Description Name: Kirby BaxterAge: 36 yearsProvider: M. McCall MDAllergies: NKDACode Status: Full CodeAdmit Wt: 190 lbs (86.2 kg)BMI: 27.3 Other 09/30 0800Client Information: Medical History: Transient ischemic attack, type 2 diabetes, depression, pulmonary embolism Social History: Smokes 1 pack/day cigarettes Name: Kirby BaxterAge: 36 yearsProvider: M. McCall MDAllergies: NKDACode Status: Full CodeAdmit Wt: 190 lbs (86.2 kg)BMI: 27.3r Lab & Diagnostics Other DIAGNOSTIC TEST RESULTSDateDiagnostic TestFindings09/30 0920 Computed Tomography (CT) Focal cord enlargement at the level of trauma on sagittal T4. Suggested MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) for more detailed imaging. Provider Lab & Diagnostics Other PROVIDER PRESCRIPTIONS & NOTES09/30 0802Prescriptions: Insert two large-bore peripheral IVs 650 mg of acetaminophen by mouth q6h PRN for pain Apply 100% oxygen via nonrebreather mask Complete full neurologic exam Electrocardiogram now Insert indwelling urinary catheter Out of bed to chair three times daily Regular diet 09/30 0925Prescriptions: Morphine 2 mg IV push q3h PRN for pain 0.9% NS 1000 mL IV fluid bolus – infuse over one hour Collect urine sample Orthostatic vital signs - once CBC level Lower the head of the bed Flowsheets Provider Lab & Diagnostics Other VITAL SIGN TRENDDate TempHRRRBPSpO2O209/30 074598.0 °F (36.7 °C)462888/5299%2L/NC09/30 0930 98.0 °F (36.7 °C)5816 100/80 99% RA Age: 36 years Provider: M. McCall MD Allergies: NKDA Code Status: Full Code Admit Wt: 190 lbs (86.2 kg) BMI: 27.3 Nursing Flowsheets Provider Lab & Diagnostics Other NURSING ASSESSMENT & NOTES09/30 0750 Neuro/Cognitive: Alert, oriented to person, place, time, and situation. Slow to answer questions. Cardiovascular: S1 and S2 sounds present. Denies chest pain. Sinus bradycardia. Respiratory: Breathing rapid. Equal chest rise and fall. Genitourinary: 16 F indwelling urinary catheter draining yellow, clear urine. Neurovascular: Numbness and tingling along with decreased sensation to lower extremities. Pain: Rates 9/10 pain. “My neck is killing me!”
Description Write a paper about glyphosate. Research and describe your findings about glyphosate. What is it, what is it used for and why is it potentially an issue. Consider various stake holders, concerns and questions. Answer at least three of the following questions in your paper. Possible questions: Does glyphosate cause cancer? Could glyphosate have other health effects? Does glyphosate harm our gut bacteria? Could glyphosate be another case like DDT or Thalidomide – should we apply the precautionary principle? Is there glyphosate in the air and rainwater? Is there glyphosate in urine? What about breastmilk? Should we worry about glyphosate in wine? Is wheat toxic because of glyphosate? Does glyphosate use enable bad farming practices? What about resistance and superweeds? Does glyphosate interfere with soil organisms or nutrient availability? Does glyphosate harm Monarch butterflies or bees? Can glyphosate research be trusted? What about conflicts of interest?
Description Please watch the southeast 67 documentary on the streaming services provided on the website. Please write a reflection paper and discuss your feelings/ reactions to the documentary; please list ONE nursing diagnosis associated with the topic of Substance Use and Addiction Disorders, and detail nursing interventions, and outcome criterion; no more than 2 pages in length. https://southeast67.com/screenings_hosting.php
Description Task You will write four reflections on a reading of your choice from the previous three weeks of the course. This assignment aims to help you practice identifying and understanding the main argument in complex texts, articulating your evaluation of the argument, and supporting it with well-argued reasons. You will briefly analyze what you take to be one of the central arguments of the reading and then raise a positive or negative critique of it. Skills & Knowledge • Practice the ability to evaluate academic texts and complex arguments critically. • Practice articulating your view clearly, concisely, and with the support of well-argued reasons and examples. • Practice the ability to recognize connections and contrasts between different philosophical concepts. Criteria for Success • Formality: o Your reflection should be between 500-600 words. o It should be written with clarity and care. Make sure to edit after yourself to catch any grammar or spelling errors. o An easy way to structure your reflection is to separate it into two paragraphs: ? The first paragraph introduces and explains arguments or concepts that are the subject of your critique. ? The second paragraph evaluates and critiques arguments or concepts introduced earlier, centering your personal critical perspective. If you want to raise multiple points of critique, a separate paragraph should be dedicated to each. o Alternatively, if you want to discuss multiple arguments or concepts, you can use the following structure: ? Explanation of the concept/argument 1 ? Evaluation of the concept/argument 1 ? Explanation of the concept/argument 2 ? Evaluation of the concept/argument 2 • Comprehension: o Select a concept/argument/idea from the reading that is interesting to you. Demonstrate understanding of the chosen concept/idea/argument by briefly yet accurately summarizing it. Work closely with the reading by paraphrasing or citing the author. o Make sure you explain only those parts of the argument and concepts you will reflect on critically. Refrain from attempting to summarize an entire article or introducing concepts and arguments you will not return to in your reflection. • Reflection: o Evaluate the chosen concept/argument/idea by raising a positive or negative critique of it. o Provide well-articulated reasons in support of your evaluation.Do not simply state your position, but explain why you hold it.Your critical perspective is the most important part of the reflection. o In formulating the reasons in support of your critique, feel free to use any justifications from the class materials and discussion.
Description Watch “When 'I' Becomes 'We',” by Mina Cikara, PhD.Answer the following questions: People report that their group-on-group interactions are what compared to their one-on-one interactions? How do people rate their ongoing group-on-group interactions? What are the 3 factors Dr. Cikara says contributes to increased agression between groups? Describe each one.Use "conflict," "mirror image perception," and "in-group bias" to describe Dr. Cikara'a experience at the baseball game. Write the answer next to the question.*Echo the question in your answer.Example: Which category or categories of psychological research was mentioned in the article?Answer: The category is...Answer: The categories are...Example: What limitations of the study are mentioned? Answer: The limitations of the study are...*Include what you've read in this chapter to your answers.*Your combined answers should equal at least two paragraphs.PARAPHRASE ONLY.DO NOT QUOTE.DO NOT PLAGIARIZE.When ‘I’ Becomes ‘We’ | Mina Cikara | TEDxCambridge - YouTube
Description Part 1 Write at least a 750-word paper responding to the following questions: What is the purpose of business analytics? What are the three components of business analytics? What assumption do you have to make about the relationship between EMV and a state of nature when you are using the mean to determine the value of EMV? Develop a Venn diagram of the three components of business analytics. Describe the unions of the three pairs as well as the union of all three. Part 2: Case Study You must use QM for Windows for this case study. Develop a report with the findings based on the case questions. Present tables with probabilities data. Present your report in an Executive Summary format. The report must be approximately 750 words with approximately 2-3 tables. You may develop your tables or copy QM output tables. This assignment will assess your ability to use a decision support program, report findings, and interpret results. The Case: Jing Tsong of Bayside Laundry has been providing cleaning and linen service for rental condominiums on the Gulf Coast for over 10 years. Currently, Jing is servicing 26 condominium developments. Jing’s two major competitors are Cleanco, which currently services 15 condominium developments, and Beach Services, which performs laundry and cleaning services for 11 condominium developments. Recently, Jing contacted Bay Bank about a loan to expand business operations. To justify the loan, Jing has kept detailed records of customers as well as the customers that Bayside received from the two major competitors. During the past year, Jing was able to keep 18 of the original 26 customers. During the same period, Jing was able to get 1 new customer from Cleanco and 2 new customers from Beach Services. Unfortunately, Jing lost 6 of the original customers to Cleanco and 2 of the original customers to Beach Services during the same year. Jing has learned that Cleanco has kept 80% of its current customers. Jing also knows that Beach Services will keep at least 50% of its customers. To get the loan from Bay Bank, Jing needs to show the loan officer that they will maintain an adequate share of the market. The officers of Bay Bank are concerned about the recent trends for market share, and they have decided not to give Jing a loan unless they keep at least 35% of the market share in the long run. What types of equilibrium market shares can Jing expect? If you were an officer of Bay Bank, would you give Jing a loan?
Description Apply Kant's moral philosophy to a moment in your life where you behaved wrong/immoral. How can these two formulas make you realize you behaved wrong?
