Dear Colleagues, Please focus on the following points as you prepare your final essay. 1. The essay question requires that you integrate information taken from several different (referenced) sources, to organize that information, and to summarize the information with conclusions that may be new to you. 2. Begin with a thesis statement, (or a claim) that you will explain and justify in your essay. Support your ideas with a rationale and evidence (not opinion statements such as “I think”) that are logically organized throughout the essay. Your ideas and the support should be clear to the reader. 3. Select relevant material to illustrate your points and provide specific references to class readings as well as additional research that you conduct via FDU library resources. Your essay must make substantive reference to at least two to three resources. Do not cite, quote, or reference from Wikipedia or general non-verifiable sources. References should follow a standard citation format APA as per your instructor. 4. Your essay should reflect appropriate grammar and syntax. Length of the paper is 3-4 pages, double-spaced with a single-spaced heading. Below is the question to answer in your paper. Examine the ways in which the global issue(s) of your choice is(are) presented through the content of the course. Cite a minimum of two or more of the works that we have studied in this course. Present your analysis infusing concepts of sustainability and our Global future. Scoring Rubric Rubric (4=ideal and 1=unacceptable): For the purposes of learning outcomes assessment across sections, the following measures and rankings will be used. Explanation of topic/issue/problem to be addressed 4) Response does a clear, explicit, and full job of identifying and explaining the importance of the TWO SDGs and how the TWO SDGs are interconnected for sustainability 3) Response does a good job of identifying the TWO SDGs although some questions remain as to the importance of both or how the TWO SDGs are interconnected for sustainability 2) Response does an adequate job of identifying the TWO SDGs but without clarity about the importance or interconnectedness for sustainability 1) Response does not include TWO SDGs or does not explain their importance or relation to sustainability Evidence of selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion 4) Response does a clear, explicit, and full job of using source(s) with interpretation/evaluation to provide evidence for the response. Viewpoints of experts are questioned and analyzed. 3) Response does a good job of using source(s) with interpretation/evaluation to provide evidence for the response, but some questions or lack of clarity remain. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning. 2) Response does an adequate job of identifying the source(s) with interpretation/evaluation to provide evidence for the response but without clarity. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. 1) Response does not include the use of sources or provides no interpretation/evaluation of the evidence. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. Influence of context and assumptions 4) Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. 3) Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. 2) Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa). 1) Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. Conclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences) 4) Response clearly explains a conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. 3) Response does a good job of explaining a conclusion that is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. 2) Response does an adequate job of explaining a conclusion that is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are NOT identified clearly. 1) Response does not include a conclusion or the conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified.
Responses to Peers: Engagement: Provide thoughtful insights or ask questions that deepen the discussion about the fashion leader or influencer your peer has introduced. Comparison: Compare and contrast the influence of your chosen fashion leader or influencer with those discussed by your peers. Highlight similarities and differences in their contributions and impact. Extension: Suggest additional ways in which the discussed fashion leaders or influencers could further shape the industry or influence trends.
Find 3 RECENT articles regarding medication or drug pricing controversies (e.g. price gouging) in the PHILIPPINES. Should be 2022 to present. Philippine articles ONLY. LINKS ONLY are needed!!!
write a presentation WITH SPEAKER NOTES so that I can present it. please follow the instructions and make sure formatting is correct. see attached documents
find a case related to aviation that has reached the supreme court. Your case analysis should be 6 - 7 pages long not including cover page and work cited page. Your paper should be typed, double-spaced, with one-inch margins using font size of 12. Fonts that can be used: Arial, Calibri, Century, Times New Roman. Sources must be cited in APA format with a work cited page.
For the product in your marketing plan, describe an internet/social media promotion plan. Choose a Web 1.0, Web 2.0, or mixed approach, and justify your approach. Explain how this approach is integrated with your marketing mix, how it successfully reaches your target market, and why it is a good fit for your product.
4.2 Discussion: Multiple Perspectives Purpose This activity provides practice in summarizing the central argument and supporting details for differing arguments and perspectives, integrating sources into your writing, and citing your sources. Instructions Prepare Select one topic that you will focus on for all the assignments in Module 4. Locate TWO articles with different perspectives on your chosen research topic. Write Write a detailed three paragraph response (about 300-350 words) to the two articles that you have researched about your chosen topic. Use specific details from your opposing perspective articles when summarizing their main ideas. What is each author's central opinion on the issue? Identify at least three main supporting details each author uses to support their argument. Whose position do you agree with more, and why? Be specific in your response. Make sure all references and quotations are clearly cited, using the MLA parenthetical form of citations. Include a Works Cited in MLA format. (For a database source, use the Cite or Page tools to get an MLA formatted citation. Grading You will be graded on your ability to identify and summarize each author's argument, develop main supporting details, and use accurate MLA citations 4.3 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography Purpose This assignment will help you to analyze, summarize, and evaluate various types of research material. Remember: You are conducting research on ONE of the topics presented at the beginning of Module 4. The sources examined in this Annotated Bibliography will be used in your Argument Research Paper. In essence, this annotated bibliography will become the basis of your Works Cited page for the Argument Research Paper. Definition: An annotated bibliography is your works cited list, with added information for each source. In addition to the citation, each annotation should include a concise summary of and evaluation of each of the sources. Each annotation should be a strong paragraph (about 150 words), double spaced. The annotations should be alphabetized by citation, just as you would alphabetize your works cited. Directions Prepare Review this resource on Developing a Strong Thesis StatementLinks to an external site. by OWL Purdue. Research and select FIVE credible sources that you will use for your Argument Research Paper about the topic you chose at the beginning of Module 4. You may choose to use the sources your researched for the Multiple Perspectives Discussion as part of your five sources. Write Create an MLA formatted Annotated Bibliography that lists and annotates at least FIVE independently researched scholarly and/or critical articles on the topic you have chosen to write about. Credible sources may include scholarly articles, newspaper articles/ editorials, news organizations such as NPR or CNN, reliable websites like .gov or .edu. Develop a tentative thesis statement. Write your thesis above your annotations. Create an annotation for each of your sources. Each annotation should include: an MLA formatted citation a summary of the source in your own wording and style (about 100 words) an evaluation of the credibility of the sources and how the source supports your argument and will fit in your essay (at least 50 words)
