Expert Answers

Description Please read the case of “Looney Tunes on Parade” by Alan Clardy (1994) and provide your views to the following questions in text: 1. How would you describe Republic Insurance Company’s organizational structure and organizational culture? 2. How would you describe Peter Gilmore’s leadership style? 3. In terms of the P-O-L-C framework, what do you think Peter Gilmore was doing well in? And where should/could he do better? Attached is the PDF for the case study. First page is just the same instructions I wrote. From the second page the case study starts. Must be referenced. 1200 -1500 words.

Description Please help me create a scope for my final project. After you have completed the scope, I will post the final project. Choose a distinct topic and reflect on a key area you have learned in this course, such as: Comparative corporate governance Multinational corporations Diversity in international management International leadership approaches (emic and/or etic) Select a specific organization to analyze in the context of your chosen focus area. the key area can be found in the textbook (Comparative International Management Second Edition Arndt Sorge, Niels Noorderhaven & Carla Koen ISBN 9780415744836 ) from chapters 1-9

ASSIGNED TYPE OF BUSINESS ENTITY ( FRANCHISE) AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING A PRESENTATION FOR THE CLASS TO INCLUDE A POWERPOINT OR INFOGRAPHIC DETAILING THE STRUCTURE, MANAGMENT RESPONSIBILITIES, TAXATION, SOURCES OF FUNDING AND PROS AND CONS OF THAT BUSINESS ORGANIZATION TYPE. THE GROUP MUST EXPLAIN THE MECHANICS OF SETTING UP AND DISSOLVING THE BUSINESS. THE PROJECT MUST ALSO INCLUDE EXAMPLES OF CURRENT COMPANIES OF THAT PARTICULAR STRUCTURE. EXPLANATION SHOULD BE GIVEN FOR WHAT TYPES OF BUSINESS MAY BE MOST SUITABLE FOR THAT BUSINESS ORGANIZATION TYPE.

This paper will include at least one specific topic you found of interest that youresearched on your own and found specifics about how Texas law works in that respect. - You do not have to attend one of my hearings – you can simply go to the Lubbock County courthouse and watch or observe a civil trial (or more) or hearing. You will need to find out the name of the case and the case number for the hearing(s) you attend so that I cancross-reference the same with the court’s docket and ensure attendance. - The paper will be at least 5 pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman or Century Schoolbook font, not including the title, caption, etc., at the top of the page. Anycitations to primary or secondary sources will be fully cited according to Chicago, MLA, or APA citation styles. You may cite directly in the paper or use footnotes (no endnotes, as they are the bane of my academic existence). The case : A man seeking for justice because he doesn't think it was fair what happened to him. He said that the gate of his residence malfunction and broke a part of his car so he didn't want to pay the rent. The case is about eviction. "Did the defendant failed to pay his rent?" He said after a part of his car got broke he didn't want tp pay the rent. He also said he tried to pay the rent but they told him he needs to vacate. The specific topic you need to speak about its "Eviction in Texas. This paper will include the basic facts of the case you observed, as well as yourunderstanding of the specific issue the hearing/appearance was dealing with, withoutside research.

Prepare a brief report about a famous strike or labor dispute explaining why the action was or was not successful. To meet the requirements for this section, students must identify a strike that occurred in the last five years. Cite the source to support the response.

Final Paper [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapters 1 through 7 and 11 through 14 of the textbook. For your Final Paper, assume the following scenario: You are the manager of Acme Fireworks, a fireworks retailer who sells fireworks, and produces fireworks displays with ground display fireworks and large aerial display fireworks. The company started in the owner’s garage 2 years ago and now has 15 employees who you manage. The company started as a sole proprietorship, and the owner has never changed the entity. The owner has informed you that the company has received inquiries from several large businesses wondering if the company could create several fireworks displays on a regular basis. The owner told the inquirers that the company could fill such display orders, and a price per display was agreed upon. It was discussed that most of the cost for a fireworks display is for skilled labor, insurance, and the actual service of setting off the fireworks. No other details were discussed. The owner is anticipating that new employees will need to be hired, but he is worried that if the large orders for fireworks displays do not continue, the company will not have the funds to pay the new employees. The owner is now considering changing the business entity, but he does not know what entity to form or how to form it. In your paper, the owner has asked you to do the following: Analyze if the contracts with the businesses will be governed by common law or the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Explain why. Analyze whether the owner formed a contract with the businesses. Apply the five essential elements of an enforceable contract. Explain the potential personal liability to Acme Fireworks if a spectator is injured by a stray firework from a fireworks display. Discuss the different employment types and relationships relevant to agency law. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each type specific to Acme Fireworks. Explain why Acme Fireworks should not operate as a sole proprietorship. Recommend a new business entity. Provide rationale to support your recommendation. For each task, be sure to analyze the relevant law, apply the facts to the law, and make a conclusion. The Final Paper must be eight to 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site.. must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper in bold font Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page. Student’s name Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus) Course name and number Instructor’s name Due date must utilize level headings to organize the paper. See the APA Style ElementsLinks to an external site. resource for assistance. must utilize academic voice. See the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. and Making Your Writing Flow resources for additional guidance. must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. For assistance on writing Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. and Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources. must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. That is, describe what your response is to the content, either positive or negative, and defend your position. If multiple options, alternatives, and/or positions are present and are being rejected, you must also defend the reasons for rejecting an option. must use at least five credible and/or scholarly sources, two of which must be from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library, in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source. To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view Quick and Easy Library ResearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips. must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site. guide. must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References ListLinks to an external site. resource in the Writing Center for specifications.

AntitrustWeek 8 Discussion - Business Competition: Antitrust Refer to Chapter 14 in your course textbook for this discussion. Respond to the following: In today's economy, there are powerful companies that seem to control massive segments of different markets. Using the NEXIS-Uni Legal Database in the Strayer Library or the FTC website below, research a company that has been sued for anti-competitive behavior in the last five years. Explain the facts of the lawsuit, why the actions were anti-competitive, and whether it is a horizontal restraint of trade or a vertical restraint of trade. (Explain these terms in your answer.) (Note: Do NOT use Amazon, Google, Facebook, Qualcomm, Samsung, or Apple. Try to find a lawsuit from a company in your home state, if available). Resources: Strayer Library Databases. NEXIS-Uni Legal Database. Federal Trade CommissionLinks to an external site.. Be sure to respond to one of your classmates' posts. Please provide answers to the discussion questions that are researched, informed, and substantiated by citing sources following Strayer Writing Standards. Classmate post:Hello everyone. The case I chose to look at this week is Intuit, Incorporated vs Federal Trade Commission. This case is about the FTC taking action against Intuit, also known as Turbo Tax. Turbo Tax deceived customers with false advertising stating “free” tax filing that wasn’t able to be used by millions of consumers. Many consumers didn’t meet the requirements for free tax filing because they were 1099 customers or earn oncome from working on a farm. Many consumers are hit with charges when they file their taxes. Under the terms of the Administrative Law Judge’s order, which can be appealed to the full Commission, Intuit is “prohibited from engaging in deceptive practices in the future (1).” It also is barred from representing that any good or service is free, unless: 1) it is free for all consumers; 2) it clearly and conspicuously discloses any terms that would limit the offer and might be misunderstood by consumers; and 3) if the good or service is not free “to a majority of U.S. taxpayers,” this also must be disclosed in a clear and conspicuous manner (1). The actions were anti-competitive because it made consumers believe they were getting to file their taxes for free, when by circumstances it is not true. This is a horizontal restraint of trade because this action was to lessen the competition with other tax preparing companies, by false advertising the free tax filing. 1.https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/192-3119-intuit-inc-matter-turbotaxLinks to an external site. Jennings, Marianne M. Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment. Available from: Strayer University Bookshelf, (12th Edition). Cengage Learning US, 2021.

BUSINESS ETHICS/ETHICS FOR ACCOUNTANTS – PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS (FA 24) 1. Research/gather publicly available information on your issue and the different opinions on what would be the best resolution of that issue (i.e., news reports, scholarly papers, research reports, documentary films, etc.) Educate your self on this issue. Please cite any outside materials you use in the quotes or in restating the ideas or writing of others. (APA Style) 2. Use the “Three Dimension Analysis (a.k.a. Three Steps) as the format for your written analysis with an introduction as follows: I. Introduction – i. Introduce the reader to the company, including a short history and the scope of their business activities (business and philanthropic) generally in about 2-3 paragraphs using your own words. DO NOT USE ANY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DESCRIPTIONS OR THE WORDS OF OTHER PEOPLE TO PREPARE ANY PART OF THIS PAPER unless you attribute your sources specifically with cited end notes. Do not use AI for any purpose. Use only your own words. ii. Provide a transition that leads smoothly into your chosen issue. II. Dimension/Step 1: DEFINE your issue of concern: i. Describe the issue. ii. Who/What are the stakeholders affected? iii. How it affects each stakeholder group. III. Dimension/Step 2: DETERMINE the causes of the issue of concern i. Is it caused by any of the following conditions or changes in norms: ethical, legal economic, social, trend related, the “nature” of a particular business, owners personality issue (“founder syndrome”), or other causes? ii. How do those issues cause the problem? IV. Dimension/Step 3: DESCRIBE Possible Solutions: i. Identify all options for a solution and describe the pros and cons of each ii. Identify/describe unintended consequences/negative impacts. V. Conclusion i. Identify the solution you think is the best. ii. Justify why you think that solution is the best, even if it’s not perfect. iii. How would you craft a remedy for the unavoidable negative impacts of your solution, if any? Again - no use of AI please.

Requirements You have been given the opportunity to present your case to an influential interest group in your community. You will use information gathered in each of the previous assignments to create a compelling presentation with the goal of persuading the interest group that your position on the policy is worthy of being implemented. Create a 6–8-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you: Provide a historical perspective of the policy from the Week 3 assignment, Historical Perspective. Describe the official and unofficial actors of the policy from the Week 6 assignment, Analyzing Policy. Present both of the positions of the policy from the Week 8 assignment, Position Paper. Persuade the audience that the position you have chosen is worthy of the policy being implemented. Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than five years old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other websites ending in anything other than ".gov" do not qualify as peer-reviewed. Use Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library to identify references. Your assignment must include: Title slide with the name of the policy, your name, and date. Reference slide with at least four peer-reviewed references formatted according to the Strayer Writing Standards. 6–8 slides (the title slide and reference slide are not included in this number). A typed narration of each of your slides in the Notes section of the PowerPoint presentation. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is: Defend positions (for and against) on policy issues using various argument types.

Overview In this assignment, you evaluate and assess workplace protection legislation, identify the law pursuant to the employment-at-will (EAW) doctrine and legal exceptions, apply this understanding to a business scenario, and explain legal requirements for hiring new employees and your own home state laws as to workers' compensation and immigration. Instructions Respond to the following in 4–6 pages: Cite two federal laws that you believe are the most important for protecting employees from workplace discrimination. Provide a compelling argument for the effectiveness of the legislation in protecting employees and two case law examples to support your assessment. Explain the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States. Some states do not allow undocumented workers, or those not legally allowed to work in the United States, to receive workers' compensation benefits. Provide the law in your home state and a compelling and supported (with research) argument advocating for or against your state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. Provide a comprehensive summary of the employment-at-will (EAW) doctrine that includes all possible legal exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. Cite and support (with research) an appropriate EAW exception that the employee in each of the following scenarios could reasonably argue to save their job. Scenario 1: JoAnn, a manager, started a blog on the company website for employee grievances and problems. She noticed that a worker was protesting that allegedly no Asian American employees had gotten a raise in two years at the company. Christine, the employee, also criticized how much CEO Elon had made last year and how he was "out of touch" with the realities of his employees. JoAnn reminded Christine that she was an employee-at-will. The next day, Christine talked to her fellow co-workers about forming a union. JoAnn fired Christine, and Christine is suing for wrongful termination. Scenario 2: Steven, a department supervisor, fired his secretary, Ann. Ann, a devout Christian, had been putting Right-to-Life flyers in the employee breakroom. Steven talked to Ann twice and reiterated her actions were not appropriate. Ann continued to leave the pamphlets and was also taking time away from work to pray at her desk during the busiest times of the morning. Ann is suing for wrongful termination. Requirements 4–6 pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the Sources list are not included in the required assignment page length. Resources Use the Strayer Library to conduct your research. Include at least three quality references. The textbook for this class is a required source for this assignment. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows: Evaluate federal law relative to workplace discrimination, employment-at-will, or worker's compensation eligibility. View Rubric Week 10 Assignment - The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace Week 10 Assignment - The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace Criteria Ratings Pts Provide a compelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees. Cite case law to support your assessment. (15%) 30 to >26.99 pts Exemplary Provides a compelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees. Cites case law to support the assessment. 26.99 to >23.99 pts Competent Provides a compelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees but fails to sufficiently cite case law to support the assessment. 23.99 to >20.99 pts Needs Improvement Provides an uncompelling argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees or cites case law that is not applicable. 20.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not provide an argument for the effectiveness of two chosen pieces of legislation for protecting employees. / 30 pts Explain the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States. (10%) 20 to >17.99 pts Exemplary Explains the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States. 17.99 to >15.99 pts Competent Explains the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States with 1–2 significant errors or omissions. 15.99 to >13.99 pts Needs Improvement Explains the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment in the United States with 3–4 significant errors or omissions. 13.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not explain the actions that employers must take to verify legal employment or does so with more than 4 significant errors or omissions. / 20 pts Provide a compelling and supported (with research) argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. (15%) 30 to >26.99 pts Exemplary Provides a compelling and supported (with research) argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. 26.99 to >23.99 pts Competent Provides a compelling argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers but provides no supporting research. 23.99 to >20.99 pts Needs Improvement Provides an uncompelling and unsupported argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. 20.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not provide an argument advocating for or against a state's practice of allowing or denying workers' compensation benefits to undocumented or illegal workers. / 30 pts Provide a comprehensive summary of employment-at-will doctrine that includes all possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. (10%) 20 to >17.99 pts Exemplary Provides a comprehensive summary of employment-at-will doctrine that includes all possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. 17.99 to >15.99 pts Competent Provides a comprehensive summary of employment-at-will doctrine but omits all possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. 15.99 to >13.99 pts Needs Improvement Provides a an incomplete summary of employment-at-will doctrine and possible exceptions designed to fight wrongful termination. 13.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not provide a summary of employment-at-will doctrine. / 20 pts Cite and support an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. (15%) 30 to >26.99 pts Exemplary Cites and supports an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. 26.99 to >23.99 pts Competent Cites an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1 but offers only weak support. 23.99 to >20.99 pts Needs Improvement Cites an inappropriate EAW exception that an employee could not reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 1. 20.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not cite an EAW exception that an employee could argue to save their job in Scenario 1. / 30 pts Cite and support an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. (15%) 30 to >26.99 pts Exemplary Cites and supports an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. 26.99 to >23.99 pts Competent Cites an appropriate EAW exception that an employee could reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2 but offers only weak support. 23.99 to >20.99 pts Needs Improvement Cites an inappropriate EAW exception that an employee could not reasonably argue to save their job in Scenario 2. 20.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable Does not cite an EAW exception that an employee could argue to save their job in Scenario 2. / 30 pts Include at least three references, including the required textbook, as sources for the paper. (10%) 20 to >17.99 pts Exemplary Exceeds number of required references; all references are high quality choices. 17.99 to >15.99 pts Competent Meets number of required references; some references are high quality choices. 15.99 to >13.99 pts Needs Improvement Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor quality choices. 13.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable No references provided. / 20 pts Clarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements. (10%) 20 to >17.99 pts Exemplary 0–2 errors present. 17.99 to >15.99 pts Competent 3–4 errors present. 15.99 to >13.99 pts Needs Improvement 5–6 errors present. 13.99 to >0 pts Unacceptable More than 6 errors present. / 20 pts Total Points: 0 Choose a submission type Select submission type TextText Select submission type UploadUpload