Expert Answers

The final exam will be held Tuesday, July 30th from 3:00pm to 4:30pm. You will receive questions at 3:00 pm, and your responses will be due by 4:30 pm. Instructions will be posted here, though I will also share them in Discord during the last week of class. Instructions This exam consists of five sections, each named for a unit of the course. Answer two (2) of the three questions in each section with a 3-4 sentence response. Each response is worth 4 points. (You will answer 10 questions – again, two from each section – for a maximum of 40 points.) Do not quote the readings, though paraphrasing and summarizing may be useful. When paraphrasing or summarizing, refer to author surnames. You do not need to include page numbers or full references. For example, you might write “As DeSantis argued,” “Scheibel did X while DeSantis did Y,” or “For example, Scheibel explored…”. Here’s the rubric I’ll use to grade each question: 4 A Excellent. Answer is as complete as possible (for 3-4 sentences), directly responds to (each part of) the question, demonstrates mastery of the course content (i.e., you’ve done the readings, listened in class, and thought through the key concepts), and is well-written: concise, reasoned, and grammatically correct. 3 B Good. As above, though lacking in completeness, demonstrated knowledge, or writing. A concrete and well-written answer that misses part of the question might earn this grade. 2 C Average. As above, but lacking in two respects. This response might have all the right ideas, but the writing may be confusing and miss part of the question. Failing to invoke the relevant concepts or offering poorly-fitting examples may result in this grade. C work is often the realm of AI responses: not necessarily wrong, but certainly disconnected from our conversations in the course. 1 D Poor. Lacking in multiple respects, confusing, and/or incomplete. Your responses will be graded for Completeness: Does your response directly answer each part of the question? Knowledge: Does your response clearly show you have read and understood the lesson content by correctly mobilizing key concepts and arguments? Have you made inferences based on this knowledge to personal or contemporary applications? Writing: Do you write clearly, in complete sentences, with minimal errors in grammar and spelling?

Discussion Topic For this discussion board post please answer the following: 1) In your own words, explain the two formulas inside Kant's Categorical Imperative. 2) What makes the Categorical Imperative special or not in your opinion? 3) Apply Kant's moral philosophy to a moment in your life where you or someone you know behaved wrong/immoral. 4) How can these two formulas help you recognize what was right and what was wrong in that scenario?

Turnitin Assignment Content EthicsPHI 1600Second Written AssignmentDeontology Read Chapter 6, watch the Week 6 Lecture, and pick a movie. Apply Kant's moral philosophy to judge the MAIN action of the movie you chose. I highly recommend the movies: Gone Baby Gone and Sleepers, but you can select any other movie. Please make sure the movie you picked displays a strong moral dilemma. Identify the moral dilemma at the beginning of your paper. You must apply Kant's 3 premises (week 6 folder) for 50 points and Michael Sandel's 3 contrasts (Week 6 Folder Lecture: Mind your Motive) for 50 points. The paper must have at least 500 words and be in MLA or APA format.

Begin your paper with a 150-word (maximum) summary of the actions Google took in China in 2006, 2010, and 2012. Note: this summary should describe briefly what happened, not explain why. Your paper should continue with an analysis of Google’s actions. It must address the following topics. Use headings for each section – do not include the text of the questions. (1) Who were the four most important stakeholders that Google top management needed to consider in their decision making about whether or not to expand into China? Explain why each stakeholder group is important and describe what each might expect from Google top management. (2) From an ethical perspective, did Google make the right choice initially in 2006 – to launch Google.cn and censor the search results? Why or why not? Explain your reasoning. Be specific. How did Google management communicate its decision? Do you think this was effective? Why or why not? Be specific. (3) From an ethical perspective, did Google make the right choice in responding to what happened in 2010? Why or why not? Explain your reasoning. Be specific. How did Google management communicate its decision? Do you think this was effective? Why or why not? Be specific. (4) From an ethical perspective, did Google make the right choice in June 2012 – by adding a new feature to searches going through its Chinese-language site in Hong Kong? Why or why not? Explain your reasoning. Be specific. How did Google management communicate its decision? Do you think this was effective? Why or why not? Be specific.

Watch the following Mary Fisher videos, and then address the items under the videos in your posts. Library Video: Mary Fisher: Background and Accomplishments Running Time: 1:58 minutes Library Video: Mary Fisher: 1996 AIDS Speech to the Republican National Committee Running Time: 6:22 minutes After watching these videos, answer the following questions in your initial discussion post. What was your perception of Mary Fisher before she started speaking? How did that perception change after she talked about her condition? What type of listening did you use while watching the video? Was there anything within the video that was a barrier for you? What, if anything, did you do to combat that barrier?

Full Discussion Question: Why might a researcher choose qualitative over quantitative sampling? What qualities of the one chosen are more beneficial than the other, if at all?

Prepare a response for each of the six study guide questions. Each question must be answered with 250-300 words (per question). Make sure to write as clearly and specifically as possible. Using your own words. Include one scholarly source for each essay question in addition to the textbook. There should be at least a total of 6 sources not including the textbook. Book Sources: Read Part 3 and Part 4 in The Story of Ethics: Fulfilling Our Human Nature. Know the strengths and weaknesses of both Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism and be able to argue in support of (or opposition to) either, including personal or historical examples to back your conclusions. Be prepared to articulate both the strengths and weaknesses of Divine Command Theory and to argue either for or against DCT in connection with making ethical decisions. Know the ethical theory of Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche, being capable of describing background and contextual factors shaping their worldviews and ethical thinking, and the influence of their thought on subsequent ethical thinking and morality. Be capable of articulating the ethical theories of Hobbes, Hume, and Kant, paying special attention to morality and justice matters, plus the contextual/background factors that shaped their theories. Be able to say why you agree or disagree with each of their views, giving a current-day instance to support your claims. Know the thinking and key thinkers comprising rationalism and empiricism, being able to compare and contrast these knowledge theories, particularly regarding their approaches to ethics (whether Christian-oriented or otherwise) and the far-reaching impact on the liberal arts and Western world. Know in detail Kierkegaard’s “Three Stages on Life’s Way.” Be capable of giving a present-day illustration representing each stage, as well as an assessment of the ethical “journey” as set forth by Kierkegaard.

now i need a good persuasive speech so i can present. i need something like speech but something simple so it will be easy to memorize and talk about it in front of the camera but it has to be persuasive speech?

Full Discussion Question: Different views concerning human nature influence ethical thinking, morality, and justice. Based on your readings, what are the particular beliefs about human nature that differentiate the ethical theories of Thomas Hobbes, David Hume, and Immanuel Kant? How might you illustrate each perspective? the discussion question.  Please include and cite at least one source.  This is an Ethical Thinking in the Liberal Arts course.  PHI-305 is the course.  Book Reference: Read Part 3 and Part 4 in The Story of Ethics: Fulfilling Our Human Nature.

hi there this is a communications class on Big Data and Society specifically COMS 2200. this is a discussion activity that you will answer based on the instructions below. - Want to know more about who is involved in data-driven campaigning? Tactical Tech maintains a list of companies that harvest and work with personal data to support political clients. Have a look at their list: https://ourdataourselves.tacticaltech.org/posts/wh... - An interesting news story from 2017 that exposes some of the ways that politicians use bots on social media to influence voter perspectives. It includes an early example of machine learning for political satire: Activity: Tactical Tech is a Berlin-based NGO that researches how personal data is used by various actors to achieve political influence. They have created a Data Detox Kit that teaches people how to take control of their digital data. https://datadetoxkit.org/en/home/ Read through the steps of the digital detox kit. Which of these steps do you already do? Which don't you do? Based on what you learned this week, will you change how you use social media or do more to control your data traces? Why or why not?