Expert Answers

Description 1. For this Bonus problem, do BOOL Level 1 #15Links to an external site.. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. 2. For this Bonus problem, do FOL Level 2 #1Links to an external site.. You'll then take a screenshot and upload the photo here. Translate each of these sentences into English and give a few sentences explaining how/why you made the choices you did for 3. the translation. Here's a quickLinks to an external site. video explaining some aspects of multiple quantification. 4% AxEyLikes(x,y) AxEyLikes(y,x) EyAxLikes(x,y) EyAxLikes(y,x)

Description Course Objectives CO4: Evaluate and analyze various forms of argument for rhetorical devices, fallacies, and possible pseudo-reasoning. (Evaluate) CO5: Create an argument free from logical errors. (Create) Use AI with caution. The university allows you to use AI for research, stimulating thought, correcting grammar, and a few other areas. See the official policy here. HOWEVER, if the Turnitin System yields an AI score above 75% you will need to rewrite the paper on your own OR submit substantial documentation attesting to your authorship of the paper. You cannot see your score unless we send the report to you, but you know if you used it to write your papers. NOTE, for these papers, every reference must have a working URL that takes the instructor to the precise location for the document used. Failure to do this can be seen as plagiarism. If you have a physical book, you may need to take a picture to prove ownership of the workDescription: The goal for the week seven presentation is to use a well-structured argument to persuade the audience of what you believe to be the truth using evidence from authoritative, unbiased sources as justification. You will use one of the three types of argument discussed in week six, Classic, Toulmin, or Rogerian to present your case. Note, you would do well to read the lesson from week six on these types of arguments before completing this assignment AND you will be free to modify your actual introduction to better align with your chosen type. A key graded component for each type of argument is producing a credible counterargument to your claim. If you cannot reasonably present a legitimate argument against your position, you need to rethink your topic. Rationally, if no one can argue against your position, there is no need for your argument. Choose an issue you'd like to convince other people of and find resources that will be the foundation for the Week 7 PowerPoint. Here you will focus on ONLY the introductory paragraph and an annotated bibliography. See the examples for formatting. At the least, the document should be double-spaced and the annotated references should be hanging indent. Part I: Introduce your topic. Using information from the textbook in chapters 5 and 6, as well as the lessons from weeks 4 and 5, write a proper introductory paragraph. This paragraph will contain your thesis and a rudimentary outline of your argument. This is NOT a rough draft and writing more than the introductory paragraph will result in a loss of points for not following directions. One consideration here is to provide enough for the instructor to provide proper guidance on how to best complete the PowerPoint. Part II: "Annotated bibliography" The goal here is to provide a proper reference in the chosen style for a minimum of three resources you plan to use in your argument. After providing that reference, provide a short description of the main points in the work AND how you intend to use that information in your final PowerPoint. See the attached example for guidance. You would be well advised to consult the week 7 assignment descriptions for clarity on expectations.

Description 5 Paragraph Analytical Philosophical Essay Instructions Paragraph #1 - Introduction - (7-9 sentences) a. Hook (1 sentence that catches the readers attention, like a relevant quote on the topic or thought-provoking statement) b. Thesis statement c. Preview of how you’re going to prove the thesis Paragraph #2 - Body Paragraph (10-12 sentences) a. Topic Sentence – Original Argument b. Claim c. Evidence/Examples Paragraph #3 - Body Paragraph (10-12 sentences) a. Topic Sentence – Counter Argument Against Original Argument b. Counter Claim c. Evidence/Examples Paragraph #4 - Body Paragraph - (10-12 sentences) a. Topic Sentence – Original Argument’s Response to Counter Argument (DO NOT SIMPLY REPEAT THE ORIGINAL ARGUMENT) b. Counter Claim c. Evidence/Example Paragraph #5 - Conclusion - (4-5 sentences) Begin paragraph with, “In conclusion, I argued that...” a. Restatement of main points that leave reader with sense of closure INSTRUCTIONS: Paper Assignment – Analytical Philosophical Essay *You must follow all of the Analytical Philosophical Essay Instructions provided by the instructor. IMPORTANT! *You will be graded on: 1. Following sentence guidelines: If a paragraph is designated as 10-12 sentences, then you must write at least 10 sentences and no more than 12 sentences. Failure to follow these guidelines will result in a 20 point deduction per paragraph. 2. Persuasiveness of the arguments you provide 3. Original thinking 4. Critical thinking 5. Use of relevant examples IMPORTANT! *You may not directly quote any outside sources (except in your Hook); however, you may make reference to real historical events, ideas, beliefs, cultural or social practices, etc. NO works-cited page or bibliography. You will be penalized for quoting outside sources. *You must choose one of the following claims as your original argument, or the basis of your thesis statement: Stealing is always wrong. Stealing is not always wrong. God is absent from everyday human life. God is not absent from everyday human life. Socrates death was in vain. Socrates death was not in vain. *The purpose of this paper is to: 1. Engage you in critical/logical thinking 2. Encourage you to objectively consider alternative points of view

Description Instructions Watch the video: Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior – WMU Autism Center of Excellence (wmuace.com) Step 1: Watch the video detailing Dr. Brian Iwata describing functional behavior analysis procedures and how to utilize these procedures effectively. Then, refer to the handout for the video – Michigan Autism Training Videos Presentation. Step 2: Download the Functional Analysis Protocol document. The format is an example to give a starting point for guide creation of an FA. Step 3: Looking at your data from previous modules, along with Dr. Iwata’s procedures in the video for Functional Analyses (FA), create a step-by-step guide for administering a FA. The format is completely up to you. Consider the following ideas for your format: Written document, like our example Presentation slides Video format Step 4: Submit your completed guide, one that hopefully will be useful to you and those you provide services to for years to come! Length: Complete the 6-page Functional Analysis Protocol template or create 5-7 slides with Presenter's notes or create a 3-minute video with a script. Sources: 3 credible resources. Criteria Distinguished Proficient In Progress Criterion Score Video Analysis 2 points Evidence of reviewing Dr. Iwata’s video is clear throughout formatted step-by-step guide (three or more areas) of formatted step-by-step guide. 1 point Evidence of reviewing Dr. Iwata’s video is clear in two or more areas in the formatted step-by-step guide. 0.5 points Dr. Iwata’s video is referenced; however, no clear evidence is locatable. Score of Video Analysis, / 2 Organized Format 1 point The guide is arranged in a clear and organized fashion. The format leads the experimenter, and all involved in the FA process in a sequential organized process from start to finish. 0.75 points The guide is arranged in a clear and organized fashion. The format is purposed or aims to be sequential. 0.5 points The guide attempts for clarity and organization, however, the reader is left wondering what step(s) to take throughout the process. Score of Organized Format, / 1 Technological Guidelines 1 point The language in the guide is clear, concise, and understandable to all key stakeholders. 0.75 points The language in the guide is clear, concise, and understandable to the experimenter and professionals conducting the FA. 0.5 points The language in the guide aims for clarity and conciseness. Score of Technological Guidelines, / 1 Environmental Components 1 point All the relevant demographic information, along with setting, date(s), and experimenters are thoroughly defined and addressed. 0.75 points All the relevant demographic information is defined and addressed. 0.5 points Most relevant information is noted and addressed. Score of Environmental Components, / 1 Target Behaviors 1 point No more than three target behaviors are presented in the guide. All target behaviors are operationally defined with non-exemplar’s defined as well, to ensure the technological dimension is fully addressed. 0.75 points No more than three target behaviors are presented and operationally defined. 0.5 points Target behaviors are operationally defined. Score of Target Behaviors, / 1 Conditions 1 point Each condition in the guide (ex., Play, Demand, Reinforcement, Automatic or Alone), are listed and defined in terms of how the condition is intended to be utilized in the FA. The control condition is highlighted by its definition, so all involved understand it is the “control” condition. 0.75 points Each condition in the guide (ex., Play, Demand, Reinforcement, Automatic or Alone), are listed and defined in terms of how the condition is intended to be utilized in the FA. 0.5 points Conditions are listed in the guide, and definitions are attempted. Score of Conditions, / 1 Data Collection 1 point There is given data-collection methodology that matches the format of the guide and process of conducting the FA. Visual Data collection format is added to the format. 0.75 points There is given data-collection methodology that matches the format of the guide and process of conducting the FA. 0.5 points There is stated data-collection measure(s). Score of Data Collection, / 1 Overall Plan 1 point Chosen conditions make applied sense within the format of the guide. There is a schedule contained within the guide that explains how the process, timing, and any misc. the author feels is significant to add. *Process = What condition to implement when. *Timing = The amount of time allocated to each process. 0.75 points There is a schedule contained within the guide that explains how the process, timing, and any misc. the author feels is significant to add. 0.5 points A schedule is attempted to show what conditions will be followed. Score of Overall Plan, / 1 APA Format & References 1 point Guide is formatted throughout in the current APA 7th Edition Format. 0.75 points References in the guide are formatted in the current APA 7th Edition Format. 0.5 points APA format is attempted; however, significant errors are evident. Score of APA Format & References, / 1 TotalScore of Module 6 Assignment: Analyze a Video Rubric This is the link for the video

Description BLHV MAJOR ASSIGNMENT Purpose of this assignment The purpose of the Moral Compass Essay assignment is to define and articulate your own thoughtfully reasoned system of values, principles, and practices as a framework for personal integrity, business and professional value creation, and conscientious leadership. This assignment primarily targets the first BLHV learning objective to foster your personal moral intelligence and wellbeing. Deliverable format Download the Moral Compass Essay Worksheet. You can use this worksheet to draft your Moral Compass Essay. Write your essay and post the completed essay to Canvas. Please do not post the Worksheet but a clean Essay. Word count: 1500 words. Your essay may be longer, but not shorter. Visuals and media (optional) to enhance your narrative. Citations in APA format are required to document references to visuals, media, course materials, and authoritative wisdom tradition sources. Step by step instructions The Moral Compass Essay is an individual assignment written entirely in your own words and based on your personal experience. DO NOT write an essay about what a moral compass is. Use the BLHV Moral Compass framework to write about your own Moral Compass. Prepare before you write by reading the BLHV Moral Compass Workbook and working on the exercises that seem useful to you. Consult the Values Toolkit (Chapter 11 of The Leadership Labyrinth), Moral Foundations Theory,Links to an external site. and authoritative sources from your own wisdom tradition in organizing your Moral Compass Essay. Thoroughly discuss every element of the Moral Compass as honestly and forthrightly as you can with personal examples. Post your completed Moral Compass Essay to the Canvas submission portal 4. Grading: 25 points. Late submissions will not be accepted.

Description PHI 1010: Intro to Philosophy Final Keystone Project Instructions Choose only one of the three following prompts to build your essay around. Each prompt will be associated with one of the chapters we have studied. Make sure to address every aspect of the prompt to receive a high grade. Your essay must be at least 600 words! 1) [Chapter 5: Epistemology/The Search for Truth]: Take a stance on the Rationalism vs Empiricism argument. Explain what these two theories mean in relation to truth and knowledge. What are the prime differences between the two? After providing some details on both, state which one is more appealing to you. Center your position on a given topic or example by appealing to the method taken for your selected theory. If you choose rationalism, then explain why a priori (independent of experience) reasoning is more suited to explain your chosen example. If you choose empiricism, then explain why certain a posteriori (empirical, dependent on experience) reasoning is more suited to explain your chosen example. You may lean on examples from the textbook/PPT notes for some inspiration or you may come up with one yourself. Some areas to think about [Mathematics, Religion, Causality, Descartes’ cogito, science, biology, human nature, sociology/social norms, technology, language etc.] Aspects to look for: 1) Introduction: You introduce the two positions just enough to set up your thesis statement in which you clearly state your position as well as your examples used to support your position. 2) Body Paragraphs: You provide enough details to adequately explain both positions. You then bring in your chosen topic/example to center your analysis on. You not only provide enough details on the example, so your readers can understand it, but you also apply the methods of your selected theory onto the example. 3) Each paragraph is well organized and relates back to your thesis 4) You have two sources evident in your essay (your textbook can be one) 5) You provide a conclusion to wrap up the gist of the work 2) [Chapter 6: Self]: The mind-body problem is one of the most fascinating issues in both scientific and philosophical domains. Yet despite hundreds of years of research, it is still quite a mystery. In this essay you will try to explain the mind-body problem in your own words. What is this problem that has plagued intellectuals for this long. Give examples and define the terms you use to help demonstrate your comprehension. Then, state your position on the matter. You don’t have to be 100% certain of your position, simply choose the one that makes the most sense to you. Explain your solution, and you may choose among the one available to you in the textbook/PPT notes (Descartes’ view, Leibniz’s view, materialist solution, idealist solution, Spinoza’s solution, behaviorism, identity theory, functionalism, embodied consciousness, or choose your own). In trying to appeal to your selected solution, give reasons or examples as to why your solution is preferable. Below is an example of how you might go about your essay, since this prompt could be a bit more confusing than the others: [For example: Descartes’ view is that which both mental and physical events are equally real in the sense that they do not come from each other. The mental does not produce the physical and the physical does not produce the mental; hence they are completely distinct things/processes. To put this in perspective, thoughts and ideas cannot be reduced to neurons signaling each other through electric signals. On the same vein matter, which is made up of a congregate of organized atoms that take up physical space, does not owe its existence to conscious activity. The proof for this lies in the continuation of matter when no one is looking. Matter continues to exist regardless of if it is being spectated by an onlooker or not. The reason why Descartes’ dualistic solution is preferable is because it fits in alignment with our intuitive experience of reality. According to Descartes these two substances constantly interact with each other. When I hit my head with my own hand, my mental processes are immediately impacted. I can no longer think clearly, as my conscious control center has been evidently impaired. Furthermore, expressions of pain rise up throughout my body. Pain isn’t just some physical expression located in the world, rather it is an expression of my impaired consciousness informing me that something is wrong.... You should get the point on how to tackle this question by now, but something along these lines!] Aspect to look for: 1) Introduction: You raise the relevance of the mind-body problem. You introduce it just enough to intrigue your readers. You also provide a clear thesis statement with your position 2) Body Paragraphs PT I: You adequately explain the mind-body problem in your own words. You use examples and define your terms so that your readers can have a decent grasp as to what you are saying 3) Body Paragraphs PT II: You offer a solution, while explaining what it is and why it is a preferable solution. You use clear examples to express your position and provide compelling reasons as support 4)You have two sources (your textbook can be one) evident throughout your work 5)You have a conclusion that wraps up the gist of your essay 3) [Chapter 7: Freedom]: Free will has been a very divisive topic in numerous philosophical circles. Some parties hold onto this conception of freedom dearly, calling it the root of our humanity, that which makes us who we are. Consider the Judeo-Christian and Islamic religious for instance. Others cry foul, advocating for its impossibility by breaching our logical and scientific understanding of reality. Take a stance on this position. First explain the free will dilemma while also raising its relevance. Why does this issue matter so deeply to us and how does it affect our lives? Then explain your chosen position [determinism, compatibilism, libertarianism]. Offer reasons why your position is preferable in contrast to the other positions. I also want you to “attack” the opposing positions by providing reasons against their validity. You may need to provide concrete examples to demonstrate your argument. Aspects to look for: 1) Introduction: You raise the relevance of the free will dilemma. You introduce it just enough to intrigue your readers. You also provide a clear thesis statement with your position 2) Body Paragraphs PT I: You adequately explain the free will dilemma in your own words. Your explanation is clear and full of enough details that demonstrates your comprehension. 3) Body Paragraphs PT II: You have a clear stance on your selected position. You first explain what your selected position means and then you offer reasons why it is the superior solution in comparison to the others. You provide enough of an explanation, maybe an example is needed, that makes it both convincing and compelling. 4) You have two sources evident in your essay (your textbook can be one) 5) You provide a conclusion to wrap up the gist of the work

Description Your assignment is to explain the main points of the video as it relates to Boden's book, mainly chapter 4. Some of the terminology is different, and some of the ideas touch on other chapters, too. But what I will be looking for is your ability to connect here is the link to watch I will provide more note that I have but the notes are not clear and might be missing

Description Instructions Instructions Step 1: Read the article from Hawkins et al. regarding Ethical Issues in FAs. Chapter 15: Ethical Issues in Functional Assessment (pp. 407-416). This article is located in your Course Resources. Step 2: Review Dr. Iwata’s Video, Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior (youtube.com) over FBA and FAs, especially the section where he begins to talk more about challenges inherent to FAs (45:09 in the video). Step 3: Review the helpful resource tutorial of How to Create a Decision-Tree. Step 4: Using the three most prevalent FA Models (Brief functional analysis (BFA); Full FA (All three test conditions & a control condition) and Trial-based FA. Create a decision tree for which FA method would be the most beneficial to utilize in different levels of risk. Situations or levels of risk are conceptualized in terms of risk to the client and risk to staff. Generally, risk is conceptualized using the following categories: Low Risk of Severity, Moderate Risk of Severity, and High Risk of Severity. The Self-Injury Trauma (SIT) Scale (Iwata et. al., 1990) was designed to assess these risks. Your decision tree, therefore, should have low-risk level, moderate risk level, and high-risk levels. Step 5: Provide a written summary at least 2 paragraphs in length explaining how you constructed your decision -tree and conceptualization of the components that are contained within the diagram. Step 6: Submit your completed decision tree, one that will be useful to you and those you provide services to for years to come! Length: Decision-Tree should be at least 2 pages in length. Sources: For this assignment, cite at least 2 APA formatted sources. Grading This assignment is worth 10 points. Refer to the rubric for details. Hide Rubrics Rubric Name: Module 6 Assignment: Create a Decision Tree Rubric Criteria Excellent 2 points Proficient 1 point Developing 0.5 points Criterion Score Applied (Make a difference of social importance) Each level of risk is thoroughly defined - Levels of risk should at least include: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk Each level of risk is explained in terms of social validity for the client. Each level of risk is defined. All three risk levels are included in decision-tree, and explained in write-up. Levels of risk are mentioned, however, not thoroughly defined. One or more risk levels are missing or a component of definition is missing. Score of Applied (Make a difference of social importance), / 2 Behavioral (Focus on observable & measurable behavior) Behaviors within each level of risk are operationally defined (observable & measurable) with at least one non behavior definition given for each behavior. Behaviors within all three levels of risk are operationally defined in observable & measurable terms. An attempt has been made to define behaviors, however, definition is not observable & measurable. Score of Behavioral (Focus on observable & measurable behavior), / 2 Analytic (Prove relationships between behavior and environment) Environmental variables are thoroughly explained in write-up. Each environment the FA would most likely be conducted in has been given consideration in terms of risk matched to the FA model. Environmental variables are explained in the write-up. An attempt has been made to explain environmental variables, however, only one environment is explained or explanations are missing key components. Score of Analytic (Prove relationships between behavior and environment), / 2 Conceptually Systematic (Relate procedures to behavior principles) FA methods are conceptually systematic (i.e., procedures are research-based and representative of the principles of ABA). In write-up, all procedures must be described in the language of ABA. Each FA method is explained/defined in conceptually systematic terms. An attempt has been made to explain FA methods in conceptually systematic terms, however, there are significant errors. Score of Conceptually Systematic (Relate procedures to behavior principles), / 2 Effective (Behavioral techniques result in socially significant change) Ethical issues in each model are thoroughly detailed and explanations given for rationale for specific model was chosen in reference to our ethics code. Ethical issues are explained in relation to each FA Model. An attempt has been made to explain ethical issues in FA Models, however, significant issues are left out or not all models are included. Score of Effective (Behavioral techniques result in socially significant change), / 2 TotalScore of Module 6 Assignment: Create a Decision Tree Rubric, / 10 Overall Score EXCELLENT 10 points minimum PROFICIENT 5 points minimum DEVELOPING 2.5 p

Description Compare and contrast the philosophy of Errol Flynn with those of Tom Blake? Where do they have agreements? Where do they depart? What can one learn from both? Where do you depart company with their ideas and why? 500 words or more. These two films are your key. The Hedonistic PhilosopherLinks to an external site. Tom Blake: A Surfer's PhilosophyLinks to an external site. Give the pro and con arguments to the vegan argument. Which argument is more ethically sound? Why? Where are there exceptions? Provide your own views on this subject. 400 words or more. How does this issue relate to morality in general? The following film is your key. Why I Don't Eat FacesLinks to an external site. Why is Baba Faqir Chand’s insights on religious visions and miracles important in understanding the nature of human consciousness and its projections? How can Faqir’s views help us better understand religious disputes? Be sure to detail your answers. 400 words or more. Give examples. In the book, Digital Teleportation, there are several chapters on virtual reality and artificial intelligence. Choose three of those chapters and provide a 300-word analysis of each and present your own reaction/views. 900 words or more total. Is the Universe an App? Using the film/essay as the basis of your essay, explain the thesis and your own argument for and against the simulation hypothesis. 300 words. Provide a 200-word analysis of the following audiobook.https://youtu.be/UI-NA2jladI?si=koU6e_ieBK3Vb6SfLinks to an external site. How do the temptations of Prince Agib help explain the dilemma of human beings? In what ways does it resonate with the story given in the Garden of Eden (in Genesis of the Bible). You may need to do extra credit research here. 250 words. Listen to the following audiobook, what does it reveal about temptation and how does it relate to our encompassing digital world?https://youtu.be/hJihsw808FI?si=s5yvjJmiNOiA9ljSLinks to an external site. (250 words). 12 Using ChatGPT 4o or any other AI generator, place three of the questions listed above (your choice) and copy and paste its responses. How accurate is it? Where do you think the AI is inaccurate or misleading or insufficient? 500 words.

Description Read Section 1 “History of the Correspondence Theory”(new tab) of the entry “The Correspondence Theory of Truth” in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Review the following selections: Chapter 2(new tab) “Truth and Knowledge” in Dew and Gould’s Philosophy: A Christian Introduction. Chapter 2 “Critical Thinking I: Being Reasonable” and Chapter 3 “Critical Thinking II: Logic” in Payne’s An Introduction to Philosophy(PDF document), p. 11-38. The video Objective vs Subjective (Philosophical Distinction)(new tab) focuses on how the terms subjective and objective are used. Watch this video on objective truth: Are There No Objective Truths?(new tab) Access the threaded discussion and in 150-200 words respond to the following: What are the advantages and disadvantages of an objective approach to truth? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Please explain.