Need Help ?

Expert Answers

Part 1: Introduction, Case Study, Ethical Question In this section, present an ...

Part 1: Introduction, Case Study, Ethical Question In this section, present an introduction to the general topic, explain the case study, identify the central moral controversy at stake, and articulate an ethical question that describes the central moral controversy at stake. This section must include one quote from one of the resources provided with the case study. To complete this section, Choose a case study from the selection provided by your instructor in the Week 3 announcement titled “Week 3 Case Studies.” Present a brief introduction to the case study. Discuss background information. Identify the central moral controversy at stake in the case study. Articulate an ethical question based on the central moral controversy. This section should be around 300 words. Part 2: Reading Philosophy Reflection In this section, choose one of the philosophical texts associated with your chosen ethical theory listed in the Philosophical Texts Download Philosophical Textsdocument. Copy and paste the text into this section of the paper. After applying the reading philosophy steps from the Week 1 discussion, Explain the key ideas in the text. Discuss how your understanding of the text evolved after multiple reads. This section should be around 150 words (excluding the philosophical text). Part 3: Explanation of Utilitarianism or Deontology In this section, describe the ethical theory of utilitarianism or deontology and explain its core principles. This section must include one quote from the provided resources on the ethical theory. To complete this section, Discuss the historical background of the ethical theory and the philosopher(s) associated with it. Explain the core moral principle of the theory, or if there is more than one, the principle that you will focus on in applying that theory to your question. Demonstrate how the theory and its core moral principle(s) apply to an ethical question that is different than the topic of your case study. For example, what would deontologists say about the morality of lying, and what principle would support their statement; what would utilitarians say about the morality of using animals in medical research, and what principle would support their statement? This section should be around 350 words. Part 4: Application of Ethical Theory In this section, apply the core principle(s) you articulated above to the central moral controversy in the case study. Explain how the core principle(s) of the ethical theory apply to the case study. This might include considering which facts or features of the case study lend themselves to analysis by the ethical theory. Apply the core principles of the theory to the central moral controversy in the case study by showing how someone using the theory would answer the ethical question addressed by your case study. This section should be around 350 words. The Case Study: Applying an Ethical Theory paper Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site. resources. Must include a separate title page with the following in title case: title of paper in bold font Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page. student’s name name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus) course name and number instructor’s name due date Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance. Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. For assistance on writing Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. and Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources. Must use at least two scholarly sources and one article, video, blog, or other source related to the case study. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source. To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this Quick and Easy Library ResearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.

READ MORE >>

Instructions Review all materials up to and including the Week 3 - Essay 1 cour ...

Instructions Review all materials up to and including the Week 3 - Essay 1 course module. Assignment objective: Apply both ethical theories and ethical situationism to the issue of misinformation (or fake news) in media. Purpose: This assignment will help you integrate theoretical knowledge with a real-world ethical problem. Task: Introduction (about 1 page): Define misinformation and its significance in contemporary media. Explain why it's an ethical issue. Ethical Theories (about 1 page): Briefly describe two ethical theories and how they view the problem of misinformation (use Utilitarianism and Kantianism ) Ethical Situationism (about 1 page): Define ethical situationism. Discuss how situational factors can influence the spread or acceptance of misinformation. (Be sure to rely on the course materials here, especially the paper 'Situationism and Agency' in the Week 3 - Topic 2 module.) If you rely on Internet searches, you may land on information about 'situation ethics' which is NOT the same as ethical situationism. There is also a political-economic view called 'situationism' which is also NOT what you need for this assignment.) Case Study Analysis (about 1.5 pages): Select a real-world example of misinformation. Analyze it using the ethical theories and the concept of ethical situationism. Proposed Solutions (about 1 page): Suggest strategies for combating misinformation, guided by your theoretical understanding. Discuss who bears responsibility and how situational factors might be leveraged. Conclusion (about .1 pages): Summarize your findings and their broader implications. Skills: This assignment will help you develop skills in ethical analysis and critical thinking. Criteria for Success: Successful papers will demonstrate a clear understanding of the chosen ethical theories and ethical situationism, provide a cogent account and analysis of misinformation in media, and propose well-reasoned solutions. Learning Goals: By completing this assignment, you should be able to apply ethical theories to real-world issues and understand the influence of situational factors on ethical decisions. Format & Length: Maximum 6 pages double-spaced, not counting title page and bibliography. Be sure to review the statement on the use of AI tools in the “Getting Started” module under Content. Be sure to include a bibliography listing the sources you use in your essay (this is standard academic practice) 

READ MORE >>

Analyze This (DISCUSSION) Shelley Dedman 55 unread replies.66 replies. FOR TH ...

Analyze This (DISCUSSION) Shelley Dedman 55 unread replies.66 replies. FOR THIS DISCUSSION BOARD, EVALUATE THE FOLLOWING ARGUMENT: Animals are not our friends, they are our food. This is because animals are not as intelligent as humans are, and thus don't deserve the rights that humans have. My uncle, an electrician, told me that in order to be optimally healthy, I should eat at least 1-2 chickens a day. I think that if a cow had the chance to eat a person, it would, so why feel bad if you eat a hamburger? Human beings are at the top of the food chain, and because of this, we should do what we please to other animals. Lastly, my friend is vegan and she listens to Taylor Swift. Taylor Swift is the worst. YOUR POST! In 2-3 paragraphs: What are the premises? How do you know? What is the main conclusion? How do you know? Then, use the 5 Criteria for Evaluating Arguments to further assess the argument.

READ MORE >>

Answer two of the following questions in 2 separate essays. Each essay should be ...

Answer two of the following questions in 2 separate essays. Each essay should be 1-2 pages (2-4 pages total). Your final exam will be posted to Moodle in a single PDF, double-spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins. 1)Explain Gilligan’s interpretation of Kohlberg’s study of moral development in children and how that interpretation is consistent with care ethics. An ideal answer to this question should (1) explain Kohlberg’s research, (2) explain Gilligan’s reinterpretation of that study, and (3) explain what care ethics is and how it is consistent with Gilligan’s interpretation of Kohlberg’s research. 2)Explain Nozick’s procedural account of distributive justice and why he thinks it is superior to patterned theories of justice. An ideal answer to this question should (1) explain the three procedural rules Nozick cites as sufficient for distributive justice, (2) explain the difference between his account and a patterned account of distributive justice, (3) explain the Wilt Chamberlain example and how that supports Nozick’s account over patterned accounts.

READ MORE >>

I have endeavored to ask for something fair, manageable, and reasonably focused. ...

I have endeavored to ask for something fair, manageable, and reasonably focused. So, I have decided to ask a series of ten (10) questions, requiring approximately seventeen (17) substantive paragraphs in response. By “substantive” I mean paragraphs that avoid padding and fluff and manage to get to the point (instead of talking around it). They all require the exercise of interpretive and critical care. The very last one, number ten (10), is a little more open-ended and thus in need of a little more thoughtful speculation. particular, you might see Eiseley’s essay as an attempt to concretize Krishna’s suggestion in the Gita that we can render our lives meaningful by seeking some sort of union with an impersonal cosmos, be this cosmos immanent nature or else some sort of transcendent “supernature.” Moreover, the stuff we have looked at concerning meaningfulness as somehow emergent from a process of personal narrative construction clearly comes into play here. Think of Eiseley’s essay as an illustrative attempt to discern meaningfulness in the natural universe through a critical description of the place he occupies within it. Note that the copy of “The Judgment of the Birds” presently in the folder now has numbered paragraphs to make cross-referencing between questions and text easier. Also, note that each of the essay questions has a recommended length assignment (given in terms of a suitable number of paragraphs). All of these questions concern the paper by Loren Eiseley that I have recommended you look at and think about for the last week or so, “The Judgment of the Birds.” This exam is an exercise in critical application. What this means is that, even though it doesn’t make explicit reference to many of the materials we have covered so far in this course, it still deals with them. In This Essay is concerned with the article presented above ("The Judgment of the Birds," by Loren Eiseley), focused on the idea that meaning is a function of narrative construction and union with an impersonal cosmos. It consists of ten questions about this article that I would like you to address. Think of Eiseley's essay as an illustrative attempt to discern meaningfulness in the natural universe through a critical description of the place he occupies within it.

READ MORE >>

Put things in your own words unless the question asks for a direct quote 1. Cho ...

Put things in your own words unless the question asks for a direct quote 1. Choose a social issue that is currently debated (ex: minimum wage, gun control, marijuana, etc.) and describe what cultural relativism would imply about the ethics of your chosen issue.  2. Describe what Martin Luther King Jr. might say about the ethics of your chosen social issue from #1.  3. Should we accept cultural relativism as the correct ethical theory, modify it in some specific way, or reject it as unacceptable? Sketch a brief argument n defense of one of these alternatives. Draw on ideas from questions #1 and #2, as well as general points from the lesson. 

READ MORE >>

Class & Professor, Ancient Greek and Roman architecture has had great influence ...

Class & Professor, Ancient Greek and Roman architecture has had great influences on modern architecture. As some of the oldest civilizations, Greece and Rome had distinct styles which have been adapted to modern styles. One of the styles is the architecture of amphitheaters as seen in Roman culture. According to Sayre (2012), amphitheaters were built by emperors as venues for spectacles and contests such as bullfights and contests between gladiators. The architecture of these structures has been adopted in many modern meeting facilities including Madison Square in New York and Robert Hall in London among many others. The most outstanding feature of the amphitheaters is the oval or round shape and several levels of the building to provide space for spectators. The convenience of hosting many people in a relatively small space and vision lines to the lower levels made these Roman features outstanding . Figure 1 (a) The Colloseum in Rome, Italy, showing the several levels for spectator seats and the oval shape compared to Figure 1 (b) of the Royal Albert Hall in London, UK. Other than the inspiration of the amphitheaters in creating round and oval halls, Greek architecture was richer and more detailed than Roman. Therefore, architectural styles borrowed from the Greeks were numerous compared to those borrowed from the Romans. One outstanding architectural element is the use of columns as structural and decorative aspects of the buildings. According to Miles (2016), the Greek style is often referred to as ‘post and lintel’ meaning that it was mainly composed of upright beams that supported horizontal ones. The upright beams were the columns and as evidenced from ancient Greek architecture, they were both a structural component as well as an aesthetic one. Due to the large size of most of the temples and other buildings, columns were used to support the beams and were also sites for decorative work which showed the affiliation or order of the building. Columns were generally thicker at the bottom and thinner at the top with cylindrical shapes. The influence of using columns in Greek temples has been seen in modern buildings. One such example is the White House which has used decorative and structural columns on the exterior as well as interior. For instance, the image of the entrance hall, considered the formal entrance to the White House, shows the use of columns for decorative as well as structural support. They are similar to those used in the image of Greek architecture. Figure 2: Greek columns compared to columns in the entrance hall of the White House. References Miles, M. M. (Ed.). (2016). A Companion to Greek Architecture(Vol. 114). John Wiley & Sons. Sayre, H.M. (2012). Discovering the humanities (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Reply Reply to Comment Collapse SubdiscussionSheri Markey Sheri Markey YesterdayMay 15 at 1:34pmManage Discussion Entry Hi Olubukoia I too was inspired by the colosseum and the columns and did a little further investigation. I wanted to know who built the Colosseum and it was Emperor Augusts between 90 and 120 AD. But in 1863 it was remodeled and used for Bull fighting and in 1989 they put a movable cover and heating in the arena for the spectators. Your post was great and I truly appreciated the pics and the information you provided. ThanksSheriReference The Amphitheatre - arenes-nimes.com (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. https://www.arenes-nimes.com/en/discovering-site/amphitheatre (Links Links to an external site. Reply Reply to Comment Collapse SubdiscussionAmy Perez Amy Perez YesterdayMay 15 at 11:44pmManage Discussion Entry Hello Olubukola!Thank you for the nicely done comparative images you provided in your post. It is incredible how influential Greek architecture has been to the Western world and especially to the Roman Empire. Your images provided a clear view of how both Greek and Roman architecture has impressed upon our contemporary architecture in compelling ways. Your mention of the ancient Roman amphitheater venues design still being used to day in modern day venues and arenas such as Madison Square Garden in NYC and Robert hall in London is quite fascinating. As a native New Yorker I have been to Madison Square Garden on many occasions for different events and I many times thought that the design was pretty well thought out- in how perimeter seating allows so many spectators to all get a quality view of the stage. I now find that I am even in more awe to know that such design has such an ancient origin! Thank you for your post!Sayre, H. M. (2013). Discovering the humanities (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Reply Reply to Comment Collapse SubdiscussionTamara Nelson Tamara Nelson 4:23pmMay 16 at 4:23pmManage Discussion Entry Olubukola, Awesome post, it was very informative and clearly explains why the Colosseum is one of the major architectural wonders of that time and how its architecture has been repeated in modern times. Sayre (2013), describes the structure as “a giant oval, 615 feet long, 510 feet wide, and 159 feet high, audiences, estimated at 50,000, entered and exited through its 76 vaulted arcades”. It baffles my mind to contemplate how these buildings were physically constructed, by men without the technology and tools of todays modern world. The enormity of this structures as with many other buildings in that time period is tremendous. I researched trying to find a scholarly article, to no avail, regarding what tools were actually used. I did discover the use of pulley systems powered by men and “beasts” were commonly used. Docs mid-week post asks what features make ancient structures remarkable to people of our time. For me, I would have to say the idea that men with limited resources and tools were able to create such huge, intricate structures. It is amazing to me.TammyReference: S Sayre., H. M. (2013). Discovering the Humanities (2 ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions Reply Reply to Comment

READ MORE >>

Urban Resilience and Ethics: Re-imagining Irish Towns ...

Urban Resilience and Ethics: Re-imagining Irish Towns

READ MORE >>
QUICK ORDER

Place a Quick Order

Our verified writers got you covered. Let us help you balance between studies, work, and family.

We provide our assistance to the numerous clients looking for a professional writing service.

Order Now
Designed and developed by Brian Mubichi (mubix)
WhatsApp