Expert Answers

completed week 3 and (2) peer responses

Everything you need to complete the assignment is in the document I provided. Make sure the pdf article you find is a FULL one not a preview of one. please I cant express this enough. Part 1 is already done, use part 1 to dictate part 2 and 3. Again if you have questions let me know

Transportation is one of the eight wastes of Lean. The waste occurs when organizations fail to ensure that the transport of their products is carried out in a timely and efficient manner. In the attached article from 2016, UPS describes how they plan the routes for their drivers using a system called Orion. A short video about the Orion software can be found here: Find a similar organization that uses an application to optimize their transportation. (Examples could include internal movement of patients within a hospital, ground operations for an airport, electrical grids, city transportation mapping etc.). Take care to cite them properly and list them in the works cited section at the end of your paper. Requirements: Write a 2- to 3-page double-spaced paper and submit it to the Dropbox by Sunday at midnight (CST). Verify that there are no spelling or grammar errors in your paper. Make sure to cite any sources in APA format that you used in your research. *This will be submitted to turn it in.com please do not plagiarize*

This is a visual thinking exercise. I'd like each of you to create 3 alternative versions of the next five years of your life using the template in the Week 2 folder. Post a photo/scan of your Odyssey Plan here. Try to use less words, more drawings. Your 3 alternative plans of the next five years (20%) should include the following: - A visual/graphical timeline. (40%) - A title for each option in the form of a six-word headline describing the essence of the alternative. (15%) - Questions that this alternative is asking. (15%) - A dashboard where you can gauge (10%) Resources Likability Confidence Coherence Example attached

ASSIGNMENT: Using your research question, working thesis, and outline from Touchstone 1.2, create an annotated bibliography that provides a synopsis of your 5-7 sources and an explanation of how you will use them. As this assignment builds on Touchstone 1.2: Write a Research Question, Thesis, and Outline, that Touchstone, as well as Touchstone 2.1, must be graded before you can submit your annotated bibliography. NOTE: If your sources or direct quotations are not verifiable for authenticity (working link, author/title/publication information match, locatable quotation) by a grader, your Touchstone grade will be negatively impacted (see the “Annotated Bibliography” and “Quality of Sources” components in the rubric). A. Assignment Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation. 1. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Make sure to: ? Alphabetize the entries, according to APA Style. ? Include the required bibliographic information in APA format for each entry. ? Include 5-6 sentences for each entry that provide a short summary of the source (with page or paragraph-numbered citations) and how you plan to use it to support your argument. ? Include one verifiable, key direct quotation from each source (potential direct quotations for the draft). ? Include five to seven entries in your annotated bibliography, all of which must include links, be verifiable, and be credible (i.e., authentic, reputable, authoritative), reliable (e.g., contains current and valid data collection and analysis), and relevant academic sources. (Use Google Scholar if you do not have access to an academic search database through your institution). ? Choose your own sources but limit the use of websites; the majority must be online scholarly journals (2 websites max for 5 or 6 sources, or 3 websites max for 7 sources). ? Thoroughly check the formatting requirements for the different source types. ? After each relevant entry indicate the source type in parentheses (book, peer-reviewed journal, newspaper/magazine, and credible website) by including the source type in parentheses after the relevant entry. 2. REFLECTION ? Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities? ? Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses? ? Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection Questions DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. Accurately recording bibliographic information is essential and saves you time, as you can transfer this information to the References page of your drafted essay. Each source entry should include a brief summary of the source as well as 5-6 sentences, including a key quotation, describing how you intend to use that source to build or support your argument. Discuss how your annotated bibliography meets these criteria. (2-3 sentences) Which strategies were most helpful for you when searching for credible sources? (2-3 sentences) What difficulties did you face while searching for credible sources? How did you overcome these difficulties? (2-3 sentences D. Requirements The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: Double-space the bibliography entries and use one-inch margins. Use a readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. Composition must be original and written for this assignment. Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition. Submission must include your reflection questions. Include all of the assignment components in a single file. Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

Why do people believe so strongly in ESP despite no clear empirical support for its existence? This question will begin an interesting class discussion and will enable you to introduce principles that will be reinforced later in the text. First, belief in ESP illustrates our tendency to be easily persuaded by vivid anecdotes and experiences. For example, even when college students have been forewarned about a “mindreader’s” tricks, they may, after viewing their dazzling performance, be convinced that they are a true clairvoyant. Vivid personal experiences are much more compelling than the abstract statistical data from dozens of laboratory experiments that fail to show the existence of ESP. Second, we are often unaware of the factors that influence our thought processes, which may lead us to “create” explanations for our experiences. For example, a couple may be watching a TV program when one suddenly suggests they invite certain friends over for dinner. The spouse claims to have been thinking the same thought. Is this mental telepathy? Probably not. It is more likely that some stimulus on the TV screen, perhaps the image of an automobile like that of their friends, triggered a common memory. Third, we may fail to recognize chance occurrences for what they are. Deficiencies in our statistical intuitions may lead us to see ordinary events as almost impossible. For example, what are the odds that at least two people in a group of 30 will have the same birthday? Most people grossly underestimate the correct answer—7 in 10. Given the billions of events that occur, sheer chance tells us some “extraordinary” coincidences are certain to occur. Here’s one of our favorites: The King James version of the Bible was completed when William Shakespeare was 46 years old. In Psalm 46, the forty-sixth word is “shake” and the forty-sixth word from the end is “spear.” (Even more incredible is that someone discovered this!) The “illusion of personal control” may also lead us to perceive phenomena that are really not there. Yale University researchers relied on this tendency in manufacturing a false belief in ESP among their students. Students tried to mentally transmit five symbols to other students who guessed what was transmitted. ESP success rate was no better than chance. When students were drawn into the drama by being given a “warm-up” period before the actual testing began, however, they were “confident” that ESP was transpiring more than 50 percent of the time. Finally, people may believe in ESP because they want to. We humans have always had a hard time accepting our finiteness. Believers in ESP proclaim a potential for omniscience. Some scientists argue that as an escape from humdrum life, pseudoscience offers phony mysteries instead of real mysteries, and that it displaces science with science fiction. Discussion prompts: What are your thoughts about ESP? Have you ever seen evidence of ESP? If so, what might be some alternate explanations? Which of the reasons one’s belief in ESP might persist do you find most compelling? Your journal should be at least 300 words (make a note, as this is higher than the normal word count!). Make sure you also cite any and all sources.

OPEN BOOK, TAKE HOME. Answer the following questions: Describe the five different types of audience segmentation presented in the Potter textbook (pp. 130-132). Explain cross-media promotion, using an example that you may be familiar with (p. 134). Describe Potter's three tasks of information processing (p. 143), including associated goals and foci. Explain the difference between exposure and attention (p. 149). What are the four exposure states and what do they mean? Why is tolerance for ambiguity an important part of critical assessment of media content? (p. 160) How do programmers design shows to attract and retain audiences? (pp. 171-172) What are some of the character demographic patterns identified in the text? (p. 174) Explain the issues related to portrayals of body image in visual media. (p. 179) Explain the four types of skills and knowledge required to assess entertainment messages (p. 189), using any show, movie, book, music video, etc., as an example. Describe the differences between traditional and digital advertising strategies (pp. 202-203). Be sure to provide sufficiently engaged, detailed content in your answers. You must cite the textbook at least once, using an in-text citation where you use the information, and accompanying reference list at the bottom of the page. Do not copy information from the Internet without quoting it and citing it. Plagiarism will result in a zero for this assignment. Robots are not your friends. %( Check grammar and spelling before submission. Submit your responses in a Microsoft Word document. Use headings in the upper left corner, including your name, class, and date. Use a centered title for your submission. This assignment is worth 50 points. Late submissions may be accepted with a penalty unless prior arrangements have been made. PreviousNext

write a 2000- 2500 word essay on The Legal Challenges of a topic provided. Must use APA citation format.

I have 7 questions CS Paper-based HW #2

Case Study 7 (How I built this) Due: Thu Oct 17, 2024 5:30pmDue: Thu Oct 17, 2024 5:30pm Ungraded, 20 Possible Points20 Points Possible Attempt In Progress NEXT UP: Submit Assignment Add Comment Unlimited Attempts Allowed Available: Oct 10, 2024 8:30pm until Dec 14, 2024 11:59pmAvailable: Oct 10, 2024 8:30pm until Dec 14, 2024 11:59pm Details GROUP ASSIGNMENT From the Book - How I Built This by Guy Raz, Please review the following Chapters. Go In Through the Side Door It’s All About Location Get Attention, Part 1: Building Buzz Get Attention, Part 2: Engineering Word of Mouth After reviewing these chapters, write a detailed analysis that encapsulates your key takeaways. In your analysis, address the following: Learnings: Describe what you gained from each chapter. Highlight specific insights, strategies, or concepts that stood out to you. Application: Explain how you plan to apply these learnings to your entrepreneurial journey. Be specific about how these insights will influence your approach to building and sustaining your venture. Real-World Comparison: For each chapter, provide at least one real-world example that compares and contrasts the information presented with actual entrepreneurial experiences. Discussion Preparation: Be prepared to discuss your findings and insights during class. Documentation Guidelines: Please adhere to the documentation guidelines provided in this course. Submission: Submit your analysis on Canvas by the specified due date. Grading Rubric Criteria Exemplary (90-100%) Proficient (80-89%) Satisfactory (70-79%) Needs Improvement (0-69%) Weight Content Knowledge Thorough understanding and insightful reflection on all chapters; key takeaways clearly articulated. Good understanding with most key points covered; minor details may be missing. Basic understanding with some important points overlooked or unclear. Lacks understanding of the material; fails to address key concepts. 30% Application to Entrepreneurial Journey Insightful and specific application of learnings to entrepreneurial journey; well thought-out strategies. Generally good application with some specifics; minor gaps in detail. Basic application present but lacks depth or specificity. Little to no connection made between learnings and entrepreneurial journey. 30% Real-World Comparison Excellent comparison with real-world examples; insights are clearly drawn and well articulated. Good comparisons with real-world examples; some insights drawn but lacking depth. Basic comparisons made; examples are present but insights are minimal. Little to no real-world comparisons provided; lacks relevance to chapter content. 20% Organization & Clarity Well-organized, logically structured, and free of errors; ideas flow seamlessly. Generally organized with minor structural issues or errors present. Some organization present; several errors affect clarity. Poorly organized; difficult to follow with numerous errors. 10% Adherence to Guidelines Fully complies with documentation guidelines; format is correct. Minor deviations from guidelines but mostly compliant. Noticeable deviations from guidelines; format issues present. Does not comply with guidelines; major format issues. 10%