Need Help ?

Expert Answers

Description Maria is a graduate student at Arizona State University. She is com ...

Description Maria is a graduate student at Arizona State University. She is completing a research paper on rewiring the brain to eliminate anxiety and stress. During Maria’s library research she comes across a book written in 1976 by Dr. Will Smith regarding anxiety due stemming from extensive media exposure. Maria copies the entire book and sells those copies on the internet to other research students. The book provides helpful statistics and an excellent summary of several leading theories. Maria did not seek permission from Dr. Smith to copy and sell his work. (1) Did Maria commit the tort of copyright infringement? (2) Does the Fair Use Exception under the federal Copyright Act provide a shield to any liability? Why or why not?

READ MORE >>

Description It's a Qualitative lab report assignment that needs to be done ...

Description It's a Qualitative lab report assignment that needs to be done

READ MORE >>

Description As part of the application process for the Regulations Coordinator ...

Description As part of the application process for the Regulations Coordinator position, we are asking you to demonstrate your ability to create clear, structured Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that facilitate communication and workflow across teams. In this role, you will be responsible for coordinating the submission and review of regulation changes across various divisions, ensuring that all proposed amendments are thoroughly vetted and comply with department policies and legal requirements. This process involves working closely with division leadership, managing timelines, and collaborating with a diverse range of stakeholders. Task: Please draft a sample Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) that outlines the process for colleagues to submit regulation change requests for your review. The SOP should: Establish steps for initial review by division leadership before submission to you, the Regulations Coordinator. Outline clear roles and responsibilities, including your role in reviewing and making recommendations on the proposed changes. Include timeframes and deadlines for the submission, review, and finalization of regulatory changes. Describe how department leadership provides the final approval for all submissions. Take into account the need to work with a diverse group of individuals throughout the process. Key Points to Consider: The importance of maintaining a clear, organized workflow for regulatory changes. How to communicate expectations and deadlines to staff submitting proposals. Ensuring clarity in your role as Regulations Coordinator and how you interact with both division leadership and department leadership. The role of department leadership in giving final approval for all regulatory changes. Length: Your draft SOP should be between 700-1500 words and include a clear structure with headings and subheadings.

READ MORE >>

Description Kentucky For Behavioral Health, Developmental Health and Intellectu ...

Description Kentucky For Behavioral Health, Developmental Health and Intellectual Disabilities As part of the application process for the Regulations Coordinator position, we are asking you to demonstrate your ability to create clear, structured Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that facilitate communication and workflow across teams. In this role, you will be responsible for coordinating the submission and review of regulation changes across various divisions, ensuring that all proposed amendments are thoroughly vetted and comply with department policies and legal requirements. This process involves working closely with division leadership, managing timelines, and collaborating with a diverse range of stakeholders. Task: Please draft a sample Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) that outlines the process for colleagues to submit regulation change requests for your review. The SOP should: Establish steps for initial review by division leadership before submission to you, the Regulations Coordinator. Outline clear roles and responsibilities, including your role in reviewing and making recommendations on the proposed changes. Include timeframes and deadlines for the submission, review, and finalization of regulatory changes. Describe how department leadership provides the final approval for all submissions. Take into account the need to work with a diverse group of individuals throughout the process. Key Points to Consider: The importance of maintaining a clear, organized workflow for regulatory changes. How to communicate expectations and deadlines to staff submitting proposals. Ensuring clarity in your role as Regulations Coordinator and how you interact with both division leadership and department leadership. The role of department leadership in giving final approval for all regulatory changes. Length: Your draft SOP should be between 700-1500 words and include a clear structure with headings and subheadings

READ MORE >>

Description Use the case study listed below about Kobe steel. Kobe Steel - Mis ...

Description Use the case study listed below about Kobe steel. Kobe Steel - Misrepresentation of product quality~ Vaswani, K. (2018, March 6). Kobe Steel scandal: How did it happen? BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-43298649 Japanese antitrust statute violated~ Xinhua. (2019, March 13). Kobe Steel fined for fabricating data amid falling credibility of made-in-Japan products. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-03/13/c_137892362.htm - - PREPARE A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION: USE YOUR PREPARATION FROM ASSIGNMENT 5. - - Reflecting on the concepts learned in the course, select and research the case study you selected and prepare a PowerPoint presentation according to the instructions below. You may use the references provided with the case study listing as part of your research. It is expected you will use the course Lessons and eReserve required readings plus your own independent research of credible sources in support of this presentation. All work must be supported with in-text citations as well as a listing of references. Work that is not supported with in-text citation as well as references may not be accepted. Your research must include peer-reviewed and scholarly sources. (See Grading Rubric.) You may use internet sources for factual information about your company, but these should be the minority of your research. Use Trefry Library, Google Scholar, and similar library sources. Your Week 5 Assignment with your instructor feedback has started you on this project. Your presentation should include the following, organized in well-designed slides with accompanying Speaker’s Notes or Audio and/or video narrative. All information must be supported with in-text citations and full references in the speakers notes and/or Slides. Further instructions for required content are also below: INSTRUCTIONS – YOUR PPT SLIDES Bullet points on slides; explanatory narrative in Speaker’s Notes section of each slide. (Scroll to end to see help about Speaker's Notes.) Speaker's notes are required to provide your PPT narrative, either in the notes spaces below the slides or by audio or video narrative. Must provide in-text citation of all content slides in speakers notes, even if we use audio or video narrative. The following covers the assignment content, building on your Week 5 worksheet, with 11 content slides. You may have additional content slides if you need them, but remember that the slides are key points supplemented by the speaker, not a paper distributed over slides. In addition are the Title, Agenda, and References Slides... note: these slides do not require in-text citation. - Slide 1 Title slide - Slide 2 Agenda slide – This is an outline of the PPT topics - Slide 3 Introduce and describe the company (name, type of business, its corporate structure) Key bullet points and image on slide – full details in Speaker’s Notes portion for slide - Slide 4 Tell the story of the facts of the case study leading up to the company’s decision, and then what happened. - Slide 5 State precisely and explain the dilemma, the company’s decision point, and choice made. Focus on the specific decision choice of your case study. Likely the company was involved in numerous actions. - Slide 6 Identify and explain the law(s) violated by the company’s action. Include the law’s requirements and purpose. Suggestion: include an example of a violation of the same law by another company. - Slide 7 Describe and explain the legal results for your case study company as a result of violation. For example, if individuals were criminally prosecuted, include that, and also what happened to the company itself. For example, did it end up in bankruptcy? Was it sold? If it survived, what did it do in the wake of the problem? - Slide 8 Summarize the harm caused by the company’s decision. Harm to third parties – who were victims of the decision? Harm to company & stakeholders. - Slide 9 Identify, define, and explain the ethical framework (you selected this in Assignment 5 -- egoism, free market ethics, or utilitarianism) that is illustrated by the company’s decision and conduct. Include an example of how this ethical framework affects making a decision (an example other than this case study). - Slide 10 Explain how the decision and behavior of the company in this case study illustrates the ethical framework you defined and explained in the previous slide. Compare company to the example you gave in the previous slide. - Slide 11 Identify, define, and explain the alternative ethical framework (you selected this in Assignment 5 - deontology, ethics of care, or virtue ethics) that could have led to a different result for the company. Explain specifically how the company effectively could have employed this alternative framework. Include an example of how it works in making a decision (not the case study example). - Slide 12 The legal issues resulting from the company’s decision in this case study were not the only legal problems it had or could have had. Identify another, different legal issue relating to this company. Examples from your studies in the course are: contract disputes; tort claims; violation of a civil or criminal statute or regulation (which you must identify specifically); civil rights; employment issue; whistleblowing. It must be a different legal issue from the laws and regulations involved in the case study violations. You should have identified this in Assignment 5. Develop here. - Slide 13 Recommend: What is a take-away from this case study for exercise of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in management of business operations? Recommend and explain at least one CSR business practice for any business. In determining your recommendation consider the concepts we have studied this term. The company you have studied for this Assignment engaged in practices that ultimately touched or affected all aspects of its management. Your recommendation must be a specific practice for any business to apply. It is not sufficient to say something like "do it differently," or "be ethical" or "corporately responsible." - Slide 14 References slide: You must provide in-text citation of all information presented on the speakers notes and/or content slides as well as a full listing of scholarly references in APA7 format as the final slide. More than 7 credible sources are required for exemplary level of the grading rubric with a minimum of 4 being scholarly or peer-reviewed sources. At least 7 credible sources are required for the Accomplished level of the rubric with 3 being scholarly or peer-reviewed. Please see the rubric's requirements for including scholarly and peer-reviewed sources. To refresh your understanding of peer-reviewed and scholarly sources read the submodule "What are Peer-reviewed and Scholarly Sources?" in Course Content, under the section, Course Overview & Introduction.

READ MORE >>

Description Question is : Critically discuss the extent to which the Companies ...

Description Question is : Critically discuss the extent to which the Companies Act 2006 has reformed Directors` Duties. Additionally, identify what you believe to be the most significant reform to Directors’ Duties as a result of the Act and explain your reasoning. (FILE IS TO HELP U ) Structure needed: 1. introduction ( overview about the subject - analysis ideas or the connection - theses) (500 word) 2. body FOR EACH SECTION IN COMPANY ACT ( INTRODUES and CRITICISE and EXPLAIN WHAT MAKES EACH OF THESE SECTION IS A significant reform to Directors’ Duties) + (BACK UP YOUR IDEAS BY CASES AND ARTICALS)(1500 word) 3. conclusion ( Summaries all the ideas)(500 word) Suggested references that have to be in the essay: 1. Cases: Directors` Duties Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum [1974] AC 821 PC Extrasure Travel Insurance Ltd v Scattergood[2003] 1 BCLC 598 Criterion Properties Plc v Stratford UK Properties LLC [2006] 1 BCLC 729) Regentcrest Plc v Cohen [2001] 2 BCLC 80 Gaiman v National Assn for Mental Health [1970] 2 All ER362 Stobart Group Limited v Tinkler ([2019] EWHC 258) Re Barings Plc (No 5) [1999] 1 BCLC 433 Re Queens, Moat Houses Plc, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow (No 2) [2005] 1 BCLC 136 Re Brian D Pierson (Contractors) Ltd [1999] BCC 29 Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] EWCA Civ 424 Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554 Foster Bryant Surveying Ltd v Bryant [2007] 2 BCLC 239 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and ors [2022] UKSC 25 reading: Andrew Keay, ‘Good faith and directors' duty to promote the success of their company,’ (2011) 32 Comp Law. P138 Company Law by Dignam and Lowry, 12th Ed., Ch 14 (Directors` Duties) OR Unlocking Company Law by Susan McLaughlin Chs 11-12 (Directors` Duties) Important Notes: 1.Legal Issues All relevant legal issues identified 2.Engagement with the Question Full and focused engagement with the question 3.Knowledge and Understanding Excellent knowledge and understanding of relevant legal principles including the most complex issues 4.Grasp of doctrinal / policy problems Excellent grasp of relevant doctrinal / policy problems 5.Use of Materials Fluent use of relevant and appropriate primary materials 6.Structure Clear and compelling structure 7.Conclusions Clear and compelling conclusions 8.Referencing Clear and thorough referencing throughout 9.Standard of English Excellent standard of English appropriate to complex / specialist legal matters 10.Presentation Excellent presentation 11.Independent Research Evidence of considerable independent research as well as core materials 12.Secondary Sources Excellent incorporation of secondary sources into analysis 13.Ability to recognise and evaluate inconsistencies of legal argumentation Excellent ability to recognise and evaluate inconsistencies of legal argumentation / to rank possible outcomes / to formulate some personal perspectives (where appropriate)

READ MORE >>

Description Type a case study. Read Chapter 3 prior to completing this assignme ...

Description Type a case study. Read Chapter 3 prior to completing this assignment. The book name is (Business Law: The ethical, global, and digital enviroment 18th edition) Case studies are included in your textbook. This exercise will help you to learn vocabulary and how to analyze the case studies. Here is your case to brief: Obergefel v. Hodges, 576 US 644 2015 p. 3-31 Your brief should be 1 to 2 pages in Times New Roman font, 12-point font. In your brief, you should include the following information: Identify the parties. Possible questions to answer would be: Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The appellant? The appellee? What is the history of the case? Possible questions to answer would be: Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision? Please note that this is the history of the case in court—not the facts of the case. What are the facts? Possible questions to answer would be: What happened that caused the plaintiff to sue? What facts did the Court find relevant in its decision? What is the plaintiff's theory? Possible questions to answer would be: Why he thinks he should win? What facts does the plaintiff think are important? What is the defendant's theory? Possible questions to answer would be: Why she thinks she should win? What facts does the defendant think are important? What is the legal issue? Tip: this will be a question that can be answered with yes or no and should end with a question mark. What is the holding of the Court? Tip: this will be either yes or no and will answer the legal issue. What is the reasoning of the Court? Possible questions to answer would be: what facts and laws did the Court rely on to decide the case?; why was the case decided in the winner's favor?; why did the other side lose? Evaluative Question for Reflection: What do you think about this case? Was this case decided correctly? Why or why not?

READ MORE >>

Description here are 2 Parts to do. Do each item in each Part, in order. Just f ...

Description here are 2 Parts to do. Do each item in each Part, in order. Just follow the order below, front to back, writing each part into your Term Paper. Label each part you answer, matching the numbers below (Part 1.a, Part 1.b., and so on). Term Paper Rules and Tips: Your Own Work: The Term Paper must be your own work. Group work is not allowed. Do not use AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Google Bard) unless allowed, as described here below. Using AI in a way not allowed here, can be considered cheating, and can have serious consequences, including reports to student services and potential penalties. You can use sources (such as books, magazines, google searchers, or an AI chat-bot, but only as allowed here: The best way: 1) First, find and read through each source, yourself. 2) Then, explain things to me in your own words. It is good to use the accepted, technical words and phrases for things (for example, "profit," "contract," "corporation," "chief executive officer," etc.), and the actual names of important businesses and persons (for example, Tesla, Elon Musk), and the names of parts of government (for example, Federal Trade Commission; Food and Drug Administration). Include citations of all your sources: If any of the following are used, always tell me, describe them clearly and indicate which parts came from that source or tool. Failure to follow this will be treated as a violation of academic integrity. Anything from a source should have the link to that source right there where I can see it and check it, in the text or in a footnote: 1) Quotes from online articles (such as news articles) or other media, such as books or videos. Keep quotes brief and clearly indicate when you're quoting, with proper source citation. 2) Anything produced using an AI tool such as ChatGPT. If you use AI, keep it brief, identify any use or output of it, specify what you used, and where. Do not include include any graphs, images or videos in your Paper. I just want writing. Further tips for research are given below, in each item. Term Paper length: Part 1 can be any length, but I am thinking, around 4 pages (double-spaced), or more. Part 2 can be pretty brief, with just a sentence or a few to answer each item. Just do your best on each item! The key is to work smart, meaning, using online research, asking good questions, making good searches. This way you will work efficiently: quickly and with more ease. Keep trying! Do Part 1 and Part 2, both: PART 1: Pick a business (company) and tell me about it: Write each answer in the same order as shown here, with each answer labeled the same as here: 1.a., 1.b, etc.: Part 1.a. Pick a subject you are interested in, that involves business in some way. Tell me what it is. Examples: a favorite sport, or makeup (cosmetics), or smartphones, or cars, or online gaming. Tell me what it is. Part 1.b. Pick a business firm (a company) involved with that subject. Tell me the name of that business. Examples: Dallas Cowboys football team, L'Oreal cosmetics, Apple, Walmart, Tesla, Reddit. Tell me the company’s name. Part 1.c. About this company, find at least 2 articles (online) from the last 3 months that show some important news about that company. Name these articles to me by title and source (including any web links). Briefly explain what these articles say, in your own words. Part 1.d. What kind of business organization is your chosen company? Every business is an organization, such as a corporation, partnership, or LLC (limited liability company). What is a basic description of that type of business organization (a corporation, etc.)? Does your chosen company do business internationally, or mainly in one country? 1.e. Who are major people involved in this company? ("People" meaning, the most powerful and influential persons guiding that business, as well as persons well known in connection with the company.) This would include the top managers, possibly top owners, as well as publicly-known personalities such as sports team star players. List for me, also, some other powerful firms (companies) involved in that same kind of business. Part 1.f. Very, very important: What are some main law/regulations this company (and this kind of business) work under? Who are the government regulators (agencies or other government bodies) it works with on these matters? Is this changing -- are this company facing new regulations, or maybe less regulation under the current US government? Look at everything the business handles (Events? Products? Employees? Software? Its taxes?) Do not skip on this, do a careful and searching job, or you will lose lots of points! Part 1.g. What (in your own words) do the sources you can find tell us about changes happening, or coming, in the big picture, for this firm/business? What are big challenges faced in doing this business, for example, are they growing and hiring more people now? What is the impact of inflation? Of the war in Ukraine? Must they spend more soon on tech? Are there new technologies affecting their business, such as new ways to shop and choose their products? Is this organization moving well with the times? Part 2: make up a little statement or story for each part of this California law: For each item below, write a statement (like a little story, which can be just one sentence long, or a few sentences) of an imaginary business (not a real business) doing each thing described. (Just so you know: these things are illegal to do.) Note: this is a real law. But here, I put it in a different order from the actual law, and from earlier semester assignments, so copying older papers from earlier semesters will not work. Make each one separate; number each one, in order, matching the numbers below: Example: a sample answer (do not use this example as your answer): an example of an answer to the first item in the list below: Part 2 - (1)[Falsely stating] geographic origin [of] goods or services. [Sample answer:] Part 2 - (1) Joe’s Wine Shop sells wine that Joe falsely claims is “made in France,” but in fact, it was made in Joe’s house in El Cajon from grapes grown in his back yard. -------------------------------------- These are each from a California law (a statute, a code section): California Civil Code section 1770, "Unfair Methods of Competition and Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices": ------------------------------- “The following unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts [by a seller] intended to result in sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer are unlawful [in California]:” [Tell a story of an imaginary business doing each of the following things:] Part 2 - (1)[Falsely stating] geographic origin [of] goods or services. Part 2 - (2) Representing [claiming, stating, communicating] that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, or grade, or that goods are of a particular ... model, if they are of another. Part 2 - (3) [Falsely stating] the source [such as, the brand or maker] ... of goods or services. Part 2 - (4) Representing that goods are original or new if they have deteriorated unreasonably or are used. Part 2 - (5) Representing that a part, replacement, or repair service is needed when it is not. Part 2 - (6) Inserting an unconscionable provision in the contract. [That word is explained in our contracts notes and videos, or can be looked up in a legal dictionary online.] Part 2 - (7) [A fake sale:] Advertising goods or services with intent not to supply reasonably expectable demand, unless the advertisement discloses a limitation of quantity. Part 2 - (8) [Making a false statement of] certification [this business supposedly has, from a government agency or other organization]. Part 2 - (9) Disparaging [defaming: making a false statement, as fact, that harms reputation, to a third person such as a customer, about the] goods, services, or business of [another business or business person] by false [statement]of fact. [Example: lying to wreck a business’s good name with a desired customer.] Part 2 - (10) [Falsely stating] that goods or services have ... characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities they do not have. End.

READ MORE >>

Description The Case of the Director Who Wore Too Many Hats Lilah is one of 5 ...

Description The Case of the Director Who Wore Too Many Hats Lilah is one of 5 directors of Executive Investments Corporation. She is also a majority shareholder holding both common and preferred stock. Her stock with voting rights amounts to 47% of all stock issued with voting rights. Lilah buys, for $1,500, an option to purchase a tract of real estate called Ocean Air, which is next to Executive's home office, for $50,000. Lilah forms a new corporation, Central Property, Inc., to hold the option. She then has Central Property buy Ocean Air. As a director of Executive, Lilah orders Executive to authorize its real estate agent to negotiate the purchase of the land from Central Property for $100,000. After a successful negotiation for the purchase of Ocean Air for $100,000, Sarah has Central Property sell it to Executive, and loan the money to Executive for the purchase price at a 5% interest rate which is 2% below the market rate. Paulo, a minority shareholder in Executive, formally complains to Executive’s board which takes no action. The Trial Paulo files a suit against Lilah on Executive's behalf seeking to cancel the sale. Lilah asks the Court to dismiss the lawsuit as Paulo has no standing to bring the lawsuit. Arguments At Trial Lilah’s attorney argues that Ocean Air is necessary for Executive as it will allow them to expand their offices and production plant thus increasing the net worth and potential profits to the shareholders. Further, the Board of Directors of Executive authorized the purchase which appeared to be in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation. Paulo’s attorney argues that the purchase of Ocean Air should have been put to a vote of the shareholders of Executive as required by Executive’s Bylaws. Executive’s Board of Directors failed in its duty to make sure this sale was in the corporation’s best interest. Questions to Decide What kind of suit will Paulo file and what is its basis? Who are the Plaintiffs and who are the Defendants? Why? What are the defenses, if any, of Executive or Lilah? Who will win the case and why?

READ MORE >>

Description You are required to produce an appropriately structured research pr ...

Description You are required to produce an appropriately structured research project report based on a topic of your choice: BUSINESS MANAGEMNET AND LAW , and showing all essential elements. The report should also include a reflective account of your professional development that reviews how you generated, developed, refined the project idea and executed the research project.

READ MORE >>
QUICK ORDER

Place a Quick Order

Our verified writers got you covered. Let us help you balance between studies, work, and family.

We provide our assistance to the numerous clients looking for a professional writing service.

Order Now
Designed and developed by Brian Mubichi (mubix)
WhatsApp