Expert Answers

this is a work in progress paper we have been working on. i will include the previous pdfs including the introduction, annotated bibs, and preliminary results. Read instructions pdf and look at feedback pdf to combine and fix to make final paper.

Auto Ethnography/ Gender Outlaws 100 points 1. Your paper must be: a. 6 - 7 pages in length b. Double-spaced c. Typed in 12-point font d. Typed using Times New Roman 2. Gender Outlaws a. Choose 3 essays to focus on in Gender Outlaws (Gender Outlaws: The Next Generation Bornstein, Kate) let me know if you cant find this online b. How do these three essays offer you new ways to think about your own gender identity? c. Support your statements with references to the text. d. Use the appropriate terminology and concepts you’ve learned in the class 3. Auto Ethnography Component: a. Reflect on your own socialization process. b. Identify and analyze three experiences/events that are "gendered" memories in which you recall learning specific lessons, either overtly and/or covertly, about expectations projections and assumptions about gender. Ultimately how are binary expectations of gender (or not) reflected in these events or experiences and how they collectively shaped your perception and presentation of self as well as your perceptions and expectations of others. c. Draw parallels or make contrasts between your experiences and those experienced the authors you chose to focus on in Gender Outlaws. d. Use the appropriate terminology and concepts you’ve learned in the class. Use this assignment for reference for part 3. Basically Gender Outlaws is about experiences that queer people face and as a straight and cis female I have to reflect on that What it means to "do gender" means to express gender in everyday life through behaviors, clothing, speech, and body language. It is not just something we are but something we do in relation to social expectations. Gender is in every social interaction and is reinforced by the environment and people around us. This idea of gender emphasizes that gender is not just the sex you were born with. In two different contexts like a weekend night at a house party and a job interview. These two settings have very different expectations when it comes to gender performance, and the rules for gendered behavior change depending where you are. At a house party gender rules are about the way you dress, talk and act. For example, women are usually expected to wear revealing or tight clothing, makeup, and high heels. This emphasizes attractiveness and sexuality. They also are expected to act more playfully or flirtatiously. But for Men, it, is expected to show dominance, confidence, and even a little recklessness. They do this through loud behavior, drinking heavily, or showing off. There's an unspoken rule that men should take up space while women should seem inviting or desirable. In comparison with a job interview which is a professional setting, gender rules enforce modesty, seriousness, and formality. Revealing clothing for women would be seen as inappropriate and unprofessional. But Gender neutral or conservative clothing, like pantsuits or blouses with slacks, are encouraged. Women are expected to be assertive but not too aggressive, polite but competent. But men are expected to be confident, well groomed, and direct. The sexualized behavior considered acceptable at a party would be seen as out of place or disrespectful in a job interview. If someone were to have the gender performance seen at a house party into a job interview, the reaction would definitely be negative. A woman showing up in a crop top and heels would be judged as unprofessional. A man acting loudly or using informal slang might be seen as immature and disrespectful. On the other hand, bringing job interview gender rules into a house party could make someone seem overly stiff or socially awkward. A woman dressed in a blazer and flats would be judged, and a man who speaks with calculated professionalism might come off as weird and out of place. These social rules show that some environments need more gender differentiation than others. A house party pushes people toward hyper gendered behavior like more revealing for women, more dominant for men. A job interview encourages a narrowed and more polished performance of gender. You can see this when women wear pantsuits, which is similar to the attire a man would wear. This teaches me that gender performance is not natural but instead socially regulated. The way we do gender is not about biology and more about our understanding of what is expected of us in different environments. It shows how much social cues we all have to navigate daily life. Knowing how to change our gender presentation based on context is a skill that we do unconsciously. In conclusion, gender is in some ways a performance that is different in these two contexts and reminds us that gender is not fixed. It’s very much changing based on the situation.

Write in complete sentences which are correctly punctuated 140-160 words What are the similarities and differences between the caste system in India and the class system of the contemporary United States? Please provide examples to defend your answers. Do we apply the same or different standards for members of diverse groups/classes in American society? Please provide examples to defend your answers. What would you do to fight the caste system? Please provide examples.

Description: Select a scholarly article on social media and education from one of the APUS Library databases. Please make sure you are choosing a peer-reviewed article from an academic journal. Write a short paper, 500-750 words in length, in which you: Summarize the article BRIEFLY. (1 paragraph) Identify the purpose of the research and describe the claims and conclusions the author(s) make(s). (1 paragraph) Describe the results of the research and how they conducted it. Do the results support the author(s) claims? (1 paragraph) How does this research fit into the big picture? Connect your article with the lessons from the week or the course as a whole. (1 paragraph) In your opinion, can you apply this research to "real life?" (1 paragraph) Please consider the following: Please use APA format. See the attached paper for an example of an APA paper. Originality of attachments will be verified by TurnItIn. Both you and your instructor will receive the results. Choosing articles that you can potentially use as resources in future assignments would be helpful in getting "ahead.”

Introduction – a short 1-2 paragraph portion that introduces your topic/issue/framework. This includes a broad overview of the issue as well as how this issue may intersect with other issues based on gender. Rationale – a 2-3 paragraph portion that explains the reason for choosing this topic, its relevance, its significance. From this part onward, the paper must have in-text (parenthetical) citations. Literature Review - 4-7 paragraphs. The literature review is an overview of existing scholarship, research, and examples about your topic. In this part, you can talk about how other scholars, theorists, or activists have analyzed the issue and its intersections/complexities. You can also address the contemporary relevance of this issue and how, despite possibly years of scholarship/activism/movement and legislation, the issue remains a problem today. You can also choose to present some interventions that have been done to address the issue, and how these interventions are flawed or limited, thereby establishing a need to do more research or advocacy work on the existing issue/s. Your literature review must include a minimum of five unique, credible, peer reviewed, academic/journalistic/editorial references. Conclusion – a 1-2 paragraph portion that wraps up your primary arguments for choosing this topic and its significance and relevance to contemporary issues. Please include 3 more sources already related to the paper and revise the paper to follow the template above. The paper must be checked by a Ai generator and not have a similarity rate of over 25%.

2 questions, approximately 500 words each. in-text citations are needed.

Critique the documentary, State Organs (2024). Yes, it is on everyone's favorite app, Tubi. Due, 6/22 @ 11:59 PM. Video Critique Rubric/Guidelines 1) What are four major themes reflected in the documentary/video? (20 points)-a minimum of 4 paragraphs 2) What does each identified theme teach you about Medical Sociology? (20 points)-a minimum of 4 paragraphs. 3) What did you learn from the video and how can society remedy the issues/concerns in the video/documentary? (10 pts)-a minimum of 2 paragraphs. *Must be four pages and must have three major headings l I've included an example critique paper in the files for you to see how it should be done.

This is the final assignment of the course! This assignment requires you to summarize and analyze three peer-reviewed empirical (meaning data are analyzed in the piece, not just theories) social science articles published in the sociology of religion. In addition to describing, in your own words, aspects of the studies themselves (study objectives, methods, findings) I want you to describe your reflections/criticisms/opinions about the article. Also, remember to do your best to connect the articles to our assigned readings from the text. Each “Research Article Overview” is worth 50 points, for a total of 150 points. See the syllabus for important details and for the template you will need to fill out for each of your article overviews. ***You will need to have all three of your research article overviews saved to single Word file (or .pages file if you are a Mac user), and upload the file here*** 1. The template is in the linked in the files portion 2. There is a book required for the last portion of the assignment and it will be attached in the files 3. There is a file of how I write so you can sound as similar to me as possible

OVERVIEW Three times during this course you will prepare a written analysis of a social movement. For each paper, you are responsible for identifying the social movement that you will analyze. One way to identify current social movements is by finding media coverage of protest events, such as demonstrations, marches, or rallies. (Note: Remember that social movements must have temporal continuity, so a protest event that occurred once without future sustained action would not be considered a social movement.) The goal of the analysis paper is for you to demonstrate your ability to apply course concepts. Your analysis paper should be at least 600-words long (approximately two double-spaced pages) with 12-point Calibri or Times New Roman font. Each paper is worth up to 40 points. Note: In this course, word/page requirements only include the text in the body of the paper. The word count does not include title or reference pages. INSTRUCTIONS STEP 1: Identify a social movement FROM OUTSIDE OF THE US that has been active since 2010. It could have started any year and it may no longer be active. It just must have had activity since 2010. NOTE: The Arab Spring is NOT available for this assignment. STEP 2: Find and analyze the following sources to develop your understanding of this social movement: A relevant social movement organization’s (SMO) webpage. Two videos and/or print news stories about specific protest events or the movement, broadly speaking. STEP 3: Write your analysis paper. It should include two main sections: In the first section, describe the social movement using concepts from Module 1. For instance, you should address the following questions: When did this movement form? What were the movement’s grievance? Who were the key actors involved (proponents v. opponents)? What was the target of the action? Note: Write this as a cohesive story about the movement. Do not just compose single sentences that answer the questions presented here. In the second section, describe the movement's outcomes using concepts presented in Module 4. STEP 4: Include a reference page as a separate, last page of your analysis paper. The reference page should include citations/hyperlinks to the sources identified in step 2 above and any other sources that inform your paper. The Cite Your Sources page contains a host of resources about APA citation style. STEP 5: Submit your analysis paper to Canvas before 11:59pm on Sunday, June 22.

I need a three paragraph Discussion Response. Respond to my peer response Below. Good Morning, classmates and Professor, We've reached Unit 5! The classes seem to be going faster and faster towards our end goal. I wish you all the best in the next class. When looking at whether Carl's termination violated his legal expectation of privacy, several factors must be considered within the context of employment law and privacy rights. Generally, an employee's expectation of privacy regarding their social media activity is not absolute, especially when their posts can potentially impact their employer's reputation or business interests. Unless Carl has an employment contract that states otherwise, he is likely an at-will employee. Under this doctrine, the employee can be terminated at any point, without cause, as long as the reason for termination does not violate the law (American InterContinental University 2025). The key is to balance the employee's right to express personal opinions against the employer's legitimate need to maintain a positive public image and protect its business. In this scenario, while Carl posted on Facebook with privacy settings that limited visibility to his friends, the fact that a coworker saw the post and reported it to management introduces a critical element. The legal expectation of privacy is often determined by whether the employee took reasonable steps to protect their information and whether the employer had a legitimate reason to monitor or access the information. Here, Carl's attempt to limit the audience of his Facebook posts suggests he intended to keep his comments private. However, the ease with which a coworker discovered his post diminishes the strength of this expectation. Courts often consider whether the information was obtained through lawful means, such as a coworker voluntarily sharing the post, versus more intrusive methods like hacking or employer surveillance. Additionally, the content of Carl's post directly violated the restaurant's policy against disparaging customers and negatively representing the restaurant on social media, which further weakens his privacy claim. Ultimately, the restaurant's decision to terminate Carl likely does not violate his legal expectation of privacy. While Carl attempted to limit the visibility of his Facebook post, the fact that it was seen and reported by a coworker, coupled with the post's direct violation of company policies, diminishes his claim to privacy in this context. The restaurant's interest in protecting its reputation and enforcing its policies outweighs Carl's expectation of privacy, especially given the potential damage his post could cause the business. This scenario underscores the importance of employees being mindful of their social media activity and adhering to company policies, even when they believe their posts are private. Reference American InterContinental University (2025). Reasonable Expectations of Privacy. Employee Relationships and Rights Review. https://class.aiu-online.com/_layouts/MUSEViewer/Asset.aspx?MID=30454810&aid=30454823