assignment: How did you interpret the task? ?Finding literature; what process did you follow? ?Critically evaluating the material: How did you weigh up the relative importance of what you read? ?Synthesis; what findings are consistent through the literature and what’s different? How have you conveyed this in your work? ?Editing the work to make it clear and coherent: How did you do this? ?Finding time to complete the work: What was the impact of the time limits? 2. Evaluation and analysis of what you learned from this process Be truthful in this section as it is important that you consider how you acted impacted on your behaviour and your completion of the assignment. Critically analyse your approach. For example: ?Explain your learning from the process you followed. What went well? What didn’t go so well? How do you know? Is there anything you’re still not sure about? How will you find out the answer? ?What did you learn from the content of the assignment material that might be important? ?Is there any psychological literature that might link to, or explain your thoughts, or behaviour? ?What sense can you make from this situation? 3. Action plan: How will you apply this learning to your future? In this section, consider how you will you apply this learning to your future. This can be in the form of specific actions that you will take in the next assignment. For example, if you reflected that you did not leave adequate time to write your essay and this was because you procrastinate too much, you should include specific actions here to ensure that you do not procrastinate next time. For example: ?Feedforward: How will this learning help you going forward, in future assignments and your career? ?What you will do the same (worked well) or differently (didn’t work well) for your next assignment? ?How can you apply psychological theory or application you’ve learnt to your future, or current work? ?If you apply this learning successfully, how would that benefit you and others? ?What will stick in your mind; how has this transformed your way of thinking about the world and your place in it? (Deep, I know, but ideally we want to help move you towards transformational learning that will stay with you, way beyond Coventry University and into your future). Further reading resources on this topic Bruno, A. and Dell’Aversana, G. (2017) Reflective Practice for Psychology Students: The Use of Reflective Journal Feedback in Higher Education. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(2) 248–260. Coulson, D. and Homewood, J. (2016) Developing psychological literacy: is there a role for reflective practice? Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(2), 2016. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol13/iss2/5 Paul Fisher, Kimberly Chew & Yi Jin Leow (2015): Clinical psychologists’ use of reflection and reflective practice within clinical work. Reflective Practice, DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2015.1095724 User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description NO AI WHATSOVER Assignment 2: Designing a Wellness Workshop Objective: In this assignment, you will work to create a comprehensive wellness workshop for a specific population. Your workshop should address a relevant issue affecting the chosen population and provide a thoughtful solution. PLEASE DO NOT USE AI or PLAGERIZE more than 25% or you will not get credit! Instructions: Part 1: Workshop Proposal (20 points) Overview (4 points): Discuss the general issue/population being addressed (e.g., provide a definition, prevalence data, any cultural significance, social impact). Identify possible problems/goals associated with this issue/population as identified in the literature (e.g., symptoms, maladaptive behavior patterns, associated risk). Discuss ethical issues as they relate to your subject. Rationale (4 points): Explain why this issue is important to address (consider social trends, neglected issues, personal experience, the impact on society, risk, or other relevant information). Describe how this issue/population is usually addressed. Identify problems/goals not adequately addressed by standard treatments. Explain how your group will support standard treatments or fill in treatment gaps. Descriptive Overview of the Workshop (4 points): Provide a workshop name and type. Specify the number of meetings, length/frequency of each session. Decide on an open or closed design. Define the needed personal characteristics of leaders. Decide if there will be co-leaders or a single leader. Specify the optimal and acceptable number of workshop participants. Provide a rationale for your choices (e.g., why the workshop duration, design, or leadership structure was chosen). Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria (4 points): Describe the methods for screening out and selecting in workshop participants. Discuss specific participant inclusion/exclusion criteria in detail. Assessment and Workshop Preparation (4 points): Explain what information will be gathered on workshop participants prior to the workshop. Describe how you will initially assess participants to learn about their needs and suitability for the workshop. Detail your orientation process for preparing participants for the workshop. Grading Rubric: Overview: 4 points Rationale: 4 points Descriptive Overview of the Workshop: 4 points Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: 4 points Assessment and Workshop Preparation: 4 points Total Points: 20 Submission Guidelines: Your submission should be well-organized and clearly written. Do not use the word " Therapy" in any of your workshop plans. Ensure you follow APA style for citations and references where applicable. Use bullet points to address each question you do not need to write in essay format. User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Description Discussion Topic: Discussion Thread: Inclusion Discussion Thread: Inclusion Academic: Begin by reading the story of Ro Vargo. In her case, what did inclusion look like? Look for research on inclusion in the classroom setting published in the most recent 5 years. Citing at least one research study you found, what is inclusion? Does your research article recommend it? Why or why not? What challenges in inclusion does your research article discuss? What is your opinion on inclusion? Biblical Application: How does the Bible address inclusion? Fully explain the application of biblical scripture to the topic of inclusion. Do not simply add scripture to your discussion. User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.