Summarize two different post seperately. For each discussion activity, you are responsible for post ...

---

Summarize two different post seperately. For each discussion activity, you are responsible for posting a reply to at least two other postings made by your classmates. Your initial substantive posting should be a thoughtful reflection on at least one aspect of the discussion theme or question posed and can either initiate a line of discussion or be in response to someone else’s posting (i.e., adding your own perspective or additional research to it). Keep in mind that quality is better than quantity and “me too” and “I agree” type postings add little to the conversation. Your postings should demonstrate that you have read and thought about the course material. You are encouraged to reference your course textbook in your postings as well as other relevant outside literature. Some points to keep in mind: Be clear and to the point in your postings. Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling. Keep postings to 300-350 words. Quality is better than quantity. Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read. Support your thoughts by referencing the textbook or other outside literature. Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion. If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution. Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions. Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings. When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA Style. Show respect and sensitivity to peers' gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs. You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions. Taking a role in online discussion. Taking a Role in Online Discussions Below are some roles that anyone in an online discussion can fulfill in order to help move an online discussion forward in productive ways. See if you can determine what role is required in your online discussion and then write a message that takes on that role. Devil's Advocate • Takes opposing points of view to those currently under discussion Pollinator • Travels to other groups, reads their postings and summarizes points made in other groups not made in home group. Facilitator • Comments on the groups process (e.g. “Perhaps we should all remember to put a subject line in our messages.”) • Encourages others to participate, • Starts a thread or an idea on the topic, if the discussion lags. Summarizer / Discussion Weaver • Summarizes the discussion for the group at specific intervals in 1 or 2 short paragraphs. Usually summarizes twice per week or if the discussion lags • Reminds others about what has already been discussed. • Asks the group what issues have been concluded and what ones are still to be discussed. • Relates ideas in posted messages to one another. Researcher • Assumes responsibility for looking at what is available on the net, journals etc. and brings ideas back to the group. Responder • Replies to others and builds on the ideas of others. This is a role that everyone in the group must perform for every discussion. Post:-1 Vaccination Misinformation Contains unread posts Oluwafikayo Ademola posted May 29, 2024 10:14 PM to Group4 Subscribe There is a continuing increase in the rate of anti-vaccine beliefs despite substantial scientific evidence of vaccines' safety and effectiveness. The misinformation around vaccine use and its link to causing autism and other adverse effects poses a significant risk of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. People tend to seek out and give more weight to information confirming their preexisting beliefs and ignore information contradicting them. If someone already believes vaccines are harmful, they are more likely to find and trust sources that support this view. This is further encouraged by social media and how it amplifies misinformation through echo chambers, with algorithms prioritizing sensational content over accuracy. Several historical and current medical malpractices recorded; the Untreated Syphilis Study at Tuskegee Timeline (The study initially involved 600 Black men – 399 with syphilis and 201 who did not have the disease. Participants' informed consent was not collected. Researchers told the men they were being treated for "bad blood," a local term used to describe several ailments, including syphilis, anemia, and fatigue). The lack of information or coded information and in the case failure to obtain informed consent often fosters deep mistrust in healthcare and public health authorities, especially among marginalized groups. The government also plays a significant role in ensuring unfounded opinions are not the loudest information available regarding vaccination. I recall the constant attempt by President Trump to discredit Dr Anthony Fauci and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's advice on the gravity of the coronavirus and its management. This kind of division between the government, its agencies and pharmaceutical companies can deepen the distrust for vaccines and allow conspiracy theories to fester. Vaccines, like any medical intervention, can provoke fear and anxiety, especially regarding potential side effects. Balancing public health duties with individual freedoms and transparency is essential for building and maintaining public trust, leading to higher vaccination rates and better protection against preventable diseases.