Expert Answers

You are the marketing department for a new MLS team that will begin play in 2026. You have a little over 18 months to put together a marketing plan for this new team. Use the Las Vegas Market Must be in powerpoint format Due Monday Oct 7 @ 11:59 PM

Quiz Instructions As defined in the syllabus and described in the course review, you will be completing a business formal oral presentation. This presentation is part of the AACSB review for continued accreditation. For this Applied Practice, you are asked to select a current topic (less than 1 year-old)/company relevant to your area of study as well as provide your consent to allow your work to be reviewed for AACSB accreditation purposes. ----------------------------------- For the business formal oral presentation, a current business case (including topic and company) must be selected based on major - so the topic has more relevance. To be able to complete this assignment, you need to: select a topic in your area of concentration identify a company/organization related to topic find current articles related to that topic area/organization Once you have completed the above steps, you are ready to complete this assignment. Question 1 2.5 pts In the space below, provide an explanation of your chosen topic and how it relates to your major field of study. Your answer should include brief such as "I propose my topic and company to be. . ." and name the topic/company and relation to your major.

Need help to complete an assignment for MBA program. You can find the full guidelines and assignment requirements in the attached file. Please read all guidelines and assignment requirements carefully. Some key points below. - Our school is very strict on plagiarism, they use some website called Turnitin to check all assignments. - They are also very strict about the Harvard Referencing System, it has to be done accurately. Word count- 5,000 – 6,000 Anything more than 6,000 words or less than 5,000 words will be rejected. - All the details you will need are in the attached document, they mention all the requirements and guidelines in details. The ASSIGNMENT TASK is on page 5, that mentions everything the assignment should contain.

All the details are inside the file and would like to get a 80 at least for this assignment.

I need help with marketing plan part B. The details of part B are inside the (part B) file and the other file is part A, which is done already. Screenshot is the tool list that might need.

Submit at least an assignment that contains the following information as you articulate your research topic: The topic is: Aligning Corporate Social Responsibility, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Consumer Protection Act, and Servicemember Civil Relief Act. More than just reputation management a call to integrate CSR principles to ensure ethical practices that protect the consumer and their credit.    Develop a draft of the research problem/topic within the first two paragraphs of the assignment Develop a draft set of research questions (3) related to the selected research problem (examples):  In what ways do companies use CSR to address and rectify consumer complaints and disputes related to credit reporting errors? How do consumers perceive the effectiveness of CSR initiatives in improving credit reporting practices? What are the emerging trends in CSR that are shaping the future of credit reporting and consumer protection? How might CSR evolve to address new challenges in consumer rights? What is the targeted selected organization that you plan to evaluate and apply your research / operational problem to?? Articulate and elaborate on the characteristics and dynamics of the selected organization and how it aligns with the proposed research problem and research questions. Please use the below template.  Articulate what academic and practitioner-based literature supports the proposed research problem and how it relates to the selected organization.

Your answer(s) for each of the below listed Homework Cases must be typed and submitted through Blackboard. In order to submit your Homework, click on each of the assigned cases which are underlined below. You will see a section of “Instructions” which describe the assignment/page number for each case. When you click on the case, you will then see an option to "Create Submission.” If you click on "Create Submission" it will open a text box for you to type your homework and submit it. Please type your answer directly into the text box and submit it.  Do not use text-editing software or other programs and then cut and paste, as this often conflicts with Blackboard, causing illegible answers.  You should not upload a separate document. Be careful that your message does not contain any special formatting when typing into Blackboard.  TEXT ONLY!  And do not type your answer in the “Comments” link.  I will not accept these case answers via email.  It is not necessary to repeat the facts of the question in your answer.  There is no defined length for the answer.  Two to four paragraphs is the norm.  Your answer should be in your own words, and never copied and pasted from any source.  Copying the court’s decision is not acceptable. Your answer will be screened by plagiarism software.  No credit will be allowed for answers that are not original.  If you are quoting material you must cite your sources. Your answer should be formatted as follows: a. The Issue:   Define the issue to be decided by the court.  This is typically one sentence describing the question that the court is addressing and deciding.  For example, The issue before the court is whether the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury.  b. The Court’s Decision.  Discuss what you think the court’s decision should be, and your reasoning. You should support your analysis with legal authority (from the materials you have studied). Citations to legal principles, statutes and/or similar case decisions (learned from your text or the case itself) will be most convincing. 

Read the following and the attachments. Your assignment is to create a Discussion Board thread (and comment on your classmates posts) in relation to the Costner v. Costner Divorce Case. Post your thread under the "Costner Divorce Case" Forum.  Background: A  prenuptial agreement (sometimes referred to as a "prenup"), is a written contract entered into by a couple before their marriage takes place.  Couples typically use these agreements to outline the terms and conditions for dividing up financial assets and responsibilities in the event of a divorce.  It is a contract. Kevin Costner is a well known actor and star of many films, as well as the hit show, Yellowstone. Mr. Costner and his second wife, Christine Baumgartner, entered into a prenuptual agreement prior to their marriage in 2004. When Christine recently filed for divorce, the lawsuit centered on the enforceability of the prenuptial agreement between Kevin and Christine. At stake was Kevin Costner's fortune, which is reported to total well in excess of $250 million. Attached is a word documnent of "media reported" information regarding the Costner Divorce Action. This background was gleaned from a variety of online sources and should be used for purposes of responding to this assignment. Keep in mind that the attached information is not necessarily complete or accurrate -- the agreement at issue is not a publically available document and the divorce was settled without many judicial findings.  In your Discussion Board post, you are to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s case based on the reported information known. Your post(s) should include the following: 1.     Factual Background: Identify the key terms in the agreement and the circumstances surrounding its execution. 2.     Issue: Describe the legal arguments of each party, using the principles of contract law.  3.     Analysis: Explain who has the stronger case, in your opinion, and why. Include a discussion of any additional factors which could have impacted the analysis, had they been further explored or developed in discovery prior to the settlement. 4.     Conclusion: State how a judge should have ruled in this case (in your view) had the case not settled.  Your Discussion Board post will not be "publically" avilable to your classmates until after the "due date" for the assignment (I will be able to see them as they are posted). After the due date,  you will have one week to post comments on at least two other student's Discussion Board posts regarding the Costner Case. Your comments on the other posts are part of your grade.

For this assignment, you will be required to do a written analysis of the scenario below using the IRAC method of analysis. Use the BU310 Unit 6 Assignment Template Download BU310 Unit 6 Assignment Template[Word] provided for this assignment to assist you with formatting as per the IRAC requirements. Scenario Cozier owned and operated Big River Harley Davidson in Wapello, Iowa. As required by law, Cozier took out a motor vehicle dealer's surety bond for $35,000 with United Fire and Casualty Insurance. The bond protects retail customers who get stuck when a motor vehicle dealer, perhaps because of fraud, does not deliver a vehicle that has been purchased. The surety bond was in force when Big River went out of business, and Cozier left the state. While in business, Big River sold a Harley to Connell Harley Davidson in Norfolk, Nebraska. Connell paid $12,000 for the Harley that was never delivered. Connell sued United Fire as surety for the $12,000. Discuss whether Connell can recover. In your discussion, you will want to analyze the: Scope of Coverage Under the Surety Bond Provisions. Scope of Surety Bond Coverage Under Iowa Code Section 322.4(7). Policy reasons underlying Iowa Code chapter 322. Submit Submit a Word Document containing your assignment and the following requirements: Paper Requirements – IRAC Method of Analysis using the headings below: Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion APA Requirements 1" inch margins Times New Roman 12 pt font Double-Spaced Title Page Reference Page Your assignment should be 3 – 4 pages not including the title and reference page. A minimum of three (3) scholarly resources is required.

Application for Innocent Spouse Relief: If a joint return has been filed and there is an understatement of tax on the return(s) due to erroneous items of one spouse (TAXPAYER), with whom a spouse has filed the joint return, it may be possible for the spouse who is attempting to claim innocent spouse status (SPOUSE) to be granted relief from the understated tax. In order to be granted relief, the SPOUSE must be able to show that the SPOUSE  had no reason to know that the understated tax existed (or the extent to which the understated tax existed) as well as other criteria which you will be asked to list in your memo to Mrs. Lamprey (see below).  It may also be possible to be granted relief with a showing that considering all the facts and circumstances, it would be unfair to hold the SPOUSE liable for the understated tax. In order to be considered for one of the three types of innocent spouse relief a Form 8857, “Request for Innocent Spouse Relief” must be filed. Assignment: Based on the facts in the case below, prepare a 2-page memo to advise Mrs. C. Lamprey as to the criteria that must be met and whether innocent spouse relief might be granted to her.  If so, prepare Form 8857, “Request for Innocent Spouse Relief,” for her signature. FACTS: Mrs. C. Lamprey had been married to E.E.L. Lamprey for 20 years. They lived in Florida all the years of their marriage, so you do not have to consider any community property issues. For all this time she had been filing joint tax returns with her husband.  In 2019, she discovered that he had a “special friend” who had been seeing for years.   Broken hearted, she divorced E.E.L. in 2019.  Mrs. Lamprey filed her 2019 tax return as a single filer.  She expected a nice $9,700 refund. However, what she received was a letter from IRS indicating that IRS had applied her refund to the 2017 jointly filed tax year.  It seems that E.E.L. had omitted $175,000 of income from the 2017 joint return.  C. recalls discussing with E.E.L. his purchase of an expensive new car in 2017.  E.E.L. explained it was for business and the business paid for it. She found the explanation reasonable. However, a Porsche convertible seemed a little excessive (although his “special friend” seemed to like it).  Mrs. Lamprey also recalls that when it came time to file their return, she just signed the return E.E.L. put in front of her.   He asked her to sign it, “Sign here C.” he said, and she did.   He did not coerce her or force her to sign.  After all, C. had no financial experience and relied on E.E.L to make all the financial decisions.  Numbers made her head spin and she knew that even if he had gone into great detail it is unlikely that she would understand anything anyway.  C. comes to your office for assistance. She needs the money and is incensed at IRS for taking it.  She asks if there is anything that she can do to get the money back.  You have heard of the innocent spouse statutes under IRC 6015.  You tell C. that you will prepare a memo for her and, if appropriate, a form 8857. Some additional facts appear below: C. had wages income in 2017      from teaching teach school of $37,500 on which there had been withholding      of $5,200.  The tax on the $37,500 included in the joint return would      approximate $5,200. C. was not aware of the      understatement of income for 2017. She had asked the only question      she could think of and it was related to the new vehicle. Their other      living expenses, during 2017, were normal for them. There were no other      major expenditures, nor did C. receive any additional funds or gifts from      E.E.L. The understated income was      received and E.E.L. grabbed the check and deposited into a joint account      with E.E.L. and his “special friend.”  C. had no knowledge of that      account. Prior to their divorce, C.      moved out of the family home and went to live with her parents as she      could not stand to be in the same house with E.E.L.  She was legally      separated from E.E.L. on January 31, 2020 under a court decree and      divorced. Nothing in the divorce decree indemnifies C. for unpaid      or underpaid taxes. What your memo should cover: Is innocent spouse relief      likely? What do you base your decision      on (e.g. what are the factors)? What source of relief do you      recommend?  IRC 6015(b)-(c) or (f)? Will the Streamlined Procedures under Rev. Proc 2013-34      apply and should it be used? Documents Provided: Partially completed form 8857. Instructions to form 8857.  Note the instructions      refer the reader to https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-8857 for change and updates. Taxpayer First Act of 2019 as      it relates to Innocent Spouse. Facts for the Form 8857: The basic facts are prefilled in. Complete the balance of the form including Part VI.