Need Help ?

Expert Answers

Youtube Link:  PROMPT: Some consider fair access to health care a moral right ...

Youtube Link:  PROMPT: Some consider fair access to health care a moral right, while others disagree. We have defined the term moral right as "a privilege to act in some specific, intentional manner or to obtain some specific benefit because one is a moral agent living in a community of moral agents under a shared moral standard." Is access to health care a moral right? Why or why not? Remember to respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts with feedback on their opinions and ideas.

READ MORE >>

The textbook is the Bioethics principles, issues and cases. fifth edition.  Di ...

The textbook is the Bioethics principles, issues and cases. fifth edition.  Discussion on  Abortion Your main goal is to demonstate your understanding of the material from Chapter 7 on pages 305-322, the Bioethics principles, issues and cases. fifth edition.  plus the reading "Abortion" by Margaret Olivia Little, pages 364-369.  You should do this by discussing one of the three "Cases for Evaluation" on pages 320-1, or another case of your own choosing. It has to be a case about real people in an actual situation they faced. 700 words One possible source of cases is Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/abortion/ You should apply ideas from the theories to the particular case you discuss.  You should cite all your sources of info. You can bring in some issues from the current political debate about abortion. Nurse Practitioners in NY can have prescription privileges. Discussion on prescription priviledges https://www.op.nysed.gov/professions/nurse-practitioners/professional-practice/prescription-privileges-and-electronic-prescribing So I want you to discuss the moral responsibilities of those who prescribe medications.  These issues include: Is the US becoming a pill-popping culture that does not address the real problems? How should a medic react when a patient demands a medication but the best solution to their problem is eating better and getting more exercise, and the patient is not interested in any change in life style. How much can a medic believe the claims of pharmaceutical companies regarding the safety and efficacy of their new products when there is such a history of manipulation of the scientific results and pressuring of regulatory bodies like the FDA? Do medics adequately discuss the side effects and chance of success of medications with their patients for the patient's choice to be sufficiently informed?  You need to discuss real life cases of moral quandaries that medics and patients face regarding medication. This can include personal experience or the experiences of family and friends. Another source of cases is Reddit. You could try these links: https://www.reddit.com/search/?q=medication https://www.reddit.com/r/PharmacyTechnician/ https://www.reddit.com/r/pharmacy/

READ MORE >>

INSTRUCTIONS: Your term paper should: Discuss the technical aspects of your to ...

INSTRUCTIONS: Your term paper should: Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms. Discuss the public policy debates relevant to the topic you choose. This section should cover arguments that favor and oppose the use of the techniques or products. Express your personal opinion regarding the topic's importance and the validity of the pro and con arguments. Within the personal opinion/conclusion, frame your position with an ethical theory from the six workable theories covered in this course. Your submission must include: A title page The body of the paper, which includes 4–6 content pages, not including title or reference pages At least three references from textbooks, websites, and articles that provide adequate justification and support your claim Subheadings (technical aspects, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion) Appropriate in-text citations throughout the paper A reference list with only the sources used in the body of the paper (All sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a professional journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted.) APA style formatting throughout your paper, using only one of these fonts: 11-point Calibri,11-point Arial,12-point Times New Roman, or 11-point Georgia. PAPER TEMPLATE: Write your introduction. Tell us what the paper is about. Provide a solid paragraph. According to APA 7 rules, you do not need a subtitle for the introduction as it’s obvious your first paragraph is an introduction. Technical Aspects This section should cover the technical aspects of your topic. For example, the technical aspects of abortion would cover what an abortion is and how an abortion is done. Be sure to include in text citations and sources. This section should be technical and should rely heavily on research. Public Policy This section is more historical in nature. Describes current and proposed changes in public policy/law. This section also relies heavily on research because it deals with specific laws and public policy surrounding your topic. Arguments Include a summary of the arguments in favor of and opposed to specific interventions, techniques, or products and a discussion of underlying ethical principles (you must use one of the 6 accepted ethical theories in this part – Kantian Ethics, Care Ethics, Virtue Ethics, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism [not just plain utilitarianism – that is wrong] or Social Contract [one of the 3 versions – Hobbes, Rousseau or Rawls]. Discuss the public policy with two additional argumentative paragraphs- one discussing the in favor of and one paragraph discussing the opposing argument. Pro Arguments This section includes a summary of the arguments in favor of specific interventions, techniques, or products involved in our topic and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. Use the textbook and class material to provide the connection to underlying ethical principles. Tying these arguments into the ethical perspectives covered in Week 1 of the course is very important. Con Arguments This section includes a summary of the arguments in favor of specific interventions, techniques, or products involved in our topic and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. Use the textbook and class material to provide the connection to underlying ethical principles. Tying these arguments into the ethical perspectives covered in Week 1 of the course is very important. Conclusion This section is where you express your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the strength of the pro and con arguments. This is where your own thoughts reign supreme. Where do you stand after conducting research on the topic? Did your opinions change over the course of the research? While you don’t necessarily need to refer to research here, supporting your opinion with credible sources (proving you have made an informed opinion) is best. 

READ MORE >>

1) In your own words, explain the two formulas inside Kant's Categorical Imperat ...

1) In your own words, explain the two formulas inside Kant's Categorical Imperative. 2) What makes the Categorical Imperative special or not in your opinion? 3) Apply Kant's moral philosophy to a moment in your life where you or someone you know behaved wrong/immoral. 4) How can these two formulas help you recognize what was right and what was wrong in that scenario?

READ MORE >>

Write me 4 discussion posts for each topic here, 300-500 words for each one depe ...

Write me 4 discussion posts for each topic here, 300-500 words for each one depending on many questions each one has. make sure to thoroughly read the assigned reading for each one.  .However, What I am looking for in the case of each of your submissions is a reasonable and honest effort informed by the reading(s). That is, don’t simply give me your opinions. Please give me the considered and sincere opinions you form only after looking at the pertinent readings and thinking about them in light of the discussion questions.)

READ MORE >>

PHL-282: Ethics Getting Started Consider the following catalog of social dilem ...

PHL-282: Ethics Getting Started Consider the following catalog of social dilemmas. Fortunately, you need not reinvent the wheel as you develop your ethical views in these areas. Many books and internet resources are available to help you reflect on these social dilemmas. Issues of Life and Death Animals and Environment Euthanasia Abortion War and Violence Political Relationships Justice and Economic Distribution Welfare Disobedience, Punishment, Law Personal Relationship Sex, Love, Marriage Parents and Children This outline comes from an ethics textbook, edited by John Arthur, entitled, Morality and Moral Controversies (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1998). Arthur has found a helpful way of organizing these issues, but the topics themselves are not unique to Arthur’s volume. They are the central social dilemmas of our day. During this workshop, see if you can develop your understanding of these issues. In relation to these issues, what opinions have you previously formed? Reevaluate the positions you have held. Do any of them need modification? Issues of Life and Death These issues make headlines today. For example, what rights do animals have? Loggers in the Northwest sometimes lose their jobs when the government hinders them from clearing land that harbors an endangered species. Dumping untreated or under-treated waste material directly into the ocean saves coastal communities millions of dollars in taxes, but kills more and more marine life. Scientists use animals to test the effectiveness of new medicines intended for humans, but these experiments sometimes result in great suffering and death for the animals. Should any of these practices be allowed? What is right and what is wrong in these areas? What rights do unborn human beings have? What rights do pregnant women have? What happens when these rights conflict? The great abortion debates of past decades have wearied most of us to the point of apathy. Yet how can anyone feel apathetic about daily destruction of thousands of unborn babies? If abortion involves, as many people believe, the taking of an innocent human life, then the scale of murder staggers the imagination. If it is not, then at the very least, many women experience post abortion emotional and spiritual wounds. Do adults have the right to end their own lives? Should a terminally ill person experiencing overwhelming pain be forced to continue enduring that pain? In such cases, should we allow euthanasia or assisted suicide? What is right and what is wrong here? Is there such a thing as a good war? Many Americans feel George W. Bush did the right thing in toppling Saddam Hussein, the dictator in Iraq. But was this military action a just war? Was it fought for appropriate reasons? How should American leaders decide which cruel dictators they should overthrow? Or in which African civil wars should they intervene? Can war be seen as a good thing, or even as the best option in a particular situation? What is right and what is wrong? The links below give you a chance to further explore these issues. Animals and the Environment http://www.fef.ca/ http://www.ewg.org/ http://envirolink.org/orgs/index.html http://www.cep.unt.edu/ Euthanasia http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/ War and Violence http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE10.HTM Political Relationships American state and federal governments frequently attempt to establish new and hopefully fairer welfare systems. Many Americans do not like giving tax money to people who cannot or will not earn enough to support themselves and their families. Others see legitimate instances in which people should receive a helping hand from government funds. But even people in the latter group are not convinced that any particular system works the way it should. Most European residents, as well as people in many of the world’s countries, hold a more generous view on sharing economic resources. Governments of many countries provide for their citizens broader sets of services and benefits (than in the U.S.), believing that to do anything but this would be immoral. What is right and what is wrong? Americans cherish our liberties. We often believe ourselves to possess the greatest freedom on earth. Yet, we have always restricted liberty for some people and in some circumstances. Where does liberty end? What kinds of statements should we be free to make? How do we decide what activity our governments should allow or forbid? These are not easy questions to answer. Nearly all these questions involve ethical issues: what is right and wrong? Courts give death sentences to American citizens. These sentences are carried out in prisons not that far from you. Our national Constitution forbids “cruel and unusual punishment.” Take a survey and you will find many who feel the Constitution forbids capital punishment. Others feel it is wrong to allow murderers to live out their lives. And yet, people are being given death sentences and executed in our prisons. . What is right and what is wrong? What about the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes? What about legalization for the purposes of pure relaxation? The following links give you opportunity to explore these questions further. Justice and Economic Distribution http:/wordwiz72.com/econ.html http://hughlafollette.com/eip3/Economic.Justice.htm http://allaboutworldview.org/christian-economics-and-social-justice-faq.htm Welfare http://publicwelfare.org/ Personal Relationships Personal relationships are fraught with ethical issues, including: Sexual preferences, Free love, and alternative lifestyles. The decades have brought many such issues of personal ethics to the forefront of consciousness. What is right and what is wrong in these areas? A few years ago a Swedish couple visited a cafe in New York City. In Sweden, parents leave their babies to bask safely in the sun in their carriages while they go inside to shop. Following their national custom, these parents left their baby in a carriage on the sidewalk while they enjoyed a restaurant meal. In this case, the infant was taken from the parents. The authorities wanted time to decide if this couple was fit to be parents. At the same time, state and county social welfare departments cannot keep up with thousands of children who grow up in abusive and dreadfully dysfunctional homes. What is right and what is wrong here? Gender, Race and Multiculturalism Not long ago the Ku Klux Klan held a demonstration on a courthouse lawn on a Midwestern county seat. Marchers carried signs and offered speeches advocating hatred and discrimination based on race. Some bystanders supported Klan members. Others denounced them. Should people have the right to advocate hatred of fellow American citizens? Is this the meaning of free speech? These are ethical questions. What is right and what is wrong? Many women know the meaning of the glass ceiling. Even more know the reality of being paid less than their male colleagues. What is the meaning of sexual equality and should it be protected by law? Should we be able to discriminate against people because of their gender, their race, their religion, or their nationality? These too are ethical questions. What is right and what is wrong? Resources Textbook: Moral choices: An introduction to ethics Background Information Here are sites that can aid your understanding of Kant. http://www.hkbu.edu.hk/~ppp/Kant.html http://comp.uark.edu/~rlee/semiau96/kantlink.html Instructions Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. Read pages 77-81 of Moral Choices, Scott Rae describes the system Immanuel Kant developed. Kant believed in the existence of God, but wanted to establish an ethical system people of any religious persuasion (or even atheists) could use. Kant's thinking, known as ethical rationalism, has significantly influenced modern western culture. Respond to the following questions: Is there anything about this ethical system that you do not understand? To what degree do you believe that reason alone can guide ethical discussions? Explain your thinking. Kant placed great emphasis on acting on the basis of what we feel we should (feel obligated to) do. How often and under what circumstances do you act out of duty? How might you be able to use elements of Kant’s system in your life? What practical applications do you feel this system offers? Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop. Read and respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts, as well as all instructor follow-up questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop. Your postings should also: Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking. Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas. Provide clarification to classmates’ questions and insight into the discussion. You can also access the discussion forum by using the Activities button.

READ MORE >>

PHL-282: Ethics esources Textbook: Moral choices: An introduction to ethics In ...

PHL-282: Ethics esources Textbook: Moral choices: An introduction to ethics Instructions Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. Read pages 247-269 in Moral Choices, a chapter discussing the ethical issues relating to capital punishment (execution of criminals). Respond to the following questions: How might a person holding a Kantian ethical philosophy view of capital punishment? (Again, remember that two people holding Kantian ethics might reach two different opinions on this question.) Based on your current ethical reasoning, how do you view the morality of capital punishment? What is the rationale behind your position? How do your views (and the reasoning behind them) compare and contrast with a person holding Kantian ethics. How do we recognize the best ethical position on capital punishment? Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop. Read and respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts, as well as all instructor follow-up questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop. Your postings should also: Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking. Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas. Provide clarification to classmates’ questions and insight into the discussion. You can also access the discussion forum by using the Activities button.

READ MORE >>

2. Can a society exist without laws? and I will be using John Stuart Mill and Jo ...

2. Can a society exist without laws? and I will be using John Stuart Mill and John Rawls.

READ MORE >>

1.    Explain and use your own example (not Spelman’s dog and wrecking ball ...

1.    Explain and use your own example (not Spelman’s dog and wrecking ball example) why unnecessarily risky acts are always wrong. 2.    Explain why anthropogenic climate change is a moral issue. 3.    Make an argument for one of Spelman’s three imperatives (reduce greenhouse gas emissions, offset our remaining emissions, and advocate for climate-friendly policies and politicians.) using consequentialist reasoning. 

READ MORE >>

Write an essay Essay should discuss at least one piece of scholarship that I upl ...

Write an essay Essay should discuss at least one piece of scholarship that I upload on the topic discussed in essay. Topic:According to Kant, reason is the source of morality. According to Hume, by contrast, the source of morality is sentiment. Explain why each of these philosophers holds the view that they advance. Which position, if either, is correct?

READ MORE >>
QUICK ORDER

Place a Quick Order

Our verified writers got you covered. Let us help you balance between studies, work, and family.

We provide our assistance to the numerous clients looking for a professional writing service.

Order Now
Designed and developed by Brian Mubichi (mubix)
WhatsApp