Need Help ?

Expert Answers

 Now, choose another company that you will use for this milestone, as well as t ...

 Now, choose another company that you will use for this milestone, as well as the final project.   By reviewing related case studies for the companies you chose, identify the strengths and weaknesses of each company detailing legal and ethical workplace situations that are influenced by society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security. It is recommended to select at least two case studies relevant to your selected companies.   Submission, APA

READ MORE >>

 There are legal and ethical guidelines that all companies should follow to ens ...

 There are legal and ethical guidelines that all companies should follow to ensure that they are not discriminating against any group. What would you do if you discovered that legal and ethical guidelines were not being followed in your place of employment? Ensure your assignment is at least three pages in length but is no longer than four pages in length, is double-spaced, and uses 12- point Times New Roman font with one-inch margins.

READ MORE >>

  For this discussion, you will focus on the HR shared service (HRSS) delivery ...

  For this discussion, you will focus on the HR shared service (HRSS) delivery model, particularly the center of expertise (COE). HRSS models centralize HR functions to enhance efficiency, consistency, and service quality. COEs are specialized teams within HRSS that provide expertise in specific areas like talent acquisition, employee relations, and benefits administration. After reviewing this module’s required resources and understanding HRSS models and systems, address the following questions: How can an HRSS delivery model benefit the employees and management of an organization? What are some challenges of an HRSS delivery model to the employees and management of an organization? How do changes in technology affect service delivery, effectiveness, and efficiency? Support your arguments with evidence from the course materials, readings, external sources, or your own personal experiences. Make your arguments more compelling by sharing concrete examples to illustrate your points. Finally, relate your response to broader course themes or real-world applications.

READ MORE >>

 One important role of an HR professional is to distinguish state laws from fed ...

 One important role of an HR professional is to distinguish state laws from federal laws    Research articles related to HR responsibilities in the implementation of state laws that are distinguishable from federal Laws. (e.g., right-to-work, benefits like vacation pay, minimum wage, and others). Identify a particular federal law and related state law.  What advice concerning these laws would you provide if you were an HR professional advising top executives who had employees in different states and possibly other countries?  Submission, APA, 3 paragraphs  WorldatWork Home | WorldatWork  

READ MORE >>

Part 1: Share an Original Post. please refer only to material from our class. Th ...

Part 1: Share an Original Post. please refer only to material from our class. This requirement applies to all of your assignments. Do not access the Internet or AI to help you draft this work. Please write in complete paragraphs - no bullet points etc. Here are your prompts. Please answer them ALL. The Problem for Sociology is discussed in your course materials. How does this problem manifest in contemporary society? What are some realistic solutions? All lectures are in Modules. From your Lecture on Culture, summarise the key points in "What's a Fair Start".Then, analyse Kate’s response to Mike—what assumptions is she making, and how do they compare with the evidence presented in the class? Provide at least one direct reference to course material to support your evaluation. From your Lecture on Culture: explain how the themes from slides 6,7,8 connect to real-world examples. Provide a specific case or personal insight that illustrates these themes. From your Lecture on Culture, slides: 13, 14, 43, identify two key facts that challenged or changed your understanding of culture. How do these facts compare to what you previously believed or to examples in your own life? The Lottery of Birth is divided into several key parts (the first of which is called BIRTH). Without directly quoting, summarise each part in your own words. Then, select two of these parts and discuss their implications using examples from class discussions, readings, or current events. How does The Lottery of Birth present its argument about patriotism? Critically evaluate whether you agree with its perspective. Use specific references to the material and apply an example from history or current events to support your position.limerick On slide 9 of The Lottery of Birth PowerPoint, click the link and compare five rich, developed nations. Explain what surprised you about the differences presented. What patterns or trends did you notice that align (or don’t align) with your prior knowledge or personal experiences? The Lottery of Birth states: “If we’re lucky, our culture plants the seeds of doubt so that we can develop the tools necessary to question our identity and the world.” In what ways does this align with or challenge your own experiences with culture and identity? Provide a personal reflection or an example from our course material that supports or contradicts this statement Part 2: Respond thoughtfully to 3 classmates' posts. - 1st peer's post (Lor): "1. Sociology often stirs tension in today’s world, as it can lead to all sorts of problems, it creates disagreements between different groups of people from different backgrounds. These challenges arise when different viewpoints clash or are misunderstood. To manage this constructively, it’s essential to foster open dialogue, listen with intention, and seek mutual understanding. Recognizing that a person’s beliefs are just one part of who they are, helps promote empathy. Ultimately, being able to be flexible in the way we think will enable us to accept, understand and respect one another, and will help in building respectful and inclusive relationships across diverse perspectives. 2. The lecture highlighted how cultural values and social structures shape ideas of fairness. It challenged the myth of equal opportunity by showing how race, class, and family background create unequal starting points in life. Just like the lecture mentioned, it explains that some people are born with silver spoons in their mouth, while others are not. And this inequality affects the different individual's potential of success in life. Analysis of Kate’s Response to Mike Kate believes hard work alone leads to success, ignoring the systemic barriers that many people face. This reflects the different cultures in the U.S., which often overlooks inequality. As noted in class and in Lareau’s Unequal Childhoods, middle-class kids benefit from resources and support that working-class children often lack. Kate’s assumption is a common but inaccurate view. The evidence clearly shows that not everyone begins life with the same opportunities, which is essential to understanding social inequality. 3. These slides showed that culture is something we learn and share with others, even if we don’t always notice it. The way we see the world is shaped by the culture we grow up in. I learned from when I was a kid that showing emotions is perceived as a weakness. But this was wrong, because I realized that other cultures—and even different families do not see it that way, and that it’s okay to be open about your feelings. These differences helped me understand that no culture is better or worse than another. They’re just different, and each one has its own way of doing things. 4. I learned that different cultures have their own ways of life. I used to think everyone in a country shared the same culture, but I realized my own immigrant community is a subculture with its own beliefs and tradition. Slide 43 showed how culture can change over time, especially with things like technology and globalization. I used to think culture stayed the same, but now I see how fast it can shift. In my family, older generations keep old traditions, while younger ones mix them with modern ideas from social media. This helped me see that culture isn’t one single thing, but it’s always growing and changing. 5. Birth: This is when we are born in environments and thing we have no control of, such as race, family and religion. This usually is the main determinant of who we are early on in our lives. Culture: Our logics and behavior are learned from the society, they can be learned through media, school, friends, and rules. Society/Freedom: The business and governmental systems at large have power over our lives and the choices we make. Family: Looking at this, one can ask if this word "freedom" actually exists because our live have gotten shaped by all these forces from when we're born. PART TWO: Birth: This explains how the family, race and environment we are born into can affect a person’s chances of success in life. A child born into poverty may not have the same opportunities as one born into a rich family. This shows how much birth can shape our future. Culture: We also learned how things like school and media teach us what’s “normal.” For instance, they shape our views on gender roles or beauty. This proves that many of our beliefs come from what we’ve been taught, not from free choice. 6. The film argues that patriotism is mostly determined by how we’re raised, and can sometimes support harmful beliefs or limit critical thinking. Although all patriotism isn't bad, the film encourages us to find out what influences our values, and to think in a more global and ethical way. By understanding both the risks and benefits of patriotism, we will have a more thoughtful and fair sense of national identity. 7. It surprised me to find out that the U.S. ranked low in healthcare and income equality, even though it's very wealthy. I've always thought that more money would mean better results, but that's not the case here. It's like a pattern that countries like Sweden and Japan, which invest more in public services, had better outcomes and less inequality. Places with bigger income gaps had more problems. After finding out all these information, it changed how I see wealth and success. It showed me that where you're born really affects your chances in life, just like in the film. 8. The quote from The Lottery of Birth—“If we’re lucky, our culture plants the seeds of doubt…” really got me thinking. I grew up just following traditions and not questioning much. For instance, learning about socialization and how our values are shaped by our environment helped me understand that many of my beliefs weren’t really my own, I inherited them. This goes with the film’s idea that only some people get the chance to learn how to question the systems they belong in. So, I agree with the quote. Culture can give us the tools to think critically, but only if it allows room for doubt and open discussion." - 2nd peer's post (Anni): "1. The Problem for Sociology highlights the need to challenge our beliefs and assumptions shaped by our family and culture to understand social issues deeply. This manifests as social inequality in contemporary society, where people face different levels of opportunity based on their background. Realistic solutions include promoting awareness and education that encourages critical thinking, implementing policies that address inequality, and fostering inclusive communities that support diverse perspectives. Another simpler solution could be asking yourself, as mentioned in the module “Why is it so hard to unlearn what we’ve been taught to believe is true?” 2. The “What’s a Fair Start” video breaks down the idea that not everyone has an equitable starting position in their life. The lecture mentions that some of us grow up wealthy and some of us grow up poor. The professor challenges his class and the audience to think about and address how we can look at social, economic, and environmental inequalities to create a fair society. He often mentions how or what we need to do to have everyone succeed in life if we start at uneven playing levels. Kate's response to Mike proves that Kate understands that, based on how she grew up, she was given extra opportunities that most likely helped her get into Harvard. In contrast, Mike explains that he got into Harvard based on his hard work and effort. What he failed to realize, and Kate mentions, is that to have a fair society, we have to understand that some, including herself, get more support or opportunities than others. This idea that Kate presents is similar to slide 67 in the Origins of Sociology, which presents the idea that poor and less privileged people are less likely to be able to develop their talents because of a lack of opportunities. 3. Slides 6,7,8 from the culture lecture show the High/Scope Perry Preschool Study shows how important early education is for better life outcomes. For example, kids who went to quality preschool ended up with lower arrest rates and higher earnings. A good real-world example is how some states are putting more money into preschool programs to help kids from less fortunate backgrounds, so they have a better shot at success later on. It shows how investing in early education can help break the cycle of poverty and give everyone a fair chance. 4. Two key facts from the slides that changed my view on culture are how most OECD countries cut down their poverty rates through redistribution and how COVID made existing inequalities way worse, especially with wealth. I used to think poverty was just about personal choices, but now I see how much impact government policies can have. And the idea that we might be "prisoners of socialization" got me thinking about how our backgrounds shape our views. I’ve noticed this with friends who grew up in different environments and how it affects their perspectives. 5. BIRTH: The video shows how factors like location and socio-economic status can lead to vastly different life opportunities for individuals. FAMILY: It illustrates the impact of family dynamics, showcasing how supportive or challenging family environments can shape a person's character and life choices. SOCIETY: The video emphasizes societal expectations and pressures, demonstrating how they influence individuals’ aspirations and self-perception, often pushing them to conform. CULTURE: Cultural elements are portrayed through various traditions and practices, highlighting how they shape identity and inform the values and behaviors of individuals within different communities. IMPLICATIONS Using family and culture, the video highlights how society shapes our choices through the pressure to conform to expectations, influencing our career paths and personal aspirations, while also showcasing how cultural practices empower individuals and the tension that arises when those values clash with modern norms. 6. The Lottery of Birth argues that blind patriotism can prevent critical thinking about a country’s flaws. It suggests that many view their nation as the best simply because they lack perspective, which can ignore harsh realities and the negative impacts of their country on others. I agree with this view. For instance, during the Vietnam War, many Americans were fiercely patriotic and overlooked the suffering caused to the Vietnamese people. This disconnect highlights how unchecked patriotism can hinder awareness and meaningful discussions about a nation’s actions. Looking through a sociological lens is essential. 7. In comparing the five rich nations, I was surprised by the differences in unemployment and resource usage. The U.S. has an 11.29% higher chance of being unemployed than Canada, which is unfortunate. France uses almost 60% less oil than Canada, which is good because it indicates a more sustainable energy approach and a lower carbon footprint. Germany's unemployment rate is 50% lower than France's, reflecting a stronger economy and better job security. However, it's crazy that Australians are almost 90% more likely to be arrested than Germans, highlighting significant differences in law enforcement and social issues between the two countries. 8. The idea from "The Lottery of Birth" really resonates with my own experiences because I’ve often found myself questioning my identity and the cultural norms around me. I used to identify myself sometimes as just one certain thing, like being part of a specific group or having a certain label, but I realized I am so much more than that. Reflecting on my journey, I see how embracing my multifaceted identity has allowed me to grow, challenge stereotypes, and appreciate the diverse influences that shape who I am today." - 3rd peer's post (Ang): "1. The Problem for Sociology A major challenge that sociology faces stems from the fact that people generally fail to recognize the significant influence of their surroundings on their thoughts. Our cultural environment teaches us all our internalized ideas and values because we usually mistake them as belonging to ourselves alone. Modern society shows itself in the way people assess others, even though they lack knowledge about their circumstances and troubles. A helpful solution involves creating awareness by teaching people and holding direct conversations that we practice in our current classroom. 2. Kate’s video “What’s a Fair Start” Presents Her View “What’s a Fair Start” presents evidence that people begin their lives with different available chances. Kate remains convinced that hard work gives everyone equal opportunities in life, despite all available evidence showing otherwise. According to our lecture on culture, starting chances depend on factors such as race, gender, and class right from the outset (Slide 13). The environment of individuals receives little attention from Kate when evaluating their chances at success. 3. Slides 6, 7, 8, and Real-Life Connections The information presented in slides 6 to 8 demonstrated that culture exists through shared knowledge, yet learning this information is typically difficult to notice. The way we observe the world derives from culture. In my childhood, I had learned that emotional openness equated to weakness. People learn opposing lessons about openness in different cultures as well as within different family environments. Cultural differences motivated me to understand that alternate ways of life should not be considered superior or inferior since they simply exist as distinct phenomena 4. Two Surprising Facts from Slides 13, 14, 43 People seem to consider their cultural background as the standard norm, according to Slide 14. I used to think that, too. The third interesting point comes from Slide 43, which describes the importance of challenging beliefs. An initial fear that questioning things made me seem challenging now teaches me to value questions as valuable assets. The impact of this experience made me develop a greater understanding of different cultures. 5. The Lottery of Birth: Summary and Analysis The sections of The Lottery of Birth documentary are arranged into BIRTH, FAMILY, SOCIETY, and CULTURE. The different segments create a case for the argument that numerous life elements are established before people can influence them. This section of BIRTH illustrates how birthplace and time of birth create massive differences in our available opportunities. In the FAMILY segment it reveals how both family resources and parent expectations together with parenting methods determine future life directions. The documentary separates information into distinct parts which directly support classroom discussions about social determinism and mobility. Early advantages in life accumulate throughout time according to the video which directly matches the concepts presented in our social class lecture.. 6. Patriotism in the Film The film depicts patriotism as an obstruction that prevents people from detecting issues within their homeland. I agree with this. When you love your nation truly, you wish for its growth even if it requires expressing what needs improvement. Those classified as unpatriotic by society ended up strengthening the United States because of their actions, such as Martin Luther King Jr. 7. Five-Nation Comparison The results of comparing five wealthy nations displayed that money fails to guarantee successful outcomes. The United States delivered inferior health and education outcomes in comparison to Norway because of its weaker supportive framework. This experience caused me to doubt the notion America held as "the best" country. The incarceration numbers and inequality metrics in wealthy nations turned out to be substantially lower than the United States statistics. The two nations demonstrate reduced prisoner populations while maintaining robust welfare system programs. The governments with elevated tax rates managed to generate better achievements for education and health results. The observed patterns disproved my existing belief that diminished tax rates and self-reliance generate superior system performance. The experience led me to doubt if American values line up with true national wellness metrics. 8. Seeds of Doubt The concept about how doubt leads to personal development appealed strongly to me. Before starting this course, I rarely concentrated on the cultural influences that have formed me. I am studying to both observe my thoughts and to query vital questions more profoundly. The personal growth experience paved the way for improvement in my student life, along with my character development. The Lottery of Birth effectively states that cultural influences generate doubtful thoughts. I relate to this deeply. Success and gender expectations along with personal identity beliefs were imposed on me during my upbringing. Education together with encounters with diverse perspectives helped me develop doubts about beliefs which I had learned as a child. Doing this course revealed that asking questions never amounts to betrayal because the process leads us to improved personal development. During our social norms discussion I understood that numerous unspoken cultural guidelines were driving my actions while I was unknowingly unconcerned about them. The realization has led me to make conscious efforts about my life practices." MATERIALS Are Attached below. Please check them out to work on this assignment. From The Lottery Of Birth: Here's the Tri-Lateral Commission (Search "rising expectations"): https://archive.org/stream/TheCrisisOfDemocracy-Tr... VIDEO: The Lottery of Birth (2013). Do you shape the world or does it shape you?: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hPPSa3cU56u4AHZwK...

READ MORE >>

SPRING 2025 – SOC 430 EXAM 1 Topic/Question Menu Pick ONE of the following to ...

SPRING 2025 – SOC 430 EXAM 1 Topic/Question Menu Pick ONE of the following topics and write an essay of no more than 1200 words in response. Save your essay as a .doc, .docx, .rtf, or .pdf file. Make sure you appropriately cite the source(s) of quoted passages and paraphrases. 1. Compare and contrast Marx (and Marx&Engels) to Durkheim on: A. the ‘causes’ of the development of the division of labor and specialization of functions in societies, and B. the effects/implications of the development of the division of social labor for societies, social groups within them, and their individual members. 2. Define ‘mechanical’ and ‘organic’ solidarity, according to Durkheim. Discuss the (reciprocal) relationship between: A. the extent (and flexibility) of the division & specialization of labor/functions in a society and B. the relative contribution of each type of solidarity in bonding/attaching individuals to each other and to society (overall and/or various societies), according to Durkheim. 3. Compare and contrast “alienation” (as defined and discussed by Marx) and “anomie” (as defined and discussed by Durkheim) as problematic features of societies like ours, or of certain important sectors (e.g., the economy or commerce, industry, and finance) of them. Discuss Marx and Durkheim’s proposed ‘remedies’ (or ‘solutions’) for the problematic feature each focused on. 4. Analyze Marx&Engels’s description of, and predictions about, the formation of proletarians into a solidary class (in the Communist Manifesto) using Durkheim’s concepts of ‘mechanical’ and ‘organic’ solidarity. 5. Define Durkheim’s notion of collective conscience (or consciousness). What determines the number of collective consciences that simultaneously exist in a society, and their relations with one another? What determines the strength of the effect of collective conscience(s) on (or control over) individual consciences? What determines the kind of effect such collective consciences have on the thoughts, sentiments and conduct of individuals? Discuss. 6. Is every social group, to some variable degree, ‘a Church’ according to Durkheim? What determines the degree to which a social group is ‘a Church’ (according to Durkheim’s definition of the term), its ‘Church-ness’, as it were? What are the effects on individuals (their thoughts, sentiments, actions) of the degree of “Church-ness” of the groups of which they are parts or members? Discuss. (The relative contribution of mechanical vs. organic solidarity in integrating a social group may be useful here) 7. Under what circumstances, and in which types of societies, are ‘egoism’ and ‘anomie’ (rather than ‘altruism’ – i.e., ‘groupism’ – and ‘fatalism’) likely to be regularly occurring problematic or pathological/abnormal social (and individual) states, according to Durkheim? What must such societies (allow or seek to) develop to prevent, minimize, and remedy such problematic social (and individual) states, according to Durkheim? (NB. This topic is NOT about Durkheim’s attempted typology of suicide, and explanation of suicide rates) 8. Compare and contrast Marx and Durkheim on the possible causes and effects of “nationalism”/patriotism in modern societies? Does the content of the national/country ideals matter for the possible effects of nationalism/patriotism? Discuss. 9. What are the ultimate causes of ‘alienated labor’ in capitalist societies, according to Marx? How are ‘alienated labor’ and the ‘fetishism of commodities’ connected according to Marx, and how may they have different (even contradictory) effects on the consciousness of ‘proletarians’? Discuss. 10. Summarize Engels’ argument regarding the positions of, and relations between, men and women in male supremacist ‘monogamous’ (i.e., indissoluble) marriages. Critically evaluate his analogizing of the relations between men and women in such marriages to the relation between capitalists and proletarians. How does it strengthen or weaken his analysis of gender, marriage and families? 11. Compare and contrast Marx and Durkheim on the ‘causes’ of ‘religion’ (as each defines it) and the ‘effects’ of religion and religious life on individuals, groups, and societies. 12. Compare and contrast Marx and Durkheim on the effects of ‘moral’ (social and cultural) regulation of economic (production, distribution, exchange, consumption) life on individuals, groups, and societies.

READ MORE >>

Write a 5-page, 12-font, Times New Roman, double-spaced paper, using your book f ...

Write a 5-page, 12-font, Times New Roman, double-spaced paper, using your book for reference, about the following questions. Please remember to cite every time you are referencing the material, and use the ASA style guide for these references in the text and for the reference list. To find this style guide search "ASA style guide Purdue" into Google and find the Purdue link. Prompt: Answer the following questions, using your book, and lectures as references. Each of these answers should be 2.5 pages in length. Race is socially constructed. What does that mean? Can you give examples of how it is socially constructed (i.e. examples of changes over time). “One aspect of our identity is gender. How were you socialized into learning what was considered culturally appropriate behavior for your gender? Which agents of socialization taught you these cultural norms, and which was the most significant in shaping your sense of self? Explain.” (Croteau, Hoynes, and Stamm 2024) You must cite and reference lectures and readings in your answers to receive full credit. Each question is worth 50% of your grade on this assignment. Additionally, include and define two key terms from the relevant textbook chapters in each of your responses. You are encouraged to use the terms used in the prompts such as "race," "gender," and "agents of socialization," in your answers. The textbook is "Fifth Edition Experience Sociology, David Croteau / William Hoynes / Tara Stamm" I have also provided a screenshot of the cover page so you know which one it is. Make sure to reference/cite ALL information found and DO NOT mention any ideas that are not your own, without having cited them.

READ MORE >>

1.Pick a sociological topic and discuss it using one of the three theoretical pe ...

1.Pick a sociological topic and discuss it using one of the three theoretical perspectives; Structural Functionalist, Conflict or Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. 2.Describe how sociology differs from and is similar to other social sciences, provide examples of these similarities and differences. 3.Discuss, in depth, these key sociological concepts: culture, social stratification, social inequality, cultural diversity, gender and socialization. 4.Enter all work cited in an MLA or APA format Answer all of the following prompts in an essay format. Make sure to supply as much detail as possible including examples when needed. Be sure to cite all your work. Use in-text citations and complete your work-cited sections. See the Purdue Owl Writing Lab (Links to an external website for MLA and APA essay formatting examples. There is a 3000 words minimum in total for the whole of the essay. Please write the four questions separately, with a total of 3,000 words

READ MORE >>

You have spent the summer working as an intern with your state senator and have ...

You have spent the summer working as an intern with your state senator and have gained the trust and respect of senior staff members. The senator has asked you to write a reflective essay addressing a landmark Supreme Court case for the monthly email newsletter to constituents. Assignment Deliverable Choose one of the following landmark Supreme Court cases, to research for your essay: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Loving v. Virginia (1967) United States v. Nixon (1974) Roe v. Wade (1973) Write a 700- 900 word reflective essay on your chosen case in which you: Describe the key facts of the case and the constitutional issues involved. Summarize the processes that took place to raise the case to the level of the Supreme Court. Summarize the ruling of the Supreme Court. Explain how the case relates to civil liberties and/or civil rights. Explain why the case is considered a landmark case and remains relevant to current political debates. Discuss what impact the case has on you personally and on society. Discuss how you would have decided the case if you were a member of the Supreme Court and why you would have decided that way. Citing sources shows fairness and respect for the ideas that inform your work. Uusing APA formatting—it’s a skill you will improve with practice, and your faculty member is here to help.

READ MORE >>

Learning objectives of assignment: To demonstrate comprehension of major course ...

Learning objectives of assignment: To demonstrate comprehension of major course concepts and topics and an understanding of how to apply what was learned in a real-world setting. Description of assignment: You will complete one reflection paper to assess what was learned about issues related to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) over the semester as well as ascertain knowledge in relation to successful intervention and prevention programs for this population. Topic for the paper is as follows Choose a specific type of interpersonal violence committed against women, men, and children (e.g., physical, sexual, emotional, verbal, economic, using children as weapons, LGBTQ, persons with disabilities, older women and women who are recent immigrants) and provide a rational for the significance of preventing this form of violence. Second, identify what you feel are the most important issues related to your specific topic. Lastly, using the knowledge you have gained from the course discussions and material, design a prevention/intervention program aimed at alleviating the specific form of violence. Make sure to include a discussion of the program’s structure, scope, target population, methodology, possible challenges, and potential results. Final paper should be typed using 12-point Times New Roman font and standard margins (1-inch on all sides) and should be 7-10 double-spaced pages in length. Your paper should be written as you would any other academic paper and should be proofread and spell and grammar checked. I will attach a pdf of my notes from the class to help you but you can also use outside knowledge if needed. Do not plagaize or use AI.

READ MORE >>
QUICK ORDER

Place a Quick Order

Our verified writers got you covered. Let us help you balance between studies, work, and family.

We provide our assistance to the numerous clients looking for a professional writing service.

Order Now
Designed and developed by Brian Mubichi (mubix)
WhatsApp