Week Four: Paper Sprint Hide Assignment InformationInstructions The paper is done in weekly sprint ...

---

Week Four: Paper Sprint Hide Assignment InformationInstructions The paper is done in weekly sprints as it is shown below: Sprint Activities Activity Due Date Peer Review Due Date Sprint Week 1 Write an introduction and provide peer review Saturday week 1 Monday week 2 Sprint Week 2 Identify two peer articles and empirical evidence that support the argument/analysis section Saturday week 2 Sprint Week 3 Write the entire paper draft and provide peer review Saturday week 3 Sunday week 3 Sprint Week 4 Write the final paper Saturday week 4 This week you must submit the revised and final version of your paper. Step 1: Make sure you consider all comments you received in weeks 1 and 3 from your peers. Step 2: Do not forget you must follow the precise APA style requested for this paper and specified in the Syllabus section of this course shell. Step 3: Make sure there is a strong connection between the introduction and conclusion Step 4: Submit your final paper as an attachment (word or pdf) by Saturday (midnight). I will grade this assignment by Tuesday or Wednesday of the following week. Step 5: Submit your peer-evaluation and self-evaluation along with your paper. No need for an additional attachment, write your evaluation in the text window (name, number from 0-to-10, one sentence of justification). Read the rubric below to get familiar with the 0-to-10 numbers. The grading rubric is the following: The Paper (85%) The Feedback Quality (15%) Paper (85 %) The paper will be graded based on Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling (8 %) APA Style for titles, paragraphs and references (8 %) Clarity of objective, introduction, conclusion and strong connection between the introduction and conclusion (10 %) Economic analysis using economic principles in the argument section (35 %) Empirical evidence that supports economic analysis in the argument section (15 %) Overall quality of conclusion (9 %) Self Evaluation (5 %) Give yourself 8 - 10 if you provided feedback in weeks 1 and 3, and the quality of your feedback to the introduction and entire draft of other students were very useful 5 - 7 if you provided feedback in weeks 1 and 3, and the quality of your feedback to the introduction and entire draft of other students were ok 1 - 4 if you provided feedback in one week of two, or the quality of your feedback to both the introduction and entire draft of other students were poor 0 if you failed to provide feedback at all Peer Evaluation (10 %) (average of points you received in weeks 1 and 3) Evaluate each feedback your received in weeks 1 and 3. Give each one: 8 - 10 if the quality of the feedback you received from this person was very useful 5 - 7 if the quality of the feedback you received from this person was ok 1 - 4 if the quality of the feedback received from this person was poor