Students have benefited from using their reading logs as a permanent record of useful ideas and appl ...

---

Students have benefited from using their reading logs as a permanent record of useful ideas and applications from the readings. The goal is to provide you an easily accessible set of resources when you are at work. Please refer to supplemental instructions for this reading log only. Use of a large language model to generate a second "duplicate" reading log is required for this assignment (cf. below). Instructions Select ONE reading from the Week 5, 6, and 7 readings. Following are some guidelines for your reading logs. Respond critically to the articles. Don’t summarize them. If you disagree (or agree) with a key idea, explain why. Provide an alternative view or position that you justify with a persuasive argument and/or specific example or experience that validates (or invalidates) article concepts. What applications does the reading have for you as a manager? What did you learn? Be specific and concise in referencing and applying concepts from the article. Don’t try to address too many points. The best logs focus on critiquing a few key points in the article. Reading logs aren’t bullet points, they’re analytical essays. Include a brief (1-2 sentence) intro of your main ideas, one key idea per paragraph, and a brief (1-2 sentence) conclusion. The best reading logs are concise (maximum about 750 words or pages double-spaced) For your reading log #2, I'd like you to use Chat GPT (or any similar Large Language Model) to generate a reading log on the article (or topic) you're writing about using these guidelines: Write your regular reading log according to the specifications noted in the bullet points above. Use Chat GPT (or any similar Large Language Model (LLM)) to write a “duplicate” reading log #2 on the focal article or topic. Document the content and number of prompts you used to generate the LLM-authored version of your reading log. E.g., it may take you several tries to get to an acceptable result. Make sure the LLM-authored log is in the same format as the one you wrote (e.g., about 750 words). Do not edit the final LLM-authored log. Write a paragraph (< 200 words) reflecting on what you learned from this exercise. E.g., do you think the LLM did anything better than you? Worse than you? Was the result of sufficient quality? Why or why not? Put the content for steps 1-3 in one document and upload it to the Turn it in assignment. It should be about 1700 words max (750 words for your original reading log, 750 words for the LLM version, 200 words for your reflection on the two).