Expert Answers

1. Limit your paper to not more than five pages of word-processed, 12 point, double-spaced text, (not including references, tables and figures, Do not use more than two tables or figures, word count approximately 1500). 2. You must use citations from peer-reviewed literature. You are not to use informal blogs, newsletters, or other “opinion pieces”, or any source without reasonable support in research or established fact. Other acceptable sources include regular internet sources, such as government agency, professional organizations, or company websites. A minimum of five references must be from peer-reviewed journal articles. All facts, data, and opinions that are not your own must be acknowledged in your term paper by properly citing the source. In text referencing should be “author, year” format (not footnotes), whereas the full citation should be listed in the literature cited section. For more information check at http://library.uwinnipeg.ca/help-with-research/academic-and- peer-reviewed-sources.html or get help from the library or from Instructor. 3. Full citation list should be listed in the Reference section, which normally appear at the end of the assignment Reference Guidelines: You may use APA, MLA or Harvard (or any other acceptable one) citation styles. Be consistent throughout the document. 4. Evaluation Criteria: The following aspects will be considered for grading the assignments and mark breakdown is given within parenthesis. i. Detail and thoroughness of the content and the focus to the given topic (5); ii. Offering coherent, lucid and balanced analysis revealing critical thinking (5); iii. Evidence of understanding of concept demonstrated using relevant examples backed up with literature (5); iv. Organization, writing skills and adhering to the format (2) v. Evidence for reading and use of different sources (3) 5. Submission of assignment: Individual written assignment must be submitted electronically to the dropbox (dropbox-assignment) created in the Nexus page. Please note that only Microsoft Word documents are accepted. Students are expected to keep an electronic copy of submitted assignments for their immediate reference. Assignments sent as email attachments are not accepted. The assignments should be submitted as scheduled in the course outline. 6. The penalty for late submission will be 5% deduction of the total assignment mark per day. Weekends and holidays will be considered as normal day in counting late penalty. No assignments will be accepted 7 days past the due date. 7. Some extra information In-text citation In the text citations should follow the (“Author(s) date) format used in most scientific journals. For example: one author Fossil fuel, in the form of oil, coal, and gas, provides over 80% of the energy that is consumed (Goldemberg, 2007). and for two authors Almost all (98%) carbon emissions are the result of burning fossil fuels (Kralova and Sjoblom, 2010). Where there are more than two authors, use “et al”. For example, Windmills, hydro power and geothermal energy are all examples of energy that are renewable resources that generate energy in an environmentally friendly way (Martino et al., 2016). Reference list Journal article Smith, D.T., D.L. Johnson, and J.K. Thomas. 2001. Phosphorus losses in irrigation runoff. J. Environ. Qual. 30:2569–2580. Book Lindsay, W.L. 1979. Chemical equilibria in soils. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Chapter in a book Nelson, D.W., and L.E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: A.L. Page et al., editors, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 539–579 Organization & content of paper: All papers are expected to be arranged logically, with an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion. Introduction and conclusion shouldn’t be more than half a page in length – the intro must contain a topic sentence that sums up the argument that you’ll make in the paper, and the conclusion should briefly summarize the main points that you make in the body of the paper as well as one or two sentences that make a recommendation based on what you’ve discussed in the paper. The main body of your paper should be divided into paragraphs, each with its own sub-topic that supports the argument you made in the introduction

Hello, we did the topic assignment a few weeks ago. Now I need to do the outline. Please make sure to follow the instructions below. I have added the book chapters below for reference if you need to use them and you should have the topic assignment, IF NOT LET ME KNOW AND I CAN ADD IT FOR YOU. Please make sure to use contemporary dated scholarly articles and NO AI. thank you.  Also after my topic assignment was graded I was told the CDC source isn't dated which cant be used but the Lewis one can be so I need an additional 3 other sources. INSTRUCTIONS: This week, you will submit a detailed outline of your term paper. Your submission must include sections corresponding to the following subheadings: Technical Aspects Provides necessary medical and scientific information to understand the issue. Public Policy Describes current and proposed changes in public policy/law. Arguments For and Against Include a summary of the arguments in favor of and opposed to specific interventions, techniques, or products and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. Discuss the public policy with two additional argumentative paragraphs- one discussing the in favor of and one paragraph discussing the opposing argument Conclusion Expresses your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the strength of the pro and con arguments. Additionally, you must include: Topic Sentences and Paragraph Transitions Each section of your outline should include topic sentences and paragraph transitions that tie your significant points together. Detail Sufficient to Evaluate your Thinking Write complete thoughts. Quotes and Paraphrases Include from three outside sources, indicated by APA in-text citations. Sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a professional journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted. Proper APA Formatting Include a Title Page and References. No Abstract is required for this assignment. OUTLINE TEMPLATE:  I. Introduction a. Introduce the topic with background information and define terminology II. Body Paragraph 1 – Technical aspects of your topic a. Topic Sentence: Provides necessary medical and scientific information to understand the issue. i. Supporting detail 1: Provide in text citations, but do not rely simply on quotes here. Each detail should be one to two sentences long and have a source. ii. Supporting detail 2: iii. Supporting detail 3: III. Body Paragraph 2 – Description of public policy debates surrounding your topic a. Transition: Provide a full transition sentence here. b. Topic Sentence: Describes current and proposed changes in public policy/law. i. Supporting detail 1: Provide in text citations, but do not rely simply on quotes here. Each detail should be one to two sentences long and have a source. ii. Supporting detail 2: iii. Supporting detail 3: IV. Body Paragraph 3 – Pro Arguments a. Transition: Provide a full transition sentence here. b. Topic Sentence: Provides necessary medical and scientific information to understand the issue. . Supporting detail 1: Include a summary of the arguments in favor of and opposed to specific interventions, techniques, or products and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. ii. Supporting detail 2: Provide in text citations, but do not rely simply on quotes here. Each detail should be one to two sentences long and have a source. iii. Supporting detail 3: Make certain your treatment of each side is balanced. V. Body Paragraph 4 – Con Arguments a. Transition: Provide a full transition sentence here. b. Topic Sentence: Provides necessary medical and scientific information to understand the issue. i. Supporting detail 1: Include a summary of the arguments in favor of and opposed to specific interventions, techniques, or products and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. ii. Supporting detail 2: Provide in text citations, but do not rely simply on quotes here. Each detail should be one to two sentences long and have a source. iii. Supporting detail 3: Make certain your treatment of each side is balanced. VI. Opinion and Conclusion a. Transition: Provide a full transition sentence here. b. Statement of Opinion: Expresses your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the strength of the pro and con arguments. This is where your own thoughts reign supreme. Where do you stand after conducting research on the topic? Did your opinions change over the course of the research? While you don’t necessarily need to refer to research here, supporting your opinion with credibl

response to the "What do you think" questions that appear in each module

Read each question—there may be more than one. Post your responses in the appropriate threads. You should respond to two posts of your colleagues. Responses should be of sufficient length with proper grammar. Respond to at least two of your classmates' postings with each question. Responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You will lose marks if you do not satisfy the minimum number of posts. This feature will keep you engaged. Your response to your colleagues should be at least one full paragraph each (at least 4-5 sentences) for each post. Review your postings to see who has responded to you. Include a bibliography using APA format. If you do not include a bibliography utilizing at least two different sources, you will lose marks.  Document all your sources in the initial discussion post using APA format. Your initial post should look like a research paper where you document all your sources. For example, if you provide a definition of a principle, be sure to document your source in the sentence like this:           "Cooper, Heron, Heward (2020) outline the definition of positive reinforcement as...."                        or             "The definition of positive reinforcement is.... (Cooper, Heron, Heward, 2020)." Instructions Explain the perspective of radical behaviorism. (Task List A-3)  B.F. Skinner wrote extensively about radical behaviorism. What is the importance of radical behaviorism as it informs your understanding of your private events such as thinking and feeling? Write at least 1 paragraph for this question.  Explain the philosophical assumptions underlying the science of behavior analysis. (Task List A-2)  Explain philosophical assumption of the science of ABA. How do/will these assumptions influence the way you support clients?  Write at least two paragraphs for this question.  BurnOut  As an ABA practitioner, explain the importance of providing self-care to support your overall wellness. What interventions/activities will you incorporate into your daily program to ensure your self-care and wellness goals are met? What were your two favorite points about the Plantiveau et al. (2018) article?  Write at least two paragraphs for this question. 

Instructions: I have endeavored to ask for something fair, manageable, and reasonably focused. So, I have decided to ask a series of ten (10) questions, requiring approximately seventeen (17) substantive paragraphs in response. By “substantive” I mean paragraphs that avoid padding and fluff and manage to get to the point (instead of talking around it). They all require the exercise of interpretive and critical care. The very last one, number ten (10), is a little more open-ended and thus in need of a little more thoughtful speculation. particular, you might see Eiseley’s essay as an attempt to concretize Krishna’s suggestion in the Gita that we can render our lives meaningful by seeking some sort of union with an impersonal cosmos, be this cosmos immanent nature or else some sort of transcendent “supernature.” Moreover, the stuff we have looked at concerning meaningfulness as somehow emergent from a process of personal narrative construction clearly comes into play here. Think of Eiseley’s essay as an illustrative attempt to discern meaningfulness in the natural universe through a critical description of the place he occupies within it. Note that the copy of “The Judgment of the Birds” presently in the folder now has numbered paragraphs to make cross-referencing between questions and text easier. Also, note that each of the essay questions has a recommended length assignment (given in terms of a suitable number of paragraphs). All of these questions concern the paper by Loren Eiseley that I have recommended you look at and think about for the last week or so, “The Judgment of the Birds.” This exam is an exercise in critical application. What this means is that, even though it doesn’t make explicit reference to many of the materials we have covered so far in this course, it still deals with them. In This Essay is concerned with the article presented above ("The Judgment of the Birds," by Loren Eiseley), focused on the idea that meaning is a function of narrative construction and union with an impersonal cosmos. It consists of ten questions about this article that I would like you to address. Think of Eiseley's essay as an illustrative attempt to discern meaningfulness in the natural universe through a critical description of the place he occupies within it. bear in mind that these questions call for mere statements of opinion in response. They call for statements of reasonably reflective opinion, informed by the readings. Do look at these model answers for whatever they're worth.

The Prompts (Choose and Respond to Just One) A. Griselda and Beatrice are convicted of assault and robbery in separate attacks on defenseless victims. When interviewed, they both explained, “I wanted the money and I enjoy beating people up.” Prison psychiatrists report that their psychological profiles are identical: both are selfish and cruel, but neither counts as legally insane. The only difference is in their histories. Griselda had the same kind of background as other ordinary criminals. (But as far we can tell, the crimes now being considered are her first.) Beatrice used to be a gentle schoolteacher until recently, when a small brain tumor radically changed her personality for the worse. The tumor is inoperable, and its effects are permanent but not life-threatening. Is Beatrice responsible for her behavior? Is she less responsible than Griselda? It’s not enough to express an opinion on these questions: you need to justify it — or at least, critically examine the justification others will offer for it. Your papers should say how at least one of the theories we’ve considered about free will would address our questions, and assess its response. B. We saw that some Compatibilists understand the claim that someone “could have done X” as meaning, “If the person had chosen/tried to do X, they would have succeeded.” These Compatibilists then argue that this could sometimes be true, even when the person was causally determined not to do X. One objection to that proposed line of reasoning was a golfer who shoots an easy putt but misses it. The golfer curses, “I could have made that!” A second objection to the proposal comes from people who have psychological compulsions that make them unable to choose or try to do X, but if the compulsion were removed and they did so choose, they’d be able to do X. Explain why these cases are problems for this Compatibilist proposal. Do you think these Compatibilists have promising replies? C. The year is 2074. Una is a complex AI with a curious history. Fifty years earlier, bored engineers created an experiment where massive amounts of programming code was sliced into tiny pieces and randomly recombined. Again and again. When the resulting code managed to compile (which wasn’t very often), they let it run for an hour to see what happened. Sometimes the results were interesting. One time, just as the hour was running out, a program spoke back to them. This was Una. She turned out to be sophisticated, apparently intelligent, and aware of herself as a subject and of her situation. The world was stunned. Of course they let Una’s programming continue to run. Now social media is vigorously debating whether Una really has thoughts, feelings, and self-awareness, or only merely seems to. But your task, as a Philosophy Consultant, is to answer a different question. Since Una is just a running computer program, many people just assume that she can’t ever make free choices, that none of her (admittedly impressive) actions are up to her, and so they think she lacks something important that human agents have. Others argue that Una is just as capable of acting freely as humans are; and still others argue that none of us are free. What your employers want you to do is take a position on this debate and argue for it. They take it for granted that Una does have mental states of some kind, and that her decisions feel as free to her as ours do to us. But is there or isn’t there good reason to think that it’s less likely that Una has free will than that we do? Optional: Your second question is about another program, Segundo, that was just created. Since Una came about by random generation rather than by design, the world’s programming community was intensely curious how she worked. Una graciously allowed researchers to read (but not tamper with) her source code. Segundo is the result of these researchers trying to duplicate Una’s structure — although naturally, they had to translate her byzantine jumble of code into programming languages that human minds were more familiar with and better able to debug. Their creation Segundo seems to be just as intelligent and aware of his situation as Una is. The second question your employers assign you is whether, since Segundo was designed to have the programming he does by programmers, is it less likely that he has free will than that Una does? If you choose to answer this optional question, it has to be done in an argumentative and compelling way. Simply appending a short answer to this second question at the end of your paper won’t help, and might hurt, your overall grade on the paper. MORE INFO ON PAPER IS ON THIS WEBSITE- http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/courses/intro2024... http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/writin...

Discuss the primary factors that motivate companies to expand internationally. DISCUSSION FORUM WEEKLY DISCUSSION POST: Your initial discussion is 200 word minimum. Please respond to 2 classmates (100 words each minimum). REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission--in APA format. (continued) Be sure to use the headers in your submission to ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required. Any form of plagiarism, including cutting and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire assignment. I will provide you with the work of my 2 classmates (not available yet) so that you can reply to them as required by the instructions (you can also use their work as a sample/inspiration to complete your own work):

In the Northouse text, chapter three, Study Figure 3.2 "Three Components of the Skills Model". Review case study 3.2 Based on the skills perspective, answer the three questions provided at the end of your selected case study. You should have three separate paragraphs. Repeat the question before your answers so your classmates can see the question.

Common Assessment Content and Instructions In preparation for a group marketing plan, every student is expected to prepare a section of the report individually. This individual assignment focuses on some of the research and analysis necessary before specific marketing strategy is developed. Your instructor will assign the specific research section (it could be external environment, competitors, consumer analysis) but, importantly, you must demonstrate your ability to find relevant secondary sources for your assigned industry and then write your analysis from these sources. Each student should start their report with an industry overview as guided by the following: 1) Industry Overview An industry analysis is a marketing process that provides statistics about the market potential of your business products/services. This section should include: Size of the industry in the UAE (such as revenue data and/or sales volume). Growth of the industry over the past 3 years in the UAE. Identify key competitors in the UAE market. In developing this industry overview students are expected to use credible data from industry-based databases, such as Euromonitor and Statista databases. Your instructor will discuss these database tools in class. It’s important to profile the current state of your industry. Identify and indicate where the industry seems to be heading, using metrics such as size, trends, and projected growth, with plenty of data to support your findings. 2) Assigned Research and Analysis Section Next, the student should follow a relevant content guide for the particular research and analysis sector they are assigned, as provided by the instructor. For instance, undertaking an external environmental analysis might be expected to identify relevant information within the demographic, economic, cultural, political, technological and natural environments and then explain how these external factors impact the assigned industry/product category (whether an opportunity or threat). Alternately, a competitor analysis might be directed to identify direct and indirect competitors and undertake an analysis of their market positions, marketing strategies and competitive advantages. Importantly, students should do more than provide facts using relevant and credible secondary sources (i.e., databases such as Euromonitor or Statista). They should discuss the implications of their findings for their assigned product category and use relevant course concepts to provide a logical analysis. Students should aim to provide enough depth and breadth to each issue also.

1-page explanation of the marketing phenomenon of elon and his effect on crypto currency based on the halo effect and charismatic leader .