Expert Answers

The "new declarations" from Goldman, and critically assess its relationship to the Declaration of Independence of 1776. A critical assessment means that you will show why reading these texts (i.e., your chosen text and the 1776 Declaration) 'alongside' one another is philosophically interesting, and will stake out a specific position, supported by reasons, on the philosophical significance of the "new declaration" you chose. The minimum word count for the final paper is 2000 words, exclusive of any quoted material. The word count must be listed at the bottom of your paper. The choice of citation format (e.g., MLA, APA, Chicago) is up to you, but all quoted material must be properly cited. I'm happy to help you with citation style and formatting! Just ask.

Use the file sent to complete this assignment. Instructions: The assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a response based on the provided guidance using the provided template Download the provided template. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts covered in this course to the information in your chosen video. , it is mandatory to support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. These citations are essential for substantiating your claims and demonstrating your understanding of the course concepts. Please ensure that you use the template and follow APA format for your paper, including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Incorrect or missing citations may impact your grade, so be diligent in citing the textbook appropriately. Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to. TED. (2017, July). Why museums are returning cultural treasures / Chip Colwell [Video]. https://www.ted.com/talks/chip_colwell_why_museums... to an external site. TED. (2022, April). You Don't Actually Know What Your Future Self Wants / Shankar Vedantam [Video]. https://www.ted.com/talks/shankar_vedantam_you_don... to an external site. TED. (2021, December). A "Seat at the Table" Isn't the Solution for Gender Equity / Lilly Singh [Video]. https://www.ted.com/talks/lilly_singh_a_seat_at_th... to an external site. For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class. The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your own words. Be sure to include details and the main points the speaker used to make the argument. Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses to make the overall argument: Major Premise Minor Premise Conclusion Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B), does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose both or neither. If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or why. Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and what information from the video has led you to your choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or ideas and explain their connections to each type of appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument. Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented. Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether you think the use of each device and fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that each one has on the argument. NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical devices. Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. A. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument. Reaction and Reflection: Offer your position on the argument presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking skills, explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or ineffective, and why. Conclusion: What are the positive implications and negative consequences for the critical reasoning concepts that were used throughout your paper and in the video? When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind: Use the provided template. First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but do not use second person (you, your). Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose. Adhere to basic APA formatting, including: 12-point Times New Roman font Double-spaced text 1-inch margins throughout Support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA format with in-text citations and references. Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that your response is expected to contain. Make sure this paper includes all of the following: Understanding the Arguments Does the student demonstrate the ability to discern the speaker's 1) issue, 2) target audience, 3) conclusion, 3) main points, and 4) unstated, implied, or assumed perspectives? Does the student accurately and faithfully summarize them in the student’s own words in detail without being too reductive or without oversimplifying the source’s points? Identifying and Applying Course Concepts Does the student accurately identify and define the course terms and ideas indicated by the prompts? The student can correctly identify course concepts including objectivity/subjectivity, facts/beliefs/ideas, fallacies, biases, rhetorical devices/appeals, valid and sound deductive syllogisms, stronger or weaker inductive syllogisms, and various types of moral reasoning.Analysis and Evaluation of Course Concepts Can the student explain if the source’s use of course concepts are effective or ineffective, and why they would be effective or ineffective to the target audience? The “Exceeds” response assumes the student understands who the target audience is and can posit how that audience may respond to different arguments and rhetoric. They are explaining why a specific rhetorical strategy works on the target audience or how a fallacy like ad hominem preys on an in-group bias. make sure this paper completes these requirements

Your exam consists of two essay questions. You must answer both. Answer each question in a separate essay. Each paragraph of the Essay should answer one part of the question. Please do not include conclusion or introduction. Number each paragraph and write one sentence topic on what the paragraph is on. Each of your essays should be approximately three to four double-spaced pages long, in a 14-point font, with one-inch margins all around. Give page references to the author under discussion whenever these are appropriate. In your answers be sure to explain each idea so that someone who was not taking this course would understand exactly what you are talking about. Answer in your own words. . Be sure to give references for any ideas, paraphrases, or quotations that you get from any other source, including but not limited to: websites, library books or journals, friends, fellow students, neighbors, other professors and your parish priest. Please remember that not citing sources like these constitutes plagiarism. 1. Kant says that “everything in nature operates according to laws, but only rational beings act according to the idea (conception) of law.” Explain what he means by this. Briefly explain how he uses this idea as the foundation of his theory that morality is based on the Categorical Imperative. Why should we be moral, according to Kant? Your answer to this last part of the question should constitute approximately one page. 2. Identify two main issues on which Nietzsche seems to disagree with Kant and Aquinas. Explain Nietzsche’s position on each, including his reasons for holding this position, using the text as appropriate. Choose one of these two issues to discuss in depth. Regarding that issue, either defend Kant/Aquinas against Nietzsche, or explain why you think Nietzsche is right. Your discussion of your chosen issue and your defense of your position should constitute approximately two pages of your answer to this question

Read each question—there may be more than one. Post your responses in the appropriate threads. Students are required to make their initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You should respond to two posts of your colleagues by 11:59 pm on Sunday night. Responses should be of sufficient length with proper grammar. You will not be able to view your classmates' responses until you post in the discussion. Respond to at least two of your classmates' postings with each question. Responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You will lose marks if you do not satisfy the minimum number of posts. This feature will keep you engaged. Your response to your colleagues should be at least one full paragraph each (at least 4-5 sentences) for each post. Review your postings to see who has responded to you. Be sure to answer all questions. Include a bibliography using APA format. If you do not include a bibliography utilizing at least two different sources, you will lose marks. Document all your sources in the initial discussion post using APA format. Your initial post should look like a research paper where you document all your sources. For example, if you provide a definition of a principle, be sure to document your source in the sentence like this: "Cooper, Heron, Heward (2020) outline the definition of positive reinforcement as...." or "The definition of positive reinforcement is.... (Cooper, Heron, Heward, 2020)." Expand on course CLOs: When selecting a measurement method, consider the behavior change goals and expected direction of behavior change. What methods of measurement did you incorporate for this week of interventions to prepare for the Final? CriteriaMeet StandardsDoes Not Meet StandardsCriterion ScoreWriting Competency: Grammatical structure, APA formattingExemplary spelling and grammar. Precise use of words with meaning clearly expressed. Feedback is supported by citing textual references from course materials in APA formatting.Minor errors in grammar or format. Acceptable, effective use of words and expression.Errors in grammar or format frequently obscure expression of thought. Ineffective wording, sentence structure, and expression./ 1Critical Thinking: Skills evident: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, evaluationHigher order thinking is clearly evident and presented in a clear logical flow. Insightful interpretation, application, explanation, and/or critiqueSome higher order thinking is evident. Organization is logical. Links need strengthening. Most ideas are clearly interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiquedBasic knowledge level information is presented. Organization is not evident. Interpretation, application, explanation and/or critique are not evident./ 1GrammarAdds clear insights to ongoing discussion. Responds to a minimum of two others. Timely responses. Asks probing, constructive questions. Includes liberal and natural use of “encouraging statements.”Contributes further thought to discussion in a timely way. Limited use of “encouraging statements.” Responds to two others.Contribution is late and therefore not able to add to discussion. Respect of others is lacking. Does not respond to others. Post is late./ 1TotalScore of Discussion Board Rubric,/ 3 Overall Score EXCEEDS STANDARDS 3 points minimum MEET STANDARDS 1.5 points minimum DOES NOT MEET STANDARDS 0 points minimum

Step 1 Visit California Matters, and scroll down to the Propositions. Choose any one Proposition, read about it on the web site, and watch the one minute film. Step 2 Find 2 Opposing View Point Adds on the Proposition you choose Research adds on the proposition you choose. Choose one ad that is pro and one that is con to explain your thoughts on the proposition. Please visit the Writing Task: Rhetorical Appeals to complete this portion. Step 3 Write Your Essay Write one paragraph for each of the following 4 sections for a total of about 600-800 words. Paragraph 1: Provide an overview of the Proposition (Do NOT copy and paste from the web site, but explain it in your own words.) Do not include your opinion here. Paragraph 2: Explain why one would vote "Yes" and why one would vote "No" on the proposition based on the information on Cal Matters and the additional research you completed on the proposition itself. . Paragraph 3 : Explain the truth behind the misleading ads that are circulating around the proposition. Use both ads as direct evidence to support you claims and explanations. Paragraph 4: Conclude with an explanation on where you stand on the proposition and explain the final result of the proposition was from the election. This is where you will include your opinion. Please also include what the final result of the proposition was from the election. ***Note: Include a Works Cited page to share your research. Refer to our class MLA guide and Source Citation guide for help.

Week 8 Signature Assignment Start Assignment Due Jan 5, 2025 by 11:59pm Points 200 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload Available until Jan 5, 2025 at 11:59pm Instructions: The Signature Assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a response based on the provided guidance using the provided template Download the provided template. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts covered in this course to the information in your chosen video. As you develop your Signature Assignment, it is a mandatory requirement to support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. These citations are essential for substantiating your claims and demonstrating your understanding of the course concepts. Please ensure that you use the template and follow APA format for your paper, including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Incorrect or missing citations may impact your grade, so be diligent in citing the textbook appropriately. Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to. TED. (2017, July). Why museums are returning cultural treasures / Chip Colwell [Video]. https://www.ted.com/talks/chip_colwell_why_museums_are_returning_cultural_treasuresLinks to an external site. TED. (2022, April). You Don't Actually Know What Your Future Self Wants / Shankar Vedantam [Video]. https://www.ted.com/talks/shankar_vedantam_you_don_t_actually_know_what_your_future_self_wantsLinks to an external site. TED. (2021, December). A "Seat at the Table" Isn't the Solution for Gender Equity / Lilly Singh [Video]. https://www.ted.com/talks/lilly_singh_a_seat_at_the_table_isn_t_the_solution_for_gender_equityLinks to an external site. For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class. The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Summarize the overall argument of the video in your own words. Be sure to include details and the main points the speaker used to make the argument. Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses to make the overall argument: Major Premise Minor Premise Conclusion Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B), does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose both or neither. If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or why. Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and what information from the video has led you to your choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or ideas and explain their connections to each type of appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument. Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented. Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether you think the use of each device and fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that each one has on the argument. NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical devices. Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated. A. Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument. Reaction and Reflection: Offer your position on the argument presented in the video you selected. Using your critical thinking skills, explain whether the speaker's argument was effective or ineffective, and why. Conclusion: What are the positive implications and negative consequences for the critical reasoning concepts that were used throughout your paper and in the video? When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind: Use the provided template. First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but do not use second person (you, your). Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose. Adhere to basic APA formatting, including: 12-point Times New Roman font Double-spaced text 1-inch margins throughout Support your logic with in-text citations from our textbook. Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA format with in-text citations and references. Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that your response is expected to contain.

Description Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words. All answers must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. Make sure to include proper in-text citations and use APA style for reference. Please follow the instructions as described in the assignment.

Description Please do the project as required without using AI, and read the requirements carefully. Then, please do the presentation related to the project or assignment. There are 3 files uploaded: 1 is the assignment and 2 for the presentation. For the presentation, there is 1 file talking about the requirements, and the other file is the PowerPoint that you should be working with. Again, please do as required exactly for both presentation and project assignment.

Description A Briefing paper setting out written responses to each of the 10 Instructions. Professionally presented answers, with in-text Harvard Referencing to support them. Total: 3,900 words (+/- 10%). The Professional Map – Employee Relations https://peopleprofession.cipd.org/profession-map/s... Employee voice https://www.cipd.co.uk/news-views/viewpoint/employ... Engagement https://engageforsuccess.org/

Description Greetings team, please find the attached assignment 2 for Strategic management and Organizational Behaviour, do the needful as per instructed in the cover page, the notes, APA style and reverences. Appreciated