Expert Answers

****PLEASE DO NOT USE GENERATIVE AI. IT IS CHECKED THOROUGHLY**** Assignment: Please answer the questions substantially. What was the "old consensus" regarding the causes of political violence?(DO NOT ANSWER) What is the "new consensus" regarding the causes of political violence? (DO NOT ANSWER) What is the difference between social and nonsocial partisans? What makes someone a social partisan? How do social and nonsocial partisans approach political disagreements? What is affective polarization and how is it measured? How does affective polarization increase discrimination? Use examples from the readings? Briefly explain what naïve realism is and how it affects motivate attributions. How do social identities, such as partisanship, affect motive attributions? What is conflict extension and how does it increase political hostility? How do close elections increase affective polarization?

No AI, its going to go thru turnitin, so should be own work. You need to use academic books or journals. Follow the instructions cuz he is very strict and picky. He is either democrat or liberal so do not say anything republican. Check the grammar as well. Again no AI. It should be treated like a paper. The course grade is based on this.

You need to answer the questions, I did the most part however you need to expend it from 4 to 10 pages. As well as find some academic journal and books. He is very strict and picky. Please don't use AI, it goes to turn it in. As well as he hates republicans. I have written 4 pages

Part One: Critical Thinking Paper In a five-page paper, apply critical thinking to a selected social issue (Child Poverty). While students will be divided by topic, this is NOT a group assignment. You are free to discuss your topic with the classmates also assigned to your topic (not required) but each student will submit an individual, 5-page paper. In this paper, you will demonstrate effective written in analyzing a social problem and the policies designed to address it. You should follow the critical thinking approach discussed in class and in the Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking. Written Argument Your paper should provide a well-evidenced critical argument following this outline: Define the social problem: document the magnitude (number affected) and scope (who is affected) of the issue to explain why your chosen issue is a “social problem”. Historical Ideologies: explain how two historical ideologies from this list (U.S. exceptionalism, Individualism, Independence, Protestant Work Ethic, self-reliance, upward mobility, and equal opportunity) described in Jimenez, Chapter 3 (available on Blackboard) Current Social Policies: describe two current social policies designed to address the issue. Policy Recommendations: If we are to fulfill social work’s social justice mission, what sort of social policy approach (i.e., laws, programs, budgetary allocations) is needed to address this social problem? Provide your best policy recommendation to address your social problem. influenced the extent to which America has treated your selected social issue as a social problem. Sources Your paper must include a minimum of 5 outside sources. Additionally, you should cite the course textbook, the NASW Code of Ethics, the Jimenez textbook, and possibly other Blackboard readings. However, these required texts do not count towards the five outside sources. Formatting and Style The paper should include a title and reference page, as well as headings and sub-headings (as indicated in the phrases in bold in the Written Argument section) and be written in 3rd person. Follow APA 7th edition for formatting and style. Your paper should demonstrate your ability to distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom, as you lay out your critical thinking argument. Part Two: Oral Argument Overview After completing your paper, summarize your arguments into an oral presentation. Imagine you are providing expert testimony to a legislative committee at the state or federal level about your social problem. Your presentation should highlight the impact of the social problem and discuss both the strengths and limitations of policy alternatives. Content Requirements Research Summary: Briefly summarize key findings from your research, including the magnitude and scope of the problem and current programs addressing it. Policy Recommendation: Conclude with a clear statement advocating for specific policy action. Social Justice Alignment: Explain why and how your policy approach aligns with the pursuit of social justice. Presentation Guidelines Organization and Delivery: Your argument should be well-organized, convincing, and confidently delivered. Duration: Aim for a 3-5 minute presentation. Visibility: You must be visible in your video. Failure to do so will result in an automatic deduction of one point. Preparation: Think through potential questions and address possible counterarguments. Notes: You may use paper notes, a computer, or a tablet, but do not read directly from them. Use them as prompts to highlight important information. Peer Interaction Watch and Comment: You are required to watch and comment on at least 6 classmates' videos. Suggested Questions for Comments: What are the strengths of your classmate's argument? Are there any areas where you think the argument could be improved or clarified? How well did your classmate address counterarguments? Did your classmate provide clear and compelling evidence for their conclusions? How effectively did your classmate connect their policy recommendation to the pursuit of social justice? Assessment Criteria Refer to the rubric for specific grading criteria.

: Write an all-inclusive 750-word op-ed on a current environmental issue (climate change, biodiversity conservation, hazardous waste disposal, water and food security, etc.)

What is more important in international problem solving: a clear vision or a detailed strategic and tactical plan?

Technological advancements often mirror ideas first imagined in literature, film, and speculative fiction. From Orwell’s 1984 to modern sci-fi narratives, societies have long envisioned data-driven surveillance systems—once a distant possibility, now an everyday reality. But where do we draw the line between fictional warnings and real-world implementations? At the core of digital transformation is data—an invaluable resource that enables more informed decision-making. However, data alone holds no power unless it is collected, analyzed, and utilized. This raises critical questions: How far can data analysis go before it infringes on personal freedoms? How is data being used to track and evaluate individuals? And what are the legal and ethical consequences of mass surveillance? In this assignment, you will explore two real-world and one fictional portrayal of government-driven digital surveillance: Chapter 1 of Dragnet Nation by Julia Angwin – A firsthand account of modern mass surveillance and its implications. An episode of Black Mirror (Nosedive) – A dystopian take on a society where social status is determined by constant digital ranking. China’s Social Credit System – A real-world example of a government-driven data monitoring and ranking system. By comparing these cases, you will analyze how data is weaponized for control, governance, and behavioral enforcement, evaluating the cultural and legal implications of living in an era where privacy is no longer guaranteed but increasingly conditional. These three questions are three independent questions. I don't need an introduction or summary. Please mark the answers to the 3 questions according to the question number.

Discuss the role that culture plays in the internationalization of U.S. criminal law There are various cultural and religious issues that influence the internationalization of U.S. criminal law both here in the United States and abroad. The United States has historically been more quick to adopt cultural norms and impose those norms globally than it has been to criminally prohibit the behavior, be it slavery, prostitution, sex trafficking, or child labor. Today, these acts are generally rejected by the American public and prohibited via our criminal laws. Other countries, including our case study Thailand, have different cultural norms that lend themselves to the proliferation of trafficking in persons. Some countries sanction prostitution and forced labor, particularly involving minority classes or foreigners. Other countries embrace child labor or have lax age of consent laws. Your response should address the following: 1. Should U.S. criminal law be used to prosecute trafficking in persons in countries with different cultural norms? For instance, should a foreign corporation be prosecuted under U.S. law for using children to produce its goods? What if that has been the practice in that country for centuries? 2. What about age of consentLinks to an external site., particularly in the context of sexual abuse? Just in June 2023, Japan raised its age of consent from 13 to 16 and redefined rape as non-consensual sex. In Thailand, the age of consent is 15 years of age. U.S. federal law prohibiting sexual abuse defines a minor as anyone under the age of 16, while U.S. federal law prohibiting sexual exploitation of a minor applies to anyone under 18. Should U.S. law control? 3. If culture does play a significant role, then what other approaches can the U.S. government take to change cultural norms? Respond to the discussion question, maximum 300 words. CITE at least TWO Learning Materials sources in your discussion post. Reply to two students with an agree or disagree and why. Replies are maximum 200 words.

You will write a policy paper for the United Nations General Assembly explaining which global issue should be given priority in the coming years. You should outline some of the main topics and concerns within one of the following issue areas: global security, international political economy, international human rights, or global environmental politics. You should then provide an argument for why your chosen issue area deserves the most attention and resources from the global community in the near future. The following components should be in your paper: Introduction- introduce what you are going to accomplish in the paper. (Tell me the plan of your paper.) Analysis of the issue area that deserves the most attention-introduce the issue area that you will argue is the most important for the international community (choose among global security, international political economy, international human rights and global environmental politics) as it has been discussed in class. Explain some of the major topics and concerns within the issue area that the global community will have to deal with. What are some important examples of current events that demonstrate these concerns? (This will be the longest section of your paper.) Take a Position on why this issue area deserves the most attention- give your opinion on why this issue area deserves the most attention in the near future from the international community (why it should be given priority for attention and resources). Explain why you think this (why this issue area over the others?). Suggest some concrete measures that the international community should take to address this issue. (This will be the second longest section of your paper.) Conclusion- wrap up your argument, restate your main thesis and acknowledge any potential critiques they might have of your proposal. Works cited - Be sure to list any sources that you referenced/quoted in your paper. ADDITIONAL INFO: Your audience for this policy paper is international policy-makers with a general background in IR- but not these particular issue areas (this means that concepts need to be defined and explained). The paper needs to be a minimum of 1000 words. (1500 minimum for honors students) You must cite at least 2 sources in this paper. The papers will be graded for both content and spelling/grammar. The papers will be checked for plagiarism automatically. Please utilize the AI writing assistant in Packback before submitting your paper. Questions to Answer In This Deep Dive Do you have an introductory paragraph that tells the reader what you are going to accomplish in the paper? Is your "analysis" section complete? Does it explain major topics and concerns within the issue area you have chosen? Have you included examples of current events that demonstrate your concerns? Is this the longest section of your paper? Did you take a position on the issue? Meaning, did you make a clear argument for why the issue you chose deserves the most attention? Have \you suggested some concrete measures that the international community should take to address this issue? Do you have a concluding paragraph that summarizes your main point and acknowledges any potential critiques the UN might have of your proposal? Have you cited at least two sources? Details Requirements Word Count & Depth (10 points) 1000 + Words Research Quality (10 points) 2 + Sources Required to receive full credit Formatting & Presentation (10 points) Grammar & Mechanics (10 points) Flow & Structure (10 points) Introductory Paragraph (10 points) Analysis of the Issue (15 points) Argument/Position (15 points) Conclusion (10 points)

Counterintelligence These materials provide insight into some of the most infamous counterintelligence cases in recent U.S. history involving the FBI, the CIA, and the State Department. In your reading, consider carefully whether we understand what motivated these individuals. Do we have a clear idea of the damage that was done from their espionage? What are the lessons learned we can derive from these cases? Read: “Former State Department Official and Wife Plead Guilty in 30 Year Espionage Conspiracy,”Links to an external site. November 20, 2009 Press Release, Office of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of Justice. David Wise, “Thirty Years Later, We Still Don’t Truly Know Who Betrayed These Spies,” Smithsonian Magazine,Links to an external site.November 2015. Watch: “The Secret Life of Robert Hanssen,” 60 Minutes, December 16, 2001. Extended Knowledge: BreachLinks to an external site. For those of you interested in the case of Robert Hanssen, you might be interested in Hollywood’s take on the events leading up to his arrest in the 2007 film “Breach.” "Eric O'Neill, a computer specialist who wants to be made an agent is assigned to clerk for Robert Hanssen, a senior agent with 25 years in the FBI, and to write down everything Hanssen does. O'Neill's told it's an investigation of Hanssen's sexual habits, however Hanssen is really suspected of spying for the Soviet Union and Russia for years and being responsible for the deaths of agents working for the United States." How to approach case study work in this course: Read and watch the case study materials. The case studies have been chosen as the most relevant and impactful examples of course topics. Answer prompt 1 and either prompt 2 or 3 below in Canvas by Thursday before moving to the YellowDig Discussions. The Yellowdig Discussion will ask you dig deeper into the cases and further Answer prompt 1 and either prompt 2 or 3: After finishing the case study, what are your conclusions regarding the threat of counterintelligence? Do you think adequate measures have been taken to address this threat? In your opinion, what more could be done? Respond to a colleague’s observations from your own perspective. There are no right or wrong answers. Find another case study or resource related to your, or your classmates’, postings and expand on its relevance. Important: Use a line break between the two sections you select for easy distinction. Bold any key words or topics and be specific about the topic, subject or question you are writing about. Read the rubric. Be specific and complete in your thoughts and extend the conversation in your replies.