Expert Answers

Read the Suburban Homes Construction Project case study found at the end of chapters 1 through 4, CPM 4e and answer the following questions in a paper formatted using a question-response format: Question 1 (from Unit 1) – What advice would you offer to Adam Smith on improving the performance of project management and increasing project success rate? Minimum 250 words. Question 2 (from Unit 4) - Describe the organizational structure that might best suit Suburban Homes. Ensure that your discussion includes all possible structures and why each is ruled out. Minimum 250 words. Question 3 (from Unit 4) - Describe the type of lifecycle best suited for their emphasis on high-quality construction. Ensure that your discussion includes at least 3 possible lifecycles and why two of them are ruled out. Minimum 250 words. You will be assessed on content and mechanics. Content (30 points/question): The content must be based on the case study materials and reading assignments. The PMBOK 6e and CPM 4e, along with other reputable resources can be used to supplement the responses through summarizing, paraphrasing and quoting those sources. Mechanics (10 points): Each question response must be at at minimum 250 words. "Minimum" is that amount typically needed to meet expectations (to earn a "B"). To exceed expectations (to earn an "A"), a deeper discussion is needed. Each reference should be listed at the end of the paper following APA guidelines. Online blogs are not acceptable references. See Purdue OWL website for guidance on in-text citations. Your Instructor will use Turn-it-in to ensure your paper is authentic work. To avoid plagiarism, see the course home page for more information and use the Purdue Online Writing Lab to learn how to paraphrase, summarize and cite the references you use in all academic writing assignments. Rubric Unit 4 Individual Assignment Rubric Unit 4 Individual Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 1 30 ptsExcellentResponse addresses in excellent detail the reviews and assessments needed to make a plan, as well as information about the content of a plan, for improving performance, all in the context of the SHCP.24 ptsGoodResponse addresses in good detail the reviews and assessments needed to make a plan, as well as information about the content of a plan, for improving performance, all in the context of the SHCP. 20 ptsPoorThe response needs more details on the reviews and assessments needed to make a plan for improving performance, all in the context of the SHCP.0 ptsNot Submitted 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 30 ptsExcellentResponse addresses in excellent detail the prospective organizational structure why other structures are not recommended from the suite of organizational structures - functional through projectized24 ptsGoodResponse addresses in good detail the prospective organizational structure why other structures are not recommended from the suite of organizational structures - functional through projectized 20 ptsPoorThe response needs more details the recommended structure and on other organizational structures rejected0 ptsNot Submitted 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 30 ptsExcellentResponse addresses in excellent detail the type of lifecycle recommended and those not recommended, with emphasis on the specifics of the SHCP.24 ptsGoodResponse addresses in good detail the type of lifecycle recommended and those not recommended, with emphasis on the specifics of the SHCP. 20 ptsPoorThe response needs more detail on the type of lifecycle recommended and those not recommended, insufficient emphasis on the specifics of the SHCP.0 ptsNot Submitted 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 10 ptsExcellentResponses to each question are at least 250 words and follow APA guidelines8 ptsGoodResponses to each question are less than 250 words or more than 500 words and/or generally follow APA with some minor errors or omissions 6 ptsPoorResponses are too short or too long and/or don't follow APA for citations and references.0 ptsNot Submitted 10 pts Total Points: 100

Read the attached instructions to complete this medical terminology assignment. The assigned abbreviations are provided to you. This should be about 2-3 pages, double-spaced (not including Works Cited). This must be in MLA format.

Developing Function Based Treatment Goals In this first discussion, begin by reviewing this learning activity, which demonstrates how to use the Competing Behavior Pathway Diagram to develop your treatment goals. Then, review the options to guide your response to the questions below. You can select Option A or B for this discussion. Option A: Cicero is a thirteen-year-old client who frequently engages in verbal outbursts in the classroom, which includes yelling and using inappropriate language. These outbursts occur approximately 3-4 times a day and disrupt the learning environment for them and their peers. The function of Cicero's verbal outbursts appears to be attention-seeking and a means of expressing frustration or unmet needs. By understanding this, the intervention can focus on teaching Cicero some alternative, appropriate ways to gain attention and express their needs. Option B: Provide a brief description of a client that you have, or are currently working with, including the behavior of concern, the context in which the behavior occurs, the function of the behavior, and what the general goals intervention should focus on (Use Scenario A as an example for organizing your description). Be sure to develop this work independently from already “established” written BIP goals/objectives for this client…pretend you are starting from scratch. Include the following in your post: Fill out a Competing Behavior Pathway Diagram to include in your post for reference. Identify and operationally define one target behavior for intervention with the client. Describe how you will prioritize the problem behavior, referencing Cooper et al., (2020) worksheet (Figure 3.9) on page 66. Develop at least one clear and measurable short-term and long-term treatment goal for your client. Select a functionally equivalent replacement behavior based on your short-term goal and discuss how you will evaluate the social significance of the replacement behavior, including consideration of cultural responsiveness. Use the unit readings to support your response.

video that presents your personal action plan for practicing pharmacy in a climate-affected world. will attach phots of the rubric the Guidline you need to make the video and everything you need. please cover all of them

Assignment 1 6665 Practicum Experience Plan Clinical hours are 0800 to 17:00 Tuesdays and Thursday Review your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted last week and think about areas for which you would like to gain application-level experience and/or continued growth as an advanced practice nurse. How can your experiences in the practicum help you achieve these aims?? Review the information related to developing objectives provided in this week’s Learning Resources.?Your practicum?learning objectives that you want to achieve during your practicum experience must be: Specific? Measurable? Attainable? Results-focused? Time-bound Reflective of the higher-order domains of Bloom’s taxonomy (i.e., application level and above ?Note: Please make sure your objectives are individualized and outlined in your Practicum Experience Plan (PEP).?While you may add previous objectives to continue to work toward. You must have 3 new objectives for each class, each quarter. Discuss your professional aims and your proposed practicum objectives with your Preceptor to ascertain if the necessary resources are available at your practicum site. Select one nursing theory and one counseling/psychotherapy theory to best guide your clinical practice. Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-based literature. Create a timeline of practicum activities that demonstrates how you plan to meet these goals and objectives based on your practicum requirements. Record the required information in each area of the Practicum Experience Plan template, including three to four (3–4) measurable practicum Learning Objectives you will use to facilitate your learning during the practicum experience. Assignment 2 6675 Review the E/M patient case scenario provided. In the E/M patient case study (WORD document) provided, assign DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10, and reimbursement codes to services based on the patient case scenario and provide justifications for your response. In 2-3 pages, address the following. You will add your narrative answers to these questions to the bottom of the case scenario document and submit them altogether as one document. What reimbursement billing code would you use for this session? Provide your justification for using this billing code. Explain what pertinent information is required in documentation to support your chosen DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10 coding, and billing code. Explain what pertinent documentation is missing from the case scenario and what other information would be helpful to narrow your coding and billing options. (There are at least 12 missing pertinent components of documentation). Discuss legal and ethical dilemmas related to overbilling, upcoding, and fraudulent practices. Propose 2 strategies for promoting legal and ethical coding and billing practices within your future clinical roles. Finally, explain how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement. Review the grading rubric for this assignment for guidance on how you are graded. Each question addressed should have its own paragraph. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion should be provided. You are also graded for correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list are also part of the grading rubric. You will lose points if your paper does not follow APA style. APA style includes use of headings and page numbers. Insert page numbers in the top right corner. APA writing is double-spaced. You need to include headings to identify the content of each of the distinct topics you are asked to address. Review the syllabus for explanation of primary and secondary sources. Assignment 3 6675 - Study Plan . Reflect on the study plan you created in NRNP 6665. Did you accomplish your SMART goals? What areas of focus still present opportunities for growth? Revise your study plan summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Develop 3–4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress. Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study. You will submit 2 documents: the previous NRNP 6665 study plan and your NRNP 6675 revised study plan. Written expression and formatting - paragraph development and organization is part of the grading rubric. Each topic addressed should have its own paragraph. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion should be provided. You are also graded for correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list are also part of the grading rubric. You will lose points if your paper does not follow APA style. APA style includes use of headings and page numbers. Insert page numbers in the top right corner. APA writing is double-spaced. You need to include headings to identify the content of each of the distinct topics you are asked to address. Review the syllabus for explanation of primary and secondary sources.

Please submit as Word document. After watching the Grand Rounds: Cardiac Arrest video below, please select either Case 1 or Case 2, and describe the rationale for the treatment plan for your selected treatment. You should support your answer with discussion points from the presentation, and from peer-reviewed scholarly articles. Link for video:

Discuss advantages and disadvantages to the five dispute resolution styles. Explore which style you would you favor and report why. Provide an example of a specific healthcare scenario and a specific conflict resolution style you would utilize to address it. Points to consider include: What role does organizational culture play in dispute resolution styles? Describe how the dispute resolution styles differ with Saudi Arabian employees vs. expatriates? Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories, which require supporting citations along with at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed references in support. Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

OVERVIEW For this policy-focused discussion, you will critically assess the current state of Sex Education policy in U.S. Schools and submit a reflection paper. This assignment allows you to demonstrate your understanding of reproductive health issues and your ability to think critically about complex and sensitive topics. Please refer to the course syllabus and the grading rubric for detailed guidance. Purpose and Learning Objectives This assignment supports course objectives by helping you: Stay informed about current policies related to reproductive health Improve written communication by articulating policy perspectives clearly Reflect on personal experiences and values Explore diverse view points on the selected policy issue Engage in meaningful peer dialogue and collaborative learning Apply the Social Ecological Model to real-world policy challenges Develop evidence-based strategies and policy recommendations Assignment Structure Section One: Initial post DUE: Wednesday, June 4, by 11:59 PM MT Write a critical reflection paper (1000-1200 words) addressing the following prompts. You may choose to focus on several, rather than all, depending on the flow of your discussion: Provide background and significance of the policy issue in the U.S. Describe how the policy varies by demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, region) Discuss the best and worst state-level policies from your perspective Compare U.S. policies with those of other countries Analyze your state's current stance and approach Reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of policy implementation Explain how the policy impacts health outcomes, supported by current best practices Identify key topics or components that should be included in the policy Discuss how frequently related-programs should be updated and why Consider the role of parental or community consent Offer recommendations for improving the policy Discuss both sides of the debate and how each supports its position Explore the influence of culture, religion, or politics Include any additional relevant issues or alternative viewpoints Writing guidelines Include at least one discussion question for your peers Support your arguments with recent peer-reviewed sources Use proper numeric citation style (e.g., JAMA)

Patient information is attached Focused Notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Focused Notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care. For this Assignment, you will work with an adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks and complete a Focused Note Template in which you will gather patient information, relevant diagnostic and treatment information, and reflect on health promotion and disease prevention in light of patient factors, such as age, ethnic group, past medical history (PMH), socio-economic status, cultural background, etc. In this week’s Learning Resources, please refer to the Focused Note resources for guidance on writing Focused Notes. Note: All Focused Notes must be signed, and each page must be initialed by your preceptor. When you submit your Focused Notes, you should include the complete Focused Note as a Word document and pdf/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your preceptor. You must submit your Focused Notes using Turnitin. Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, faculty will deduct points per the Walden Late Policies. To prepare:?(SOAP note template and checklist are attached) Review the Focused Note Checklist provided in this week’s Learning Resources and consider how you will develop your Focused Note for this week’s Assignment. Use the Focused SOAP Note Template and the example found in the Learning Resources for this week to complete this Assignment. Select an adolescent patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a Focused Note.? Assignment Subjective: What details did the patient or parent provide regarding the personal and medical history? Include any discrepancies between the details provided by the child and details provided by the parent as well as possible reasons for these discrepancies. Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Include pertinent positive and negative physical exam findings. Describe whether the patient presented with any growth and development or psychosocial issues. Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority and include their ICD-10 code for the diagnosis. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management? Include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Reflection notes: What was your “aha” moment? What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? PRAC_6541_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric PRAC_6541_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization of Write-up 10 to >6.0 ptsExcellentAll information organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format and utilizes expected headings.6 to >3.0 ptsGoodInformation generally organized in logical sequence; follows acceptable format and utilizes expected headings. 3 to >0.0 ptsFairErrors in format; information intermittently organized. Headings are used some of the time.0 ptsPoorErrors in format; information disorganized. Headings are not used appropriately. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness of History 20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentThoroughly documents all pertinent history components for type of note; includes critical as well as supportive information.15 to >11.0 ptsGoodDocuments most pertinent examination components. 11 to >7.0 ptsFairDocuments some pertinent examination components.7 to >0 ptsPoorPhysical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory of Present Illness 10 to >6.0 ptsExcellentThoroughly documents all 8 aspects of HPI and pertinent other data relevant to chief complaint. Includes critical as well as supportive information.6 to >4.0 ptsGoodDocuments at least 6 aspects of the HPI and pertinent other data relevant to chief complaint. Includes critical information. 4 to >2.0 ptsFairDocuments at least 4 aspects of HPI and some data pertinent to chief complaint. Lacks some critical information or rambling in history.2 to >0 ptsPoorMissing many aspects of HPI and pertinent data. Critical information missing. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness of Physical Exam 10 to >7.0 ptsExcellentThoroughly documents all pertinent examination components for type of note.7 to >4.0 ptsGoodDocuments most pertinent examination components. 4 to >2.0 ptsFairDocuments some pertinent examination components.2 to >0 ptsPoorPhysical examination cursory; misses several pertinent components. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostic Reasoning 10 to >7.0 ptsExcellentAssessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes all secondary problems. Cost effective when ordering diagnostic tests.7 to >4.0 ptsGoodAssessment consistent with prior documentation. Clear justification for diagnosis. Notes most secondary problems. 4 to >2.0 ptsFairAssessment mostly consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests.2 to >0 ptsPoorAssessment not consistent with prior documentation. Fails to clearly justify diagnosis or note secondary problems or orders inappropriate diagnostic tests. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTreatment Plan/Patient Education 20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentTreatment plan addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Medications prescribed are appropriate and full prescription is included. Evidence based decisions. Cost effective treatment.15 to >10.0 ptsGoodTreatment plan addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Medications prescribed are appropriate but include 1 or 2 error in writing prescription. 10 to >5.0 ptsFairTreatment plan fails to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Medications are inappropriate or include 3 or more errors in writing prescription.5 to >0 ptsPoorMinimal treatment plan addressed. Medications are inappropriate or poorly written prescription. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Education / Follow Up / Reflection 10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentPatient education addresses all issues raised by diagnoses, excellent insight into patient’s needs. Follow up plan in appropriate and reflects acuity of illness. Reflection is thoughtful and in depth.8 to >5.0 ptsGoodPatient education addresses most issues raised by diagnoses. Follow up plan is appropriate but lacks specifics Reflection is thoughtful and in depth. 5 to >3.0 ptsFairPatient education fails to address most issues raised by diagnoses. Follow up plan is lacking specifics or is inappropriate for patient acuity. Reflection is brief, vague. and does not discuss anything that would have been done in addition to or differently.3 to >0 ptsPoorMinimal patient education addressed. Follow up plan is inappropriate Reflection is absent. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. Professional language utilized 5 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Professional language utilized.4 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains a few errors (1 or 2) in professional language use. 2 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains several errors (3 -4) in professional language use.0 ptsPoorContains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains many errors in professional language use. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly References and Clinical Practice Guidelines. The assignment includes a minimum of 3 scholarly references that are not older than 5 years. Clinical practice guidelines are included if applicable. 5 ptsExcellentContains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references less than 5 years old are listed. Clinical practice guidelines are cited if applicable.4 ptsGoodContains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references less than 5 years old are listed. Clinical practice guidelines are cited if applicable. 2 ptsFairContains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference less than 5 years old is listed. Clinical practice guidelines are not cited if applicable.0 ptsPoorContains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed. Clinical practice guidelines are not cited if applicable. 5 pts Total Points: 100

A. Upload your completed and signed “CPE Record” for evaluation as a separate document. The record should include the following: the date each activity was completed your typed signature verifying that all activities have been completed