THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS As leaders, it’s important to understand who the stakeholders include in the decision-making process. Part of the decision-making process is doing a stakeholder analysis. This assessment will provide an opportunity to learn more about what to consider when determining your internal and external stakeholders. Consider a project you have worked on in the past. Create a 1-2-page document that identifies the various stakeholders and why they would be interested in the project. Use the template below as a guide to ask what each stakeholder's role is in the project.
As leaders, the decision-making process can be a challenge. Multiple levels of qualitative and quantitative information are provided to the leader to support their decision-making process. It’s important to be organized and so that the decision-making process flows appropriately. This assessment will provide the opportunity to build on your leadership decision-making skills through a stakeholder analysis. Watch this regarding the decision-making process and stakeholder analysis. Watch this video on practical steps to decision-making, including creating a list, creating a stakeholder analysis, gathering information, and sharing with decision-makers. Now consider a decision that you have to make as a leader. Using what you learned in the above video, conduct a systematic decision-making process. Include the following steps in your assessment and document them in an essay format, with each number being a different paragraph. Determine what you would do as a leader while making a specific decision. Identify the decision. Identify decision makers and influencers & their role in this decision. Identify what data is needed. Why? Identify where the data will be retrieved from. Why? Clarify who you will share the data with. Why?
Leadership decision-making has its own set of challenges. Using the "project" selected in the first assignment and the documents completed in the 1 & 2 assignment and the "Risk Assessment Matrix" article, AND the "Economic Evaluation Tool" video, Develop an "Implementation Plan" that includes communicating back to those stakeholders involved in the process. Specific Assignment Details Refer to documents completed in Formatives 1 & 2 Read the article that includes the Risk Assessment Matrix. Watch the video below about Economic Evaluation Tools. Develop a 2-3 page paper (excluding Cover & References pages) "Implementation Plan." The paper should be in proper APA format. Discuss the plan's steps and how you intend to communicate your plan to lead.
List of next best steps for the leader Determining the next best steps for any project is challenging. Several elements play a significant role in decision-making. Specific Assignment Details Use the "project" selected in first assignment. Using APA format, write a 2-3 page paper (excluding Cover and References pages) that outlines the "leader's next best steps". List evidence-based next steps that include finances, relationships with quality, health insurance, hospital systems, and the physician services market. At least four (4) peer-reviewed sources are required for this Deliverable.
Read and follow the instructions one by one. Check guidelines as well. Discussion Post Topic: Identifying Perspectives: Two Middle-Range Theories in Relation to a Phenomenon of Interest. Two Theories: Theory of uncertainty in Illness and Theory of Symptoms Management Instructions: Select Your Theories and Phenomenon: Begin by clearly stating the phenomenon of interest you wish to explore. Identify two middle-range theories from the course that provide distinct lenses for understanding this phenomenon. Ensure that your choice is well grounded in the literature and relevant to the phenomenon you are addressing. Explain Each Theory: For each selected middle-range theory, provide a concise explanation of its core concepts, assumptions, and purpose. Discuss the theoretical framework and how the theory is typically applied in nursing practice or research. Compare and Contrast the Perspectives: Comparison: Explain the similarities between the two theories regarding their approach to the phenomenon. Identify any overlapping concepts, shared assumptions, or common outcomes they may emphasize. Contrast: Highlight the differences between them. Discuss how each theory uniquely shapes the understanding of the phenomenon, addressing aspects such as: The theoretical constructs used to describe the phenomenon. The implications for nursing practice or research that result from using one theory over the other. Potential strengths and limitations of each theoretical perspective in capturing the nuances of the phenomenon. Incorporate Evidence-Based Support: Use at least two scholarly references (peer-reviewed articles, textbook chapters, or reputable sources) that detail how these middle-range theories have been applied or studied in relation to similar phenomena. Summarize the key findings of these sources to support your analysis, and ensure that all citations follow APA 7th Edition guidelines. Organize Your Post: Introduction: Briefly introduce the phenomenon you will be discussing and state the two middle-range theories you have chosen. Provide context for why these theories are pertinent to your phenomenon. Body: Describe each theory individually, explaining its concepts and relevance to the phenomenon. Include a section that directly compares and contrasts how each theory shapes your understanding of the phenomenon. Use subheadings or bullet points if needed to enhance clarity. Conclusion: Summarize your key points, emphasizing how each theoretical perspective contributes a unique understanding of the phenomenon and its implications for practice or further research. Final Considerations: Make sure your discussion is clear, evidence-based, and reflective of graduate-level critical analysis. Use proper APA formatting throughout your post, including in-text citations and a reference list. Engage with any assigned rubrics or additional guidelines provided by your instructor to ensure your post meets all expected criteria. By following these detailed instructions, you will create a comprehensive discussion post that not only identifies two middle-range theories relevant to your chosen phenomenon but also critically compares and contrasts their unique contributions. References must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years. Please ensure you can LOOK UP your reference from your citation submission. REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up-
Please follow instructions below. Please attached references use for this discussion. Minimum 350 words (not including references ). References must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years. REFERENCES Must have DOI NumbersThe kidneys are highly vascular organs that filter the blood, removing wastes for excretion and returning the rest of the blood to the vascular system. The functional units of the kidneys are nephrons, each composed of a glomerulus and a tubule. How is the GFR measured? What are the strengths and limitations of methods of determining GFR? Often an incidental finding in children during a urinary tract infection workup, in vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), urine flows from the bladder back up the ureters. Could you explain the mechanism of action of this abnormality in children?
IHP 604 Module Five Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric Overview For your course project, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, the parties affected, and the importance of addressing the issue. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if your implementation was successful. The first step to completing your course project is to select a healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. In Module Three, you selected an organization and identified a publicly available set of data. For this assignment, you will need to choose an area that needs to be improved, a way to improve it, and a framework to utilize in your quality improvement initiative. You may change your selection of the initiative or the framework in your final project submission, which is due in Module Nine. This assignment helps you focus on this aspect of the final project and also maps to the second learning objective of this module. Prompt Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Selection of area of improvement: Describe an area of improvement related to your previously selected healthcare organization and its public-facing data that you will utilize for your course project. Selection of method of improvement: Describe the method of improvement that you will utilize in your course project. Selection of framework to use in improvement initiative: Identify which of the four problem-solving frameworks (tracers, root cause analyses [RCA], failure mode effect analysis [FMEA] studies, or plan-do-study-act [PDSA]) you will utilize for your course project by applying it to your improvement initiative. Discuss your selections: Discuss why you selected the area of improvement, method of improvement, and framework. Report sections: Describe the report sections you will include in your course project to describe your healthcare quality improvement initiative in a compelling and informative way. Throughout your paper, provide specific evidence from at least two scholarly sources. What to Submit Submit this assignment as a 1-page Microsoft Word document. You should cite at least two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.
make a presentation about “ Differentiate between gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer“ last slide before sources “ write two short questions and their short answers” Total 3 to 4 slides are enough
