Expert Answers

To prepare: Consider that you are in charge of addressing a key issue: capital punishment involving a minor. Review the principles of forensic risk assessment in the Discussion Learning Resources and consider the risks to individuals impacted by the death penalty. In the Discussion Learning Resources, review the American Psychology-Law Society (AP-LS) Forensic Psychology Specialty Guidelines and APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct and consider how they might pertain to the issue of the death penalty, including the effectiveness of the death penalty to deter crime. Post a response to the following: Based on the principles of the forensic risk assessment, discuss the risks not only to the inmate, but the community at large. Explain how the AP-LS Specialty Guidelinesfor Forensic Psychology and APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct pertain to the issue of the death penalty. How does this affect the forensic psychology professional’s assessment? (Consider the concept of nonmaleficence). Evaluate the effectiveness of the death penalty to deter crime between your state and another state. Note: If you are an international student, you may use your local or regional jurisdictions. Note: Your posts should be substantial (500 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. 

To prepare: Identify one case in the Assignment Learning Resource, “Capital Punishment of Young Adults in Light of Evolving Standards of Science and Decency: Why Ohio Should Raise the Minimum Age for Death Penalty Eligibility to Twenty-Five (25),” and consider how you might provide an evidence-based argument for 1 of the following positions: Death penalty should be used for ages 18+, 21+, or 25+ (choose 1 age group) Death penalty should be reinstated for juveniles Death penalty should be used on juveniles based on their crime Post a response to the following: Propose an argument for one of the following and support your argument with evidence-based research: Death penalty should be used for ages 18+, 21+, or 25+ (choose 1 age group) Death penalty should be reinstated for juveniles Death penalty should be used on juveniles based on their crime. Note: Your posts should be substantial (500 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. 

Topic Self esteem 

https://youtu.be/wyHRnnS0MWQ https://youtu.be/3ueGQY8mHJo These videos are a great preview to applying for graduate school. Watch both and post your take-aways. Your response should be 12-15 sentences long and include a description of the GRE. Pay attention to your paragraph formation, orthography, grammar, spelling, and punctuation; Proofread your work!

Research the life/background of Justin Bieber. This is the background for your argument. You will then use Berry’s model and discuss whether you think Justin Bieber is assimilated, integrated, marginalized or separated to mainstream American culture. Defend your argument with specific examples from the Bieber  life or from his behaviors. You may discuss what you consider to be “mainstream American culture” as part of this argument. Also discuss how the level of acculturation may have or be affecting the person or groups relationship with larger American society.   

 Powerpoint Slides  Variables  State the variables? Identify the dependent variable(s)?   Identify the independent variable(s)?   Identify the variables’ levels of measurement? (e.g., nominal, ordinal, interval/ratio). Each variable in the study could have a different level of measurement.  State the measurement tools (scales) were used, if applicable (e.g., the Beck Depression Inventory or other types of scales or tools)   Data Collection Procedures  Describe how the data were collected. Briefly explain these procedures.

 Assessment Description For this assignment, research two older, but highly respected research-based articles. The articles should be peer-reviewed and scholarly.   Read through them carefully and write a summary of each article. Write about the articles in everyday language, explaining the theory each was testing, the method used, the most important results, and the main points in the discussion. Be very careful not to plagiarize at this stage (please reread the course resources on academic integrity (plagiarism) and the APA guide on paraphrasing). Write 500-600-words for each summary (for a total of 1,000-1,200-words), following this organizational structure: A description of the article's purpose and main hypotheses A clear statement of the study's design: Experimental or correlational? What were the main IVs or PVs? What was the main DV? Who participated? A methods paragraph in which you mention each key variable in turn, followed by how it was operationalized. (e.g., "The study measured the variable self-compassion using a self-report questionnaire developed by Neff; it had 25 items that were rated on 5-point scales.") A paragraph in which you describe the main results. If they used regression, you must describe the main relationship as well as what it was controlling for (e.g., "Self-compassion predicted well-being, even when controlling for self-esteem and emotionality"). If it was a factorial design, describe the main effects and interactions. A short paragraph about the authors' conclusions. Turn in one document with both summaries; make sure to distinguish which summary belongs to which article with appropriate APA headings. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. USE THIS TWO ARTICLES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.   Albornoz, Y. (2011). The effects of group improvisational music therapy on depression in adolescents and adults with substance abuse: a randomized controlled trial. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 20(3), 208–224. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/08098131.2010.522717 Gok, K., Sumanth, J. J., Bommer, W. H., Demirtas, O., Arslan, A., Eberhard, J., Ozdemir, A. I., & Yigit, A. (2017). You may not reap what you sow: how employees’ moral awareness minimizes ethical leadership’s positive impact on workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 257-277. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3655-7

How to evaluate a couple to be ready for treatment

 I relate with your statement that in the future I would develop or add indicators that are more individual like and not as general as the one I completed. I agree with you that the best strategy is planning, the teachers should create and set clear expectations and rules that result in routines. As a teacher,  what would you implement to acquire feedback from your students?  

   Bounce Journal Assignment Instructions Read assigned chapters in Bounce: Living the Resilient Life (2010) and write a concise, comprehensive “So What?!” A three-part journal entry follows the convincing pitch to get the reader involved.  The body of the Bounce Journal should be least 2 pages. The “So What?!” must be proofread to eliminate grammar and spelling errors, and address assigned chapters.  The journal entry must utilize the required      structure. The structure has 3 parts: 1) “What Did I Find? (citation with pagination/location required)  2) “What Did I Think and/or Feel?” 3) “What Am I Going to Do?”  First person used sparingly.  Wicks, R. (2010). Bounce: Living the resilient life. New York: Oxford University Press.  First Bounce Journal: assigned chapters: Have a Life! An Introduction Navigating Life’s Rough Waters: Riding the Crest      of Chronic and Acute Stress Personal Renewal: Creating and Tailoring Your Own      Self-Care Protocol