Expert Answers

All details are attached. The first week is already overdue so you need to work on things starting from week 2 so need to work on things from week 2-week 12, so please put 77 days, if you want to get bid selected. Complete details are in the attachment  Assignments, Descriptions and Values Weekly Posts: Every week inquirers are expected to post a response to the provided readings. On top of this, inquirers should respond to at least two other posts by other inquirers. These secondary posts should either aim to address questions brought up, attempt to clarify, or attempt to further develop the conversation. Philosophy requires dialogue, the best way to do this is to talk amongst yourselves. The initial response, and the replies, should both endeavor to use the Good Thinker’s Toolkit. If I can see what is troubling you, then I can address it via audio- lecture or a response of my own. Midterm Paper The midterm paper asks inquirers to compare two different philosophical viewpoints on a subject (to be determined), and then formulate their own opinion on the topic. Ultimately, this paper is judged on two fronts: knowledge of the two separate philosophies, and implementation of critical thinking in arguing for one’s own belief. Final Paper  The final paper topic will be posted in depth closer to the end of class. However, it should be noted that this paper will provide several options. This way one can write about a topic that interests them.

Put the following argument in standard form. Identify the form of the argument; evaluate whether the premises are true or false; and then decide if it is valid, and explain why or why not. If you want to live a better life, then you should spend time in nature. But, you have to work all the time, so you can’t spend time in nature. Therefore, you shouldn’t work all the time.

The outline is attached in the attachment. The OUTILNE FORM: You well need to follow EXACTLY the outline form required by the College. [See below] Introduction: To “get attention” [see the outline form from the College] you should use one of the three methods of introduction covered in the course. The main body will be four sections and answer these questions for those who view your video: What about this person’s life is heroic? Consider that some achieving people came from poor backgrounds and were able to become hugely successful. Also consider that people achieve heroic greatness by great personal sacrifices and effort. What is this person’s flaw? Remember a flaw is an aspect of character. Drug or alcohol abuse is not a flaw. Why someone abuses these things is a flaw. What is the hero’s downfall? How was his or her life when things were good? What are the details of the downfall? What was the tragic end? Did the hero have recognition? In public? Private? If not, you may consider the recognition of others who knew the hero. These sections must conform to the “FORMAL” outline form as specified by the College. [IT IS ATTACHED]. Each of the four sections mentioned above is a Key Idea. Simply copy the form from the College and substitute your ideas for the words in blue. The form must be EXACTLY the way the College requires it to be and will be passed in separately. You will also need a speaking outline. See the examples in the file on the forms of speaking outlines from the College. I would use the “single sheet” method.

Purpose The most common assignment in college classes is the research paper. Research papers tend to fall into two categories—the argumentative and the informational. In this class, we will practice putting together a research paper that is more informational in nature. Its main goal is to practice assembling sources in a way that adequately explores a research question from various sides but does not (necessarily) take a strong stance on the “correct” answer. The paper can lean in certain directions if that is where the scholarly conversation leans, but it is not necessarily trying to persuade the audience of one specific point of view. The point of the paper is to assemble a scholarly conversation around a research question and then synthesize possible answers to the research question. The ILR course itself takes you through the necessary steps to create this final paper.  In summary, the steps you will have gone through are as follows: Identify and narrow a research question. Find and evaluate sources. Summarize sources in an annotated bibliography. Write a rough draft. Revise a rough draft and proofread. Task Compose a 1000-word essay in APA citation style (you may use MLA if you are an English major) that presents and then attempts to answer your research question. You must use a minimum of five cited sources. Three must be from peer-reviewed academic journals. Popular sources, including magazine articles, newspapers, secondary scholarly summaries of topics, or government or institutional literature may be allowed if deemed appropriate as per the lessons on source evaluation and rhetorical needs of the paper. Cite your sources on a standard format APA reference page. If you are an English major, MLA will be allowed with permission from instructor. Submit your essay as a Word document, .pdf file, or a .rtf only. Please do not use Pages or any type of image file. Topic You will have the freedom to choose your own topic for this research essay. There are, however, some topics that are not allowed. Any of the topics from ENG102. To remind you, the current topics from ENG102 are Bail Reform, Homework, Communication in Relationships, Ocean Pollution, The War in Ukraine, Homework (is it necessary), Nursing Burnout, and Self-Driving Cars. Under no circumstances may you choose one of these subjects. Whatever subject you wrote on for ENG240. Any paper you wrote for another class at NU or another university. See a pattern? We want a new paper. It is important to note that the papers you wrote in ENG102 and ENG240 are argumentative in nature, so they would not fit this assignment anyway.

Length Requirement: Main post, 200 words minimum. Replies to two classmates, 50 words minimum (each). Points: 10 Peer Responses Due: Respond to two classmates by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. PST. Purpose It is important to understand that research is a “recursive” process. This means that we often have to do the process several times or go back in steps to make progress. Task Review The Research Cycle graphic. In 200 words minimum, please reflect on the research process wheel. If this is one of your first classes, what did you learn going around the wheel for the first time? If you have research experience, what advice could you give your fellow students about the research process

HANDOUTS  Persuasive Speech (problem/cause/solution example) I: Introduction Attention Getter  What is the significance of your topic? Thesis Preview of Points  Transition Sentence: (i.e. “So before we talk about the why “this problem” is occurring or what we can do to stop it, it’s important to understand “the problem” more in depth.) II: Background on the problem (here are things you can consider talking about, but it is not limited to them.) Who is the problem hurting? Restate thesis in a new light Clincher (Easy clincher: bring back your attention getter) B)What is the problem doing? Where is it occurring? Transition Sentence: (i.e. “Now that we know a little about [the problem I am speaking about], it is important to understand why [this problem is occurring].”) III: Cause of the problem (You can do this in several ways, below are just some  Things to consider. You basically want to explain the underlying things that created the problem so that we can better understand why it is a problem and who to blame [if anyone]) How did this problem come about? Who is responsible for the problem? When did it start? Why is this problem persisting? Why hasn’t something already been done to stop this? If something has been done, why is it not being enforced? Transition Sentence: (i.e. I could go on all day telling you about [the problem], but if I don’t tell you what YOU can do to solve it, then what’s the point of this speech? IV: Solutions/Call to action What is being done? What needs to be done? Why is this solution feasible? What problems could get in the way of this solution being implemented? What can we do to help? Transition Sentence: (This final sentence is much more dependant on the topic of the speech itself, so you’re on your own for this one.) V: Conclusion

FInal assignment - instructions Read the article "The Monsanto Papers: Poisoning the scientific well" + "The Monsanto case" presentation (both attached to the instructions posted on Moodle). Based on the article and the materials in the presentation: 1.       Identify the strategies and tactics used by Monsanto-Bayer to influence public opinion, media coverage and policy-making regarding the safety of their product – Roundup (glyphosate) in order to deal with the crisis posed by the IARC decision. A. What were the source strategies used – and through which tactics were they implemented? (20 points) B. What were the message strategies used – and through which tactics were they implemented? (20 points) C. Consider Aristotle's three approaches to designing compelling messages, and explain which of Aristotle's approaches fit these strategies, and why? (5 points). D.      According to Grunig and Hunt's 4 models of public relations: Which ethical model (Grunig and Hunt's models) do you think the strategies and tactics you found represent, and why? (5 points). 2.      Relate to the article "Media influence on Herceptin subsidization in Australia: application of the rule of rescue" (MacKenzie et al., 2008), and the introduction to the article "Health News Agenda Building: Journalists' Perceptions of the Role of Public Relations" (Len-Ríos et al., 2009). Based on the articles and the class presentation on this topic:   A. How would a researcher from the Agenda Setting theory relate to the media coverage described in this study? Explain and elaborate on the theory  B. How would a researcher from the Agenda Building theory relate to this coverage? Explain and elaborate on the theory 

1. Demonstrate your completion of the reading by concisely summarizing the main content. 2. Show your accurate understanding of key concepts and ideas from the reading materials using your own words. 3. Critically evaluate these concepts and ideas with reasoning and/or specific examples. 4. Demonstrate your appropriate application of key concepts and ideas from the reading materials using specific examples.

Instructions Post your initial answers to the questions no later than Wednesday (this week - week 1 of this module). Your answer should be thorough and supported by the readings and instructional materials presented. You should cite any resources you use to help answer these questions in a formal (APA) manner (but the use of other sources is not required). This is a graded assignment and therefore you should use professional writing standards. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization will all be counted as a part of your final grade on this assignment. To adequately answer the questions, you should be aiming for approximately 500 words. Respond to three (3) of your classmates' posts by Sunday at 10pm Central (this week - week 1 of this module). Your responses should be more than "I agree" or "I disagree." You should provide an in-depth reason for your statements that further the conversation by either expounding on the topic with additional information from the materials or your own research or providing specific examples explaining how they connect to the discussion at hand. To adequately further the conversation, you should be aiming for at least 100 words for each response. Module 7: Overview (1 of 8) Module 7: At a Glance (2 of 8) Module 7: Instructional Resources (3 of 8) Current Discussion: Module 7: Discussion (4 of 8) Extra Credit #3, Assignment (5 of 8) Module 7: Assignment - Paper (6 of 8) Module 7: Quiz (7 of 8)

Write a blog post following these instructions and respond to this blog.  Instructions:  The pandemic and it's consequences- as well as the Black Lives Matter protests- have shown everyone that racial discrimination and prejudice have multiple impacts on the lift chances of people of color in America. What are some of the ways this happens in America? Why does it continue to happen? How is racism related to the corona virus pandemic? Policing in America? What needs to be done to make changes so there is a more equal and fair social structure? Kamala Harris is now the first black woman  candidate for President- based on what we know about race and gender in America- how do you think these factors might impact the election? Blog Post to respond to: Racial discrimination impacts life chances in a couple of approaches. In healthcare, humans of color often obtain inferior medical remedies as compared to white people. Studies have shown that Black and Hispanic sufferers are much less likely to receive necessary treatments and more likely to stand delays in receiving care. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated those disparities, as Black and Hispanic groups skilled higher infection and mortality charges due to pre-current health conditions, loss of entry to great healthcare, and employment in vital however excessive-threat jobs. In the exertions marketplace, racial discrimination manifests via higher unemployment rates, decreased wages, and limited possibilities for career advancement for human beings of color. Educational inequalities are pushed through factors inclusive of underfunded faculties in predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, in addition to limiting financial mobility and perpetuating the cycle of poverty. Persistence of Racism Racism continues to persist in America due to an aggregate of historic, social, and structural elements. The legacy of slavery and segregation has ingrained racial biases deeply into the fabric of American society. Institutional racism, which entails guidelines and practices that systematically downside people of shade, stays widely widespread in numerous sectors, including the crook justice system, housing, education, and employment. Additionally, implicit biases, or subconscious negative attitudes towards certain racial groups, perpetuate discriminatory behaviors even among people who do now not consciously preserve racist ideals. These biases influence selections in hiring, law enforcement, healthcare, and lots of different areas, contributing to ongoing disparities. Racism and the COVID-19 Pandemic The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the intersection of racism and public fitness. People of coloration have been disproportionately laid low with the virus because of underlying fitness disparities, crowded living conditions, and frontline jobs that multiplied publicity to the virus. The financial fallout from the pandemic additionally hit these communities harder, with better costs of process loss and monetary instability. Furthermore, vaccine distribution initially desired wealthier, predominantly white regions, leaving many groups of color with restricted access. This inequity in healthcare responses deepened the mistrust in scientific institutions that many human beings of color already harbored due to ancient abuses and ongoing discrimination. Policing in America The BLM protests added national interest to the issue of policing and racial violence. Police brutality disproportionately impacts Black individuals, who are much more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested, and subjected to pressure than their white counterparts. High-profile instances of police killings, together with the ones of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, sparked sizeable outrage and required systemic reform. Racial profiling and discriminatory policing practices are products of explicit racial prejudices and implicit biases inside law enforcement. These practices undermine acceptance as true within the police amongst groups of coloration and perpetuate a cycle of fear and violence. Kamala Harris's candidacy reflects both progress and ongoing demanding situations within the political panorama. Her race and gender may additionally appeal to voters who searching for greater illustration and equality, but they will additionally face resistance from individuals who hold prejudiced perspectives. Historically, candidates of shade and ladies have encountered extra scrutiny and bias, that could affect public belief and media coverage. Harris's campaign could impress support among citizens who prioritize racial and gender equity, potentially growing voter turnout among marginalized communities. However, she may additionally need to navigate stereotypes and double standards that often disadvantage women and those of color in politics.