Expert Answers

please create a discussion post following the instructions and the rubric: Instructions: Locate a mass media article published within the last year that describes findings of an epidemiological study. Be sure that the article is about an epidemiological study and not another area of population health. Then, use the Walden Library to locate the peer-reviewed research article on which the mass media report is based. Post a response to the following: Briefly summarize the study you found, and then include the citations for both the mass media and the peer-reviewed articles. Explain what epidemiological concepts are included in the mass media article (e.g., measures of association, study design, confounders, and bias) and how they compare to those in the peer-reviewed article. Give your assessment of how well the mass media article represented the actual research that was conducted. Describe any obvious omissions from the mass media article that epidemiologists critiquing the study would need to know. Finally, imagine that a patient brings this mass media article to you and asks you for your informed opinion. Explain how you would respond or interpret the article for the patient. Rubric: RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points): Discussion posts minimum requirements: The original posting must be completed by Day 3 at 11:59pm ET. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Day 6 at 11:59pm ET. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the peer posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in Standard Academic English and follow APA 7 style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week's learning resources as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) 20 to >19.0 ptsExcellent• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Detailed response to faculty. 19 to >15.0 ptsGood• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Appropriate reply to faculty. 15 to >12.0 ptsFair• Discussion postings and responses are somewhat responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort. 12 to >0 ptsPoor• Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Post (30 possible points) 30 to >29.0 ptsExcellentInitial Discussion posting: • Post demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of content and/or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. 29 to >23.0 ptsGoodInitial Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. 23 to >18.0 ptsFairInitial Discussion posting: • Post may lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. 18 to >0 ptsPoorInitial Discussion posting: • Post lacks in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis. • Posts do not generalize, extend thinking or evaluate concepts and issues within the topic or context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly resources are not provided. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: First Response (20 possible points) 20 to >19.0 ptsExcellentDiscussion response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides rich and relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that demonstrates new perspectives, and synthesis of ideas supported by the literature. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Posts on separate day. 19 to >15.0 ptsGoodDiscussion response: • Contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Posts on separate day. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairDiscussion response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. • Posts on separate day. 12 to >0 ptsPoorDiscussion response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant examples or ideas. • There is a lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. • Posts on same day. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: Second Response (20 possible points) 20 to >19.0 ptsExcellentDiscussion response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that demonstrates new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of ideas supported by the literature. • Second response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • Posts on separate day. 19 to >15.0 ptsGoodDiscussion response: • Contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Second response is supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly sources including course and outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted. • Posts on separate day. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairDiscussion response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • Minimal scholarly sources provided to support post. • Posts on separate day. 12 to >0 ptsPoorDiscussion response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant examples or ideas. • No sources provided. • Posts on same day. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQUALITY OF WRITING (10 possible points) 10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentDiscussion postings and responses exceed doctoral level writing expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear, concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing. • Make few if any errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodDiscussion postings and responses meet doctoral level writing expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear and appropriate to doctoral level writing • Makes a few errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints. 8 to >6.0 ptsFairDiscussion postings and responses are somewhat below doctoral level writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English that affect clear communication. • Numerous errors in APA 7 format • May be less than courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints. 6 to >0 ptsPoorDiscussion postings and responses are well below doctoral level writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English that affect clear communication. • Uses incorrect APA 7 format • Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints. 10 pts Total Points: 100 Resources to look into: Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024). Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice (4th ed.). Springer. Chapter 6, “Applying Evidence at the Population Level” (pp. 128-157) Chapter 7, “Using Information Technology to Improve Population Outcomes” (pp. 158-182) Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practiceLinks to an external site.(6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett. Appendix A, “Guide to the Critical Appraisal of an Epidemiologic/Public Health Research Article” American Journal of Health Behavior. (n.d.). Writing a press release Links to an external site.. https://ajhb.org/journal/writing-press-release The James Lind Library. (n.d.). https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/Links to an external site. Hammes, L. S., Rossi, A. P., Pedrotti, L. G., Pitrez, P. M., Mutlaq, M. P., & Rosa, R. G. (2021). Is the press properly presenting the epidemiological data on COVID-19? An analysis of newspapers from 25 countriesLinks to an external site.. Journal of Public Health Policy, 42(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-021-00298-7 Shah, H. M., & Chung, K. C. (2009). Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicineLinks to an external site.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 124(3), 982–988. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03928 Walden University Doctoral Capstone Form and Style. (n.d.). APA style for capstone writers: Abstracts for the capstone .Links to an external site.https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/formandstyle/apa/abstracts#:~:text=The%20abstract%20should%20begin%20on,exceed%20one%20page%20in%20length Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals .Links to an external site. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

Title page Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent, including brand and generic names, as well as appropriate FDA indication uses Any supporting, valid, and reliable research for non-FDA uses Drug classification The medication mechanism of action The medication pharmacokinetics The medication pharmacodynamics Appropriate dosing, administration route, and any considerations for dosing alterations Considerations of use and dosing in specific specialty populations, such as children, adolescents, elderly, pregnant people, those exhibiting suicidal behaviors, etc. Definition of half-life, why half-life is important, and the half-life for your assigned medication  Side effects/adverse reactions potential Discuss clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia Note: Be sure to include screening tools that would be utilized. Contraindications for use including significant drug to drug interactions Overdose considerations Diagnostics and labs monitoring comorbidities considerations Legal, ethical, and social considerations Pertinent patient education considerations References page Support your rationale with a minimum of three (3) academic resources.

Description as per attached 1 attachments Slide 1 of 1 attachment_1 attachment_1 UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Assignment 3 Logistics Management (MGT 322) General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY • • • • • The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page. Students must mention question number clearly in their answer. Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism). Logistics Management ASSIGNMENT -3 Submission Date by students: 05/12/2025 Place of Submission: Students Grade Centre Learning Outcome: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of how global competitive environments are changing supply chain management and logistics practice. 2. Apply essential elements of core logistic and supply chain management principles. 3. Analyse and identify challenges and issues pertaining to logistical processes. Assignment Workload: This assignment is an individual assignment. Critical Thinking The changes in the present competitive business environment are characterized by profound competition on the supply side and keen indecisive in customer requirements on the demand side. These changes have left their distinctive marks on the different aspect of the manufacturing organizations (Gomes et al., 2006). With this increasing global economy, cost effective manufacturing has become a requirement to remain competitive. Increased global competition leads the industry to increasing efficiency by means of economies of scale and internal specialization so as to meet market conditions in terms of flexibility, delivery performance and quality (Yamashina, 1995). To achieve this goal, different manufacturing and supply techniques have been employed. The last quarter of the 20th century witnessed the adoption of world-class, lean and integrated manufacturing strategies that have drastically changed the way manufacturing firm’s leads to improvement of manufacturing performance (Fullerton and McWatters, 2002). Read textbook chapter 7 or secondary data on the internet and answer the following questions. Question: 1. Why did major manufacturers adopt lean thinking and the Just-In-Time (JIT) model? 2. Define the main categories of waste and why overproduction is the root cause of all waste that businesses need to prevent during production. 3. The development of artificial intelligence. Is the agile supply chain a perfect notion for SCM in the future? Give examples to support your answer. 4. APA style Reference (1.0 Marks) Note: Each answer should be within the 300- 400 words limit. 

Description n Chapter 8 of your textbook, read the case study "Business Case: Superior Engineering in Texas: Stay or Go?" https://sk.sagepub.com/cases/superior-engineering-in-texas-stay-or-go After reading the case study, address the following questions in a minimum of three pages: Does Superior fit the definition of a small business or an entrepreneurial venture? Please explain. Reconcile the executive team's concerns regarding Texas's poor performance with Figures 1–3 in the case. Complete a vertical analysis for both Superior without the Texas SBU and for the Texas SBU as a separate analysis. Why has Texas struggled to be profitable? What does a vertical analysis of Superior's financials suggest about the Texas operation versus Superior as a whole? What are your recommendations for Superior and the Texas operation? Should the Texas operation be discontinued? Why, or why not? Based on your answer, describe how you would handle the human resource management (HRM) decisions related to your decision to keep or discontinue the Texas operation. Summarize how your analysis impacts HR activities. In your analysis, you must propose one entrepreneurial action or solution (a nontraditional solution) that would benefit the company.

Description You need to have SEO skills and Wix.com experience (Building onto a website I made)Assignment #4 Website – PR, Blogs and Link Strategy PART B Instruction: 1. You will add additional pages to your website that will be optimized for SEO, GEO and AEO. 2. Your website should include a blog page (two blog posts) and a minimum of two additional optimized pages. Page categories can be your choice, below are suggestions: Skills – focus on digital marketing, social media badges. Certifications - add value by describing what skills each certification provides). Projects/Work samples Resume Page or Work experience (do not publish personal details, phone # or address) Videos Blog/Stories Testimonials 3. Each webpage should: Minimum of 300 words. One page on your website must be 1,000 words (blog page is recommended) Apply Website Design and Accessibility best practices to all webpages Apply Keyword and On-page SEO principles. 1. Link to website https://elevatesolutions60.wixstudio.com/seoprofessional101 2. SEO Keyword Strategy for additional pages 5–6 keyword phrases used to target across your site. Base your choices on your niche, location, or interests. Original keyword phrases + links to additional pages where the keyword phrases are used. 3. Meta Titles & Descriptions Create a sample title tag (correct # of characters) and meta description (correct # of characters) for your homepage. Add screenshots for each additional page created. 4. Wix Analytics Analytics for website performance and webpage details and overview of performance to date. Screenshots of analytics + analysis of performance Grading Rubric (25 points) Criteria What to Look For Home Page + Branding (3 points) Clear message, value proposition, personal branding, and a call-to-action. Minimum 300 words. Additional Pages (6 points) Two or more pages (e.g. Portfolio, Resume, Testimonials) showcasing work, experience, or volunteer projects. Blog Page (4 points) At least one blog post (750-1000 words) that is relevant, well-written, and optimized. On-page SEO (4 points) Each page includes unique meta titles/descriptions, relevant keyword use, image alt text, and internal links. AEO + GEO Elements (3 points) Uses brief, structured summaries (1–2 sentences) on key pages to help answer common search queries. Includes geo-context where relevant (e.g. 'Digital Marketer based in Halifax, NS'). I Designed for scan ability. I am a Digital Marketer, based in Antigonish, Nova Scotia Writing Quality (3 points) Content is clear, engaging, and organized. Minimal grammar/spelling issues. Matches brand, tone and consistency throughout website. Performance Evidence (2 points) Includes screenshots of Wix analytics and PageSpeed Insights (desktop or mobile). No premium tools required. 25 points Total Grade UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW MKTG 5030 Assignment #1 and #4 Personal Website Value: 20 points Assignment #4 Website – PR, Blogs and Link Strategy PART B Instruction: 1. You will add additional pages to your website that will be optimized for SEO, GEO and AEO. 2. Your website should include a blog page (two blog posts) and a minimum of two additional optimized pages. Page categories can be your choice, below are suggestions: • Skills – focus on digital marketing, social media badges. • Certifications - add value by describing what skills each certification provides). • Projects/Work samples • Resume Page or Work experience (do not publish personal details, phone # or address) • Videos • Blog/Stories • Testimonials 3. Each webpage should: • • • • Minimum of 300 words. One page on your website must be 1,000 words (blog page is recommended) Apply Website Design and Accessibility best practices to all webpages Apply Keyword and On-page SEO principles. MKTG 5030 Assignment #1 and #4 Personal Website Value: 20 points 1. Link to website https://elevatesolutions60.wixstudio.com/seoprofessional101 2. SEO Keyword Strategy for additional pages 5–6 keyword phrases used to target across your site. Base your choices on your niche, location, or interests. Original keyword phrases + links to additional pages where the keyword phrases are used. 3. Meta Titles & Descriptions Create a sample title tag (correct # of characters) and meta description (correct # of characters) for your homepage. Add screenshots for each additional page created. 4. Wix Analytics Analytics for website performance and webpage details and overview of performance to date. Screenshots of analytics + analysis of performance MKTG 5030 Assignment #1 and #4 Personal Website Value: 20 points Grading Rubric (25 points) Criteria What to Look For Home Page + Branding (3 points) Clear message, value proposition, personal branding, and a call-to-action. Minimum 300 words. Additional Pages (6 points) Two or more pages (e.g. Portfolio, Resume, Testimonials) showcasing work, experience, or volunteer projects. Blog Page (4 points) At least one blog post (750-1000 words) that is relevant, well-written, and optimized. On-page SEO (4 points) Each page includes unique meta titles/descriptions, relevant keyword use, image alt text, and internal links. AEO + GEO Elements (3 points) Uses brief, structured summaries (1–2 sentences) on key pages to help answer common search queries. Includes geo-context where relevant (e.g. 'Digital Marketer based in Halifax, NS'). I Designed for scan ability. I am a Digital Marketer, based in Antigonish, Nova Scotia Writing Quality (3 points) Content is clear, engaging, and organized. Minimal grammar/spelling issues. Matches brand, tone and consistency throughout website. Performance Evidence (2 points) Includes screenshots of Wix analytics and PageSpeed Insights (desktop or mobile). No premium tools required. 25 points Total Grade MKTG 5030 Assignment #1 and #4 Personal Website Value: 20 points

Description All requirements in the attachment Similarity should be less than 10% AI should be zero UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW BUSS 312 Class participation ( 5 Marks for class participation) The student will be evaluated on the basis of his/her attendance (upto 2nd Mid- Term only) and the active participation in class activities (case studies ) 3 case studies + Attendences Buss 312 Assignment Assignment #1 ( 10 Marks) Define M-Commerce and describe its key enablers in context of Oman (apps, payment systems, 5G, etc.). Explain in your own word how M-Commerce enhances customer experience and loyalty. • Provide an examples from any local companies with example (Minimum 2500 Words) Note :- The student should not copy or use AI for this work , he can use authentic resource and cite then in APA style. (This is an individual Assignment)\\ • • • • Use table charts and graphs, diagram wherever required Plagerized and AI Generated, outsourced work may result in 0 Marks The assignment must be submitted in WORD Assessment Rubrics ssessment Matrix (Rubric) Criteria Excellent (A) Good (B) Satisfactory (C) Demonstrates clear, in-depth Good understanding of Basic understanding Understanding S-Commerce and understanding; with minor of Concepts M-Commerce lacks depth or errors or missing concepts with clarity. links. accurate terminology. Insightful analysis Clear examples Examples Case Study with strong, with some mentioned but Analysis relevant examples analysis. weak analysis. Needs Improvement Weight (D/F) Limited or inaccurate 20% understanding. Examples missing or irrelevant. 25% Criteria Excellent (A) Good (B) Satisfactory (C) Needs Improvement Weight (D/F) and critical evaluation. Comprehensive and well-structured Clear Partial or Comparative comparison No meaningful comparison with descriptive 15% Analysis between Scomparison. some gaps. comparison. Commerce and MCommerce. Demonstrates originality and Limited Lacks Application & practical insights Some originality application or originality and 15% Creativity in applying and relevance. creative application. concepts to thinking. business scenarios. Well-organized, Mostly logical flow, Acceptable but Poorly Organization organized with professional lacks flow or organized or 10% & Presentation minor formatting, and clarity. unclear. inconsistencies. visuals (if used). Proper APA 7 Few sources or References & style with reliable Minor citation No or incorrect inconsistent 5% Citation and diverse errors. referencing. format. sources. Clear, concise, Understandable Difficult to Language & Minor language error-free but with read or poorly 10% Clarity issues. academic writing. frequent errors. written. Total = 100 marks (Grade will be scaled accordingly) Assignment 2 (5 Marks) Create a social commerce presence for a local (Dhofari) product/service using any two platform. like Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, or WhatsApp Business etc. Requirements: • • • Create a product page or campaign post(s). Include product photos, description, pricing, and purchase/contact link. Use hashtags, influencer tags, and interactive tools (polls, reels, or stories). • • Collect data on engagement (likes, comments, shares, followers) for at least 5–7 days. Analyze how the platform’s features support buying decisions. Deliverables: • Screenshot evidence or short screen recording. Criteria Excellent (A) Good (B) Satisfactory (C) Fair Integration of S-commerce Strong linkage between theory and practice; clear comparative insights. Partial linkage with some analysis. Limited conceptual understanding. Missing or incorrect linkage. 1 Creativity & Innovation Highly original, relevant, and visually appealing work. Good creativity Minimal with some creativity. originality. Copy-paste or generic. 2 Organized Understandable Unclear or and clear but lacks incomplete with minor polish. presentation. issues. 2 Clear, confident, Presentation & engaging, and Communication professional delivery.

Description Class Preparation Materials: Required Readings: Bernstein, S. (2015). Does going public affect innovation? The Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1365-1403. Chok, J., & Qian, J. (2013). Do executives' backgrounds matter to IPO investors? Evidence from the life science industry. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e60911. Kerr, W. R., & Nanda, R. (2011). Financing constraints and entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of research on innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 331-353). Edward Elgar Publishing. Kerr, W. R., & Nanda, R. (2015). Financing innovation. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), 445-462. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31(4), 674-692. Maksimovic, V., & Pichler, P. (2001). Technological innovation and initial public offerings. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 459-494. Capital Markets and Innovation Discussion For this week’s discussion, answer the following questions in at least 100 words each: What do investors buy when they invest in start-up firms with no substantial assets in place? Does going public affect the innovation output of firms? If so, through what mechanisms does going public influence innovation? What are the key financing mechanisms used to support innovation? How do these financing mechanisms impact the nature and extent of innovation? What is the contribution of venture capital to innovation? How does venture capital financing influence the rate and direction of technological change? How do financing constraints affect entrepreneurial activity and innovation? What are the consequences of these constraints for the development of new firms and technologies?

Description In your summative assessment, you will interview 3 leaders with different roles in the workplace. From those interviews you will create artifacts that share their approaches in leadership and how they implement initiatives along with your analysis of their style and effectiveness. You will also give recommendations for improvements. Here are the main points for you to consider in your interviews and artifact: 1. Names of all three leaders and their roles in the organization. Make sure all three are different in roles and leadership approaches. 2. Initiative titles and summaries on initiatives all three leaders are working to implement. These should all be different with different leadership for each. 3. Describe the importance of ethics for the leaders of these organizations and how it impacts their ability to lead and implement necessary changes. 4. Provide your analysis of the leader and performance of initiative implementation for each leader. You are given three options to choose from to complete your summative artifact. We also encourage you to conduct your own research when preparing your artifact. Make sure your submission is formatted according to APA guidelines where appropriate. eBook Create an ebook providing a summary with analysis and recommendations from your interviews of three leaders with their initiatives. You will also provide your analysis and recommendations for improvement. (10-15 pages) Include graphics. Document Type/Template: An eBook (10 -15 pages) using eBook tips with graphics to highlight 3 leaders, their initiatives, leadership approaches, and ethics, followed by your analysis and recommendations for improvements of each. UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW 1 In your summative assessment, you will interview 3 leaders with different roles in the workplace. From those interviews you will create artifacts that share their approaches in leadership and how they implement initiatives along with your analysis of their style and effectiveness. You will also give recommendations for improvements. Here are the main points for you to consider in your interviews and artifact: 1. Names of all three leaders and their roles in the organization. Make sure all three are different in roles and leadership approaches. 2. Initiative titles and summaries on initiatives all three leaders are working to implement. These should all be different with different leadership for each. 3. Describe the importance of ethics for the leaders of these organizations and how it impacts their ability to lead and implement necessary changes. 4. Provide your analysis of the leader and performance of initiative implementation for each leader. You are given three options to choose from to complete your summative artifact. We also encourage you to conduct your own research when preparing your artifact. Make sure your submission is formatted according to APA guidelines where appropriate. eBook Create an ebook providing a summary with analysis and recommendations from your interviews of three leaders with their initiatives. You will also provide your analysis and recommendations for improvement. (10-15 pages) Include graphics. Document Type/Template: 2 • An eBook (10 -15 pages) using eBook tips with graphics to highlight 3 leaders, their initiatives, leadership approaches, and ethics, followed by your analysis and recommendations for improvements of each. 3

Description UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Learning Outcomes: After completion of Assignment three students will be able to understand the following CLO2: Examine the role of the financial system in the economy and the rationale for financial intermediation. CL04: Compare and contrast the role of and function of organized financial markets and financial intermediaries. The assignment consists of two part; part A and part B Part A- Assignment Questions (10 Marks ): 1. Should Price Stability be the Primary Goal? Discuss. (2 marks) 2. Compare and contrast the characteristics of the various money market instruments (3 marks) 3. In the U.S., the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (2000) removed derivative securities, such as CDSs, from regulatory oversight. This change opened the door for speculators to bet on the health of a company or pool of assets and was certainly a culprit in the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Why did Congress pass such legislation? (5 marks) Part B- Powerpoint Presentations (Submission 5 marks + Presentation 5 marks total =10 Marks): Describe the regulation and structure of the thrift industry and compare it to that of the commercial banking industry. (Submission 5 marks and presentation 5 marks). Note Complete the assignment in word file followed by references Paste the PPT slides below as follows (remove the template and paste the one that you prepared) Number of slides should not exceed 8. Answers Part A- Assignment Questions (10 Marks ): 1. Answer- 2. Answer-

and that will help our products stay at the leading edge as well. In response to a question about open source