Expert Answers

What is Aristotle's Golden Mean? As a concept how is the Golden Mean supposed to help guide our actions towards happiness? What does MLK means when he talks about "Natural Law"? Do you believe Crito or MLK has the better insight on how Laws should function? separate the questions. dont answer together.

1. Express this formula is simplified negation normal form. You can either answer the questions in the textbox below or cut and paste the questions into a word document and upload it here. To earn even partial credit on this assignment you must explain (i.e. name the equivalence and explain how/why you're using it) each step that you use to get the sentences into NNF. ~(~((~BvC)& A) v ~(~BvC)) 2. For this exercise, you will complete BOOL Level 1 #2Links to an external site. on the proofmachine. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. 3. For this exercise, you will complete BOOL Level 1 # 11Links to an external site.on the proofmachine. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here

Analysis 2 Attempt In Progress NEXT UP: Submit assignment Add comment Unlimited Attempts Allowed Available: 17 Jan 2025 8:00 until 2 Feb 2025 23:59Available: 17 Jan 2025 8:00 until 2 Feb 2025 23:59Details Directions Remember to complete the assigned reading/watching from Week 3 and watch the recorded lectures. Follow the prompt below and submit your digestion by Sunday at 11:59pm. No AI Policy One-Week Extension Policy Guidelines Read the rubric to understand how assignments are graded (scroll down the page) This is not a research project, so outside sources are not allowed. Use of outside sources may result in a loss of points or a "0" grade. The goal is to demonstrate an understanding of the assigned reading by applying course concepts to real world issues. However, perhaps you could cite a small example from an outside source, but it should not be at the expense of addressing the prompt and demonstrating your understanding of the assigned reading. Check with me if you are ever unsure. No AI Policy Formatting: 12 point font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins, number your responses to the prompt questions, and organize your writing into paragraphs when appropriate (long blocks of text are confusing and hard to read). File Type: Only .doc or .docx files are accepted in this course. Citations: Use in-text citations when citing or explaining evidence from the assigned reading/watching. Be sure to explain any quotations in your own words. When citing evidence, use in-text citations: include the author's name and the page number (if applicable). For example, (author name 88). If citing evidence from a video, then cite the time-stamp. For example, "Quotation from the assigned video" (author name time stamp). Pro Tip: it's ok to shorten the passages. You can include [...] when you are omitting unnecessary text from the passage to shorten it. Analysis Questions (The entire response must be within 600-800 words) Number and respond to all prompt questions below. Support your reasoning using only evidence from the relevantmaterials assigned this week. Be sure to explain any quotations in your own words. Read the rubric for an explanation of the grading criteria. Aim to be clear and concise: There is a small penalty for going over or under the word limit. When citing evidence, use in-text citations: When citing from the readings, include the author's name and the page number. For example, "quotation from the assigned reading" (Marcuse page#). When citing from the Black Mirror episode, cite the time stamp. For example, 'explain the scene from the episode' (0:45:30). Be sure to watch the podcasts for a fuller understanding of the reading. Don't forget to write your total word count at the end! If you watched "Fifteen Million Merits" then respond to the two questions below and skip Section B: How are Marcuse’s concepts, “technological rationality” and "one-dimensional thinking," demonstrated in the Black Mirror episode, “Fifteen Million Merits”? Explain three specific scenes from the episode to support your claims and cite the video time stamps for these scenes. Be sure to clarify the meaning of Marcuse's concepts through your explanation of the scenes from this episode. Is Bing “one-dimensional” in the final scene of the episode? Explain your reasoning. (This is open to interpretation, so I am judging how strong your evidence is in support of your claim.) If you watched "Nosedive" then respond to the two questions below and skip Section A: How are Marcuse’s concepts, “technological rationality” and "one-dimensional thinking," demonstrated in the Black Mirror episode, “Nosedive”? Explain three specific scenes from the episode to support your claims and cite the video time stamps for these scenes. Be sure to clarify the meaning of Marcuse's concepts through your explanation of the scenes from this episode. Is Lacie “one-dimensional” in the final scene of the episode? Explain your reasoning. (This is open to interpretation, so I am judging how strong your evidence is in support of your claim.) View Rubric Digestion Rubric (F23) (1) Digestion Rubric (F23) (1) Criteria Ratings Points Critical Analysis view longer description 15 pts Meets Standards This is a deeply engaged analysis that demonstrates a clear understanding of the material and its practical implications. The submission displays strong logical reasoning. There are no significant interpretive errors. 12 pts Approaching Standards This displays partial understanding of the ideas and arguments from the assigned reading and lectures. The submission requires deeper analysis and closer attention to the focus of the prompt questions. There might be also some interpretive errors or logical fallacies. 10.5 pts Below Standards There is only superficial or minimal engagement with the ideas and arguments from the assigned reading and lectures. This submission requires a deeper and clearer understanding of the material. There are significant interpretive errors. 0 pts ChatGPT Responses earn 0 points This response is nearly entirely written by AI according to GPTZero. As a result, it does not address the prompt, relate the ideas to real-world examples, and does not demonstrate having read the assigned reading nor watched the lectures. / 15 pts Citing Evidence view longer description 10 pts Meets Standards The submission cites the relevant section(s) of the assigned reading when analyzing its ideas and arguments. Sufficient citations include the page number(s) from an assigned reading or video timestamp when appropriate. Direct quotations are short (if any), and when present, they don't constitute more than 10% of the submission. All textual evidence is relevant and strengthens the reasoning in support of your claims. 7 pts Approaching Standards The submission includes some textual evidence, but they may lack relevance to the prompt questions or they may only partially support your claims. Textual evidence might be vague, decontextualized, or irrelevant, which detracts from the strength and clarity of your arguments. Textual evidence might be missing proper citations or there may be an over-reliance on direct quotations instead of your own analysis. 3 pts Below Standards The submission contains little to no textual evidence. References to the assigned reading are vague, decontextualized, or irrelevant and therefore do not strengthen the reasoning in support of your claims. In some cases, there may be an over-reliance on direct quotations without sufficient context and analysis for how these ideas support your reasoning. / 10 pts Word Count view longer description 2 pts Meets Standards This is within the word count range specified in the prompt 1 pts Approaching Standards This misses the word count by 1-50 words. 0 pts Below Standards This misses the word count by more than 50 words / 2 pts Grammar, Mechanics, & Formatting view longer description 3 pts Meets Standards Excellent spelling, mechanics, and formatting. All prompt questions are numbered. 1.5 pts Approaching Standards A couple significant errors with spelling, mechanics, and formatting. 0 pts Below Standards Lots of errors that affect readability and comprehension / 3 pts

The essay prompt and grading guide will be provided later. Chose one of the prompts. Word limit is 1500 words within 10% over or under word limit. Work cited does not count toward word limit. Use MLA format Long block quotes are discouraged. Best to put key points in own word. Need to include a main text word count, does not include in-text citations. Reading are also attached below. Use gender neutral language. Essays should avoid using “he” or “man” or “mankind” in the generic sense. Use “they” generically.

Directions Remember to complete the assigned reading/watching from Week 4 and watch the recorded lectures. Follow the prompt and submit your discussion post by Sunday at 11:59pm. Remember to respond thoughtfully to two of your peers. Read the rubric to see what qualifies as a "substantive reply" No AI Policy One-Week Extension Policy Guidelines Read the rubric to understand how Discussion posts are graded: How do I view the rubric for my graded discussion?Links to an external site. This is not a research project, so outside sources are not allowed. Use of outside sources may result in a loss of points or a "0" grade. The goal is to demonstrate an understanding of the assigned reading by applying course concepts to real world issues. However, perhaps you could cite a small example from an outside source, but it should not be at the expense of addressing the prompt and demonstrating your understanding of the assigned reading. Check with me if you are ever unsure. Students must post before viewing the posts of their peers. To help promote independent work, you cannot revise or delete your posts. Some try to cheat the system by posting a blank post, reading what others have written, and then synthesizing a reply based on what others have written. Blank submissions will earn 0 points. No AI Policy Formatting: 12 point font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins, number your responses to the prompt questions, and organize your writing into paragraphs when appropriate. Remember to number your responses. Citations: Use in-text citations when citing or explaining evidence from the assigned reading/watching. Be sure to explain any quotations in your own words. When citing evidence, use in-text citations: include the author's name and the page number (if applicable). For example, (author-last-name page#). If citing evidence from a video, then cite the time-stamp. For example, "Quotation from the assigned video" (author name time stamp). Pro Tip: it's ok to shorten the passages. You can include [...] when you are omitting unnecessary text from the passage to shorten it. There is no need to sign your name at the end of your post (we can see your name next to your post) Treat this like a real conversation. There is no need to say things like "Great job on the post!" No one says these things in real life conversations. Discussion Prompt (The entire response must be within 300-500 words) The total word count should be at least 300 words and no more than 500 words. Aim to be clear and concise. There are no research projects in

Directions Please complete the Week 4 reading and watch the lectures Follow the prompt below and submit your digestion Guidelines Read the rubric to understand how assignments are graded (scroll down the page) This is not a research project, so outside sources are not allowed. Use of outside sources may result in a loss of points or a "0" grade. The goal is to demonstrate an understanding of the assigned reading by applying course concepts to real world issues. However, perhaps you could cite a small example from an outside source, but it should not be at the expense of addressing the prompt and demonstrating your understanding of the assigned reading. Check with me if you are ever unsure Formatting: 12 point font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins, number your responses to the prompt questions, and organize your writing into paragraphs when appropriate (long blocks of text are confusing and hard to read). File Type: Only .doc or .docx files are accepted in this course. Citations: Use in-text citations when citing or explaining evidence from the assigned reading/watching. Be sure to explain any quotations in your own words. When citing evidence, use in-text citations: include the author's name and the page number (if applicable). For example, (author name 88). If citing evidence from a video, then cite the time-stamp. For example, "Quotation from the assigned video" (author name time stamp). Pro Tip: it's ok to shorten the passages. You can include [...] when you are omitting unnecessary text from the passage to shorten it. Analysis Questions (The entire response must be within 600-800 words) Number and respond to all prompt questions below. Support your reasoning using only examples from the relevant Week 4 materials. Be sure to explain any quotations in your own words. When citing evidence, use in-text citations: When citing from the readings, include the author's name and the page number. For example, "quotation from the assigned reading" (Winner ##). When citing from a video, cite the time stamp. For example, 'information from the video' (0:05:10). Be sure to watch the lectures for a fuller understanding of the reading. Don't forget to write your total word count at the end! CONTEXT: Over the last 15 years or so, people have come to rely increasingly on social media and other algorithmically curated systems for access to information. What news we read, which current events we learn about, the kinds of videos we watch, whose social media posts are prioritized as we scroll—all of these determinations are made not by news editors or even by us; they’re made by the algorithms powering Facebook’s and Instagram’s feeds, YouTube’s and TikTok’s recommender systems, X’s timeline, and so on. The overarching questions to consider in this assignment are: what value or values are driving these systems, and what are the implications of having our information organized according to those values? How would things change if we organized our information differently? PROMPTS: Why does Langdon Winner argue that technology is not value-neutral? Explain his reasoning and cite two examples from "Technologies as Forms of Life". Why does Winner say that judging technology to be value-neutral contributes to negative consequences for society? Cite a short passage from the "Technologies as Forms of Life" reading to support your reasoning. Building on your response to Question 2, do you agree or disagree with Winner? Explain your reasoning with clear and specific real-world examples. What does the fact that we optimize information for engagement say about what we value? How else might we organize information (i.e., according to which other value or values), and how could we optimize for that instead? In your response, clarify which design changes to a specific technology will produce your desired results. View Rubric Analysis Rubric W25 Analysis Rubric W25 Criteria Ratings Pts Course Context 10 pts Meets Standards Demonstrates deep understanding of the context from the assigned texts and the “podcasts.” 8.5 pts Approaching Standards Shows a good understanding of the text’s context but may lack depth or overlook important nuances that were discussed in the “podcasts.” 7 pts Below Standards Significantly flawed or incomplete understanding of the text’s context. The context is not informed by the information from the “podcasts.” This doesn’t fully address the prompt questions or the assigned texts. / 10 pts Citing Evidence 15 pts Meets Standards Textual evidence is clearly integrated, relevant, and effectively supports the claims made in the analysis. Direct quotations are short (if any), and when present, they don't constitute more than 10% of the submission. All evidence is cited using in-text citations. 12.75 pts Approaching Standards The submission includes some textual evidence, but it may lack relevance to the prompt questions, or they may only partially support your claims. It might rely too much on direct quotations instead of your own analysis for how the evidence supports your claims. 10.5 pts Below Standards Little to no textual evidence is cited, or evidence is irrelevant or too vague to support the claims in the argument. In some cases, there may be excessive reliance on direct quotations without sufficient context and analysis for how these ideas support your reasoning. / 15 pts Critical Analysis 20 pts Meets Standards This is a deeply engaged analysis that demonstrates a clear understanding of the material and its practical implications. The submission displays strong logical reasoning. There are no significant interpretive errors. 15 pts Approaching Standards This displays partial understanding of the ideas and arguments from the assigned reading and “podcasts.” The analysis requires greater depth and closer attention to the focus of the prompt questions. There may be some interpretive errors or logical fallacies. It may show some original thought but may include too much summary and description. 10 pts Below Standards There is only superficial or minimal engagement with the ideas and arguments from the assigned reading and “podcasts.” This submission requires a deeper and clearer understanding of the material. There may be significant interpretive errors, too much summary in the style of a book report, or vague explanations of course concepts as opposed to critical analysis. / 20 pts Original Writing Style 15 pts Meets Standards Demonstrates originality, a strong human writing voice, and there is no evidence of AI use. 11.25 pts Approaching Standards Mostly original-sounding work but may have a few sections that appear formulaic or unoriginal. There is no overt use of AI, but it’s possible that AI was consulted in the writing process. 7.5 pts Below Standards (half credit) The analysis is weakened by a generic and formulaic style. The writing style resembles the quality of AI generated text and likely includes many of the commonly used terms that AI is known to employ. The style may also appear to have been revised from an AI generated response. / 15 pts Language Mechanics & Formatting 5 pts Meets Standards Excellent mechanics and formatting. All responses to the prompt questions are numbered and the text is organized in paragraph form (no long blocks of text). The total word count is written at the end. 4.25 pts Approaching Standards A couple significant errors with spelling, mechanics, and formatting; the submission might not be organized into paragraphs; the responses might not be numbered; or the total word count might be missing. 3.5 pts Below Standards Lots of errors that negatively affect clarity and comprehension. / 5 pts Word Count 5 pts Meets Standards The total word count is within the range specified in the prompt. 3 pts Approaching Standards The total word count is over or under the range specified in the prompt by 1-50 words. 0 pts Below Standards The total word count is over or under the range specified in the prompt by more than 50 words. / 5 pts Plagiarism Detected 0 pts AI Plagiarism Significantly AI-generated text that does not reflect the student’s own thinking. There is likely information cited in the submission that does not exist in the assigned reading/watching (i.e. AI hallucinations). 0 pts Non-AI Plagiarism Plagiarism from online sources, submissions from former students, or a purchased assignment. / 0 pts

Background Follow the Assessment (FBA) process in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Once data is collected from both indirect and direct assessments, it must be carefully analyzed to understand the behavior and its underlying causes. This analysis involves the following: Data Analysis: Reviewing observational data, interviews, and rating scales to identify patterns and trends in the behavior. Key aspects to examine include the frequency, intensity, and duration of the behavior, as well as any contextual factors such as specific times of day, activities, or interactions with others. Analyzing this data helps to pinpoint consistent antecedents (events that occur before the behavior) and consequences (events that follow the behavior). Formulating Hypotheses: Based on the data analysis, develop hypotheses about the function of the behavior. These hypotheses should address why the behavior is occurring and what it aims to achieve. Common functions include: Attention: The behavior might be a way for the individual to gain attention from others. Escape: The behavior might serve as a means to avoid or escape from an undesirable situation or task. Access: The behavior might be used to obtain a desired object, activity, or privilege. Self-Stimulation: The behavior might be performed for sensory stimulation or pleasure. Hypothesis Summary: Create a summary of the hypotheses that outlines the function of the behavior based on the analyzed data. This summary should include: A description of the behavior and its key features. The identified antecedents and consequences that are linked to the behavior. The proposed function of the behavior and how it meets the individual’s needs or goals. Instructions Based on the information provided in previous assessments (background information, FAST & MAS assessments, parent/teacher interview, data collection, identify the function of targeted behavior, identify antecedents and consequences, and develop a hypothesis statement. Length: This assignment must be 3-5 pages (excluding the title and reference pages). References: Include 3 scholarly resources. Grading This assignment is worth 10 points and is due on Sunday. Refer to the rubric for more specific details on how this will be graded. Hide Rubrics Rubric Name: Module 4 Assignment 1: FBA-Analyze Data Rubric Print

Touchstone 1.1: Philosophical Thinking ASSIGNMENT: In Touchstone Task 1, you answered four reflection questions regarding philosophy. Now, take those reflections and apply them to this concrete, graded Touchstone assignment. Consider the three following questions: What is knowledge? What is the nature of reality? What is the good life, and how ought I live it? These are the basic questions that were considered by the Ancient Greek Philosophers. They are also critical questions for our own lives today. As you have learned in the course, philosophical inquiry is fundamental to the human experience. In this Touchstone, you will engage with the philosophical ideas presented in the course material. You will identify which of the above questions are associated with each branch of philosophy in a 1-2 page (300-600 words) essay. In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI. A. Directions Step 1: Define Philosophy For this graded Touchstone, think back to the reflection questions from Touchstone Task 1. Now, use your reflection to create a concrete definition of philosophy. Then, distinguish and define each of the three main branches of philosophy introduced in Challenge 1.1. Your response should be approximately 100-200 words. Make sure your information and citations come from the Sophia tutorials to support your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of the lesson and use the following format for in-text citations: EXAMPLE (Aristotle’s Highest Good, n.d.) EXAMPLE (The Footnotes to Plato, n.d.) Please note these are examples only. You will have to adjust the citation based on the specific part of the tutorial you are referencing. Step 2: Connections and Differences First, identify which of the following questions align with the three branches of philosophy outlined in the course: What is knowledge? What is the nature of reality? What is the good life, and how ought I live it? Second, explain the differences between the three branches of philosophy by applying a specific Greek philosopher to each branch and question, using cited examples from the course material. For example, explain how Socrates would answer the question “What is knowledge?” or how Epictetus would answer the question “What is the good life?” Your response should be approximately 200-400 words. Make sure your information and citations come from the Sophia tutorials to support your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of the lesson and use the following format for in-text citations: EXAMPLE (Aristotle’s Highest Good, n.d.) EXAMPLE (The Footnotes to Plato, n.d.) Please note these are examples only. You will have to adjust the citation based on the specific part of the tutorial you are referencing. Step 3: Review Checklist Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. 1. Review Touchstone Task 1 ? Did you review your reflection responses from Touchstone Task 1 to help create the definition of philosophy? 2. Definitions ? Have you defined philosophy and the three main branches of philosophy? ? Is this portion of the essay between 100-200 words? 3. Connections and Differences ? Have you identified which branch of philosophy corresponds with each of the three philosophical questions: What is knowledge? What is the nature of reality? What is the good life? ? Have you identified a specific Greek philosopher for each philosophical branch and explained the connection? ? Have you properly cited your examples from the course material to explain the differences between the three branches of philosophy? ? Is this portion of the essay between 200-400 words? 4. Conventions ? Have you proofread your essay for grammatical and mechanical errors? ? Have you used spell check or another method to check spelling? ? Have you cited examples from the course using the in-text citation instructions? (Please do not include sources from outside of the course.) 5. Before You Submit ? Have you included your name, date, and course at the top left of the page? ? Is your essay between 1-2 pages (approximately 300-600 words)?

Instructions: Main Post: Write a minimum of 200 words discussion about one of the topics below. (due date: Monday by 11:59 pm) (Part A of the assignment) (7.5 points) Peer Response: Read and respond to at least two other classmate (Minimum 75 words). (due date: Monday by 11:59 pm) (Part B of the assignment) (7.5 points) Note: The peer response must contain relevant content as well. Avoid repeating (even in different words) what you wrote about in your main discussion as part of the response to the classmate. Whether you agree or disagree with your peer's discussion, add new content to your peer's post. While you may add comments such as "I agree with you" or "Interesting findings,” that is not enough to receive a grade for the peer response. Your reaction to a peer's discussion must contain relevant content taken from the material learned in class or external sources. Case Study: Metaphysics Suppose you work for an advertisement company whose next commerical is suited to present a new generation cellular phone. The company managers have endorsed the marketing strategy of "keeping it real" because they have found that their customers really appreciate advertisements that bring out elements they consider most parallel to reality. You have been assigned to design this commercial with the stipulation of following the marketing strategy. Task One: Describe your chosen icon for the Cell Phone and explain your choice in reference to what you consider real. For instance, if you believe immaterial numbers to be the most real, describe your chosen numerical icon. On the other hand, if you believe materialism as the most real position, describe your chosen physical object as the icon. Task Two: Choose which elements of the phone to focus on that follows your chosen meatphysical theory. For instance, if you are an immaterialist who sees reality as a process like Hegel (Spirit), focus on the phone's processes or activities rather than static programs or simply numerical statistics. If you are a materialist who values physical interactions among people, then focus on the camera application by going into detail about the physical features the phone can capture. Be creative, have fun with this assignment, and try to make connections to the metaphysical theories we have covered in this chapter!

chapter 17: For this problem, you'll use the Truth Machine. Build a truth table for the following sentence: (R->Q)<->~S Also indicate whether the sentence is a Tautology, Taut-Falsity, or Contingent. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. chapter 18: For this exercise, you will complete PROP Level 2 #19Links to an external site. on the proofmachine. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. If you're having trouble either using the proofmachine or understanding the strategy for the proof chapter 19: For this exercise, you will complete proof PROP Level 2 #23Links to an external site. on the proofmachine. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. If you're having trouble either using the proofmachine or understanding the strategy for the proof chapter 14 & 15: For this exercise, you will complete BOOL proof Level 2 #30Links to an external site.on the proofmachine. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. If you're having trouble either using the proofmachine or understanding the strategy for the proof PLEASE LABEL WHICH CHAPTER FOR EACH ANSWER SO I KNOW. THANK YOU!