Expert Answers

Participation Expectations For each discussion activity, you are responsible for posting at least one substantive initial response to the discussion questions posed, as well, as a reply to at least two other postings made by your classmates. Your initial substantive posting should be a thoughtful reflection on at least one aspect of the discussion theme or question posed and can either initiate a line of discussion or be in response to someone else’s posting (i.e., adding your own perspective or additional research to it). Keep in mind that quality is better than quantity and “me too” and “I agree” type postings add little to the conversation. Your postings should demonstrate that you have read and thought about the course material. You are encouraged to reference your course textbook in your postings as well as other relevant outside literature. Some points to keep in mind: Be clear and to the point in your postings. Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling. Keep postings to 300-350 words. Quality is better than quantity. Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read. Support your thoughts by referencing the textbook or other outside literature. Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion. If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution. Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions. Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings. When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA Style. Show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs. You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions. PREPARING TO WRITE 1. Read assigned material—critically—and take notes as you read: Who wrote this material (a respected expert? an activist with a specific aim or belief?) Do they have any possible biases? Are studies reliable and valid? (What kind of research was performed?) When was this material written? Are the definitions/conditions/opinions described still accur vant? ate/rele Is an opinion expressed? How might someone disagree? How does this material relate to other concepts and theories you are studying? (Remember, instructors choose readings with a plan in mind—try to imagine why they have assigned this reading) Does the article complement other things you have learned? Is it in opposition? 2. Read and understand the discussion question or topic provided by your instructor • What are you asked to do? (Formulate an opinion? Respond to a question? Explain a concept or theory?) • How are you asked to do this? What kind of information are you expected to include (e.g., supporting quotations or references, examples, etc.) Do you need to bring in outside research? 3. Sort out the finer details • Is there a word maximum? Minimum? (Most posts will be 1?2 paragraphs maximum). • How many times are you expected to post? (Find out if you are required to post a certain number of times per question, per week, etc.) • How much of your grade is this component worth?Each post? Budget your time accordingly A.re you expected to respond to other students’ posts? What proportion of original posts versus responses are you asked to provide? INITIAL POSTS - An initial post is a response to the original question presented by the course instructor, or the opening post on a particular topic (i.e., not responding to other students’ posts). Consider each post a “mini?thesis,” in which you state a position and provide support for it. If you are responding to a question, be sure to 1. Take a position: Provide a clear answer to the question (incorporate some of the wording of the question in your answer if possible). 2. Offer a reasoned argument: Provide an explanation for your point of view, and use evidence from your text, notes, or outside research (where appropriate) to support your point. 3. Stay focused: End with a summary comment to explain the connection between your evidence and the question (how your evidence proves your point). Your post might also introduce a question or idea that others can follow up on. But make sure you have answered the question first! Discusssion Marking rubric. A+ Discussion Post A+ Initial Post /2.5 points deliver information that is full of thought, insight, and analysis • make insightful connections to course content • make insightful connections to real-life situations • contain rich and fully developed new ideas, connections, or applications • contain no spelling errors and typos Question of discussion is - Vaccination Attitudes Use this discussion area to complete the discussion activity in Unit 05. The results of scientific empirical studies show that vaccines are safe and effective in combating the spread of disease. However, there is a segment of the society that believe vaccines are linked to autism or hold conspiracy theory about vaccinations in general. Discuss why some hold "anti-vax" attitudes? What is the source of misinformation? Hint: Cognitive biases and overconfidence are two relevant concepts to explore. You may find the following article and videos helpful as you develop your argument. Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 211, 274-281. Video from the Washington Post:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQti02x57bE  Vaccines—Calling the Shots Sneak Peek | NOVA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8fW-r6cO3M FRONTLINE | The Vaccine War | PBS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPOrnU3ImxI write in 300 words. follow proper guidlines as given in begning. Use AP7 STYLE OWL PURDE. Provide reference. Write in on own words. Some points to keep in mind: Be clear and to the point in your postings. Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling. Keep postings to 300-350 words. Quality is better than quantity. Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read. Support your thoughts by referencing the textbook or other outside literature. Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion. If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution. Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions. Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings. When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA Style. Show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs.

In your discussion for Unit 4, you will be asked to engage in a one-on-one debate with an assigned discussion partner on a pair of discussion topics selected from the issues listed below. In order to assist you in preparing for this discussion, you are first asked this week to complete and submit a written argument and discussion plan detailing how you will approach the discussion: Topic: Electoral College

The topic of this study is the influence of stress inducement on mental health consequences. Prior to finalizing your presentation for this assignment, review any feedback received in the Preliminary Research Design Presentation and Feedback discussion. Revise the 7-minute audiovisual presentation you created for the discussion, using PowerPoint or any other presentation software or format with which you feel comfortable. Provide either closed captioning or a transcript of the presentation for accessibility. Ensure that all requirements for the presentation are met. After making any needed changes, submit the final version of the presentation to Waypoint. The content of the presentation must include the following: A brief introduction Devise a specific research question related to the topic you chose in Week 1. Explain the importance of the topic and research question. A brief literature review Evaluate published research studies on your topic that you found during your work on the Annotated Bibliography assignment last week and identify two relevant published studies. A description of potential methods Create an appropriate research approach and design to investigate your research question based on what you have learned about research design options and requirements in this course. Provide a rationale for your design choices. A discussion on ethical issues Apply ethical standards to the proposed research and identify potential ethical issues that would apply. Explain how you plan to address these issues. A conclusion Summarize the main points of the presentation and reiterate why the proposed research is important and why it should be carried out.

For this assignment, you are required The development and data collection will be completed in groups, but each group member will run their own data analyses and write their own research paper based on the results. You will be asked to identify a question related to a psychological phenomenon (can be the same or different from the other two projects) and design a short survey study (i.e., using self-report questionnaires only) in Qualtrics that will be administered to other students in UIC Psychology courses, including the other groups in your class. Before data collection, I must approve your study methods and materials.

The purpose of this assignment is to draft and submit a complete, organized, detailed research paper in APA format with sources cited and referenced accurately. You are expected to present a complete research paper that meets all of the original assignment criteria. Signature Assignment Contemporary psychology has become highly diversified. Many perspectives have been adopted for the study of psychology. Each of these perspectives sees behavior and experience in a unique way that frequently contradicts other highly regarded perspectives. For this assignment, review the text to discover more about the seven perspectives of psychology (neuroscience, evolutionary, behavior genetics, psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive, and social-cultural). This is based on your interpretation of the academic material. Rely on your own words and your interpretation of the material for this assignment. Although direct quotes may be used, do so sparingly. Your instructor will want to know how you define the terms, perspectives, and ideas. Keep in mind that you still give credit to your source when paraphrasing the main ideas. Describe each of these perspectives include a minimum of one peer-reviewed article or text reference for each perspective. Select any two perspectives and identify similarities and conflicting viewpoints. How do these perspectives differ from the others? What are some common viewpoints in the perspectives?  Select one of the following psychological disorders: substance use disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive, and generalized anxiety. Identify which perspective would be most beneficial in understanding and treating the disorder. Provide supporting evidence using critical thinking from the course content, readings, and academic peer-reviewed sources

The grade for your presentation and peer feedback will take place in Waypoint. Your grade will reflect the quality of your presentation, content, and the depth of your responses. This discussion forum will be assessed on a 20-point scale and is worth 20% of your final grade. The presentation is worth 18 points (including your initial discussion post with your presentation and Waypoint Submission) and replies to classmates are worth 2 points total. Refer to the Grading Rubric under the Week 6 - Discussion Forum 2 Submission page for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated. Biological Psychology Final Presentation [WLO: 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] As a reminder, your initial discussion post, with your presentation, and Waypoint submission is due on Day 5 (Saturday). You have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, Review any resources you may have previously collected when choosing your topic. watch Recording Presentations With ZoomLinks to an external site. and PowerPoint with ScreenPalLinks to an external site. If necessary, review the Writing Center’s How to Make a PowerPoint PresentationLinks to an external site. resource. If you are not able to create a video presentation, please contact your instructor right away. Introduction The purpose of this discussion forum is for you to create, share, and discuss a video presentation for your classmates. Step 1 is to create your presentation. Step 2 is to create your main post and insert or attach your presentation. Step 3 is to review classmate’s presentations and provide feedback to at least two classmates. Instructions To complete this discussion forum, follow these steps outlined in the tabs below:  Step 1Steps 2 and 3Folio SubmissionSubmission Instructions Step 1 Create the Presentation

Please use the information about Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning in Chapter 6 of the text and the videos provided below to write a two to three page essay in your own words that compares these two types of learning. How are they different? For Classical Condtioning, use information about Pavlov's dogs, and unconditioned stimulus, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned response, conditioned response, etc. And for Operant Conditioning, don't forget to talk about positive and negative reinforcements and punishments. Always start with the text. As it says, above, read the information about Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning in Chapter 6 and take notes. You will see all of the information you need to be talking about. Then watch the videos provided. You will be able to take more notes and add more information. Once you have taken notes from the information in the text and in the videos, you should have enough information to get started on your essay. However, you are free to add your own sources once you have gleaned everything you can from the text and materials provided. This applies to all the essays. You are free to write more than 3 pages and you may use other sources, however, you must cite the text and the videos provided and do a minimum of 2 - 3 pages for your essay (but they can be longer). Give some examples of the two types of learning as well. You are free to write more than 3 pages and you may use other sources, however, you must cite the text and the videos provided as well. The better your essay, the higher your grade will be. These are short essays so you may not need much formatting, however, if you cite sources I have not given you, use APA formatting. There is a module in Canvas that contains information about APA formatting. Hint: While writing, formatting, and spelling are important in writing these essays, I am grading primarily on content as well. Therefore, the more you cite the text and materials provided as your write, the better your grade will likely be. Adding additional research material may help your grade was well. The Difference Between Classical and Operant Conditioning (4:14)Links to an external site. Classical vs Operant Conditioning (4:48)Links to an external site. Classical and Operant Conditioning (1:56)Links to an external site.

In a Word document, write a thesis statement on your chosen turning point. No sources needed. All work must be your own words. You instructor will let you know if you need to change or modify your statement. This assignment must be completed in order to move forward. Before starting: 1. Review the article from Purdue Owl regarding writing thesis statements. 2. View videos about thesis statements, which can be found in the Readings and Resources section of this Unit.

Question: Learning Theories in Xavier's Classroom Click the 'scenario' button below to review the topic and then answer the question. Question: Identify the learning theory primarily represented in Xavier’s teaching practice and explain how Xavier created a learning environment to align with the theory.

1. Will add responses after discussion is 2. Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Social Conditioning Reflection [due Mon] Exam Content We often condition ourselves into certain roles and behaviors because of our perceptions of self, misperceptions, heuristics, and personal biases. In some cases, we have fallen trap to social conditioning in terms of attitudes, behaviors, and roles. Reflect on these instances in your life.Provide at least 2 examples of significant instances of when this has occurred in your life.Describe each instance in at least 700 to 1,050 word APA formatted paper. Address the following in your reflection: What led to these incidents? What were your personal biases, misperceptions, or preconceived notions that led to these incidents? Reflect on your attitudes and behaviors during these incidents. How can you spot incidents like these in the future? Provide recommendations of how you can overcome these situations in the future. Discuss how these strategies align with the recommendations in the readings. Use at least 1 academic source, (No papers will be accepted in this course without references and citations). NOTE: This is a subjective paper, it is appropriate to use first person narrative. Format the citations according to APA guidelines. Submit your assignment. 3. Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. All posts and responses must be at least 150 words, contribute to the discussions, and connect to research or your readings. Due today Respond to the following in a minimum of 150 words: The availability heuristic occurs when people overestimate the occurrence of more memorable instances or events because these are readily available to memory when trying to decide or to answer a question. Give an example of how you have recently used the availability heuristic. Research other heuristics (there are hundreds of them) online. Discuss another heuristic and share an example of how you have used it. Why do so many mistrust scientific findings? Often because the finding conflicts with a person's worldview. Misinformation occurs when people remember something they read without engaging in careful analysis or evaluation and thus incorporate that information into their general knowledge. Why does this happen? (Address both your attitudes and beliefs in your argument) What can you do to avoid this in the future?