Expert Answers

As you read over your analysis of your HSO, what themes do you notice? Does your HSO struggle to manage certain types of risk more than others? Think about possible underlying problems that may be exacerbating those risks and undermining high-quality service delivery. Some organizational problems can be minor in nature while others have a substantial negative impact on quality and risk in multiple domains. Your thorough analysis can guide you to identify a significant organizational problem that merits intervention. In this Assignment, you will use your analysis of your HSO and additional resources to justify an organizational problem that impacts both quality and risk. You will also use one of your resources to develop a brief research summary. Review the analyses of your HSO against the frameworks, and then consider which problems most interest you. Search the Walden Library, scholarly databases, and other credible sources for information your issue. Part 1: Justification Based on your analysis of your HSO against the frameworks, select an organizational problem that has implications in both quality and risk. Locate three to five (3–5) resources that support your selection, and then ensure that it is a real and significant problem. The credible sources may be from regulatory, certification, or accrediting agencies; peer-reviewed articles; professional association white papers; journal articles; or presentations. Synthesize these sources, and then explain how the findings provide adequate support for your selected problem. Part 2: Brief Research Summary (From the Prospectus Form) Using one of the sources you located in Part 1, related to your selected HSO problem, develop a brief research summary. Ensure that the source you selected addresses the existence of the problem in healthcare organizations. Follow this formatting within your research summary to provide justification for your research problem: Include the complete, APA reference entry. Develop a single sentence that includes the following: a) An in-text citationb) A description of what was studiedc) A description of what problem was found within the last 5 yearsd) An explanation why this research is important in relation to your HSOBelow is an example of a brief research summary that must be followed exactly. Please make sure to write a single sentence using the a, b, c, and d labels.Heido, S., Bron, P., Frazer, K., & Wing, C. (2019). Factors influencing nurse leader’s intent to stay or leave employment: a quantitative analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 23, 105–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/12252(a) Heido et. al, 2019; (b) studied the prevalence of nurse leaders intending to leave their jobs; (c) they found that up to 40% of nurse leaders will leave their jobs in the next two years as a result of burnout and work dissatisfaction; and (d) this is important to an HSO because it supports the currency and significance an operational problem with retaining a workforce.

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the legal, ethical, and community standards within the mental health and wellness field. Using two scholarly sources, create an 8-10-slide presentation to address the following prompts: Review the differences between values, ethics, morals, and laws. Describe the ways have you utilized these concepts in your professional and/or personal life. Analyze legal, ethical, community standards, and the statute of limitations. Provide an example of each. Explain confidentiality, including its limits. Explain the legal and ethical purposes of client rights, specifically regarding informed consent. Explain legal standards, scope of practice, statute of limitations, and how they can apply to you in the mental health and wellness field. Give an example of something that you believe might be within your scope of practice and of something that might be outside your scope of practice. Explain how the “Statement on the Integration of Faith, Learning and Work” can integrate into ethics in the mental health and wellness profession? Title slide and reference slide are not included in the slide count. Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 75-100 words.

Article Review-Influence of Gender on Inhaler Technique Click the Article 4 link on the Modules page to download or print the article. In APA, 7th ed., format review this article to include a summary of the article followed by a critique. Use the rubric as a guide. The review should be at least 500 words, double-spaced, using 12-point Arial font with 1-inch margins. I will review early drafts if desired. If submitting a draft, email it to me and do not submit it DO NOT use any Artificial Intelligence resources Do it by you I HAVE ATTACHED THE TEMPLATE TO USE AND A SAMPLE Click the Article 4 link on the Modules page to download or print the article. In APA, 7th ed., format review this article to include a summary of the article followed by a critique. Use the rubric as a guide. The review should be at least 500 words, double-spaced, using 12-point Arial font with 1-inch margins. I will review early drafts if desired. If submitting a draft, email it to me and do not submit it DO NOT use any Artificial Intelligence resources Do it by you

Need a 500 word answer with references Vincent Valley Dental (VVD) is a comprehensive dental practice with 37 sites. VVD provides a wide range of services from preventive to specialty dental care. VVD has grown rapidly and is seeing a strong increase in the number of patients who seek its services. The areas VVD serves is also seeing strong population growth. As a result of increasing patient demand and the interest in providing more effective dental care for children, a new process was recently begun—Saturday schedules reserved for children. The benefit of the new Pediatric Saturdays is that the scheduling is highly efficient, allowing families to have all their children seen at about the same time and be on their way in about 30 minutes. In addition, Pediatric Saturdays is also an excellent opportunity to introduce the children’s parents to the practice and meet the doctors. As part of the process, Pediatric Saturdays are planned one year in advance. Special considerations are taken to assure that the majority of the pediatric population has access on Saturdays. The number of Pediatric Saturdays planned is based on the pediatric population in each practice. Staffing for Pediatric Saturdays is also planned in advance. Although dental hygienists need to fulfill their commitment to the practice for Saturday coverage, an effort is made to cover the Pediatric Saturday schedules with dental assistants whenever possible. Pediatric patients aged 3 through 15 years are scheduled in a 30-minute appointment with the dental assistant or dental hygienist. Adult patients ages 16 years and older, if scheduled on a Saturday, are seen by the dental hygienist. Pediatric patients who require scaling of calculus and stain are seen by the dental hygienist. All patient appointments are confirmed two days in advance. Parents are reminded that they must accompany the child to the appointment. After a one-year trial, the management team convened to review this new process. Sally Quinn, chief operating officer, said she felt that, in general, the Pediatric Saturdays were meeting VVD’s goals. However, the team identified a number of problems. Bob Palmer of the West Side Clinic said that in his experience, multiple family members are scheduled at the same time, which is a convenience for the family. However, if a family with multiple children scheduled cancels or fails, large openings are left in the schedule, which leads to inefficient use. Vicki Benz of the Southside Clinic said that she thinks families are becoming less available for Saturday appointments due to activities/sports commitments, and pre-appointing becomes a challenge when parents do not know their kids’ schedules six months in advance. Not pre-appointing creates a need to have staff call patients to try to fill the schedule, which isn’t always successful—and/or a priority. The current scheduling software is cumbersome to use in filling these openings, and most staff are not trained in its advanced features. Dr. Tzano observed that because of all the Saturday appointments and the doctors’ schedules, it is difficult to maintain primary doctor relationships for pediatric patients. Even if a doctor plans his or her Saturdays six months apart (which does not always happen), if the patient is not available (sick, etc.), it is also difficult to keep the patient with the primary doctors. Martha Mackey, director of HR, also commented on employee morale. Team members do not always enjoy working on Saturdays, and it was becoming more difficult to find employees willing to work this schedule. Finally, Bob Martin, chief financial officer, stated that in addition to the scheduling problems, the average procedures (fees) per patient aren’t as high as they could be. For example, a parent generally doesn’t consent to a fluoride treatment when insurance doesn’t cover it, and it is the same situation with X-rays. He said, “We routinely are told that patients will only consent to treatment if it’s covered. We always talk about how we plan treatment based on the needs of the patient, but ultimately patients determine their own needs based on their insurance coverage. Through July revenue is 15.1 percent below plan (budget).” How would you resolve the problems with VVD’s Pediatric Saturdays?

Please provide a 2-4 page paper and poster with graphs/pictures and a QR code with cited sources on research on pharmacogenomics in psychiatry. Please see all the attached documents. Please see sample poster for guidance.

What does evidence-based practice mean to you as a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) student, and how do you envision integrating it into your future role as a nurse leader? In your response, please reflect on the following points: 1. Define evidence-based practice (EBP) from your perspective and explain its importance in nursing and healthcare. 2. Share your thoughts on how you plan to apply evidence-based inquiry principles in your future practice as a nurse leader. 3. Identify any potential challenges or barriers you anticipate in implementing evidence-based practice and how you plan to address them. In addition to your main response, you must also post substantive responses to at least two of your classmates' posts in this thread. Your response should include elements such as follow-up questions, further exploration of topics from the initial post, or requests for further clarification or explanation on points made. See the rubric for specific grading criteria.

1.What are the benefits and the challenges of offering group psychotherapy services within both inpatient and outpatient clinical environments? intervention. 2.Discuss the importance of identifying ground rules, especially in relation to confidentiality for group psychotherapy services. 3.Describe how group psychotherapy differs from individual psychotherapy and describe the types of patients who might be better served by group psychotherapy. To reflect, write one or two paragraphs with a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of two references are required

After reading and reflecting upon the textbook reading and the information contained in the module resources, discuss at least one strategy to initiate patient involvement in the care that is provided in an acute-care facility, such as a hospital or same-day surgery. Consider how you would measure the effectiveness of your strategy and some potential barriers to patient involvement. Also discuss any liability issues for the health team members or the organization if there is failure to involve the patient in her or his care. (Carefully review this module's reading from American Nurse Today.) Resourses Textbook: Patient Safety: An Essential Guide, Chapter 2 Chapter 2 presents the pivotal role of the patient experience in the safe delivery of care. Strategies, as well as barriers to patient and/or family involvement, will be presented. While barriers may pose challenges to fully and successfully involving the patient in his or her care, they are not an excuse for failure to include the patient. This chapter will help you address this module’s discussion prompt and consider strategies to incorporate into your final paper. Article: Make Your Nursing Care Malpractice-Proof opens in new window This article addresses avoiding malpractice claims by being proactive in terms of one’s professional practice. This reading will help you address this module’s discussion prompt. Discharge Instructions and Liability opens in new window This resource identifies legal considerations when preparing patients for discharge. This resource will help you address the module discussion. Ideal Discharge Planning Overview, Process, and Checklist PDF opens in new window This resource identifies best practices to prepare patients for discharge. This resource will help you address the module discussion. Video: Learning From a Positive Patient Story (IHI) (5:18) opens in new window This video provides a good example of how the care team can encourage the patient to become a self-advocate. Website: Patient Engagement and Safety (AHRQ) opens in new window This AHRQ website discusses patient empowerment and the role of the patient in preventing errors and supporting the culture of safety.

"HEAL 351 Media Evaluation Outline" is the prompt instructions. "sample paper" is an example of the essay. "Week 1_FA24", "HEAL 351_Week 2_FA24", and "HEAL 351_Week 3_FA24" are the class notes that may help.

There will be three journal assignments, and they all have to be on the same topic. I will first copy and paste the assignment, then I will copy and paste the research I would like to do. There is only one journal assignment this week. Instructions: According to Dhillon (2022), whether engaged in academia or not, writing reviews is a useful tool for one’s career. Reading widely keeps one up to date, and writing reviews encourages one to evaluate the literature critically for its strengths and weaknesses, and to distill relevant, new information. A good scientific review gives one an in-depth understanding of a subject, exposes key gaps warranting future research, and expands one’s mastery of their specialty. While a literature review may be 4,000 to 6,000 words, article reviews are much shorter, and form the basis of a more-comprehensive literature review. According to Central Michigan University (2022), an article review is written to identify, summarize, and evaluate an author’s position on a subject. The review should make positive and/or negative judgments regarding the article’s content, go beyond a “gut” feeling, and be based on the writer’s knowledge gained through education and readings – including other articles on the subject. The University of Illinois, Springfield (UIS, 2022) posits a journal article review must go beyond a simple summary, and provide a deeper-level evaluation. UIS provides these approaches to consider when reviewing a journal article: Evaluate the article’s purpose and argument Evaluate the presentation and organization of the information Evaluate the methods used for appropriateness Evaluate the data (are the calculations correct; are there errors of fact/interpretation; has the author used cited literature appropriately?) UIS (2022) notes that the evaluation and conclusion sections of the review are generally much shorter than the summary. UIS and Queen’s University Library (2022) offer similar suggestions for writing a scholarly review. The template I’ve attached to assist you with article reviews this term is based on the previous references and especially on Adams’ (2023) suggested approach. Review of Adams' article is strongly encouraged. Adams, J. (2023, January 31). How to write an article review. https://www.wikihow.com/Write-an-Article-ReviewLinks to an external site. If this link does not open, here is this one https://www.wikihow.com/Write-an-Article-Review. Instructions Continued : This assignment supports the following unit learning outcomes: Prepare logically constructed, relevant, and culturally appropriate written arguments and presentations. Write an article review for a scholarly article, using the following guidelines: Select a topic within healthcare finance, human resources, or administrative/operational strategy. Topic should be relevant to you: either aligning with the simulation (hospital administration) or other healthcare-specific setting. Article publication date within the last three (3) years. Paper length should be 3-4 pages. Introduction and conclusion sections are required, with additional body sections dictated by the article’s content and your analysis. Paper must be written in third person, using scholarly tone and format. APA requirements: Title and reference pages, in-text citations, and three scholarly sources. RESOURCES Purdue Writing Lab. (n.d.). Graduate writing style. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/graduate_writing/gradua... HELPFUL INFORMATION In Unit 7, you will complete a systematic literature review. That assignment may include research from articles reviewed in Units 2, 4, and 6 assignments. You may also choose to use new articles for the Unit 7 assignment, as well. It may be helpful to review the Unit 7 Assignment 2 details prior to beginning article reviews in Units 2, 4, and 6. Submit Word document Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria. Estimated time to complete: 2 hours Rubric Article Review Article Review Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic 5 pts High Proficiency A relevant scholarly article is analyzed. Topic is clearly applicable to healthcare finance, HR, or admin/operational strategy. 4.5 pts Moderately High Proficiency A relevant scholarly article is analyzed. Topic is applicable to healthcare finance, HR, or admin/operational strategy. 4 pts Moderate Proficiency An article is analyzed but is editorial not scholarly. Topic is applicable to healthcare finance, HR, or admin/operational strategy. 3.25 pts Moderately Low Proficiency An article is analyzed, but the topic is not relevant. 1.5 pts Low Proficiency Some relevant topics are analyzed, but no article is analyzed. 0 pts No Marks No article is analyzed. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePublication Date 3 pts High Proficiency Article publication date is within the last three (3) years. 2.7 pts Moderately High Proficiency N/A 2.4 pts Moderate Proficiency N/A 1.95 pts Moderately Low Proficiency N/A 0.9 pts Low Proficiency N/A 0 pts No Marks Article publication date is NOT within the last three (3) years. 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Analysis 12 pts High Proficiency Document is appropriately formatted and structured. Content is effectively organized. Key findings are clearly stated. 10.8 pts Moderately High Proficiency Document is appropriately formatted and structured. Content is organized. Key findings are stated. 9.6 pts Moderate Proficiency Document is mostly appropriately formatted and structured. Content is somewhat organized. Key findings are difficult to discern. 7.8 pts Moderately Low Proficiency Document formatting and structure is not consistent with an article review. Content and key findings are unorganized. 3.6 pts Low Proficiency There is little evidence that the assignment is an article review. 0 pts No Marks No document formatting is used. 12 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 10 pts High Proficiency Analysis reflects scholarly research and full comprehension of course concepts. 9 pts Moderately High Proficiency Analysis reflects research and full comprehension of course concepts. 8 pts Moderate Proficiency Analysis reflects some research AND/OR comprehension of course concepts. 6.5 pts Moderately Low Proficiency There is minimal evidence of research. Course concepts are correctly applied. 3 pts Low Proficiency Analysis is supported only by personal experience, with some irrelevance. 0 pts No Marks There is no evidence of any research or application of course concepts. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 5 pts High Proficiency The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 4.5 pts Moderately High Proficiency The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 4 pts Moderate Proficiency The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 3.25 pts Moderately Low Proficiency The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 1.5 pts Low Proficiency The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0 pts No Marks The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 5 pts High Proficiency The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. ? Three?sources are included. 4.5 pts Moderately High Proficiency The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. ?? Three?sources are included. 4 pts Moderate Proficiency The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.?? At least one source is included. 3.25 pts Moderately Low Proficiency The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 1.5 pts Low Proficiency Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0 pts No Marks There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. 5 pts Total Points: 40 My Topic:Benefits of collaborative or intergrated care with pediatricians and child psychiatrists,behavorial therapists, social workers etc.......... Myquestion; Dr. Mike, I was asking if researching articles on the benefits of collaborative or integrated care in a pediatricians help diagnosis children quicker if the have mental health issues. Research shows that’ there is an extreme lack and delay of children receiving mental health care due to lack of child psychiatrist. There is also a delay of care with children with mental health issues because there is a shortage of mental health professionals. Children who are diagnosed at an early age when collaborative or integrative care have better chances of succeeding as adults then children who receive zero mental health care. His response:As for the topic, I now understand and concur with your choice. It's a great topic and I think you could come up with three related articles and then weave them into a systemic literature review. Go for it! This is the Unit7 assignment that he said to look at first : Prepare logically constructed, relevant, and culturally appropriate written arguments and presentations. In weeks 2, 4, and 6 you completed article reviews on topics relevant to the simulation, and your area of professional interest in healthcare administration. For this assignment, you will prepare a systematic literature review. The purpose of a systematic review is to demonstrate knowledge and research of a specific topic and identify and explain gaps in the literature and associated conclusions. This is all completed using an established framework and clearly defined context for research. Please use the following points to guide your systematic literature review. If you are uncertain about your paper’s content or structure, contact your instructor for guidance. Word document length: 3-5 pages Structure: Systematic literature review Required components: Introduction, research question, body, conclusion. Additional sections should be included as relevant to your research framework. APA requirements: Title and reference pages, in-text citations, minimum of five scholarly sources. RESOURCES Purdue Writing Lab. (n.d.). Writing a literature review / Purdue Writing Lab. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/c... Kramer, L. (2022, June 2). How to write a stellar literature review. How to Write a Stellar Literature Review | Grammarly Blog. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/literature-review/?.. Please let me know if you have any questions. I know I copy and pasted a lot, I just wanted to be thorough. Thank you so much!!!