Expert Answers

StudentDiscussion Thread: Writing a Letter to a Prospective Doctoral Student At this point in the course, you should be getting pretty familiar with the topic of doctoral persistence. As you think about your experience and the articles you have read, summarized, and synthesized as a part of your literature review, you now have quite a bit more information on doctoral persistence than a few weeks ago. For this assignment, consider your experience and knowledge obtained over the last few weeks on the topic. As this is a written letter, there is no need to draw from other sources or cite. For your thread, respond to the following: Write a letter to a student considering enrolling in a Doctoral Program in the School of Business here at Liberty. What do you recommend that the prospective enrollee consider? What advice do you have for the person?

Explain the various communication styles and identify your own style. Discussion Instructions (Initial Post is Require before “Viewing” Peer Posts):  You are required to submit a substantial response. A substantial response is one that stays on topic and fully addresses the assignment in a clear, concise, and meaningful manner.  Substantial Content refers to providing relevant content toward the actual topic of the discussions. This includes quality input, questions and information in your discussion posts and responses to peers. The deliverable length of initial posting must be at least 150 words.  After the initial posting, students are required to respond to at least two (2) peers responses.  Peer responses must be at least 50 words for each response, in order to receive full credit.  Discussions must be the students original thoughts based on the topics from the "Open Educational Resource" (OER) Course Textbook and/or other referenced sources.  Direct quotes from references must be less than 10 words.  Please review postings for sentence structure, grammar and punctuation errors.

Instructions Covering Chapter 3 (See attached PDF)Homework #2 is due by Sunday (Day 7).See the attached PDF file.Complete each homework assignment in two (2) parts.First, complete the mathematical requirements for each assigned question and subpart in a separate Excel tab. Save your file as HW #[x] - LastName, FirstInitial.xlsx. So, for HW #2 Jane Doe should save her Excel file as "HW 2 - Doe, J.xlsx".Second, complete the narrative description requirements of the assignment in a Word document. Complete the narrative in the Word document. When the question asks for calculations, make reference to the appropriate tab in the Excel file for reference. You may also copy and paste a picture or spreadsheet link within the body of the narrative as well. Save your file as HW #[x] - LastName, FirstInitial.docx. So, for HW #2 Jane Doe should save her Word file as "HW 2 - Doe, J.docx".Submit your files through the BlackBoard assignment to receive credit. Show mathematical steps in detail to receive full credits Refer to rubric Homework 2 Guideline WebEx Video: #1 - Page numbers and week mentioned in this video does not match with page numbers shown in the attached file, but this is because I recorded this video a while ago before the course was revised. I said week 3 assignment in the video because this question was in week 3 assignment in the past. So, stick to page numbers shown in the attached file. Other than that, the content is the same so you will not face any confusions. Question #1 Homework Explanation Video#2 Question #2 Homework Explanation Video Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Model Formulas 9 to 10 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven 6 to 8 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven (1 to 2 errors) 3 to 5 pointsModels are formula driven but have several errors in the formulas (3 to 5 errors) 0 to 2 pointsModels are not formula drive. Numbers that should be formula driven are typed in cells. Numerous errors in the formulas (6+ errors) Model Accuracy 9 to 10 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven. Correct answers on virtually all aspects of the models (1 to 2 errors) 6 to 8 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven. Answer are correct on most aspects of the models (3 to 5 errors) 3 to 5 pointsModels are appropriately and accurately formula driven. Answer are correct on some aspects of the models (6 to 8 errors) 0 to 2 pointsModels are not formula drive. Answers are typed into cells. Few answers are correct in the models (9+ errors) Model/Spreadsheet Formatting 17 to 20 pointsEasy to understand and follow the logic of the model. Cells are appropriately color coded to highlight cell meanings. Excel sheets are appropriately named by problem number. 12 to 16 points2 to 3 deficiencies 6 to 11 points4 to 5 deficiencies 0 to 5 points6+ deficiencies Narrative Discussion 9 to 10 pointsuestions are answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language are used where appropriate/necessary. 6 to 8 pointsMost questions are answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Mostly complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language are used where appropriate/necessary (2 to 3 deficiencies) 3 to 5 pointsSome questions are answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Limited use of complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language (4 to 5 deficiencies) 0 to 2 pointsQuestions are not answered in narrative form (where appropriate). Complete sentences, proper grammar, and professional language are not used. Spreadsheet answers are not described, only the spreadsheet itself is referenced (6+ deficiencies) BUS542 - Homework2.pdf

Narrative DesignAssignment Instructions Each qualitative design is slightly different from the others; these differences are important for researchers to consider when selecting a design that is most appropriate for exploring their research problem. After reviewing the Learn material for the module, address the following in a paper in current APA format. The submission should be between 1,000 – 1,250 words. 1. Provide a description of the narrative design and when it is appropriate to use this design. 2. Describe 2 problems or challenges you might encounter when using this design, and how these may be addressed by the researcher. 3. Provide a problem statement pertaining to doctoral persistence/attrition of business students. 4. Craft 2 qualitative research questions that align with exploring the stated problem and are appropriate for narrative design. 5. Compose a purpose statement to address one of these research questions that aligns with a narrative design.

Write a 650 word response to the following: Analyze how the SPL model and the concept of doctoral demeanor contribute to development as a doctoral student. Begin by identifying and describing the components of the SPL model and its significance in learning and development. Then, discuss how embodying a doctoral demeanor—characterized by professional language, behavior, and accountability—complements the SPL model to support the academic, professional, and personal growth. Reflect on the impact of these principles in shaping a doctoral identity and enhancing an academic journey, especially in preparing for increased accountability throughout a dissertation process. Highlight the importance of adhering to these standards in all forms of communication within the College of Doctoral Studies community and explain how this commitment will facilitate the growth as a scholar-practitioner-leader. *References. Citations. APA Format.*

Assignment 1: Cost of Debt Purpose: This assignment aims to help students examine how the cost of capital is calculated within healthcare infrastructures. Instructions: The cost of debt is calculated based on the interest rate (return) that lenders require borrowers to pay, also known as debt financing. When a healthcare organization engages in debt financing, the process can help alleviate potential medical and healthcare-driven expenses. For this assignment, you are to write a 2-4 page APA formatted paper discussing the following key points: What is the difference between debt financing and equity financing? Discuss how debt financing can alleviate medical debt within healthcare institutions? Should health organizations aim to have zero debt? Discuss the pros and cons of having long-term and short-term debt. Should you use external scholarly articles to support your responses, do ensure to use appropriate APA format and include a references page. Resources Reiter, K. L., & Song, P. H. (2018). Gapenski's fundamentals of healthcare finance (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press. Assignment 2: Pay Sources in Long-Term Care Purpose: To distinguish the differences in pay sources utilized in long-term care. Instructions: There are several options when it comes to paying for long-term care. First, review the required materials about Competition, Integration, External Control and Payment, utilize the information from the text, previous chapters read, and your own external research to evaluate currently available long-term care payment options. Take note of the pay sources located in Chapter 11 of your textbook. Next, prepare a 5-7 slide presentation using a resource of choice (PowerPoint, Google slides, Prezi, etc.) to showcase each of the available long-term care payment options (Chapter 11). Your presentation should be designed for an audience of seniors and their family members. Please keep this in mind as you develop your assignment. The presentation should be clear and easy to follow, without the use of medical jargon or acronyms. Be sure to include speaker notes for your presentation. This can be done in either the speaker notes section of the powerpoint slides or on a separate document. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for your presentation including in-text citations and a reference slide (not counted towards minimum slide number). If you use Google slides, Prezi, or another software be sure to download the file and submit it to Canvas. Do not submit a URL. Resources FACHCA, S.C.M.H. L. (2020). Pratt's Long-Term Care (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://reader2.yuzu.com/books/9781284229615

Dear Prospective Doctoral Student, It is a pleasure to hear about your interest in the Doctoral Programs here in the School of Business at Liberty University. This is a significant step in your academic journey, and as a fellow doctoral candidate myself, I am writing to share some advice and factors to help guide you in the decision-making process, in addition, throughout your journey. Prior to enrolment, make sure to research your interests and that they algin with the degree program. A doctoral program is a significant time commitment, so make sure the program and curriculum expectations will balance with any personal and professional obligations. Without reviewing the programs, the expectations can be misleading, transparency and understanding is key. As time progresses in your doctoral journey, research will become a significant aspect of the program, so understand this is a significant time commitment, but don't get discouraged! Reflect on what and why you are deciding to make this next step. Reflect on how the programs align with your long-term personal and professional career goals. A doctoral degree is typically geared towards those interested in academia or high-level industry research roles. If this decision has current or potential benefit, go for it. Lastly, it is important to consider the cost of the program and any potential funding opportunities that could be available to you such as scholarships, grants. Financing is an important part to completing this program. Not preparing financial funding, it will allow you to not stress on the monetary aspect, and to focus on your studies through the journey. While this is a lot of information, there are many avenues to complete the necessary research to answer the above questions. As you consider these programs, reach out and network! Speak with current students and alumni as they can provide firsthand insight into the program, faculty and overall experience. Networking will help build necessary relationships with faculty and fellow students. All of these individuals can be valuable resources throughout the program and afterwards. A doctoral program is challenging and requires heigh level of dedication and discipline, and it has proven affective to network and build those mutual partnerships with fellow students and faculty to get the important mentorship to guide you through completion. Those with motivation or more likely to overcome adversity and persist. Socialization can help you increase your drive further and provide to that determination. It is important to keep your self-confidence and motivation up, and remember why you made it this far in the firsts place. Lastly, get organized. This may seem obvious, but the volume and curriculum can vary depending on classes and expectations. Getting organized will help you to keep track of deadlines, assignments, and meetings. This can make sure you manage the workload in life and reduce stress. I hope this information is helpful as you consider your decision. Remember, this is a personal journey and it is important to choose a program that aligns with your goals and interests, and can integrate into your current lifestyle. Best of luck in your journey and never hesitate to reach out for any additional questions or support. Sincerely, Lucianna

Module 4: Ethics Journal Introduction Each week, you will reflect on past or current ethical dilemmas. The purpose of this activity is to help you personally engage with the reading and internalize it. Your ethics journal entries will be useful when you develop your personal ethics philosophy in the last week of this class. Identify an ethical situation you have encountered or heard about and relate it to the ethical theories and concepts discussed in the Johnson textbook. Your response should explain the ethical situation, why it is significant, and how it relates to the textbook. Important: If you do not cite AI assistance, you will receive a zero for the assignment. However, you can revise and resubmit for full credit. Responding to your peers is optional. Instructions Read chapters 7 & 8 in the Johnson textbook, Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership: Casting Light or Shadow. Respond to the following question: Describe the ethical dilemmas you have encountered either as a leader or as a follower, how they were resolved, how you feel about the outcomes, and what you learned that you can apply to future ethical decisions. Use the Johnson textbook to help identify examples. As you read, jot down notes of your personal or professional experiences or media stories related to that week’s reading materials. You must reference specifics in the Johnson textbook from chapters 7 & 8. If you write about any individuals or organizations, do not reveal any identifying information, especially when recounting unethical conduct or actions. Directions Use an AI tool to help you brainstorm, organize, and edit your response. The AI will guide you through a series of questions to help develop your ethical situation and its relation to the Johnson textbook. Examples of AI tools you can use are provided at the bottom. Use the prompt provided below to interact with the AI. AI Assistance Prompt:"I need help with an assignment for my MBA Leadership class. Please do not provide original thoughts. Instead, help me clarify and expand on my ideas. Here's the assignment question: 'Describe the ethical dilemmas you have encountered either as a leader or as a follower, how they were resolved, how you feel about the outcomes, and what you learned that you can apply to future ethical decisions.'First, ask me to identify an ethical situation I have encountered or heard about that resonates with me.After I answer, ask me the following follow-up questions one at a time: Describe in detail the ethical situation, why it is significant, how it was resolved, and how you feel about the outcomes. Which ethical theories and concepts from the Johnson textbook relate to this situation? How do these theories and concepts help to understand or resolve the ethical situation? What did you learn from this situation that you can apply to future ethical decisions, and why is understanding this ethical situation and its theoretical background important for leadership practice? Once I have answered all the questions, please help me organize my responses into a cohesive post that meets the assignment requirements, ensuring it is clear, professional, and well-structured." Post the cohesive result generated after answering the AI's questions by Day 7 of this week. Your post should clearly communicate the ethical situation, its significance, and its relation to the Johnson textbook. You do not need to respond to your peers but may do so if you wish. Discussions need to be professional. Please make proper use of capitalization to begin sentences; also, make sure that there are no misspellings, incomplete sentences, or other violations of grammatical rules. The basic criterion for a discussion post to be considered effective is that your message must be original and intelligible. You must communicate concisely and effectively. In addition, you must meet the weekly requirements for full credit on discussion assignments. Citing AI in Your Assignment: Include the in-text citation in your post to acknowledge the use of AI assistance. Add the reference list citation at the end of your post. Here is a suggested format for citing the AI tool: In-Text Citation: "Assistance provided by [AI Tool Name] was used to brainstorm, organize, and edit this response." Example Reference List Citation: OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT. Available from https://chat.openai.com/Links to an external site.. Microsoft. (2024). Copilot. Available from https://copilot.microsoft.com/Links to an external site.. Anthropic. (2024). Claude. Available from https://claude.ai/Links to an external site.. Meta. (2024). LLaMA. Available from https://meta.ai/Links to an external site.. Examples of AI Tools You Can Use: ChatGPTLinks to an external site. CopilotLinks to an external site. ClaudeLinks to an external site. Meta LLaMALinks to an external site. Required Textbooks (3) The links on the first two textbook titles are to Amazon, the cheapest place I've found to buy these books. There are used editions of these books that are MUCH cheaper than even renting them. All three books are necessary to complete course requirements. Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2017) The Leadership ChallengeLinks to an external site., 6th edition. 978-1119278962 Johnson, C. E. (2018). Meeting the Ethical Challenges of LeadershipLinks to an external site., 6th edition. Sage: Thousand Oaks. 978-1506321639 Nichols, T. (2024). Generative AI and Leadership Ethics. Harvard Business Publishing.

·The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. ·Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted. ·Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page. ·Students must mention question number clearly in their answer. ·Late submission will NOT be accepted. ·Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. ·All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism). ·Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted. -·Each answer should be within the range of 300 to 350-word counts. ·Reference You can support your answer with the course book. You can use secondary sources available on internet.

Response to student post. please provide at least 3 reference per response