Expert Answers

Overview Your Cognitive Psychology Theories Evaluation is a multipart assessment. Part 1: Memory PowerPoint is a presentation of approximately 17 slides in which you compare and contrast memory types. Part 2: Cognitive Psychology: Theories of Language and Intelligence is a 13- to 17-page, two-section analysis paper. In this paper, Section 1, “Cognitive Psychology: Theories of Language,” consists of the first 8–10 pages in which you use language to explain the basics of cognitive psychology. Section 2, “Cognitive Psychology: Intelligence Case Study,” consists of the next 5–7 pages in which you apply different theories of intelligence to an applied setting and make recommendations on how to enhance the intelligence in that setting. Submission Length: 17 slides in a Memory PowerPoint presentation and a 13- to 17-page analysis paper addressing theories of language and intelligence. Professional Skills: Written Communication, Information Literacy, and Engaging Multiple Social and Cultural Perspectives are assessed in this Competency. Instructions To complete this Assessment, do the following: Review the criteria provided in the rubric. Adhere to the required assignment length. Download the PowerPoint template available here. Download the APA course paper template available here. Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission, and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. Rubric All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring. This Assessment requires submission of two (2) files: (1) Memory PowerPoint presentation and (2) Cognitive Psychology: Theories of Language and Intelligence paper. Save these files as follows: Memory PowerPoint presentation: save as CA001_powerpoint_firstinitial_lastname (e.g., CA001_powerpoint_J_Smith) Cognitive Psychology: Theories of Language and Intelligence paper: save as CA001_paper_firstinitial_lastname (e.g., CA001_paper_J_Smith) You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu. Cognitive Psychology Theories Evaluation To prepare for this Competency Assessment: Review the resources in the Learning Activities found throughout this Competency. Download and review the Memory PowerPoint template. Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. PART 1: MEMORY POWERPOINT (17 SLIDES) Many types of memory are discussed in your Learning Activity resources (e.g., semantic, procedural, episodic, implicit, explicit, declarative, nondeclarative). For your Memory PowerPoint presentation: Identify 3 pairs of memory types you will compare and contrast in the presentation (e.g., one pair of memory types you compare and contrast might be semantic memory and procedural memory). Evaluate each pair of memory types by defining them and explaining their similarities, differences, and where they interact. Each of your 6 memory types must be supported by 1 unique scholarly resource from the Walden Library. You may use a memory type more than once in your 3 pairs; however, duplicated memory types will each need to have a unique resource. At the bottom of each slide of the PowerPoint template is a Notes area. In the Notes area of each slide, you must include your notes and/or the talking points you would cover for each slide if conducting the presentation for an audience. Your Memory PowerPoint presentation should include the following in the provided PowerPoint template: Title Slide (1 Slide) Introduction (1 slide) Of the types of memory discussed in your Learning Activity resources, identify 3 pairs of memory types you will compare and contrast in the presentation. Memory Types Evaluation (4 slides per pair, 12 slides total) Define the memory types for each pair (1 slide). Explain the differences between each pair (1 slide per pair). Explain the similarities between each pair (1 slide per pair). Explain where the two memory types interact (1 slide per pair). References (3 slides) Support your evaluation with 1 unique scholarly source from the Walden Library for each of the 6 memory types you identify. (Note: If you use a memory type more than once, you must identify a unique source for each. There should be a total of 6 unique resources cited in APA format for this section of the PowerPoint presentation.) PART 2: COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: THEORIES OF LANGUAGE AND INTELLIGENCE (13–17 PAGES IN ADDITION TO TITLE PAGE AND REFERENCES) Section 1: Cognitive Psychology: Theories of Language (8–10 pages) Contrast the approaches to language acquisition between behaviorist B. F. Skinner and cognitive scientist Noam Chomsky (e.g., language acquisition device (LAD), transformational grammar). Contrast the strong version and the weak version of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. In a brief summary, explain the relationship between language and reading. Be specific, provide examples, and justify your response with citations from the resources in your Learning Activities or from your search of the Walden Library. Section 2: Cognitive Psychology: Intelligence Case Study (5–7 pages) Identify one form of intelligence talked about in the Learning Activity resources and describe how you see the intelligence being manifested in an applied setting of your choosing (e.g., classroom setting, health care setting, human resources setting). Describe evidence-based recommendations you believe will enhance the intelligence in your chosen setting. Be specific, provide examples, and justify your response with citations from the resources in your Learning Activities or from your search of the Walden Library.

For this assignment you will create an annotated bibliography (see below) of 3 peer reviewed articles on a topic of interest to you. Please pick a topic that you might consider for your independent project at the end of the semester, An annotated bibliography is a list of citations for various sources (such as books, articles, or documents) followed by a brief descriptive and evaluative paragraph, known as the annotation . The annotation typically includes: A summary of the source's main ideas or arguments (2-4 sentence An assessment and evaluation of the source's reliability, credibility, and relevance (1-2 sentences) A reflection on how the source is useful for the researcher's specific topic or how it has influenced their thinking (1-2 sentences) Annotated bibliographies serve several purposes: They present a list of resources that others can use for research They prepare researchers to write a research paper by encouraging close reading of sources They provide an overview of available research on a given topic The format of an annotated bibliography typically follows a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago) for the references, with the annotations appearing in paragraph form below each citation.

There are various treatment approaches available for individuals with paraphilic disorders, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, and alternative interventions. In your response, critically evaluate the effectiveness of these different treatment approaches. Analyze the strengths, limitations, and potential risks associated with each approach. Support your analysis with evidence from at least one academic journal article discussing relevant research studies or clinical trials. Grading: To complete the discussion post for full credit, follow the instructions below: A minimum of one complete paragraph for your answer. Note: a paragraph is a writing structure that requires a minimum of five complete sentences. These five or more sentences should represent a valid knowledge of the topic. Use APA 7th Citations and Formatting Examples The Discussion also requires a Comment or Reply to a classmate's Discussion. This Comment or Reply requires a minimum of three complete sentences. It is not only about the number of sentences, but the valid knowledge of the topic represented throughout the paragraph (Discussion) and/or the three sentences (Comment or Reply). And we are talking about "university student's sentences" not "Mary is a girl or Tom is a boy" kind of sentences... These three sentences should represent a valid knowledge of the other student's Discussion. Note: Sentences just expressing your opinion and/or perception of your classmate's Discussion, and/or complimenting your classmate do not count for points, i.e., "I love what you wrote about..."; "You did a great job..."; "I agree with you''... Not complying with all the above requirements will decrease the score for the Discussion.

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) REBT is therapeutic approach founded in cognition, emotion and behaviorism. The theoretical combining of these three processes produce a therapeutic approach that should minimize emotional disturbances, decrease self-defeating behaviors so the individual can become more self-actualized and think more rationally. In this assignment you are to research REBT and present an overview on how the therapeutic techniques used in this approach accomplish these goals (remember there are 3 and all need to be addressed). In addition, you are to select one technique/approach to illustrate the effectiveness of this therapeutic approach. Remember you must have a title page, minimum 4 complete pages of content and a reference page. Additionally, you must reference 3 scholarly sources. (You can use your textbook for 1)

Overview For this Performance Task Assessment, you create a community-based, narrated PowerPoint presentation of approximately 12–14 slides in which you provide information, based on five current, peer-reviewed research study articles, related to the psychology of personality theory and that promote a topic of well-being. Submission Length: 12- to 14-slide community-based Psychology of Personality Research and Well-Being narrated PowerPoint and Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix. Professional Skills: Written Communication, Information Literacy, Engaging Multiple Social and Cultural Perspectives, Inquiry and Analysis, Oral Communication, and Technology are assessed in this Competency. Instructions To complete this Assessment, do the following: Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length. Download the PowerPoint template available here: PZ003_Psychology_of_Personality_Well-Being_PowerPoint_Template Download the Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix available here: PZ003_Personality_WellBeing_Literature_Review_Matrix Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission, and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. Rubric All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and References must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring. This Assessment requires submission of two (2) files: 1) completed Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix and 2) Psychology of Personality Research and Well-Being narrated PowerPoint. Save each file as follows: Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix Template: save as PZ003_review_firstinitial_lastname?(e.g., PZ003_review_J_Smith) Psychology of Personality Research and Well-Being narrated PowerPoint: save as PZ003_powerpoint_firstinitial_lastname?(e.g., PZ003_powerpoint_J_Smith) You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu. Psychology of Personality Research and Well-Being Analysis Your Psychology of Personality Research and Well-Being Analysis will be a two-part assessment in which you will evaluate how psychology of personality research has shown that a given area of personality can be used to enhance the well-being of individuals. For this Assessment, you play the role of a psychologist presenting a talk in the community on the connection between personality and well-being. You select a topic that relates to the connection between a given personality construct and enhanced well-being (e.g., what positive psychology says about promoting joy or how building grit in children can enhance academic achievement) and submit the topic to your Faculty SMEs for approval. Once you receive topic approval from your Faculty SMEs, research the topic using the Walden Library to identify five current (5 years or newer) peer-reviewed research articles within the realm of your approved topic, at least one of which uses qualitative methodology. (Note: In rare cases, a qualitative study may not be available for your chosen topic. In those cases, contact your Faculty SMEs for guidance.) This research will form the basis of your community-based presentation content. Populate the Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix with the requested information about each of the five articles. (Note: The Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix will be submitted as part of your Assessment.) Based on the information from the research articles, create a narrated PowerPoint presentation with your talking points. (Note: Presentation requirements are provided in the PowerPoint template.) To prepare for this Assessment: Search for a well-being topic of interest that is personally or professionally relevant to you and that relates to the connection between a given personality construct and enhanced well-being (e.g., what positive psychology says about promoting joy or how building grit in children can enhance academic achievement). You may want to use the same topic from your Module 2 Connect With Your Peers section. Once you select your topic, email your chosen well-being topic to your Faculty SME?for approval.? After Faculty SME’s approval of your well-being topic, complete the following:? Select from the Walden Library five peer-reviewed research articles within the realm of your approved topic. All articles should be current (i.e., 5 years or newer). At least one article must utilize a qualitative design (Note: In rare cases, a qualitative study may not be available for your chosen topic. In those cases, contact your Faculty SMEs for guidance). Review and use the Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix to organize and gather your research. Review the PowerPoint presentation template and other resources found in Module 2 Learning Activity 2 for information about how to create your narrated PowerPoint presentation. Your Psychology of Personality Research and Well-Being Analysis should include the following: Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment. PART 1: PERSONALITY AND WELL-BEING LITERATURE REVIEW MATRIX Using the Personality and Well-Being Literature Review Matrix, populate the matrix with the following requested information about the five articles related to your well-being topic of interest that is personally or professionally relevant to you and that relates to the connection between a given personality construct and enhanced well-being. Research topic Article citations in APA format Design of study (e.g., quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, meta-analysis, case study, etc.) Research questions Methodology (e.g., participants, questionnaires, etc.) Results of study Take-home message of the study (i.e., what does this study say about enhancing the well-being of individuals?) PART 2: PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY RESEARCH AND WELL-BEING POWERPOINT (12–14 SLIDES; NARRATED) Using the PowerPoint template, and supported by the information in your matrix, your narrated presentation must include the following: Note: Each slide in the PowerPoint presentation template contains notes in italics that clarify the required information/directions for each slide. These notes should be removed when you create your PowerPoint. Title Slide (1 slide—Slide 1) Presentation title: Include your name, your credentials, and university name. Introduction (1 slide—Slide 2) Purpose of the presentation: Introduce your topic and describe its connection between a given personality construct and enhanced well-being. Research Summary (5 slides; 1 per article—Slides 3–7) For each of your five, current (5 years or newer), peer-reviewed research articles from the Walden Library and related to your topic of well-being, include the following information. (Note: One of your articles must utilize a qualitative design. In rare cases, a qualitative study may not be available for your chosen topic. In those cases, contact your Faculty SMEs for guidance.) Articles 1–5 APA citation Findings of the study (bulleted) What this study says about enhancing the well-being of individuals Results Synthesis (2–3 slides—Slides 8–10) Synthesize the results from the five (5) studies. As you consider the results of these five (5) studies, what can you conclude about this area in personality and well-being? What is the “take-home” message from these studies? Be sure to consider the role of culture in the development of this “take-home” message. Practical Applications (2 slides—Slides 11–12) Using the “take-home” message you formulated in Slides 10–12, offer some very practical suggestions of what these studies suggest people can do to enhance their (and others’) well-being. Be sure to consider the role of culture in these practical applications/suggestions. References (1–2 slides—Slides 13–14) Use APA format Be specific, provide examples, and justify your response with citations from the Resources in your Learning Activities or from your search from the literature and/or the Walden Library.

rst, I want you to assess your implicit biases at the following Implicit Assessment site. You can choose any of the following tests: Disability IAT Gender Career IAT Age IAT Skin Tone IAT Religion IAT Weight IAT Sexuality IAT Race IAT Gender IAT Then, I want you to create a post where you address the following: After taking the implicit bias test of your choice, read through the full website to learn more about Implicit Bias, how we learn it, and how we can overcome it. Then, create a post and share the most interesting thing you learned from the website. (3 points) Describe a time where you either discriminated against someone, or where you were the target of discrimination. Based on what you have learned in the chapter, what factors do you believe may have contributed to the feelings of prejudice that outlined that event? (3 points) Locate a resource (video, website, lesson plan, poem, worksheet, image, article) that could be valuable at helping us to better understand the negative implications of prejudice and promote a spirit of tolerance and compassion for diverse people and viewpoints. (3 points) For example, The following video represents a spoken word poetry artist sharing some wisdom about sexuality and how some may hold prejudicial views about people based on their sexual orientation: https://youtu.be/IpKI11XqCgg Please use the following words to answer the questions below. Milgram’s Study, Cooperation, Cognitive Element, Altruism, Prejudice, Fundamental Attribution Error, Saliency Bias, Group Polarization, Informational Social Influence, Social Psychology, Cognitive Dissonance, Empathy Altruism Hypothesis, Norms, Obedience, Egoistic Model, Romantic Love, Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis, Interpersonal Attraction, Deindividualization, Companionate Love, Attributions, Diffusion of Responsibility, Group Think, Conformity, Attitudes, Discrimination, Fundamental Attribution, Reference Groups 1. The act of following a direct command, usually from an authority figure. Can be decreased by holding people individually responsible for their own behavior. 2. A group's movement toward either riskier or more conservative behavior depending on the members' initial dominant tendencies. 3. Misjudgment of others' behavior as stemming from internal dispositions rather than external situational causes. 4. The study of how other people influence a person's thoughts feelings and actions. 5. The belief that helping others is truly selfless and motivated out of our concern for others. 6. A love between couples based on an intense attraction and excitement, but largely based on illusion and which is short lived. 7. Positive feelings toward another, which is influenced by similarity, culture, and exposure. 8. A tendency to feel less self conscious, less inhibited, and less personally responsible as a member of a group rather than when you are alone. due to a sense of anonymity. 9. Explanations for events or behaviors that make us feel safer and in control. 10. Faulty decision making that occurs when a highly cohesive group strives for agreement and avoids inconsistent information. 11. Change in behavior due to real or perceived group pressures. 12. Learned predispositions to respond cognitively, affectively, and behaviorally to particular objects in a particular way. 13. A negative action toward an individual based on prejudice. 14. One aspect of attributions based on an assumption that an event or behavior stems from an individual's internal disposition rather than situational factors. 15. We look toward these as people we like and admire in our decision to conform or not to conform. 16. The element of an attitude related to our thoughts or views on a specific topic. 17. Prejudgment. A learned, generally negative attitude directed toward a specific person solely because of their membership in an identified group. 18. An assumption that others have more information than you do, and thus you are more likely to conform to their behavior. 19. Our tendency to focus on a specific behavior because it is more noticeable rather than the situation itself. 20. A feeling of discomfort caused by a discrepancy between an attitude and a behavior or between two attitudes. 21. Expected behaviors that are adhered to by members of a group that often provide order, safety, and predictability. 22. The belief that we help others only for the hope of reciprocation, or because it offers us a positive feeling or reward in exchange. 23. Aversive stimuli creates anger, which for some leads to aggression. 24. A strong, lasting attraction based on admiration, respect, trust, deep caring, and commitment. 25. The dilution, or diffusion, of personal responsibility for acting by spreading responsibility among all the other group members. 26. A method of getting members of different groups to work together toward a goal, which also can reduce prejudice. 27. Actions designed to help others with no obvious benefit to the helper. 28. The electric shock study that showed people's incredible tendency toward obedience, which could be increased by watching others obey.

Choose only one of the two following prompts to build your essay around. Each prompt will be associated with one of the chapters we have studied. Make sure to address every aspect of the prompt to receive a high grade. 1) [Chapter 3: God/Religion]: This prompt has two parts!!!! [You must use sources from Fyodor Dostoevsky, Hegel, and Blaise Pascal] Which type of God discussed in this chapter is most compelling to you? Even if you do not believe in God, choose the one that is most likely to appeal to you, as this is a good practice to figure out what kind of person you are. [For example: a Deist perspective would show that you might be intrigued by scientific solutions]. After deciding which one to choose from, present at least two reasons why this is a compelling version of God. Try to be both analytical and communicable. Make your reasons clear and presentable. Each reason should have enough details to take up at least one paragraph. [You Use examples to further clarify your reasons. Have at least two external sources for your research. Here is a list of options you may choose from: [You must use sources from Fyodor Dostoevsky, Hegel, and Blaise Pascal] a) Orthodox Christian Tradition of God: Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnibenevolent; Trinity of “The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” b) Anthropomorphic God: One that is similar to humans, but instead has the best version of our qualities; for example, God is the most compassionate, most loving, most powerful, wisest intellect, etc. c) God as an Impersonal Creator (Deist perspective): Started up the universe but leaves it alone after that, similar to having a Big Bang role d) God as Transcendent: Being beyond our world, but could be knowable through either reason or mystical experiences (personal, immediate ones) e) God as present through our relationships with other people. Our way of knowing God is through our positive interactions with others. (View of Karl Rahner and Gustavo Gutiérrez) f) God as Immanent (maybe even Pantheism): God is present within our world and even within us. God is heavily involved with the current fabric of our universe. G) God as Spirit: Not a static entity, but more of an ever-present force that keeps developing. This is God as a process of becoming h) God as Object of Faith: One cannot know God, but it is through ever-persistent faith that we encounter God’s presence I) God as Moral Being: God’s existence is evident through the moral order established in this world Then after presenting your two reasons, choose one of the following arguments about knowing God that is most appealing to you. When describing this argument, make sure to explain what the argument is and why it is appealing. Here is a list of options: A) Cosmological Argument B) Argument from Design C) Ontological Argument D) Rational Faith E) Pascal’s Wager F) Irrational Faith BASIC FORMAT FOR THIS PROMPT: 1) Introduction with a thesis statement that includes your position and how you will argue for it. 2) Two body paragraphs, each centered on one major reason why the version of God you have chosen is compelling. Your reason is clear: you have examples to support them. 3) One or two body paragraphs detailing which argument from the list above is most compelling to you. You explain the argument while also expressing why it is important. 4) Conclusion- This can be short; just a short wrap up of the essay. 2) [Chapter Four: The Nature of Reality]: Explain and defend what you consider to be most real. Are you a materialist by believing physical or material components to be most real (atoms, the physical elements, electrons, electromagnetic forces, etc.) or are you an immaterialist that believes that the immaterial is most real (spirit, mind, Plato’s forms, ideas, etc.). Or are you a dualist who believes that both are equally real? Use the following two principles to make your case: 1) Whatever is most real is that which does not depend upon anything else to make it what it is; 2) Whatever is most real is resistant to change, in that it does not get destroyed or created. I highly recommend looking at some of the philosophers in this chapter to help guide your thought process. [You must use sources from Hume, Schelling, and Nietzsche] For instance, consider: a) Materialism: Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes, Heraclitus, Democritus, or any modern scientific view b) Immaterialism: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Zeno of Elea, Plato (Plato’s Forms), Idealism, Berkeley, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Leibniz c) Both are equal: Aristotle, Descartes, Spinoza (both are the same substance), This essay must be at least 600 words. When arguing for your position, explain what immaterialism/materialism means. Use the two principles above to serve as reasons for your choice. Then utilize components of the philosophers in this chapter to guide your ideas and to perhaps serve as examples. Have at least two external sources for your research, as sources can be one of the best ways to generate reasons and creative ideas. BASIC FORMAT: [You must use sources from Hume, Schelling, and Nietzsche] 1) Introduction: Includes your thesis statement, in which you clearly state your position 2) Within your body paragraphs you explain what materialism/immaterialism is. Give examples to clarify your explanation. Then demonstrate your position by appealing to the two principles above. 3) Within your body paragraphs, you appeal to another philosopher(s) as to what their position is on the matter to provide support for your own position. This may be a good spot to appeal to external sources here if you wish. 4) Conclusion: short wrap of the main points of the essay.

Identify a social justice issue (LGBTQ+, refugee, English Second languge, et) in the school or the community that you feel strongly about and would like to address. Develop an advocacy plan using the Social Justice Advocacy Form attached. Please readtwo articles attached to guide your work. For additional resources about School Psychology and Social Justice please visit https://www.nasponline.org/social-justice

INSTRUCTIONS Case Study:Minnie is a 10-year-old student with autism who exhibits disruptive behaviors in class. Her teacher believes that identifying her preferences could help in developing an effective reinforcement strategy to reduce these behaviors. You are tasked with conducting a preference assessment.Step 1: Conduct an Indirect Assessment by interviewing Minnie's parents and teachers.Step 2: Perform a Direct Assessment using the Multiple Stimulus without Replacement (MSWO) method.Questions:a. What information would you seek during the Indirect Assessment interview?b. Describe the procedure you would follow to conduct the MSWO assessment with Minnie.c. How would you analyze the data from the MSWO assessment to create a preference hierarchy?d. Discuss how you would use the results of the preference assessment to develop a reinforcement strategy for Minnie. Assignment Requirements: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message. The submission must be APA 7 formatted. The assignment should be a minimum of 3-5 pages. Please include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations as needed. The title page and reference page are not included in the page requirement. Rubric:Understanding: Demonstrates a clear understanding of preference assessments, their types, and their application. (7 pts)Application: Ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios, especially in the case study analysis. (7 pts)Critical Thinking: Evaluates the efficacy of preference assessments with well-reasoned arguments and evidence. (7 pts)Clarity: Responses are clear, well-organized, and free of grammatical errors. (2 pts)APA 7 format: (2pts)

https://www.ridester.com/uber-vs-lyft/ This is a personal view and you do not have to agree with it. However, for this discussion board question, assume yourself as a manager of a cab company and you want to be in the market where lot of customers use Uber and Lyft for travelling. Based on the attached comparison, how would you want to position your company? What do you think you need to do to make your company competitive in the market?