Expert Answers

NO PLAGERISIM!!!! I am looking for someone to assist me with answering weekly discussion questions. I want to select one person to use the entire semester if possible! What are the important milestone components of the PsyD program? How does the PsyD program as a professional doctorate differ from a traditional PhD? Why did you choose to pursue a PsyD at our university? Post your original reply in no more than 500 words and make sure you cite your source(s). MUST READ these References to put in the discussion-- Elliot, D. L. (2022). A “doctoral compass”: Strategic reflection, self-assessment and recalibration for navigating the “twin” doctoral journey. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1652–1665. Retrieved from the EBSCO multi-search database in the TUW online library. (Please note: This article from Great Britain refers to the PhD but the content is entirely relevant to a PsyD student.) American Psychological Association. (2021, November 8). Careers in applied Psychology: Industrial-organizational Psychology [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JfMU6LDoCc (58:52) Maples, G. W. (2023). High impact, low mood: An analysis of graduate student attitudes and perceptions through PHD memes. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 18, 1-23. Retrieved from ProQuest One Academic database in the TUW online library. OPTIONAL Hawkes, D., & Yerrabati, S. (2018). A systematic review of research on professional doctorates [PDF]. London Review Of Education, 16(1), 10-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1174872.pdf

Casino operation analysis Due 11/2 11pm EVENT DISCUSSION Alex Alvarado Oct 29 2:38pm | Last reply Oct 30 2:09pm Manage Discussion by Alex Alvarado ""Recently published research by the Lancet Public Health Commission suggests that the growth of online casino gaming has led to the accessibility of gambling more broadly. The report calls the industry’s expansion a public health crisis. 22 academic experts representing 12 countries reviewed existing studies and data on gaming’s prevalence and its global adverse effects. The study suggests that gambling is legal in over 80% of countries globally and that 16% of adults who game have a disorder. The United States offers gaming in 38 states and Washington D.C., with 19% of adults reporting having placed sports bets in 2022. The authors highlight predatory marketing practices and sophisticated digitalization of online gaming platforms as concerns, with insufficient consumer protections in place. The authors call for greater governmental regulation and accountability of operators and game developers. These findings are significant, as they highlight several implications for the continued prosperity of the global gaming industry. First, a narrative suggesting that operators are more concerned with profits than wellbeing can cause societies to turn against the industry’s progress, particularly as mental health comes into focus in the post-COVID era. Second, it is a statistical fact that online gaming is experiencing extraordinary growth, sometimes doubling the size of markets as seen in Michigan. It is incumbent on the industry to comprehensibly account for consumer protections for the long-term health of the brand identity of casino gambling. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/gambling-industry-growth-threat-public-health-report-rcna175356 Links to an external site."" Requirement: Current Event Discussion: Module 2 The student(s) assigned to current event #2 are required to post the link to the article and their synopsis by Tuesday night at midnight PST the week it will be discussed. All other students are required to read the article and synopsis before posting their questions and comments on the posting. You are allowed to do 1 posting (but you can do two separate if you want extra time to think/address the different parts), but for full credit, you must answer both needed parts: 1. Why you agree or disagree with the person posting this synopsis on if this is important to casino operators and why you believe that 2. Ask a question either pertaining to the article, topic, or a related follow-up. These do not have to be done in any order just make sure you address both before the due date. The points possible pertain only to the discussion forum part. The original student(s) posting and the moderating of the discussion forum are part of a different grade. word count about 250

Unit VII Final Research Paper Assignment objective: In this assignment, you will produce your final paper with the addition of the counterargument and conclusion paragraph, your revised introduction paragraph and developed body paragraphs, and a references page with at least three sources. Length: The overall paper should be 1,300 to 1,500 words, not counting the references page. References: At least three sources are required, and at least one must come from the CSU Online Library. All sources should be academically credible (academic journals, eBooks, periodicals, organizational websites, etc.) and no more than 5 years old. Use APA Style 7th edition standards to format the reference citations for each source. Details: In this assignment, you will transition the outline you created in Unit IV into at least three body paragraphs; be sure to implement your professor's suggestions and feedback from the Unit IV assignment. You will also write the paper's counterargument and conclusion. The paper should include all the following components (in order): Title page Introduction Body paragraphs Counterargument Conclusion References page Introductory Paragraph: Include approximately six sentences. The introduction paragraph serves to introduce the topic and the paper's thesis statement. Make the suggested revisions based on the feedback you received in Unit IV. Body Paragraphs: Include at least three paragraphs. Transition the outline of the body you produced in Unit IV to full paragraph form to support the paper's thesis (revisit Unit VI lessons on transitions and cohesion). Each body paragraph should address one of the justifications of the thesis statement's position. Counterargument: Include approximately six to seven sentences. Introduce an argument that opposes the argument made in the thesis statement and then refute it (revisit Unit VI lessons on introducing a counterargument). Conclusion: Include approximately six sentences. Bring the paper to a close by emphasizing the importance of the issue and the controversy and answer the "so what?" question.

Use the Internet to locate additional information about the author(s) and publication to identify any biases and establish credibility. Highlight and annotate the articles by highlighting sections and then explaining why. Remember not to highlight large sections at one time because that defeats the purpose of highlighting. Articles are attached.

Technology has opened the door for flexibility within the workplace. Assume that I am your manager, and write a memo convincing me to implement workplace flexibility in our business. You can decide what type of business we have; I would suggest using the type of job that you hope to have once you finish your degree. Make sure to provide research that supports your arguments. Included in your memo should be a specific request for the type of flexibility that you desire; explain how that will work within your office, and make sure to address any potential problems and how they would be dealt with. There is no minimum length for this assignment, but you need to convince me that it is a mutually beneficial arrangement (hint, this is usually about 1.5-2 pages minimum). You should have several sources to support your argument, show me that this has worked for other companies, and explain the benefits to the company. This memo does not have to be formatted as an APA paper, but please put a title page on it that will act as the cover page. Assignment must be submitted as a .doc or .docx (Microsoft Word) file. Any assignment submitted in any other format will automatically be given a 0 as the final score

I will add the prompt and rubric given to me. I tend to struggle with writing and getting started often I worry that I am using a incorrect format. I typically do better when given an example to use as a reference but I have not had one provided for this assignment and have had some mental blocks that keep telling me I am doing it all wrong. Would you be able to assist me in getting through this assinment? This paper is about being a consumer of information. The topic of the paper is information seeking behavior and the administration of the current President of the United States. Part I. The Administration In this section of the paper write a detailed description of how you are (intentionally or unintentionally) receiving information about the administration of the President of the United States. In this part of the paper, be sure to address the following…. Conversationally (people talking about it)? Older technologies (such as television, radio, print newspapers/magazines)? Newer technologies (computers, phones, tablets through online news, social media, video clips, etc.). Is most of the information you are receiving serious? Satire/jokes? Do you attempt evaluate the truthfulness of the news to which you are exposed? If so, how do you go about that? How do you evaluate the accuracy/strength of the information you receive about the current president/administration? How has the sharing of political messages changed with the advent of new information technologies? In general, what is your favorite source of U.S. political information? Part II. Information-Seeking Behavior Pick one of the current hot button political topics (health care law, global warming, immigration, gun control, pandemic response, abortion) and search for information on where the current administration and their political opponents stand on this issue. In this section you will write about: How did you go about searching (what technology did you use? What search interface (Google? other?). What keywords did you use? How successful was your searching? Did it take several searches to find the information? How many? How did you decide to revise your search strategy for better results? Choose one of the information behavior models outlined in chapter 12 of your textbook. Apply that model to your information searching. Did your personal searching process fit the assumptions of the model? In what way did the model fit and/or not fit? Did the sources you used in Part II correspond with the sources you found to be most credible in Part I? Remember! Any time you use a source outside your own brain, you must cite it. You may use APA, MLA, or Chicago style citations. More information about these citation styles can be found at https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/resources.htm and citation/resources.htm. I have provided a rubric to help you insure that you are meeting all requirements for this paper. Pay special attention to the "Use of Model" section. This is where students lose the most points. In addition, make sure you look at the "Adherence to Requirements" section. I would hate for you to lose points over a requirement that is easy to meet. Formatting Guidelines Use a Title page, Times New Roman 12 font, 1 inch margins and double spaced. Paper will use essay format (not bulleted list) and be 1,200 words minimum. Have an introduction paragraph and a conclusions paragraph that tie the paper together. (While I recommend breaking your paper up into Part I and Part II, your introduction and conclusion should tie it all together.) Cite your sources! If you include facts of any kind (and you should), you must cite your source. You may use any citation style you wish but you should include in-text citations and a works cited or references page. I will count off points if you state facts without citing a source. If you have not at least cited your textbook, you will lose points. Short Paper Rubric (2021) Short Paper Rubric (2021) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall topic 50 to >40.0 ptsExemplary Full Marks - ADemonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and questions. Thoroughly addresses all aspects of the prompt. Use of quotes used judiciously. Less than 20% duplication straight or verbatim from other sources. 40 to >30.0 ptsAccomplishedThoroughly addresses most aspects of the prompt. Displays some critical thinking with regard to information behavior. Less than 35% duplication straight or verbatim from other sources. 30 to >20.0 ptsDevelopingAddresses some aspects of the prompt and demonstrates some critical thinking with regard to information behavior. Less than 45% duplication straight or verbatim from other sources. 20 to >0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory BeginningDemonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the prompt. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis. More than 45% duplication straight or verbatim from other sources demonstrating lack of synthesis and bordering plagiarism. 0 ptsNo Marks - Did not submit Assignment by the Due DateDid not submit Assignment by the Due Date. 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Model 50 to >40.0 ptsExemplary Full Marks - AIdentifies a specific model from the textbook, providing the name of the model's creator and title of the model if available. Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the model by describing it and applying it to the student's own information behavior. 40 to >30.0 ptsAccomplishedDemonstrates a thorough understanding of the model by describing it and applying it to the student's own information behavior. Model is not clearly identified but is recognizable from the text. 30 to >20.0 ptsDevelopingModel is identified but application is insufficient to indicate that the student understands it. Or - Student may have used a theory or style as opposed to a model. 20 to >0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory BeginningModel is not clearly identified or described. Student has not demonstrated an understanding of the model or has not applied it to their own information behavior. 0 ptsNo Marks - Did not submit Assignment by the Due DateDid not submit Assignment by the Due Date. 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 30 to >24.0 ptsExemplary Full Marks - APaper is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flow smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, Reference List, etc.). 24 to >18.0 ptsAccomplishedPaper is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components (introduction, body, conclusion, Reference List, etc.) for the most part. 18 to >12.0 ptsDevelopingPaper is somewhat organized, although occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or component may be less than complete. 12 to >0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory BeginningPaper lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. Central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. 0 ptsNo Marks - Did not submit Assignment by the Due DateDid not submit Assignment by the Due Date. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality 30 to >24.0 ptsExemplary Full Marks - APaper is well written and clear using APA, MLA, or Chicago guidelines and standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Ideas are well synthesized and masterfully written. 24 to >18.0 ptsAccomplishedPaper shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English and following APA, MLA, or Chicago guidelines. Synthesis is clear. 18 to >12.0 ptsDevelopingPaper shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English and following APA, MLA, or Chicago guidelines. Displays lack of original thought or synthesis of ideas. 12 to >0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory BeginningPaper shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English and following proper APA, MLA, or Chicago guidelines. Content borders on plagiarism demonstrating lack of synthesis. Lack of in-text citation crediting original sources used. 0 ptsNo Marks - Did not submit Assignment by the Due DateDid not submit Assignment by the Due Date. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdherence to Requirements 20 to >16.0 ptsExemplary Full Marks - APaper is submitted by the deadline and meets or exceeds all requirements -Title page minimum of 1200 words, double spaced in 12-point font, correct margins, proper citation throughout. 16 to >12.0 ptsAccomplishedPaper is submitted by the deadline and adequately meets most requirements - Title page, minimum of 1200 words, double spaced in 12-point font, correct margins, proper citation throughout. 12 to >8.0 ptsDevelopingPaper is submitted by the deadline and/or may be lacking one or two of the stated requirements. Length, font or citations may be insufficient. This does not severely impede the content or strength of the piece but demonstrates a lack of adherence to requirements. 8 to >0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory BeginningPaper substantially fails to meet multiple requirements. Synthesis may be lacking due to a heavy reliance on quotes or use of source ideas not properly quoted, bordering on plagiarism. Content and strength of paper is severely affected by failing to meet required criteria, particularly with regard to length. 0 ptsNo Marks - Did not submit Assignment by the Due DateDid not submit Assignment by the Due Date. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Proofreading 20 to >15.0 ptsFull MarksPaper is free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. Paper has been proofread and contains no typos. 15 to >10.0 ptsDevelopingMinor errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or formatting do not impede the flow of ideas in the paper. Paper has been proofread and contains few typos. 10 to >0.0 ptsBeginningFrequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting that hinder the flow of the paper. 0 ptsNo MarksDid not submit assignment by the due date. 20 pts Total Points: 200

Learning Outcomes CO 3: Evaluate the possible consequences of poorly reasoned actions. LO 3.1: Examine the outcomes of various whistleblower situations. CO 4: Examine differences in actions and outcomes based on the status of stakeholders. LO 4.1: Differentiate relevant stakeholders and possible consequences of poorly reasoned actions related to whistleblowing. CO 5: Critique different levels of responsibility relevancy for various stakeholders. LO 5.1: Justify suitable actions to bring about morally justifiable outcomes related to whistleblowing. Please find an article or news story about some whistle-blowing situation. Please do not use high-profile cases like Snowden or Manning. If you can find the same story described by different sources all the better. Do not use some personal experience unless it was discussed in credible new sources. I need to be able to verify the account. Then, using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after telling me about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all of the key stakeholders and how you feel they were impacted. For example, if someone released company records and emails to blow the whistle, discuss whose emails and how the information led to actions against them. If no one was negatively impacted, then why use it for this case study? Discuss the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your moral compass to describe or explain why you feel someone’s actions were morally wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors involved were thinking or what motivation they may or may not have had. What matters is ONLY your beliefs about whether the actions were morally right or wrong. Use named moral theories to support your position. Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was some whistle blown? Finally, imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do to keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from feeling a need to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may feel the real wrongdoer is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why what the company/government did or is doing is justified, again using your moral theories.

Having visited the Roman Forum, Colosseum, and Pantheon you feel inspired by what you have seen and decide to write a short fiction piece (200-300 words) set at one of these monuments.Please choose either the Roman Forum, the Colosseum, or the Pantheon as a setting for your story. Please make sure to include at least three architectural details or features of the site that you have learned from the readings, videos, and/or discussions between characters in Chapter 3. Here is the link to the chapter. https://romethegame.itch.io/rtg-chapter-3-new-2024 the password is Forum2024 PLEASE NO AI OF ANY SORT. If it follows any sort of ai structure I will get a 0. Please be unique in making this story. Please use modern language and make the story easy to follow along.

The purpose of this essay is to assess your personal information-seeking behaviors, i.e. how you look for information and conduct your research. Please be sure to review the assignment formatting guidelines. All references must be properly cited in APA format. In approximately 250 words, describe an instance in which you were searching for information. This could be a personal instance (such as looking for a restaurant while traveling), or something you did for an academic reason (such as writing a research paper for a class). download a template for this assignment. Include the following elements: A description of your information need (i.e. what were you looking for?) A description of your search strategies (which sources did you rely on, and how did you decide to go there?) An overall assessment of your research behavior, including how you determined that your needs were met. Also include here which elements of your process were satisfactory, and which elements were not. Name any roadblocks you encountered, and in which areas of research you wish you were more skilled. Rubric Individual Research Behaviors Individual Research Behaviors Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Information Need 10 pts Excellent Clearly describes the information need, purpose, and context of the search with specificity. 8 pts Good Describes the information need and context with some detail, minor specificity. 6 pts Fair Describes the information need, with basic context. 4 pts Poor Provides a vague or unclear description of the information need. 2 pts Deficient Description of information need is missing or highly unclear. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection and Assessment of Research Behavior 15 pts Excellent Provides a thoughtful reflection on the research process, addressing successes, challenges, and self-assessment of research skills. 12 pts Good Reflects on the research process, noting successes and challenges, some self-assessment. 9 pts Fair Includes basic reflection on research process, but lacks depth in self-assessment. 6 pts Poor Offers limited reflection; little mention of successes or challenges. 3 pts Deficient Reflection is missing or does not address key points. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure, Clarity, and Mechanics 10 pts Excellent Essay is well-organized, flows logically with clear transitions; free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 8 pts Good Essay is mostly well-organized and clear, with few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. 6 pts Fair Structure is adequate but lacks logical flow; some grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. 4 pts Poor Lacks clear structure, with frequent grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. 0 pts Deficient Structure is unclear; numerous grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors interfere with readability. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Formatting 10 pts Excellent Correctly formatted; includes all required elements and citations, if applicable. 8 pts Good Mostly correct formatting; includes all required elements, minor citation issues. 6 pts Fair Basic formatting; missing minor elements, some citation issues. 4 pts Poor Formatting is incorrect or missing elements. 0 pts Deficient Formatting is largely incorrect; missing citations or references, if needed. 10 pts Total Points: 45

The methodology chosen for your dissertation study emerges from the topic selected within the defined problem space and must be supported by the extant literature. Some topics are better suited to quantitative methodologies while others align better with qualitative methodologies. In this assignment, you will make an initial choice to conduct your potential dissertation research using either a quantitative or qualitative methodology. You will justify your choice of methodology based on the problem statement and supported by the extant literature. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Refer to the discussions in which you have engaged to date in the class discussion forums. Refer to your Topic 2 assignment submission and any related feedback from faculty. Refer to the dissertation topic you have been developing in this course and your previous research courses as well as any related feedback from faculty and peers. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA Style for their writing assignments. Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. The manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Directions: Write a paper (750-1,000 words) in which you create an argument for your chosen methodology. Include the following in your paper: A refined statement of and reflection on your potential dissertation topic. How have you refined your topic based on feedback from your instructors and the problem space identified for your potential topic? A single-sentence problem statement that aligns with your potential dissertation topic. A statement of your potential methodology. A justification of the potential methodology choice stated above. How have the quantitative and qualitative components discussed in class influenced your decision? How does your selected methodology align with your problem statement? Justify with at least one empirical or scholarly source. A justification for not selecting the alternative methodology. Why does this methodology not align with your problem statement? How have the quantitative and qualitative components discussed in class influenced your decision? Justify with at least one empirical or scholarly source.