Expert Answers

Assignment due Wednesday, December 4, 2024 by 11:00pm In this assignment, you will create a personal ethical framework—a set of principles that guides how you approach and resolve moral decisions. This process will help you: · explore and define your values, · understand different ethical theories, and · apply these insights to real-world dilemmas. The assignment consists of several structured steps, each designed to guide you through the process of identifying and reflecting on your values, analysing ethical conflicts, and applying ethical theories to practical situations. You’ll start by examining various ethical theories we’ve covered in class, identifying key aspects that resonate with you or challenge your beliefs. Next, you’ll select your core values and explain why they hold significance for you, connecting these values with relevant ethical theories. You’ll also reflect on potential conflicts between values, detailing your approach to resolving such dilemmas. Finally, you’ll apply your framework to an ethical scenario, analysing how your values and chosen theories guide your decisions. In the end, you’ll submit a reflective essay (800-1200 words) that outlines your framework and discusses how this assignment and the Ethics course has shaped your understanding of ethics and moral decision making. Submit to Forum: all 4 preparation tasks and the final reflection (800-1200 words). Your reflection will be graded on the following LOs: Professionalism: Ensure that your communication follows established guidelines and use a careful editing process. EthicalTheory: Identify the main claims, concepts, criticisms and justifications of an ethical theory. EthicalConflicts: Resolve conflicts among competing ethical claims and act in a way that best satisfies relevant ethical considerations. EthicalFraming: Define ethical problems by framing them in a way that helps to resolve them. EthicalDilemmas: Discuss specific ethical dilemmas posed by the distribution of a public good, international issue, and taking or saving a life. MoralStatus: Assess the moral status of different stakeholders and evaluate what course of action should be taken given their status. **Assignment Template: **https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NADKdSzhT9uLHJ... Important: *If you do not submit the 4 preparation tasks, your reflection will receive zero for all LOs.* You should only use sources from the class material. APA7 should be used for referencing and citations. Use only use ethical theories that we have covered in the course. ChatGPT and other generative AI tools are not allowed to be used to write the essay. As you work, be sure to keep your notes and outline on this assignment in an accessible place, as you may be asked to discuss it in a future class session. Assignment Information Length: 800 - 1200 Words Weight: 18% Learning Outcomes Added Professionalism: Ensure that your communication follows established guidelines and use a careful editing process. EthicalTheory: Identify the main claims, concepts, criticisms and justifications of an ethical theory. EthicalConflicts: Resolve conflicts among competing ethical claims and act in a way that best satisfies relevant ethical considerations. EthicalFraming: Define ethical problems by framing them in a way that helps to resolve them. MoralStatus: Assess the moral status of different stakeholders and evaluate what course of action should be taken given their status. EthicalDilemmas: Discuss specific ethical dilemmas posed by the distribution of a public good, international issue, and taking or saving a life. ProfessionalEngagement: Follow the established guidelines of behavior by being engaged and responsive.

While you may add comments such as "I agree with you" or "Interesting findings,” that is not enough to receive a grade for the peer response. Your reaction to a peer's discussion must contain relevant content from the material learned in class or external sources. Case Study: Personal identity Consider the famous psychological case of Phineas Gage. Gage was a 25 year old railroad worker who reportedly had a gentle, discipline, and kind personality. One day while working to destroy some rock impeding the way, the gunpowder that was used exploded and sent a meter-long bar (3.2 cm in diameter) through his skull, damaging several parts of his face and brain. A couple of months later he recovered, but he developed a different personality. He became rude, disobedient, and extremely irritable. He was fired from his job and decided to move to a different country. Eventually after four years with his chaotic personality, he started to slowly revert back to his old personality, but let's say for the purposes of this thought-experiment that he never returned back to his old personality and he completely lost his memory. Answer the following questions with this information: 1) What do you consider as the core aspect of what consitutes the self? Do you think the self is most defined by a consistent memory, desires, or passions? Do you think you have one, many, or no unifed self? Do you think the self is intact and seperate from the body like a "soul" or do you think the self is merely the product of brain chemical and neurons? 2) Do you think that this version of Gage completely lost his self with his noticable personality traits, goals, memory, and relationship changes? Or do you think his core self was retained thoughout the entire sequence of events. Use aspects of question one as support for your answer. For instance, if you think the self is defined by key relationships with other crucial individuals, then Gage clearly became a different person; but if you think the core self is similar to a soul-like entity, then perhaps Gage did not become a different person. 3) Now imagine that Gage before the incident owed 200,000 dollars to a couple of old friends, and they want their money back several years after the incident. The new version of Gage argues that his old self has died, and thus he does not owe anything anymore because he is not the same person. Do you think that Gage's arugment has any weight at all considering the tragic accident that completely changed who he is? Support your answer with a couple of reasons.

For your Week 6 Discussion Forum do not forget to write your responses in "question and answer" format. That means write out the question first in its entirety before drafting your response back to it. Include the number to each question so that I can clearly differentiate your answers. Use at least one scholarly peer-reviewed source AND your "AG" textbook to validate your points. Only use APA format for your "in-text" citations and include your Reference List entries at the end of your responses. Make sure to familiarize yourself with Chapter 13 in the "AG" textbook before you address the following question prompts: 1.) Choose and identify any historical Supreme Court case (e.g. Roe v. Wade, Citizens United v. FEC, etc.) whose outcome you see as having had a significant political and social impact over American society. In at least 150 words explain why you see the outcome of this particular case as having had such a profound impact over American society? 2.) In our present moment, what current issue or problem do you see in American society today that you think the Supreme Court needs to address immediately? Why do you feel this way? Explain in at least 150 words. 3.) Respond to two or more of your peers. Each response should be at least 100 words. *Don't forget that your initial response to the discussion prompt(s) is always due by Thursday evening by 11:59 p.m.and then your two peer responses are always due by Sunday evening at 11:59 p.m. (and not a second later). DO NOT USE ANY AI TOOLS FOR ANY OF THE ANSWERS INCLUDING GRAMMARLTY OR QUILBOT AND ANY OTHER AI TOOLS. FOR QUESTION 3 AFTER YOU ANSWER 1 AND 2 I WILL SEND OVER THE CLASSMATES RESPONSES. https://assets.openstax.org/oscms-prodcms/media/documents/AmericanGovernment3e-WEB.pdf THIS IS THE BOOK

Use the topic questions and the scoring rubric to see if your draft responds fully to all parts of the question. A complete, thoughtful answer is more important than word count. Topic B: Explain Locke’s view of human nature. Use details from the textbook to support your description. Explain Using Vaughn’s Ch. 8 and the excerpts from Locke reprinted there, explain Locke’s view of human nature. Use details from the textbook to support your description of his view. Next, explain Hobbes’s view of human nature, again using details from the textbook to support your description of Hobbes’s view. How does Locke's view of human nature differ from Hobbes' view? Which thinker’s argument do you find more convincing? Explain fully, and defend your answer.

Mental Health and the Workplace (I NEED THE ASWER BEFORE MIDNIGHT PLEASE) All of you at some point will graduate and move on to build your careers and professional lives. This article provided in the link below will offer you some insight regarding things to consider in your job search, and to ensure that you find a happy, healthy, and productive work environment. Read the article below and provide a "free-style" response; meaning that you can give your views about the content, if it is helpful, and how you can use the information as you move on in your academic and career lives. Be sure to incorporate the course content as much as possible. You may also cite other scientific information to support your views. Mental Health in the Workplace: Insights from CEOs and Gen Z on Mental Health Issues (techrepublic.com) Links to an external site. Your original post must be at least 100-200 words. You must respond to at least 2 of your peers' post and each response must 50 words or more. Do not just agree with their content, but further the discussion by asking questions and providing new insights. Reply from Emma Aivazov To it me the statistic that CEOs have been reported to report mental issues because of toxic environments was really interesting. It also goes to show that just because CEOs are in a position of high power and make more than the rest of the employees, it doesn't always mean they are happier. The other the statistic that that both surprised and saddened me was the when asked, 88% of employees would leave their job to work for a boss that was empathetic. How 88% of workers feel like they are in a toxic work place where there is no empathy. It is very sad that this is a harsh reality and that so many people are dealing with this issue. The main issues was the their jobs were not flexible. Employees wanted better working hours, an open door policy, etc. They just want a more calm and welcoming environment. Reply from Supphawit Kalaphan The article sheds light on a growing issue in the workplace—mental health—and emphasizes the importance of empathy in creating supportive environments. As a second-year student, I can see how this applies to both our academic and future work lives. Many people, especially Gen Z, struggle with mental health at work, which makes it essential for companies to offer resources that foster well-being. The data in the article is eye-opening, especially how more employees and even CEOs are dealing with mental health issues. I think this is a good reminder that mental health doesn’t just affect “other people,” but it’s a concern for everyone, regardless of their role. For me, one of the most valuable points is how empathy in the workplace can help. It seems like small actions, like offering flexible hours, or having open conversations about mental health, can create a big difference in preventing burnout and stress.

We end this class by discussing two classic essays on 20th-century aesthetics. On the basis of your reading of Sontag and Weitz, and integrating the previous readings you have done throughout the semester in this class, evaluate the role of thinking (doing theory on artworks and the concept of art itself) and feeling (relating to artworks primarily through sensibility, as proposed by Sontag) in aesthetic experience. Minimum length of your post: 750 words. Think of this post as a very brief essay: you must include a title, an introduction, a series of paragraphs developing your view/thesis, and a concluding, retrospective paragraph in a Word document.

Good evening class, our end-week discussion this time focuses on the Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior. Your short nine hundred word paper should include Introduction Body References Well formatted APA sources (at least 3 within last five years )

The topic I want to do this over is the a philosophy topic called "The Experience Machine". Basically finding somebody who's critizeds the experience machine and explain why that person is wrong. "Find an arguement against it and then try to say "heres why I dont agree with that person". The "Experience Machine" is a thought experiment in philosophy, proposed by Robert Nozick, where individuals are presented with the choice to plug into a machine that would provide them with any pleasurable experience they desire, essentially simulating a perfect life of happiness, but completely detached from reality; the idea is to argue against ethical hedonism, suggesting that people value more than just pleasure and would not choose to live a life solely based on simulated experiences, even if those experiences were extremely positive.

[Chapter Four: The Nature of Reality]: Explain and defend what you consider to be most real. Are you a materialist who believes physical or material components to be most real (atoms, the physical elements, electrons, electromagnetic forces, etc.) or an immaterialist who believes that the immaterial is most real (spirit, mind, Plato’s forms, ideas, etc.)? Or are you a dualist who believes that both are equally real? Use the following two principles to make your case: 1) Whatever is most real is that which does not depend upon anything else to make it what it is; 2) Whatever is most real is resistant to change, in that it does not get destroyed or created. I highly recommend looking at some of the philosophers in this chapter to help guide your thought process. For instance, consider: a) Materialism: Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes, Heraclitus, Democritus, or any modern scientific view b) Immaterialism: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Zeno of Elea, Plato (Plato’s Forms), Idealism, Berkeley, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, etc. c) Both are equal: Aristotle, Descartes, Spinoza (both are the same substance), This essay must be at least 600 words. When arguing for your position, explain what immaterialism/materialism means. Use the two principles above to serve as reasons for your choice. Then utilize components of the philosophers in this chapter to guide your ideas and to perhaps serve as examples. Have at least one external source for your research, as sources can be one of the best ways to generate reasons and creative ideas. BASIC FORMAT: 1) Introduction: Include your thesis statement, in which you clearly state your position 2) Within your body paragraphs you explain what materialism/immaterialism is. Give examples to clarify your explanation. Then demonstrate your position by appealing to the two principles above. 3) Within your body paragraphs, you appeal to another philosopher(s) as to what their position is on the matter to provide support for your position. This may be a good spot to appeal to external sources here if you wish. You provide an example to help demonstrate your position 4) Conclusion: a short wrap of the main points of the essay.

This integration paper gives you a chance to reflect upon the major topics discussed throughout the course. You will have the opportunity to identify connections between Old Testament and New Testament texts. Then you will have the chance to reflect on those connections. Writing is part of the process of organizing and communicating your thoughts. The paper will be organized into two parts with required information and presentation for each part designated below. Each section of the paper should be around 375 words each, with a total paper word count of about 750 words. Part I: Articulating the Christian perception of the place of love within the Scriptures. In this section, you will be presenting, to the best of your ability, how Christianity would attempt to articulate ideas based upon your Scripture selections. Identify and explain how one passage from the Old Testament and one passage from the New Testament (which were read as part of the course) are interrelated and conducive to discussing the Christian understanding of love. Note that the passages do not necessarily need to be talking about love overtly. They may be passages, for example, which themselves support the understanding of God’s love and loving activities. Identify a second, underlying or related theme within your selected passages that is theologically connected to the theme of love that is found in the passages you selected for step 1. Explain how this theme is related to and supports the topic of love in the passages selected. Identify and explain how Verbum Domini or Dei verbum contains elements which help to make sense of your presentation of the scripture passages. This section will require at least the use of two quotations with effort spent thoroughly explaining your choices. Part II Formulate your own response to the integration you articulated in part one of the paper. You may agree with it and add arguments or disagree with it and consider critical arguments. This second section of the paper will begin with a thesis statement in the form of either: “I agree…” or “I disagree…” In this second part of the paper, you will integrate your own understandings of God, yourself, and the world with the material in the course and specifically your selected passages. In this section, you will need to consider and explain at least one counterargument to your rationale. You must respond to the counterargument and explain your response. ******Textbook: Senior, D., Collins, J., & Getty, M. A. (2016). The Catholic Study Bible (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press Academic US. https://reader2.yuzu.com/books/9780190267261