1.Submit a recent contract from you or your organization, and provide a brief synopsis of how it meets the basic requirements of a contract. 2.In thinking about the sources of law section of this module, what source of law most impacts your current organization. Identify the type of organization in your submission. If you need, you can select a specific organization if you are not currently involved with an organization. Give specific examples of how the source of law affects the selected organization.Instructions 3.While the concept is focused on business, most organizations take on some aspect of one of these business forms. Describe the form of your current organization. Be sure to include if the organization is non-profit or for-profit. If it is a governmental or educational agency, describe the business form it mostly closely resembles being specific on how you see the match.
I have uploaded my resume, you need to modify it more professionally and comprehensively to improve its content. no plagiarism, no ai. Turnitin report I need.
Respond to the substance/argument in the paper as a Social Scientist would. I say Social Scientist in very general terms, but you are welcome to be any specific kind of Social Scientist. You may also reply in a general sense of the term. Your response should reflect what you know about the Social Sciences having read about it/them in the book, The Three Cultures. You need to say enough to demonstrate that you have engaged the paper you're reading, and understand the elements of what it means to be a Social Scientist. In other words, offer something very interesting. As you complete your response, you must end with a question. Hopefully you'll be asking a good question. Better questions usually begin with the word "why" or "how," which makes them open ended. So, please begin your question with one of these two words. The question should logically follow from the interesting idea(s) that precede(s) it. Then, you need to return to this discussion to answer the response/question that someone else has asked you in response to your paper. When you do, you must reply as a Humanist would. Again, I'm saying Humanist in very general terms, and again, you are welcome to be any specific kind of Humanist. You may also, if you like, reply in a general sensed of the term. Your answer should reflect what you know about the Humanities having read about it/them in the book, The Three Cultures. You need to say enough to demonstrate that you have engaged the question and the interesting thing that your questioner has asked, and that you understand what the Humanities are about. Don't worry if you think the question could have been better than it is (although I expect all the questions to be very good): it will be up to you, in any case, to make something remarkable out of your reply. In both the Response/Question (as the Social Scientist) and the Reply/Answer to the Response (as the Humanist) I am expecting something quite extraordinary.One last important request: please do not criticize anyone's work -- or anyone! We need to respect one another here. This is very important indeed. Although the history of thought is littered with countless moments of negation, we can certainly rise above the fray and be good examples of how best to conduct the conversation. It's good practice.
Dear Colleagues, Please focus on the following points as you prepare your final essay. 1. The essay question requires that you integrate information taken from several different (referenced) sources, to organize that information, and to summarize the information with conclusions that may be new to you. 2. Begin with a thesis statement, (or a claim) that you will explain and justify in your essay. Support your ideas with a rationale and evidence (not opinion statements such as “I think”) that are logically organized throughout the essay. Your ideas and the support should be clear to the reader. 3. Select relevant material to illustrate your points and provide specific references to class readings as well as additional research that you conduct via FDU library resources. Your essay must make substantive reference to at least two to three resources. Do not cite, quote, or reference from Wikipedia or general non-verifiable sources. References should follow a standard citation format APA as per your instructor. 4. Your essay should reflect appropriate grammar and syntax. Length of the paper is 3-4 pages, double-spaced with a single-spaced heading. Below is the question to answer in your paper. Examine the ways in which the global issue(s) of your choice is(are) presented through the content of the course. Cite a minimum of two or more of the works that we have studied in this course. Present your analysis infusing concepts of sustainability and our Global future. Scoring Rubric Rubric (4=ideal and 1=unacceptable): For the purposes of learning outcomes assessment across sections, the following measures and rankings will be used. Explanation of topic/issue/problem to be addressed 4) Response does a clear, explicit, and full job of identifying and explaining the importance of the TWO SDGs and how the TWO SDGs are interconnected for sustainability 3) Response does a good job of identifying the TWO SDGs although some questions remain as to the importance of both or how the TWO SDGs are interconnected for sustainability 2) Response does an adequate job of identifying the TWO SDGs but without clarity about the importance or interconnectedness for sustainability 1) Response does not include TWO SDGs or does not explain their importance or relation to sustainability Evidence of selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion 4) Response does a clear, explicit, and full job of using source(s) with interpretation/evaluation to provide evidence for the response. Viewpoints of experts are questioned and analyzed. 3) Response does a good job of using source(s) with interpretation/evaluation to provide evidence for the response, but some questions or lack of clarity remain. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning. 2) Response does an adequate job of identifying the source(s) with interpretation/evaluation to provide evidence for the response but without clarity. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. 1) Response does not include the use of sources or provides no interpretation/evaluation of the evidence. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. Influence of context and assumptions 4) Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. 3) Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. 2) Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa). 1) Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. Conclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences) 4) Response clearly explains a conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. 3) Response does a good job of explaining a conclusion that is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. 2) Response does an adequate job of explaining a conclusion that is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are NOT identified clearly. 1) Response does not include a conclusion or the conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified.
Responses to Peers: Engagement: Provide thoughtful insights or ask questions that deepen the discussion about the fashion leader or influencer your peer has introduced. Comparison: Compare and contrast the influence of your chosen fashion leader or influencer with those discussed by your peers. Highlight similarities and differences in their contributions and impact. Extension: Suggest additional ways in which the discussed fashion leaders or influencers could further shape the industry or influence trends.
Find 3 RECENT articles regarding medication or drug pricing controversies (e.g. price gouging) in the PHILIPPINES. Should be 2022 to present. Philippine articles ONLY. LINKS ONLY are needed!!!
