Expert Answers

: Clearly and concisely answer each of the following questions in no more than 250-300 words: a half, double-spaced typed page of 12 point Times New Roman with one-inch margins, header, and footer.You will not receive credit for any part of your answer that exceeds this space restriction.

Question : Suppose Mill's theory of utilitarianism is true. Should you eat meat? Carefully explain your answer. Possible Outline to follow: 1-3 sentences explaining the general importance or overarching theme of the philosophy discussed in the whole reading assignment. 2-3 sentences answering the direct comprehension question. 2-3 sentences demonstrating your knowledge of the question or general philosophy using a specific and real-world example or scenario. 2-3 sentences connecting to another major concept from the reading. There are usually several concepts/ideas that can be woven together to show a deep understanding of the theory in question. Criterion Score Research Comprehension Question Criteria 5 points All relevant points addressed in an articulate and thorough manner. Student's response is written concisely in their own words. Serious preparation and reflection demonstrated. Accurate and thorough exposition of the text provided. Answer demonstrated significant quality time spent with the text and with the course material. Student's response indicated that quality time had been spent studying, reflecting, and critically engaging with the ideas and arguments at hand. Response is free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 4 points All relevant points addressed, though some part is not expressed well or is slightly incorrect. Student's response is written concisely in their own words. Adequate preparation and reflection demonstrated. Thorough exposition of the text provided, with minor inaccuracies. Student's response demonstrated engagement with all required readings and course materials. Response has minor (1-2) errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 3 points Most important points are addressed. A few ideas are poorly expressed or incorrect. Student's response is written concisely, but with excessive (more than 2) use of direct quotes from the text. Answer demonstrates surface-level engagement with the text. Response has several errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 2 points Incorrect, but with some accurate elements, or missing substantial important elements. Student's response is not written concisely, or the bulk of the response consists of direct quotes from the text. Answer demonstrates inadequate engagement with the text. Critical connections between ideas are missing. Response has an excessive number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 1 point Disrespectful response, or incorrect response that demonstrates complete lack of familiarity with text

RESPONSE PAPER INSTRUCTIONS Format: Use standard MLA format for writing an essay. Include... -Title Page with Class, Instructor, Date, Student Name and Student ID Number -Body of paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, Times New Roman -In-text citations with author and page number, example: (Miller, 24) -Works Cited Page, must include at least two different sources -Word Count: 500-750 words Save your paper as a PDF document and upload it on UR Courses. Topics: Select a topic from Week 7, 8, or 9 of class. You must take either an affirmative or opposed position. Here are some recommended topics. Choose only one of the following... John Stuart Mill is (correct / incorrect) that ethics is a calculation aimed at providing the most happiness to the most people. Policing (does / does not) need extensive systematic reforms to be a community good. Indigenous philosophy (can / cannot) help solve today's environmental problems. Create your own topic closely related to the issues discussed in class. Content of Paper: THESIS Take an affirmative or opposition position on your topic. Make this thesis the first line of your paper. DEFINE THE MORAL PROBLEM You will need to give a detailed description of the moral issue being discussed. Pick a specific case study as an example. What is included? What is not included? Define any technical terms. Describe what choices are possible for a person faced with this moral problem. What should a real person in such a situation choose to do? ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE Support your thesis. Explain how a person can solve the moral problem they face. Give arguments for why your solution is the best one. Use citations from both the class readings and your own research. Give facts and examples that support how your thesis provides the best position on how to solve moral problems. OBJECTION AND REPLY Finally, you must generate one objection and one reply. Objection: Raise an argument that shows how your thesis may not be correct. Reply: Raise a counter-argument to show that the objection is false and that your thesis is true after all. Contact the class instructor if you have any questions about the assignment. (Choose the Third topic for this assignment Indigenous philosophy (can / cannot) help solve today's environmental problems.)

In Chapter 9 of the course text, pages 89-90, Dr. Thompson defines a "livable city" as a dynamic, organic eco-community of nature, places, people, institutions, cultures, and commerce that enables the present generation to flourish without compromising capabilities and opportunities for future generations. Please prepare five to six slides explaining how businesses can support each component of the livable cities diagram.

Critical Incident Response Case Study This case study must be at least five pages of narrative and include an introduction and conclusion. The requirement is to analyze the response to a critical incident. Pay special attention to the issues of leadership, communications, and organization. Be sure to include a title page and reference/citation page. For all written assignments in this course, do not include an abstract or table of contents and examine issues only in the United States.

A paper regarding... It's really an easy question, don't let it scare you. I'll simplify: Part One "What is the strongest theory" Part Two "give an example of it in action." That said, use quotes and citations from the assigned readings, and make sure to write an academic essay. Respond to both parts, either in separate academic essays, or combined in one longer paper. Part One: We have looked at a number of ethical theories, central to these are Deontological Ethics (Kant), Teleological Ethics (J.S. Mill), Feminist Ethics, and Virtue Ethics (Aristotle); in addition, we have looked at several other theoretical orientations, the Stoics, St. Paul and St. Augustine, Postmodern theorists (S. Fish), Existential theorists (Camus, Sartre, Nietzsche), and Cosmopolitanism (K.A. Appiah): of the above, what do you think is the strongest theoretical orientation? Make sure to examine WHY you think your chosen theory is the strongest, and in doing so, make sure to include specific references to other theories that expose the weaknesses you see there. I am looking for you to display command of at least the “big three” theorists (Kant, Mill, Aristotle), as well as perhaps, some of the other material. Make sure to use references to back up your claims, including primary sources (use the text book and the readings I have given you throughout the semester). For example, if you chose Aristotle and Virtue Ethics as the best theory, examine what is weak about both Kant and Mill. If you feel that we need more than one theory, this is fine, however you will have to work to justify why. You might talk about the importance of being well versed in all major theoretical orientations, again using examples. 500+ words Part Two: Think about the topics in the applied ethics section of this course (examples including but not limited to: abortion, death penalty, end of life issues, environmental ethics, media ethics, medical issues, ethics and technology, cloning, the food system, water issues, class division, racial relations,) use a topic from this section to explain why the theory you are advocating is the best theory to address this particular issue. 500+ Words link attached are all the assigned readings https://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/greeks.html https://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/athenians.html http://www.dankalia.com/more/taoteching.pdf https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/ Mill, John Stuart: Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (utm.edu) Kant, Immanuel | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (utm.

Don't forget to write your total word count at the end! NO AI USE In recent years, a huge number of people have welcomed AI voice assistants—like Amazon's Alexa—into their homes. Initially, they promised to do basic information retrieval (e.g., fetching the weather report) and to incorporate centralized, always-on voice command into the smart home. But that is just the beginning. As these tools become more sophisticated, companies like Amazon and Google expect them to take on an increasing number and variety of tasks. One area of particular interest is health. For a number of years, data scientists have been exploring what always-on smart speakers can learn and infer about the people they listen to. Initial results indicate that they might be able to determine if someone is having a heart attack or has taken a fall. Recent research suggests they might be able to detect the onset of mental health issues. The goal for Questions 1-2 invite you to think about the ethical implications of using always-on smart assistants as health technologies. Questions 3-4 relate to the article from Helen Nissenbaum. ARTICLE PDF ATTACHED 1. What fairness issue(s) does this case raise? To clarify, how might using Alexa for health care purposes result in unfair outcomes? 2. What privacy issue(s) does this case raise? To clarify, how might using Alexa for health care purposes result in harm to user privacy? 3. From the Nissenbaum article, explain the (normative) “knock-down” argument against protecting privacy in public. Cite a short passage from the reading to support your reasoning. All evidence should be cited using in-text citations. 4. What is Nissenbaum's response to the "knock-down" argument? Be sure to explain what she calls "contextual integrity"? Cite a short passage from the reading to support your reasoning. All evidence should be cited using in-text citations.

Instructions: Answer the following question in five to seven complete double-spaced pages. You will need to include at least three direct quotes of one or two sentences from the Writings of the philosophers themselves as found in the text. The only citation needed for these quotes should be (Text, p. --). Your grade will also depend in part on your own personal commentary on the issues you discuss. If you prefer, you may write this paper in the "first person." Warning: This is not a "research paper." Your answer should be an essay based on what you have learned in the course from from the Course Lecture Notes and the readings from the Assigned Textbook. "Outside sources" should not be used (see Syllabus). Failure to comply with this requirement may lead to a lower grade including a possible grade of "0" or "F" for this assignment. You will also be severely penalized for using a "chatbot" to construct your essay for you. Prompt: What were the views of "the state of nature" held by each of the philosophers Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau? How did these views lead to the concepts of the "social contract" proposed by each? What are your own views on the topics discussed by these philosophers? This assignment is due on Tuesday, March 18th at 11:59 PM. Late submissions will be penalized according to the conditions laid out in the Syllabus.

Philosophy course. Please put 31 days if you want bid to be selected. Regarding "Week 1- Post your Introduction", I will send you my introduction. You need to answer the questions and reply to three peers. Regarding "Week 1- Discussion", After you have chosen one of the selections from Philosophical Texts, finish parts 1 and 2 of the assignment. Once you have done so, send it to me. I will submit the assignment and a voice recording of me reading the philosophical text out loud. I will keep sharing instructions for upcoming weeks work

Assessment Description Research and find an instance of a policy compliance issue that has occurred in an organization related to the field you are pursuing as your career (Government, Nonprofit, Health). Find an issue that has enough detail for you to do a thorough examination of the policy and the compliance issues involved. Review the policy compliance issue that occurred and offer an update to the policy in the form of a policy memo and an evaluation of the issue by doing the following: Part I: Analyze the problem you chose and write a 500-750-word policy memo that proposes improvements to the policy to better address the problem and improve the compliance issues. Be concise and follow the general structure of a policy memo. At a minimum, your policy memo should contain the following: A title A summary of the problem At least three possible solutions Statement and explanation of the recommended solution with rationale The implications and benefits of the recommended policy Brief conclusion At least three sources used to support claims Graphics and/or other visual elements so it reflects the formatting of a professional policy memo Part II: Create a presentation that briefly outlines the policy. Include your decision-making process for presenting the information contained in the policy. Explain the specific policy compliance issues that occurred and why your proposed update will help improve the compliance issues. Use two to three scholarly resources to support your decision-making process, some of the sources may be the same as sources used to support your recommendations in the policy memo. Your presentation will require an outline of your presentation speech or speaker notes depending on the format chosen for the presentation. For PowerPoint, 8-12 slides are required with speaker notes of 50-75 words for each slide. Reference information must be provided at the end of the presentation. Reference and title slides do not count as part of the slide count.