Expert Answers

Review the readings from Part 1 “Epistemology”(new tab) from Dew and Gould’s Philosophy: A Christian Introduction, which includes Chapters 2-6. Chapter 4 “Ancient Philosophy” from Payne’s An Introduction to Philosophy(PDF document). The section on Socrates, p. 66-68, from Melchert’s The Great Conversation In 400-500 words add to the journal you began in Assignment 1.4 and continued in 2.4. Select the philosopher(s) that you think offer(s) the best answer to the question of knowledge. Explain your reasoning for your selection.

Final Paper Prompts (1750-2000 words), choose one of the prompts Prompt 1 Pick a (more or less) well-known person and analyze their life and/or actions through two texts we studied. At least one of the texts you use should be from the second half of the semester (starting Gandhi). This person can be real (e.g., politician, artist, celebrity) or fictional (the protagonist of a novel or a film). Possible angles: Rousseau on the “noble savage”, Gandhi and/or Fanon on the right way to resist colonialism, Mill on individuality, Wollstonecraft on liberating women, Lorde on the Erotic, Nietzsche’s will to power, Freud's psychoanalysis, Marx on alienation. These are just options. You can develop them or find others. Prompt 2 In September 2018, India’s supreme court struck down a law prohibiting consensual gay sex (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/world/asia/indi...). Discuss this event through two of the texts we studied. At least one of these texts should be from the second half of the semester (starting Gandhi). Possible angels: Rousseau and the Western image of indigenous sexuality, Mill on individual freedom, Said on the orientalist image of the non-Western as sexual, Gandhi on resisting colonialism, Freud on the repression of Eros, Nietzsche on slave morality, Ahmed on resisting Western culture in the non-Western world, Foucault on the origins of gay identity. These are just options. You can develop them or find others. Prompt 3 Is having and expressing sexual and/or gender identity (you may write on either or both) an expression of freedom or a sign of oppression? Discuss this question through two of the texts we studied. At least two of these texts should be from the second half of the semester (starting Gandhi). Possible angels: Foucault on the origins of queer identities, Freud on the repression of Eros, Kristeva on the abject, Nietzsche on will to power and/or slave morality, Marx on alienation from the body/senses under Capitalism, Mill on individuality. These are just options. You can develop them or find others. You can write on sexual or gender identity in general on a more specific identity people claim (e.g., “queer”, “trans”, “nonbinary”, “gay”, “straight”, etc.). Prompt 4 China has been implementing a “social credit system” that rewards or punishes citizens based on their ordinary social behavior as described in this US article (https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/china-so...). Discuss this system through two of the texts we studied. At least one of these texts should be from the second half of the semester (starting Gandhi). Possible angels: Said on orientalism, Mill on individuality and conformity, Lin Zexu’s claims against the West, Marx on oppression under Capitalism, Rousseau on amour-propre, Foucault on knowledge as power, Kristeva on the abject, Freud on how civilization makes us unhappy, Nietzsche on slave morality. These are just options. You can develop them or find others. Prompt 5 In the past few years, enhancing “diversity” has become a chief route for addressing minority concerns in culture, politics, education, and business. Organizations strive to have a more diverse face – be it in their workforce, students, customers, etc. Discuss pros and/or cons of this approach through two of the texts we studied. At least one of these texts should be from the second half of the semester (starting Gandhi). Possible angels: Fanon or Gandhi on resisting colonialism, Said on orientalism, French Revolution texts on civic equality and freedom, Nietzsche on will to power and/or slave morality, Kristeva on the abject, Mill on individuality, Wollstonecraft or Lorde on liberating women and/or Black women. These are just options. You can develop them or find others. You may write on diversity in general or focus on a specific minority. Prompt 6 Recently, especially given the pandemic and the riots in the US Capitol, there are increasing worries about conspiracy theories and their adherents. Discuss this issue through two texts we studied. At least one of these texts should be from the second half of the semester (starting Gandhi). Questions you may explore (but you could rather formulate others): Are conspiracy theories an exercise of will to power and/or a form of slave morality? Do they reflect fear of the abject (Kristeva)? Do they express resentment among the lower classes (Marx, Ahmed)? Do they unleash repressed instincts (Freud)? Resistance to knowledge as power (Foucault)? Prompt 7 Your own topic. If you’re interested in this option, you must email me by December 6 with a paragraph describing it – the question/s you will explore and the sources you’d like to use (must be two sources, one of which from the second half of the semester; starting Gandhi).

Course Objectives CO4: Evaluate and analyze various forms of argument for rhetorical devices, fallacies, and possible pseudo-reasoning. (Evaluate) CO5: Create an argument free from logical errors. (Create) Use AI with caution. The university allows you to use AI for research, stimulating thought, correcting grammar, and a few other areas. See the official policy here. HOWEVER, if the Turnitin System yields an AI score above 75% you will need to rewrite the paper on your own OR submit substantial documentation attesting to your authorship of the paper. You cannot see your score unless we send the report to you, but you know if you used it to write your papers. NOTE, for these papers, every reference must have a working URL that takes the instructor to the precise location for the document used. Failure to do this can be seen as plagiarism. If you have a physical book, you may need to take a picture to prove ownership of the workDescription: The goal for the week seven presentation is to use a well-structured argument to persuade the audience of what you believe to be the truth using evidence from authoritative, unbiased sources as justification. You will use one of the three types of argument discussed in week six, Classic, Toulmin, or Rogerian to present your case. Note, you would do well to read the lesson from week six on these types of arguments before completing this assignment AND you will be free to modify your actual introduction to better align with your chosen type. A key graded component for each type of argument is producing a credible counterargument to your claim. If you cannot reasonably present a legitimate argument against your position, you need to rethink your topic. Rationally, if no one can argue against your position, there is no need for your argument. Choose an issue you'd like to convince other people of and find resources that will be the foundation for the Week 7 PowerPoint. Here you will focus on ONLY the introductory paragraph and an annotated bibliography. See the examples for formatting. At the least, the document should be double-spaced and the annotated references should be hanging indent. Part I: Introduce your topic. Using information from the textbook in chapters 5 and 6, as well as the lessons from weeks 4 and 5, write a proper introductory paragraph. This paragraph will contain your thesis and a rudimentary outline of your argument. This is NOT a rough draft and writing more than the introductory paragraph will result in a loss of points for not following directions. One consideration here is to provide enough for the instructor to provide proper guidance on how to best complete the PowerPoint. Part II: "Annotated bibliography" The goal here is to provide a proper reference in the chosen style for a minimum of three resources you plan to use in your argument. After providing that reference, provide a short description of the main points in the work AND how you intend to use that information in your final PowerPoint. See the attached example for guidance. You would be well advised to consult the week 7 assignment descriptions for clarity on expectations.

BLHV MAJOR ASSIGNMENT Purpose of this assignment The purpose of the Moral Compass Essay assignment is to define and articulate your own thoughtfully reasoned system of values, principles, and practices as a framework for personal integrity, business and professional value creation, and conscientious leadership. This assignment primarily targets the first BLHV learning objective to foster your personal moral intelligence and wellbeing. Deliverable format Download the Moral Compass Essay Worksheet. You can use this worksheet to draft your Moral Compass Essay. Write your essay and post the completed essay to Canvas. Please do not post the Worksheet but a clean Essay. Word count: 1500 words. Your essay may be longer, but not shorter. Visuals and media (optional) to enhance your narrative. Citations in APA format are required to document references to visuals, media, course materials, and authoritative wisdom tradition sources. Step by step instructions The Moral Compass Essay is an individual assignment written entirely in your own words and based on your personal experience. DO NOT write an essay about what a moral compass is. Use the BLHV Moral Compass framework to write about your own Moral Compass. Prepare before you write by reading the BLHV Moral Compass Workbook and working on the exercises that seem useful to you. Consult the Values Toolkit (Chapter 11 of The Leadership Labyrinth), Moral Foundations Theory,Links to an external site. and authoritative sources from your own wisdom tradition in organizing your Moral Compass Essay. Thoroughly discuss every element of the Moral Compass as honestly and forthrightly as you can with personal examples. Post your completed Moral Compass Essay to the Canvas submission portal 4. Grading: 25 points. Late submissions will not be accepted.

Read Section 1 “History of the Correspondence Theory”(new tab) of the entry “The Correspondence Theory of Truth” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Review the following selections: Chapter 2(new tab) “Truth and Knowledge” in Dew and Gould’s Philosophy: A Christian Introduction. Chapter 2 “Critical Thinking I: Being Reasonable” and Chapter 3 “Critical Thinking II: Logic” in Payne’s An Introduction to Philosophy(PDF document), p. 11-38. The video Objective vs Subjective (Philosophical Distinction)(new tab) focuses on how the terms subjective and objective are used. Watch this video on objective truth: Are There No Objective Truths?(new tab) Access the threaded discussion and in 150-200 words respond to the following: What are the advantages and disadvantages of an objective approach to truth? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Please explain.

Review the readings and videos from Read Section 1 “History of the Correspondence Theory”(new tab) of the entry “The Correspondence Theory of Truth” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Review the following selections:Chapter 2(new tab) “Truth and Knowledge” in Dew and Gould’s Philosophy: A Christian Introduction. Chapter 2 “Critical Thinking I: Being Reasonable” and Chapter 3 “Critical Thinking II: Logic” in Payne’s An Introduction to Philosophy(PDF document), p. 11-38. The video Objective vs Subjective (Philosophical Distinction)(new tab) focuses on how the terms subjective and objective are used. Watch this video by Billy Graham entitled What Is Truth?(new tab) Read Part 3 “Philosophy of Religion(new tab)” in Dew and Gould, p. 163-221. In 400-500 words add to the journal you began in Assignment 1.4 and continued in 2.4 and 3.4. Select the philosopher(s) that you think offer(s) the best answer to the question of truth. Explain your reasoning for your selection

Instructions After reviewing the article, Dignity and Respect: Why Therapeutic Assent Matters by Flowers and Dawes, explain how you would initiate one conversation of assent during the first intake or treatment planning meeting for a client. The client is working mainly on social skills training, is fully verbal, participating in mainly general education courses in the 10th grade of high school, and plans to attend college or technical/vocational after graduation. The second conversation is for a younger, elementary age, nonverbal client, working on functional communication skills. Parents/guardians attend and fully participate in both meetings. Responses are formatted in the discussion forum like other prompt assignments. Please answer each question entirely with a minimum of 200 words and respond to a minimum of two additional peers for full credit. Length: Your initial post should be roughly 200 words in length, and your responses to peers should be roughly 100 words each. Cite sources you reference in-text and under a “References” section in APA format.

Explore the concept of the Socratic Method as demonstrated in the dialogues Euthyphro and The Apology. How does Socrates use questions to expose contradictions and lead others toward self-examination? Analyze the different definitions of piety that Euthyphro presents in the dialogue. How does Socrates dismantle each definition, and what does this reveal about the nature of true piety? In The Apology, Socrates argues that "the unexamined life is not worth living." Explain the significance of this statement and discuss its implications for individual and societal growth. Compare and contrast the accusations against Socrates in Euthyphro and The Apology. What do these accusations suggest about the nature of Athenian society and the challenges faced by those who question the status quo? To what extent is Socrates a model citizen? Consider his commitment to truth, his obedience to the law, and his willingness to sacrifice his life for his beliefs. Choose two of the essay questions listed above. Write 200 words or more for each chosen essay following MLA format (thus 400 words total). Place your essays on the website you create for this course and also share both essays on this week's discussion board.

Note: The peer response must contain relevant content as well. Avoid repeating (even in different words) what you wrote about in your main discussion as part of the response to the classmate. Whether you agree or disagree with your peer's discussion, add new content to your peer's post. While you may add comments such as "I agree with you" or "Interesting findings,” that is not enough to receive a grade for the peer response. Your reaction to a peer's discussion must contain relevant content taken from the material learned in class or external sources. Read and respond to at least two other classmates The case of Mark, who kills his boss after ingesting a pill that weakens emotional control, presents an intriguing dilemma in terms of determinism and libertarianism. Determinism argues that all actions are the result of preceding causes, such as genetic factors, past experiences, or environmental influences, and that free will is an illusion. In this case, Mark’s internalized anger toward his boss and the action of being drugged with Coctyus can be seen as deterministic factors that contributed to his violent reaction. Mark’s emotions were suppressed for years, and the drug merely triggered an emotional response that he was unable to control, suggesting that his behavior was largely determined by prior emotional and situational factors. On the other hand, libertarianism posits that individuals possess free will and the ability to make choices independent of external or internal influences. If Mark had acted purely out of choice and not under the influence of a substance, libertarians might argue that he would be responsible for his actions regardless of his circumstances. However, in this case, the drug interferes with his ability to control his emotions, complicating the issue of free will. Regarding responsibility, both Mark and Dave bear responsibility for the tragic outcome. Mark, although influenced by the pill, still acted violently, and his prior resentment toward his boss suggests a lack of emotional regulation or coping mechanisms. Dave, however, bears a significant portion of the responsibility, as his deliberate actions to manipulate Mark’s emotions with the pill led to the violent act. If Dave had not sought to provoke Mark, the situation might have never escalated. As for the sentence Mark should receive, it is crucial to consider both his actions and the external influences on him. While Mark did commit murder, the fact that he was under the influence of a substance that impaired his ability to control his emotions suggests that a reduced sentence may be appropriate. This might involve a sentence that includes psychiatric evaluation and treatment, as well as a prison term that reflects the impact of the drug-induced state on his behavior. The sentence should balance personal responsibility with the recognition of external manipulation.

BOOL: CHAPTER 5 Translate the following sentences either from English into BOOL or from BOOL into English. Use the standard atomic sentences from the book (i.e. P == Pia is guilty, Q == Quinn is guilty, R == Raquel is guilty, etc.). You can either answer the questions in the textbox below or cut and paste the questions into a word document and upload it here. 1. P&Q 2. Qv(~P&~R) 3. (PvR)&~Q 4. ~Pv~Q 5. Either Pia is guilty or Quinn and Raquel. 6. Neither Quinn nor Raquel are guilty. 7. Quinn is guilty but Pia is innocent. 8. Pia and Quinn are guilty but Raquel and Stan are innocent. THEN------- TRUTH TABLE: CHAPTER 6 For this problem, you'll use the Truth Machine. Build a truth table for the following sentence: Pv~(QvR) You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. THEN----- CHAPTER 7: For this problem, you'll use the Truth Machine.Links to an external site. Build a truth table for the following two sentences and answer whether the two sentences are equivalent or not. The two sentences are: P&~(QvR) (P&~Q)&~R You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here.