Expert Answers

Write a paper addressing the following prompts. Each prompt does not need to be answered separately, just as long as they are addressed within the body of your paper. Briefly describe and differentiate between "Traditional" Medicare and Medicare Advantage (MA)? Which of these two types of Medicare insurance are more highly associated with the use of prior authorizations (PA)? Explain what are PAs? What is the purpose of PAs? Why do insurers believe PAs are necessary? What concerns with delays and barriers are associated with the use of PAs? In your opinion, discuss 2-3 potential implications of the use of PAs on medical decision-making and health outcomes? Provide examples.

Consider how neurocognitive impairments may have similar presentations to other psychological disorders. Review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. Select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind. Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient. Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient. Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.Incorporate the following into your responses in the template: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?? Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over??Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.) VIDEOS https://video-alexanderstreet-com.eu1.proxy.openat... https://video-alexanderstreet-com.eu1.proxy.openat... .NRNP_6635_Week10_Assignment_Rubric NRNP_6635_Week10_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate documentation in the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template about the patient you selected. In the Subjective section, provide: • Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Past psychiatric history• Medication trials and current medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history• Allergies• ROS 20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response throughly and accurately describes the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. 15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response describes the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. 13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or, subjective documentation is missing. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn the Objective section, provide:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses. 20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately documents the patient's physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented. 15 to >13.0 ptsFairDocumentation of the patient's physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies. 13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient's physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or, objective documentation is missing. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn the Assessment section, provide: • Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form. • At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. 25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.... Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.... Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy.... Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vaguess or innacuracy. 17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or, assessment documentation is missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.). 10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentReflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. 8 to >7.0 ptsGoodReflections demonstrate critical thinking. 7 to >6.0 ptsFairReflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. 6 to >0 ptsPoorReflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). 15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making. 13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. 11 to >10.0 ptsFairThree evidence-based resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification. 10 to >0 ptsPoorTwo or fewer resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph development and organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation 5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (? five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding 5 pts Total Points: 100

Write 1-2-page(s) essay not less than 200 words and maximum of 500 words excluding references with a font of Times New Roman and size of 12. The line spacing should be 1.5. Heading should be Bold and text color should be Black Avoid Plagiarism Assignments must be submitted with the filled Cover Page (Students information should be filled on the first page of the document) Assignments must carry at least two up to date references using APA style. Please see below web link about how to cite APA reference style. Click or tap to follow the link: https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/apaquickguide/intext. This assignment must be submitted on time by the end of Week-12, i.e., Saturday, 23 November 2024 at 11:59 pm.

Top-down (brain-based/psychotherapeutic) therapies and bottom-up (body-based) interventions are used for treatment of various psychiatric mental health conditions. For this discussion you have an opportunity to compare and contrast top-down and bottom-up approaches for the treatment of trauma and substance use disorders. Complete this discussion by addressing the following questions: What is the difference between top-down and bottom-up therapeutic approaches? What top-down therapies are used for trauma. What top-down therapies are used for substance use disorders? What bottom-up interventions are used for trauma? What bottom-up approaches are used for substance use disorders? Why is it important to include both approaches for the treatment of trauma and substance use disorders?

Complete the concept map below, differentiating the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnostics for right and left-sided heart failure on the diagram provided. FOR A PEDIATRIC As the RN caring for a pediatric with heart failure, how would you evaluate the client’s physical assessment findings to determine if the client was experiencing left-sided heart failure, right-sided heart failure, or bi-ventricular failure? What key features of the assessment would be the nurse’s priority? Once you have completed the concept map, utilize it to answer one (1) of the following discussion questions based on your assigned group. Be sure to upload your concept map to your discussion post.

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. General Instructions This week, you will discuss how the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) impacts quality and safety. Include the following sections: Application?of?Course?Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Describe one practice area in which MIPS could be used to improve the quality of care related to your anticipated future practice setting. Do not discuss your current practice setting. Discuss two ways MIPS could positively impact the practice area. Describe the role of MIPS in supporting the financial viability of healthcare providers and organizations and client health outcomes. Examine how advanced practice nurses can contribute to the development and refinement of MIPS quality measures to ensure that they are valid, reliable, and meaningful for clients and providers. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site.: Cite a scholarly source in the initial post. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

Create an original presentation with speaker notes. You will not be presenting your PowerPoint to the online class, you are only required to research, write, and submit the presentation. Here are the detailed requirements: Use a total of 6 references for your presentation: 3 peer-reviewed and 3 credible resources. Include data from at least 3 peer-reviewed articles (primary research). You can obtain your articles from the NU Library. Provide at least 3 other credible resources. Do NOT use Wikipedia, Blogs, Encyclopedia, or other non-credible sources -- these will not count towards your 6 references. Make a PowerPoint with bullet points of concepts and information obtained from your research. Your PowerPoint should contain at least 12 slides of information, plus a title slide and a reference slide (in APA format). The title and reference slides do not count in your required minimum of 12 slides. Write your talk in the note section of the PowerPoint. These notes should contain details from your research and not just general information. The notes should be in your own words and not a copy/paste from your research. This video will show you how to make speaker notes in your PowerPoint: Your presentation will go through a plagiarism checker (Turnitin) when submitted in Brightspace. Do NOT plagiarize (including self-plagiarism). This will result in zero points. rubric Criteria Not yet proficient Proficient Highly proficient Criterion Score Formatting 0 points The presentation does not comply with the slide number and notes requirement. 2 points The presentation partially complies with the slide number and notes requirement. 4 points Presentation contains the required number and types of slides and has presenter notes. Score of Formatting, / 4 References 1 point The references and their formatting do not comply with the requirements and are insufficient for the content presented. 3 points Some of the reference requirements or formatting may be subpar, but overall, the references used partially comply with the requirements. 4 points The presentation includes 3 peer reviewed and 3 additional credible sources, which are APA formatted. Score of References, / 4 Content and research 2 points The presentation present factually incorrect data, and/or the information presented is not supported by the evidence and examples. 5 points The presentation's content is only partially supported by the evidence and examples provided. 8 points The presentation is factually correct and makes a clear point (key concepts). Each information is supported by sufficient evidence and examples that support the topic. Score of Content and research, / 8 Organization and structure 1 point The presentation is disorganized, does not include graphics, and does not flow well. 2 points The presentation could be improved regarding organization, use of graphics, and flow. 3 points The presentation is well-organized, clear, and effectively structured. Points flow in logical order. The presentation included figure and graphs from peer-reviewed and credible resources. Score of Organization and structure, / 3 Notes 1 point The notes are clearly plagiarized. 2 points The notes are incomplete, and only partially add to the presentation in details and concepts. 4 points The notes are original and elaborate on key concepts and add details, showing mastery of the subject. Score of Notes, / 4 Visual Impact and Delivery 0 points The presentation is unprofessional, has major spelling/grammar errors, or lack of labeling that makes it difficult to follow. 1 point The presentation partially complies with the requirements regarding style, clarity, labeling, grammar, and spelling. 2 points Slide design is attractive and professional. No grammar or spelling errors that could be distracting. Bullet points are clear and concise. All slides have a title, and pictures, figures, and graphs are clearly labeled. Score of Visual Impact and Delivery, / 2

Select a topic that is related to healthcare, in a meta-analysis (literature review manner) and provide 3 questions that this dissertation will answer, provide title, population, and/or disease. 

APA STYLE STUDENT PAPER AND TABLE 2 Page Minimum (total including the exercise plan chart) Double Spaced Times New Roman, 12 pt. Font Sections: Title Page, Main Body, Reference In-Text Citations -Provide if necessary TABLE/CHART GUIDELINES Label table with Arabic numeral Provide a brief, but clear title Label and Title should be flush left and single-spaced above the table Information in the table/chart should be flush left in the cell or column

Discuss how you would apply coaching in the healthcare work environment. How might a coaching leadership style apply to your current work role? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this style in the context of health care? Consider the implications for employee motivation, satisfaction, and productivity as well as patient satisfaction, quality of care, and patient safety.