Need Help ?

Expert Answers

Description Reading: Book: https://www.mtsac.edu/elcw/english/documents/engl1.. ...

Description Reading: Book: https://www.mtsac.edu/elcw/english/documents/engl1... I want to highlight some key ideas for you as you go into this module's discussions where you make more direct connections to American civil religion and what you've read so far in Gorski's book. "Whiteness" As you hopefully reviewed and many of you discussed, Coates presents whiteness as a social construction. As you think about what you've read so far in Gorski's book, and as you continue to read going forward, I would encourage you to keep Coates' ideas here in mind as they are helpful in conversation with each other, especially as you see the development of white, religious nationalism in the U.S. It's helpful to understand race as not just a categorization of people based on the color of their skin, but as a social construction that collapses diverse ethnic identities into racial identities for the purpose of privileging some and oppressing others. This video can also be helpful to understand race as social construct (you'll read more about Du Bois in Gorski's book as well): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wny0OAz3g8 Coates is critiquing the power construct of "whiteness", even noting the ways in which it is ultimately destructive to the humanity of many people who "believe themselves to be white". "The Body" Note here Coates' emphasis on physicality and the present. There is a lot that can be said about Coates' emphasis on the body, but pay particular attention to his skepticism of religion and spirituality when they are used as a way to de-emphasize the body, downplay the cause of bodily suffering, forgive injustice in light of the afterlife, etc. This is important in this week's discussion on "forgiveness". "The Dream" This discussion continues this week in addressing Coates' ideas on the dream and violence. The "American dream" as a concept is often shaped by various experiences and can be far from uniform, but Coates helps us to examine the way some people's prosperity can come at the expense of others. While I won't unpack this entirely yet prior to discussion, it's important to see the way Coates highlights that those who hold more power and privilege in society systemically have more influence over means of violence. The violence of power typically serves the interest of those with power. "Religious Language" This discussion creates another direct connection to this week's discussion. Coates peppers his writing with religious language and metaphor throughout with varied purposes, but no doubt we can see that Coates is writing with an awareness of the religious way American identity and doctrine are expressed, using that same language to critique it (e.g. "democracy is America's god...") I look forward to seeing everyone continue discussion this week! Discussion question 1: On page 6, Coates refers to democracy as "America's god". What does he mean by this? Do you agree? Refer to his discussion of "heresies" on the same page in your answer. (cite examples from text). Discussion question 2: Coates expresses opposition in the book to religion (and church) as a means for hope and optimism (see pages 28, 43, 35-36). What are reasons for this (use examples from the text) and do you agree?

READ MORE >>

Description This week's Focused Discussion Board assignment asks you to analyze ...

Description This week's Focused Discussion Board assignment asks you to analyze material presented in this week's documentary. Please don't forget that using ChatGPT or other AI software to generate a response will not fulfill the assignment, and that using AI to write your answers would take away any value the assignment might have for you. Remember that you need to write an initial post that responds to the questions in this prompt.  Absolutely no outside sources allowed! Please limit your response to a discussion of material presented in this week's documentary. Neither I nor your classmates want to spend time responding to unreliable material taken from random websites. Tip for success: This discussion board prompt is asking you for your evidence-based opinion. Everything you say on this discussion board should be based on material from the documentary Meet the Romans. Failure to base what you say on evidence from the documentary will result in a deduction of points. Based on the evidence presented in this week's documentary Meet the Romans, answer the following questions: 1. According to Professor Mary Beard, should ancient Romans be seen as a nation/race according to Mary Beard? What should they be seen as? 2. What does Professor Mary Beard mean when she says that Rome was diverse but not tolerant?

READ MORE >>

Description 1. Discuss three reasons why the US Supreme Court would take a case ...

Description 1. Discuss three reasons why the US Supreme Court would take a case or not take a case. 2. Recently, the FBI raided President Trump's lawyer's office. The president is citing attorney client privilege and executive privilege to say that the raid was unconstitutional. What does privilege mean?

READ MORE >>

Description I am unable to give you credit for this paper because it is not pro ...

Description I am unable to give you credit for this paper because it is not properly cited. Your information does not have proper attribution. The pages in Brumberg don't match, and there is information without citation. The discussion of Freud on p. 5 is a good example. There are also no quotes from Brumberg. And, Owens is about slavery, and while it can and should be linked to the development of modern medicine, it really does not discuss  anorexia.  See assignment.

READ MORE >>

Description Each student will be required to write a short but serious research ...

Description Each student will be required to write a short but serious research paper.  Subject: Your choice; anything related to the material covered in the course. “Informational” papers can earn a strong “B.” “A” papers will argue a position and deal with some academic issue grappled with by scholars. DO NOT decide on a topic before doing preliminary research. You must first research to find out what scholars are writing about. Select a topic based on what you find… MINIMUM length: 5 pages, excluding bibliography/ sources cited page(s). You're welcome to write MUCH more. ? Format: IDC (“I don’t care!”) Notes may be at the bottom (footnotes), and the end (endnotes), in the middle (MLA), as long as they are present and consistent in style. Should your name be on each page? “I don’t care!” I don’t deduct “points” for such nonsense. I want something that’s well-written. Websites: Scholarly articles and books accessed online are absolutely acceptable, but PLEASE cite them with “normal” publication information: Author, title, publisher, date, page numbers (as if they were found in hard copy). For this class DO NOT include web links. Look at your text books. Do you find web links in the bibliography? Cite everything (book, journal, etc.) as if you found it in hard copy. Author, title, place of publication, publisher, date, etc. Or name of the journal, volume, date, pages, etc. That way I know it's peer-reviewed, not an online encyclopedia or somebody's blog… If an article is not published in a serious academic journal (and is not “peer-reviewed” scholarship) it should not be used. Encyclopedias of any kind (including online encyclopedias) are not considered scholarly research, though they can certainly be used for your own background knowledge. Do not include web links at all for my course. Ever see web links in your textbooks? I use the web all the time, but I cite as if I found in hardcopy without a web link. You might give "real" books a try in addition to journal articles. Ever try google books? Regular Google search; from drop-down menu select "books." Some pages missing but it's a gold mine! We even have a library, which for some reason nobody uses!

READ MORE >>

Description Week 2 Assignment - Unions and the Modern Workplace Learning Objec ...

Description Week 2 Assignment - Unions and the Modern Workplace Learning Objectives Covered LO 03.01 - Discuss three ways that 18th-century class/societal stereotypes evolved into current management and leadership practices LO 03.02 - Discuss the rise of the American labor movement and identify three roles of state and federal governments in labor conflicts Career Relevancy As modern workers, we benefit from the development of unions, whether we recognize their influence or not. Unions brought about a massive change in working conditions, which were abysmal during the development of factories in the early 19th century. Unions argued for safer working environments, better wages, and other worker benefits. Today, many industries utilize unions to ensure worker safety and rights are respected. During the 18th century there were specific expectations from those in different societal rank. Things that men did, women didn't. From the development of equal and civil rights we can see that today we have a modern outlook to how a workplace should look and act. No longer do we see only white males as leaders and executives.  Background Many of the social classes in the early American colonies were based on the same ideas that existed in England. Your class was based on your bloodline and money. But, there was a new idea that your class could be based on merit. Work hard and drive to be on the top, and you can make it happen. That mentality did not exist in England but was starting to take form in America. In today’s working society there still seems to exist a mentality that if you have the right name or enough money you can climb to the top a little easier, but there is still room for those who can work hard and have the drive to succeed. Today, labor laws provide a basis for workers' protection and ability to stand against any sort of discrimination. However, legal framework was not formed overnight, it took over two centuries to arrive where the United States is now. Where do our management and leadership practices stem from and how did the labor movement and labor laws affect and shape the America we know today? During the age of industrialization and development and expansion of the western world in the United States, workers started demanding more recognition and better conditions. Unions of various forms were starting to appear across the United States because workers felt the need to band together and unite in their vision for a favorable working future. More and more occurrences of violence and arrests due to strikes were happening because of unhappy workers. Lumen (2018) states: The degrading conditions of industrial labor sparked strikes across the country. The final two decades of the nineteenth century saw over 20,000 strikes and lockouts in the United States. Industrial laborers struggled to carve for themselves a piece of the prosperity lifting investors and a rapidly expanding middle class into unprecedented standards of living. But workers were not the only ones struggling to stay afloat in industrial America. Americans farmers also lashed out against the inequalities of the Gilded Age and denounced political corruption for enabling economic theft (para. 10). Independence Hall Association (2018) adds to this idea by stating:  Owners had strategies of their own. If a company found itself with a high inventory, the boss might afford to enact a lockout, which is a reverse strike. In this case, the owner tells the employees not to bother showing up until they agree to a pay cut. Sometimes when a new worker was hired the employee was forced to sign a YELLOW-DOG CONTRACT, or an ironclad oath swearing that the employee would never join a union. Strikes could be countered in a variety of ways. The first measure was usually to hire strikebreakers, or SCABS, to take the place of the regular labor force. Here things often turned violent. The crowded cities always seemed to have someone hopeless enough to ‘CROSS THE PICKET LINE’ during a strike. The striking workers often responded with fists, occasionally even leading to death (para. 9-10). Because of the high number of strikes and lockouts, state and federal governments needed to be involved. Independence Hall Association (2018) states: Prior to the 20th century the government never sided with the union in a labor dispute. Bosses persuaded the courts to issue injunctions to declare a strike illegal. If the strike continued, the participants would be thrown into prison. When all these efforts failed to break a strike, the government at all levels would be willing to send a militia to regulate as in the case of the Great Upheaval. What was at stake? Each side felt they were fighting literally for survival. The owners felt if they could not keep costs down to beat the competition, they would be forced to close the factory altogether. They said they could not meet the workers' unreasonable demands. What were the employees demanding? In the entire history of labor strife, most goals of labor can be reduced to two overarching issues: higher wages and better working conditions. In the beginning, management would have the upper hand. But the sheer numbers of the American workforce was gaining momentum as the century neared its conclusion (para. 11-13). Today, both state and federal governments are involved with labor conflicts. The list below represents just three roles of state and federal governments in labor conflicts for example. The federal government is connected to labor unions since most labor unions are aligned with a political party. State agencies such as workforce commissions ensure that the rights of laborers are protected. The federal government establishes the minimum wage and prosecutes employers who violate it. History provides models that are still in place today. Three ways that 18th-century class/societal stereotypes have evolved into current management and leadership practices can be found in gentry, middling, and farmers. Gentry were the upper class of landowners. This class can be compared to the business owners of today. As landowners and now current day business owners, they see it as their duty to govern and direct others. The middling, or what we might call the middle class, were the tradesmen. They had a specific skill and could perform it well for good pay. In today's society, the middling would be likened to the skilled workers such as teachers and medical professionals. Finally, the farmers were the unskilled workers who did the manual labor. These people too are found in today's society as the working class. With minimal skills, they are subject to doing any job they can find. The gentry and today's business owners represent those in management while the middling and farmers were led by them. How does this affect your career? It is important to note that most of really influential successes of unions were achieved peacefully.  The reputation in history of violent strikes from unions represents the exception rather than the rule, in many ways.  For instance, historical steps forward, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which outlawed child labor and created the 40-hour work week, were passed during the Great Depression once most of the strike violence had already stopped (Green, 1997). This should encourage employees to plead their case where labor disputes are concerned in a manner that speaks of professionalism. References Green, J. (1997). Why teach labor history? OAH Magazine of History,11(2), 5-8. doi:10.1093/maghis/11.2.5 Lumen. (2018). The labor movement. Retrieved https://courses.lumenlearning.com/ushistory2ay/chapter/the-labor-movement-2/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.  Independence Hall Association. (2018). Labor vs. management. Retrieved from http://www.ushistory.org/us/37b.asp (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Prompt Research general labor unions and think about how they affected laws, politics, and helped bring about change. Then research unions in your own career field. In a paper, in which you cite at least two sources, answer the following questions: Discuss labor union regulations in your state. Discuss the role of your state government in labor conflicts. Consider where you want to work. Discuss three ways that 18th-century class/societal stereotypes are found in the current management and leadership practices.

READ MORE >>

Description Consider all of the different material items that shaped the Atlant ...

Description Consider all of the different material items that shaped the Atlantic world. (This could include plants, animals, microbes, precious metals, or the like.) Which two items do you think most impact on the Atlantic world? Why? You can use examples from any geographic period or any time period we have covered in class. Writing the Paper Content: You should base your argument on the course readings themselves. I do not have a set number of articles/primary sources you should cite, but you don’t want to base your paper on merely one or two pieces of information. Length: Your paper should be 7-8pp. pages. This is a maximum, not a minimum. Although I may choose to read more than 8 pp. if you exceed the maximum length, I am only obligated to read the first 8 pp. of your paper. Style: This is an academic, analytical essay. This means that your paper must have a well- defined argument. You should also support it with relevant references to the reading. You cannot address every facet of these questions, nor can you recount every example. You will have to choose the best examples that support your argument. If you have questions regarding the style of a history essay, please ask me during class. Citation style: You should follow the Chicago Manual of Style. If you have questions about

READ MORE >>

Description The United States government and politicians develop policies that ...

Description The United States government and politicians develop policies that dictate who gets what, when, and how. In some cases, the decisions that are made may be supported by the public, while others may not. Voter ID laws have been a subject of significant debate and controversy in American politics. These laws, implemented at the state level, require voters to present specific forms of identification before casting their ballots. Proponents argue that these laws help prevent voter fraud and ensure the integrity of elections. However, critics raise concerns about potential voter suppression and the unequal impact of such laws on different demographic groups. In this writing assignment, you will comprehensively analyze the impact of voter ID laws on voter turnout, understanding their significance and controversies. Your study can explore  Assessing Voter Turnout: Investigate how the implementation of voter ID laws has affected overall voter turnout in states where such laws are in place compared to states without such laws. Examining Demographic Disparities: Analyze the extent to which voter ID laws disproportionately affect certain demographic groups, such as minorities, low-income individuals, the elderly, and students. Exploring Voter Fraud Incidents: Evaluate the actual occurrences of voter fraud in states with and without voter ID laws to determine whether these laws effectively address the issue they intend to combat. Evaluating Equity Implications: Examine the equity implications of voter ID laws, including their potential impact on equal representation and democratic principles. You will research, analyze, and express your views on how Voter ID laws impact elections and citizens' access to voting. A compelling and strong research project will present information by critically thinking about the topic. In other words, doing research on the topic, absorbing important information, and using that to form a decision or opinion on your own. You will not be graded on the position you take, but rather on how you go about supporting your position with strong arguments, backed by peer reviewed sources. This project requires early preparation in order to succeed. Follow the directions below to complete your assignment effectively.  Important Steps to Follow to Create a Strong Research Outline: Here are a few very important steps to take that will help you with this project:  Explore the issue:  start by writing freely on the topic of Voter ID issue. This may include any background information you may already know, your own views on the subject, and any opinions you may have heard or read from others. Set time aside to brainstorm ideas on both sides of the issue and list them in separate columns Focusing the Argument (Write out your thesis statement): In order to really focus your main argument, you will need to take a clear stance on the topic. Express your main point of view in a one sentence thesis.                 Thesis Statement:  Supporting the Thesis: to plan the argument you must present at least four points that best support your thesis statement. You may find these points in the lists you have created earlier or have new ones from the research you have conducted. As you create your list, you need to ensure that you support each point with specific facts and examples. If you are unable to do so, go back and conduct more research on the topic. Feeling strongly about an issue does not mean you will be able to argue about it effectively. You need to back up your points with solid evidence (facts and examples) that is up to date and accurate information. Use only peer reviewed sources.  Argument 1 Fact: present background/ factual detailed information that supports your thesis  Example: present an example about this argument. The example can be a historical, data, etc.   Source(s): list the sources that support this argument (author, publication title, year, etc.) sources must be peer reviewed.  Know the other side: A successful research paper will also be able to know/ mention the other positions on the main argument. While discussing your arguments you must also discuss some of the rebuttals to your argument and why they are weak.  Use this link attached down below to form the outline correctly  Grading: Outline: 20% of overall grade  Research Poster: 20% of overall grade What are peer reviewed sources? Peer reviewed sources are articles or books found in scholarly publications. They are articles or books that are written by experts in specific fields and then reviewed by several other experts in that field before any publication. This is to ensure the highest level of quality. For your final research project you will complete a research poster on the topic of voter ID laws

READ MORE >>

Description Analyzing an Historical Debate For this assignment, you will analy ...

Description Analyzing an Historical Debate For this assignment, you will analyze an historical debate over the Black Death. I have provided articles that you must use for this paper (other sources will not be accepted). I have posted a file below this one with links to the articles YOU NEED TO SELECT 2 ARTICLES ON YOUR TOPIC WHERE THE AUTHOR'S ARE ARGUING DIFFERENT THESES. Please note, that you may not find two complete opposite articles (for example, no historian will argue the Black Death did not happen), but each article has a different thesis or specific point that the author is trying to prove. Using the example above, while no author will argue that the Black Death did not happen, they will argue about why the 1340s-1350s version of the Bubonic plague was worse than other outbreaks. There have been periodic outbreaks of bubonic place from ancient Roman times onwards (according to USA Today, an Oregon man had a confirmed case in Feb. 2024), but rarely was the disease so wide-spread or so devastating as in the mid-1300s. This is not primarily a descriptive paper. It is an analysis of how authors build their arguments. INSTRUCTIONS:  You will use those 2 articles to write your paper. In that paper, you need to address the following questions:  Part I. Introduction: (10%) Describe in general the issue. (For example, you may analyze the importance of this issue in terms of to the culture, economics, political system, or social structure at the time.) Part II. Historical Debate: (40%) - - Please make certain you identify each article by title or author's name when you discuss it. If I cannot tell which article you are discussing, I cannot tell if you have analyzed it correctly (HINT, the authors are not your friends so you should refer to them by full name or formal last name only -- never call them by their first names)  Read two perspectives (articles) on this argument from different sides, and describe the authors’ perspectives on this topic: (This assignment is not an article review, however, you need to demonstrate that you understand the readings in order to address the application questions).After reading the articles, what were the authors' thesis? What evidence did the authors use to support those theses? Does the evidence support his or her thesis? Did the author(s) of the readings demonstrate an understanding of important elements of the culture’s history, values, politics, beliefs, or practices at the time of the issue? How or how not? Which author created the clearer argument? Why did you feel that argument is clearer? Part III. Conclusion (30%) How did the readings change the way in which you understood the subject? How might your own background influence your perspective on this issue? Provide examples. 

READ MORE >>

Description Week 7 Readings:Chapter 32. For this Discussion, answer one of the ...

Description Week 7 Readings:Chapter 32. For this Discussion, answer one of the instructor-provided questions by 11:55pm, ET, Friday and respond to 3 other students' postings by 11:55pm, ET, Sunday. You are also required to answer a follow-up question from your instructor. The follow-up post is due the following Sunday by 11:55 pm, ET. The follow-up answer should be posted in the Discussion specifically set-aside for that. 1. Read this letter from "Docs teach" : Docs teach: Letter from Reagan to Gorbachev http://docsteach.org/documents/198162/detail?mode=browse&menu=closed&type[]=written-document&sortBy=era&page=52 What was Reagan saying to Gorbachev in this letter? (you might have to hit control and enter to get it to open) 2. From a topic in chapter 30: Find two articles: one pro Reaganomics and one anti Reaganomics. Remember that scholarly articles have a historian's name attached to them. Compare them and tell us if "trickle down" economics was successful. Watch those sources, don't use anything that is blatantly propaganda or that is lacking an author's name. 3. How did the Cold War end? What was Reagan's role in its end? Has it really ended? Go to your week six lessons for this, look at The End of the Cold War section, to start with. Much of the lessons for week six relates in one way or another to the Cold War. 4. Was President Bill Clinton to the left, right, or centrist? How do you support your answer? You should be opening the lessons/textbook for questions like this. 5. Explain how, having lost the popular vote in 2000, Bush nevertheless became president.

READ MORE >>
QUICK ORDER

Place a Quick Order

Our verified writers got you covered. Let us help you balance between studies, work, and family.

We provide our assistance to the numerous clients looking for a professional writing service.

Order Now
Designed and developed by Brian Mubichi (mubix)
WhatsApp