Expert Answers

Overview For the final paper, students will be responsible for investigating a place-specific topic in LA or another city/suburb such as gentrification in West Adams, urban (re)development around the LA Olympics, police reform in South LA, the suburbanization of poverty in Irvine, etc. through secondary research (news articles, policy reports, census data, academic articles). Whatever research topic and case that you chose to focus on, you must deploy the conceptual tools and empirical cases from the readings and lectures to analyze, interpret, and form a position on your issue. Key Elements *Number of Paragraphs for each section are suggestions only* Substantive - Introduction: A central question that your essay is going to answer or examine. A clear thesis statement of your argument (1-2 paragraphs) - Background: Historical background of the neighborhood, city, or region in relation to your issue. Demographic context of ethnicity, class, and other census variables (1-2 paragraphs). - Analysis: Combining course readings and outside sources to analyze your issue (i.e. a trend in urbanization, sides of a policy debate, a struggle over urban development, an urban social problem). (The bulk of the paper) - Conclusion: Ties together elements of the analysis back to your argument. (1 paragraph) o Optional alternative to the conclusion above: Policy Recommendation(s) Conclusion. Connecting your analysis to make an argument for policies and practices that can be adopted by governments, NGO’s, individuals or businesses. (1-3 paragraphs). Formal - 1250-1500 words, double-spaced, one-inch margins, with page numbers, and a Title. (Abstracts should not be included in the final paper submission) - Engages with four or more readings from the course. Two of these four should be engaged with substantially – ie more than a single sentence or passing reference, drawing on a key concept or central argument, specific example(s), etc. Uses specific examples and quotations from the texts to support analysis. Lecture material can be cited and count as one of the required course readings and/or Articles/Chapters included in the Honors Section syllabus. - Engages with four or more outside sources (newspaper articles, census data, academic articles, books, podcasts, other media).-In-line citations (author year: pg number) ie (Smith 1996: 23). - A list of works cited (not included in the word count). I do not care which specific format you chose, but it should be an official format (ie Chicago, MLA, ASA, etc) and be consistent. Abstract You will submit a 200-word abstract that must include each of the following: 1) An overview of the issue you will be analyzing: a trend in urbanization, sides of a policy debate, a struggle over urban development, etc. 2) A central question that your essay is going to answer or examine. 3) (If you have it at this point) A clear thesis statement of your argument. 4) A sentence or two about how the paper is organized, and argument is developed. You may also submit an outline, which can be as developed or rudimentary as you like, the main thing I want to see is how you’re planning to connect our readings and concepts covered in the work to a case of your choosing. *Abstracts will not be graded, but failure to submit one will result in a half-grade reduction from the final paper. *Abstracts are not submitted with final paper Grade/ Points Characteristics A range An “A” paper demonstrates a superior, sustained, and consistent level of critical engagement with the issues that the writer addresses. A clear and perceptive thesis statement Includes all required substantive and formal components listed on the paper guidelines (see final paper guidelines and final alternative paper guidelines for list). Key Elements Substantive - Introduction: A central question that your essay is going to answer or examine. A clear thesis statement of your argument - Background: Historical background of the neighborhood, city, or region in relation to your issue. Demographic context of ethnicity, class, and other census variables. - Analysis: Combining course readings and outside sources to analyze your issue (i.e. a trend in urbanization, sides of a policy debate, a struggle over urban development, an urban social problem). (The bulk of the paper) - Conclusion: Ties together elements of the analysis back to your argument. o Optional alternative to the conclusion above: Policy Recommendation(s) Conclusion. Connecting your analysis to make an argument for policies and practices that can be adopted by governments, NGO’s, individuals or businesses. Formal - 1250-1500 words, double-spaced, one-inch margins, with page numbers, and a Title. (Abstracts should not be included in the final paper submission) - Engages with four or more readings from the course. Two of these four should be engaged with substantially – ie more than a single sentence or passing reference, drawing on a key concept or central argument, specific example(s), etc. Uses specific examples and quotations from the texts to support analysis. Lecture material can be cited and count as one of the required course readings and/or Articles/Chapters included in the Honors Section syllabus. - Engages with four or more outside sources (newspaper articles, census data, academic articles, books, podcasts, other media). - In-line citations (author year: pg number) ie (Smith 1996: 23). - A list of works cited (not included in the word count). I do not care which specific format you chose, but it should be an official format (ie Chicago, MLA, ASA, etc) and be consistent. - There will be a half-letter grade deduction for each day late. No papers will be accepted after Friday Dec 15. The paper demonstrates strong reasoning throughout, supported by persuasive evidence and relevant, fully developed examples. The quotes and examples from course and outside texts are clearly connected to the key claims of each paragraph and support the argument stated in the thesis. The paper’s organization supports the development of the writer's ideas and demonstrates effective uses of cohesive devices. The word choice is varied and precise and only minor errors in grammar and usage are evident. The paper is written clearly in the student’s own words and has been proofread. B range A “B” paper demonstrates competence and an acceptable level of critical engagement with the issues that the writer addresses. Meets all (B+) or Most (B, B-) of the response requirements. A clear thesis statement. Includes nearly all required substantive and formal components listed on the paper guidelines (see above). The paper's reasoning is sound, and is based on relevant evidence. It generally demonstrates accurate and sufficient use of evidence – including specific examples and quotes from the cited texts - although there may be occasional lapses. Connections between evidence and the topic are weaker or underdeveloped in comparison to the “A” papers and there is less analysis. The paper is generally written clearly in the student’s own words and has been proofread but may have some problems with organization and/or clarity and have some errors or quote the source material more than is ideal. While errors in grammar and usage may be present, they do not interfere with the reader’s understanding of the text. C range A “C” paper fails to meet several requirements (substantive and formal) of the assignment. The thesis is not clear, weak, or fails to directly address the question. The writer’s understanding of the text(s) upon which the paper is based is generally plausible and logical in most, but not all, parts. There are some problems with sources and citation; there are not enough, not all are relevant, etc. Missing required texts. Does not include specific examples or quotes from most texts – instead relying on general summary. There is little synthesis or analysis provided compared with the “B” papers. There are problems with the clarity and organization of the paper. There are significant grammatical and spelling errors. D range Most or all of the problems of “C” papers are in evidence here, but they are significantly worse. Part of the assignment is missing, or severely lacking.

Discuss the ways in which this film illustrates themes and concepts concerning inequalities, power legal or social change as discussed in assigned readings. In other words, write an analysis of the film through the lens of the materials presented in assignments. ( Cover Weber's theory of law shifting from repressive to restitutive.) this is the movie. https://archive.org/details/my.-cousin.-vinny.-199...

Please write a brief response to the attached discussion board post. There is no word limit/minimum. Instructor Directions: Responses: In responding to others note what you find interesting in others’ posts and why, developing an analysis. • Your response might seek to clarify ideas or bring something new into the discussion. • A response of "I really agree with what you said" or “ditto!” does not reflect your thoughts or contribute to the discussion. • Look for ways to add value to the DB with additional information, examples, quotes from the readings, items in the news Add value to the DB by making a contribution beyond summarizing student post and expressing appreciation for the quality of the post. Demonstrate your engagement with the course material, highlighting your learning. For example: Ask the student a question to expand the analysis. Provide additional information not covered in the student response. For example: An example from Takaki, documentary not mentioned. A newsworthy event that shows continuity with the historical materials covered. Your own observations or use of self as an example.

Hello, please write a brief response to the attached discussion post. Instructor Directions: Note what you find interesting in others’ posts and why, developing an analysis. • Your response might seek to clarify ideas or bring something new into the discussion. • A response of "I really agree with what you said" or “ditto!” does not reflect your thoughts or contribute to the discussion. • Look for ways to add value to the DB with additional information, examples, quotes from the readings, items in the news. Add value to the DB by making a contribution beyond summarizing student post and expressing appreciation for the quality of the post. Demonstrate your engagement with the course material, highlighting your learning. For example: Ask the student a question to expand the analysis. Provide additional information not covered in the student response. For example: An example from Takaki, documentary not mentioned. A newsworthy event that shows continuity with the historical materials covered. Your own observations or use of self as an example.

I have to do fielnotes on a research paper/project that is due later in the semester. I already made an outline on what my project might be on. You can use it or not to make fieldnotes. I am attaching the fieldnotes instructions, my research paper/ project plan (you can do it on another topic if its easier for you), and the instruction to the research paper/Project. all I ask you to do it make the fieldnotes for now. everything will be attached down below.

Norms are rules or standards of behavior shared by most members of a society or subgroup. They are statements about how you ought to, or should, behave. When appropriate behavior is defined differently for women and men, the expectations specific to each are called gender norms. One way to find out what the norms are in any given situation is to violate them–i.e., break the rules. The purpose of this assignment is to determine the boundaries of some contemporary gender norms and to discover and challenge your own boundaries around gender. A secondary purpose is to give you the subjective experience of violating a self-defined gender norm – to give you “hands-on” experience. Choose a natural (i.e., non-laboratory) setting in which to violate a gender norm. Think through clearly what norm you’re going to violate–make sure it’s a gender norm. . . . Sometimes the reactions will be minimal; other times it will be strong; remember, no reaction is a reaction!!! Be sure to record all reactions while they are happening. Also provide concrete evidence by way of photo(s) included as illustrations in the body of your paper. Structure your 4-page typed-double-spaced paper as follows State specifically the gender norm you intend to violate. Explain why or how it is a gender norm, and provide cultural context. State in clear details exactly what you did. Report any variations in your procedure. For example, you may try your experiment in one setting, then in another. You may compare different variations of the same norm violation, or change the degrees of violation. Give all the details of the violation process. Include the photo evidence as proof/documentation here. Describe your experience subjectively in two different ways: (1) your feelings as you prepared and engaged in the norm-violating behavior; (2) your feelings about how other people reacted to you. Report in great detail the general and specific reactions of others to your behavior. If you get no reaction at all, or a mild reaction, report that. Report on the effects of any variations in your procedure, and what you think the significance of any (or no) reaction is. What did you learn from this assignment? About yourself? About your culture? Apply course terminology to your experiences, citing the assigned course readings.

**** Please do not use AI generated software. It is checked thoroughly. Read the Assigned Lesson Chapters, then watch this video: Watch the provided video (1:15–3:00). Read Chapter 3 (Section 3.1, Overcoming Culture Shock). https://youtu.be/2XCq2kODbK Address the following questions: Have you had similar experiences to any culture shock examples from the video? If so, describe what happened and how you navigated it. Think about a norm, folkway, more, or tradition from your life. How has socialization influenced your acceptance or rejection of it? If you were to study abroad like the students in the video, what aspect of your culture might surprise or confuse someone from another culture, and why? How would you help them overcome their reactions? Think about a cultural event you enjoy. What are the cultural elements and symbols used? What type of culture is it? How would you explain it to someone from another culture? Use specific examples from the video to support your responses. Incorporate at least 5 key terms from the textbook, defining them in your own words and citing the textbook (e.g., chapter and section or page number).

For the final paper, students will be responsible for investigating a place-specific topic in LA or another city/suburb such as gentrification in West Adams, urban (re)development around the LA Olympics, police reform in South LA, the suburbanization of poverty in Irvine, etc. through secondary research (news articles, policy reports, census data, academic articles). Whatever research topic and case that you chose to focus on, you must deploy the conceptual tools and empirical cases from the readings and lectures to analyze, interpret, and form a position on your issue. USE SUBURBANIZATION OF POVERTY IN EITHER Palmdale, or Contra Costa County. - 1250-1500 words, Key Elements *Number of Paragraphs for each section are suggestions only* Substantive - Introduction: A central question that your essay is going to answer or examine. A clear thesis statement of your argument (1-2 paragraphs) - Background: Historical background of the neighborhood, city, or region in relation to your issue. Demographic context of ethnicity, class, and other census variables (1-2 paragraphs). - Analysis: Combining course readings and outside sources to analyze your issue (i.e. a trend in urbanization, sides of a policy debate, a struggle over urban development, an urban social problem). (The bulk of the paper) - Conclusion: Ties together elements of the analysis back to your argument. (1 paragraph) o Optional alternative to the conclusion above: Policy Recommendation(s) Conclusion. Connecting your analysis to make an argument for policies and practices that can be adopted by governments, NGO’s, individuals or businesses. (1-3 paragraphs). Formal - 1250-1500 words, double-spaced, one-inch margins, with page numbers, and a Title. (Abstracts should not be included in the final paper submission) - Engages with four or more readings from the course. Two of these four should be engaged with substantially – ie more than a single sentence or passing reference, drawing on a key concept or central argument, specific example(s), etc. Uses specific examples and quotations from the texts to support analysis. Lecture material can be cited and count as one of the required course readings and/or Articles/Chapters included in the Honors Section syllabus. - Engages with four or more outside sources (newspaper articles, census data, academic articles, books, podcasts, other media).-In-line citations (author year: pg number) ie (Smith 1996: 23). - A list of works cited (not included in the word count). I do not care which specific format you chose, but it should be an official format (ie Chicago, MLA, ASA, etc) and be consistent. Abstract You will submit a 200-word abstract that must include each of the following: 1) An overview of the issue you will be analyzing: a trend in urbanization, sides of a policy debate, a struggle over urban development, etc. 2) A central question that your essay is going to answer or examine. 3) (If you have it at this point) A clear thesis statement of your argument. 4) A sentence or two about how the paper is organized, and argument is developed. You may also submit an outline, which can be as developed or rudimentary as you like, the main thing I want to see is how you’re planning to connect our readings and concepts covered in the work to a case of your choosing. *Abstracts will not be graded, but failure to submit one will result in a half-grade reduction from the final paper. *Abstracts are not submitted with final paper Grade/ Points Characteristics A range An “A” paper demonstrates a superior, sustained, and consistent level of critical engagement with the issues that the writer addresses. A clear and perceptive thesis statement Includes all required substantive and formal components listed on the paper guidelines (see final paper guidelines and final alternative paper guidelines for list). Key Elements Substantive - Introduction: A central question that your essay is going to answer or examine. A clear thesis statement of your argument - Background: Historical background of the neighborhood, city, or region in relation to your issue. Demographic context of ethnicity, class, and other census variables. - Analysis: Combining course readings and outside sources to analyze your issue (i.e. a trend in urbanization, sides of a policy debate, a struggle over urban development, an urban social problem). (The bulk of the paper) - Conclusion: Ties together elements of the analysis back to your argument. o Optional alternative to the conclusion above: Policy Recommendation(s) Conclusion. Connecting your analysis to make an argument for policies and practices that can be adopted by governments, NGO’s, individuals or businesses. Formal - 1250-1500 words, double-spaced, one-inch margins, with page numbers, and a Title. (Abstracts should not be included in the final paper submission) - Engages with four or more readings from the course. Two of these four should be engaged with substantially – ie more than a single sentence or passing reference, drawing on a key concept or central argument, specific example(s), etc. Uses specific examples and quotations from the texts to support analysis. Lecture material can be cited and count as one of the required course readings and/or Articles/Chapters included in the Honors Section syllabus. - Engages with four or more outside sources (newspaper articles, census data, academic articles, books, podcasts, other media). - In-line citations (author year: pg number) ie (Smith 1996: 23). - A list of works cited (not included in the word count). I do not care which specific format you chose, but it should be an official format (ie Chicago, MLA, ASA, etc) and be consistent. A The paper demonstrates strong reasoning throughout, supported by persuasive evidence and relevant, fully developed examples. The quotes and examples from course and outside texts are clearly connected to the key claims of each paragraph and support the argument stated in the thesis. The paper’s organization supports the development of the writer's ideas and demonstrates effective uses of cohesive devices. The word choice is varied and precise and only minor errors in grammar and usage are evident. The paper is written clearly in the student’s own words and has been proofread. B range A “B” paper demonstrates competence and an acceptable level of critical engagement with the issues that the writer addresses. Meets all (B+) or Most (B, B-) of the response requirements. A clear thesis statement. Includes nearly all required substantive and formal components listed on the paper guidelines (see above). The paper's reasoning is sound, and is based on relevant evidence. It generally demonstrates accurate and sufficient use of evidence – including specific examples and quotes from the cited texts - although there may be occasional lapses. Connections between evidence and the topic are weaker or underdeveloped in comparison to the “A” papers and there is less analysis. The paper is generally written clearly in the student’s own words and has been proofread but may have some problems with organization and/or clarity and have some errors or quote the source material more than is ideal. While errors in grammar and usage may be present, they do not interfere with the reader’s understanding of the text. C range A “C” paper fails to meet several requirements (substantive and formal) of the assignment. The thesis is not clear, weak, or fails to directly address the question. The writer’s understanding of the text(s) upon which the paper is based is generally plausible and logical in most, but not all, parts. There are some problems with sources and citation; there are not enough, not all are relevant, etc. Missing required texts. Does not include specific examples or quotes from most texts – instead relying on general summary. There is little synthesis or analysis provided compared with the “B” papers. There are problems with the clarity and organization of the paper. There are significant grammatical and spelling errors. D range Most or all of the problems of “C” papers are in evidence here, but they are significantly worse. Part of the assignment is missing, or severely lacking. NO PLAGIARISM OR AI WILL BE CHECKED MANY TIMES

Consider that public order crimes are against the law because they threaten the "moral" fabric of society. Who gets to define those values and is it fair? How do morals and values of society change over time? Choose something that we would consider a public order crime today that may not have always been immoral OR something we do not consider a public order crime today that we may have in the past. Explain historically how your particular example experienced this shift (you may have to use some outside research so please include citations and a work cited list. For online resources please include links).

The one thing we all have in common is that we are all here at UCSB… Earning a bachelor’s degree is a major determinant of future earnings, but going to college is not only determined by academic capability. Your essay will reflect on various aspects of the structures that shape your ascribed status (what Mills calls the context of “history”) in order to identify the resources that led to the achieved status of being a student at UCSB (what Mills calls the “biography”), including any individual agency you exerted to overcome the constraints of social structure or that you used to take advantage of your position within it. This is an analytic essay that happens to be about you. This means that you should treat your own story sociologically, analyzing key details about your social position in relation to social structures. This should not simply be a story about how you got to college. Your thesis statement should be in the first paragraph and respond to this question: Based on your unique background, ascribed statuses, and identities, how difficult or easy was it for you to get access to the academic and financial resources needed to attend UCSB? The paragraphs of your essay should address the following key questions: When did you first think that you might go to college? Where did this idea come from, and how did your social position influence when and how you came to think about it? What kinds of academic and financial resources allowed you to attend UCSB? What elements of structural structure did you have to overcome (if any) to obtain these? How do your social identities affect your sense of belonging here at UCSB? Are there places that you feel more or less comfortable on campus? Why or why not? Paper guidelines: 3-5 pages, double-spaced with 1” margins, in a standard 12pt font Have a clear and underlined thesis statement in the first paragraph. Include and underline at least 3 key concepts from the course, in addition to those included in this prompt. Define these and apply them to your analysis. Address each of the 3 key questions above You may include external resources as long as they are cited (I highly encourage you to look up demographic information about your high school, for example) Essays will be graded according to the following rubric: Thesis statement 2 points Addresses 3 key questions 9 points Defines and accurately applies 3 concepts 9 points Clarity of writing and analysis 5 points TOTAL 25 points