Review the Learning Team Project Charter to identify any potential project risks. Note. The project ...
Review the Learning Team Project Charter to identify any potential project risks. Note. The project manager is responsible for keeping an accurate record of risks and issues. This is a dynamic document that will be developed progressively throughout the project. Identify at least five-to seven-risks for the learning team project and document these in an appropriate format. Develop a risk management plan and give a detailed explanation of how the project team will respond to and manage the risks moving forward. Select a Risk Management Plan format to use from an organization where a member of your learning team works. Compare the format to the elements of the Risk Management Plan outlined in Part I, Section 11.1.3.1 Risk Management Plan of the PMBOK. Note. If you cannot locate a format to use between your learning team members, search for a format online or develop one of your own based on the elements outlined in Part I, Section 11.1.3.1 Risk Management Plan of the PMBOK. Cite any research or templates used consistent with APA style guidelines. Submit your completed risk plan as either a Word or Excel file by the due date by clicking on the assignment in Canvas and uploading the document. Rubric Risk Management Plan Risk Management Plan Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeElements25 Points 25 pts4-Advanced 100%The plan contains a complete and thorough description and explanation for all of the plan elements. The plan presented represnts best practices in risk management plan design. Contains all 11 elements and other relevant elements: • risk strategy, • methodology, • roles and responsibilities, • funding, • timing, • risk categories, • stakeholder risk appetite, • definitions of risk probability and impacts, • probability and impact matrix, • reporting formats, • tracking • other relevant elements21.25 pts3-Proficient 85%The plan contains all of the required elements. The descriptions and explanations contained in each plan section are above average. Contains all 11 elements: • risk strategy, • methodology, • roles and responsibilities, • funding, • timing, • risk categories, • stakeholder risk appetite, • definitions of risk probability and impacts, • probability and impact matrix, • reporting formats, • tracking 18.75 pts2-Emerging 75%The descriptions and explaantions contained in each plan section are average. Contains 8-to-10 of the following elements: • risk strategy, • methodology, • roles and responsibilities, • funding, • timing, • risk categories, • stakeholder risk appetite, • definitions of risk probability and impacts, • probability and impact matrix, • reporting formats, • tracking13.75 pts1-Novice 55%The plan does not contain all of the required sections. The descriptions and explaantions contained in each plan section are poor. Contains less than 8 of the following elements: • risk strategy, • methodology, • roles and responsibilities, • funding, • timing, • risk categories, • stakeholder risk appetite, • definitions of risk probability and impacts, • probability and impact matrix, • reporting formats, • tracking0 pts0-No Submission 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication25 Points 25 pts4-Advanced 100%The information contained in the plan demonstrates a superior knowledge of the project risk.21.25 pts3-Proficient 85%The information contained in the plan section(s) demonstrates above average knowledge and understanding of the project risk. 18.75 pts2-Emerging 75%The information contained in the plan section(s) demonstrates an average knowledge and understanding of the project risk.13.75 pts1-Novice 55%The information contained in the plan section(s) demonstrates a below average knowledge and understanding of the project risk.0 pts0-No Submission 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion40 Points 40 pts4-Advanced 100%The plan section(s) provide a complete and comprehensive discussion of the information necessary for the plan section(s). All of the required information is included and the material is presented in an excellent, understandable, and organized manner. A working professional reading the plan would understand the process and procedures, goals and intent of each plan section.34 pts3-Proficient 85%The plan section(s) provide a complete discussion of the information necessary for the plan section(s). All of the required information is included and the material is presented in a satisfactory and organized manner. A working professional reading the plan would gain a basic understanding of the process and procedures, goals and intent of each plan section. 30 pts2-Emerging 75%The plan section(s) provide a less than complete discussion of the information necessary for the plan section(s). Most of the required information is included and the material is presented in an average and partially organized manner. A working professional reading the plan would have some difficulty in understanding of the process and procedures, goals and intent of each plan section.22 pts1-Novice 55%The plan section(s) do not provide a complete discussion of the information necessary for the plan section(s). Most of the required information is not included and the material is presented in a below average and dis-organized manner. A working professional reading the plan would have difficulty in understanding of the process and procedures, goals and intent of each plan section.0 pts0-No Submission 40 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar10 Points 10 pts4-Advanced 100%Follows proper structure, grammar, and spelling. No errors throughout the work product.8.5 pts3-Proficient 85%Follows proper structure, grammar, and spelling. Few errors are shown. 7.5 pts2-Emerging 75%Contains errors in structure, grammar, and spelling.5.5 pts1-Novice 55%Follows some proper structure, grammar, and spelling but contains enough errors to distract.0 pts0-No Submission 10 pts Total Points: 100
