Expert Answers

Did you miss a lecture and worry that it will affect your grade (reminder that two of the lectures drop)? I have provided a make-up activity for up to two lectures. Watch the following videos: For these videos: Watch the video. For each video, provide a 200-word summaryfor each video of the lecture including key points. a 200-word analysis for each vidoe about how it connects to the themes of the course and the ideas of pre-modern race and POC in the middle ages. Please note that these will have a higher threshold for whether or not I will provide credit as it is makeup; subpar responses not to the standard described in the syllabus will not receive credit. Video one summary 200 words Video one Analysis 200 words Video two summary 200 words Vidoe two analysis 200 words. Answer

Take a look at the following map of Ibn Battuta's travels: Write a response about the travels of Ibn Battuta using the above map. What commonalities do the areas have? Would you expect someone to be able to travel these sorts of distances in this period? What possibilities exist for the transmission of knowledge, technology, disease, etc with these sorts of networks.

Select 5 that you feel are the most important. Then provide a definition of each of the selected terms, including who/what, where, when and why you think they are significant for history. The best responses typically provide this information in a chart/table so that they make sure they get credit for all components. Also, note that for significance, think about what change happened because of this term or why the term is important and thus included in the textbook. If you do not have a textbook, you may choose from the following list of terms: Abbasid dynasty Abu-Bakr caliph hajj jizya Mecca Muhammad Shia Sunni ulama Umayyad dynasty

Read chapter 15 - "Out of the War: Clamors for Change" in Ronald Takaki's A Different Mirror and complete the following steps: In your review you will answer the following questions: What is/are the big question(s) being addressed in the chapter? Identify only 1 or 2 questions. Keep in mind, Takaki may not explicitly state these questions. How does Takaki answer this/these question(s)? In what ways does one of the sources for the week shed additional light on Takaki’s story? Find the other sources for the week listed under Takaki chapter. What questions were you left with after reading Takaki’s chapter? Each weekly review should be about 1 page typed, single spaced. Each review is worth 5% of your overall grade. Collectively, the weekly reviews make up 50% of your overall grade. Do a good job! You will submit the review via Canvas. Typed Assignment/Paper Format Requirements: All typed assignments are to be done in Times New Roman 12 point font. Set margins at 1 inch. For spacing, consult the specific assignment instructions. For papers requiring citation: If you borrowed an idea or are quoting an author in your paper, use the following citation method: If you are citing our textbook A Different Mirror put the author’s last name and the page number as a footnote--- ie… [1]Takaki, 232. If you are citing a primary source document that was assigned for the course, put the author’s (of the primary source) last name, abbreviated title of the document in italics and page number (if applicable) as a footnote. --- ie… [2]Bacon, Declaration, If you are citing a source (primary or secondary) that was not assigned in the course, footnote using the Turabian Chicago-Style Format. For Turabian formatting guide see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/turabian/citation-guide.htmlLinks to

Essay Prompt: Analyzing Geertz's "Thick Description" and Its Methodological Value for Historical Research Drawing on Clifford Geertz's essays "Thick Description" and "Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight," along with John Tosh's discussion of cultural evidence, analyze the methodological strengths and limitations of Geertz's approach for historical research. How does Geertz's concept of "thick description" work as a research methodology, and to what extent can historians effectively apply this anthropological approach to historical sources and contexts? In your response: Explain the key elements of Geertz's "thick description" methodology, using his analysis of the Balinese cockfight as an example Evaluate how this approach helps researchers interpret cultural meanings and social relationships Consider the specific challenges historians might face when attempting to apply thick description to historical sources and past societies Assess whether the benefits of this interpretive approach outweigh its potential limitations for historical research Your essay should engage critically with both Geertz's theoretical framework and Tosh's perspective on cultural evidence in historical research. Support your arguments with specific examples from the readings. References Geertz, Clifford. "Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight." Daedalus 101, no. 1 (1972): 1-37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024056. Geertz, Clifford. "Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture." In The Interpretation of Cultures, 3-30. New York: Basic Books, 1973. Tosh, John. "Cultural Evidence and the Cultural Turn." In The Pursuit of History, 6th ed., 205-229. London: Routledge, 2015. Essay Requirements Length: 750-900 words (approximately three double-spaced pages in 12-point Times New Roman font). Citations: Include properly formatted in-text citations and a bibliography in Chicago Author-Date Style. The bibliography does not count toward the word limit. Submission: Submit your essay on Canvas as either a Google Doc or PDF. Evaluation: Your essay will be evaluated based on the criteria outlined in the course rubric document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O-PTHMha6CrIxlCwTCEJzKQeOKey-Q6A0BERnGcIcd8/edit?usp=sharingLinks to an external site.. Please refer to this document for detailed information on how your essay will be assessed. Your essay will be scanned through Turnitin for AI usage and plagiarism. Your essays will be evaluated based on the following criteria: Does the essay have a clear, specific, and nuanced thesis statement? Does the thesis directly address the essay prompt and accurately reflect the ideas in the readings? Does the essay provide a coherent overall understanding of the work(s) discussed? Is the essay organized in a clear and logical manner that effectively defends the thesis, without unnecessary tangents or irrelevant information? Is the writing clear and concise? Does the essay use evidence from the readings to support its arguments? Does the paper adhere to the conventions of English grammar and usage, including proper in-text citations and a correctly formatted bibliography?

Read chapter 8 - "Searching for Gold Mountain: Strangers from a Different Shore" in Ronald Takaki's A Different Mirror and complete the following steps: In your review you will answer the following questions: What is/are the big question(s) being addressed in the chapter? Identify only 1 or 2 questions. Keep in mind, Takaki may not explicitly state these questions. How does Takaki answer this/these question(s)? In what ways does one of the sources for the week shed additional light on Takaki’s story? Find the other sources for the week listed under Takaki chapter. What questions were you left with after reading Takaki’s chapter? Each weekly review should be about 1 page typed, single spaced. Each review is worth 5% of your overall grade. Collectively, the weekly reviews make up 50% of your overall grade. Do a good job! You will submit the review via Canvas. Typed Assignment/Paper Format Requirements: All typed assignments are to be done in Times New Roman 12 point font. Set margins at 1 inch. For spacing, consult the specific assignment instructions. For papers requiring citation: If you borrowed an idea or are quoting an author in your paper, use the following citation method: If you are citing our textbook A Different Mirror put the author’s last name and the page number as a footnote--- ie… [1]Takaki, 232. If you are citing a primary source document that was assigned for the course, put the author’s (of the primary source) last name, abbreviated title of the document in italics and page number (if applicable) as a footnote. --- ie… [2]Bacon, Declaration, If you are citing a source (primary or secondary) that was not assigned in the course, footnote using the Turabian Chicago-Style Format. For Turabian formatting guide see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/turabian/citation-guide.htmlLinks to

How do tax policies at the state and local levels impact social equity and economic development, and how can governments design tax systems that promote both? Analyze the effects of South Carolina's Act 388 on property tax burden distribution and consider the challenges of balancing the need for tax incentives for businesses with ensuring fair treatment of all taxpayers. Include in your analysis the discussion of various sources of revenue for state and local governments and the potential for creating sustainable revenue streams by addressing the system's equity. Example Topics: ? Discuss the impact of the property tax assessment cap in South Carolina and how it affects different property types. ? Analyze the use of Fees in Lieu of Taxes (FILOTs) in South Carolina as a tax incentive and consider their effectiveness and fairness. ? Examine the effects of tax policies on educational funding in South Carolina and their long-term impact. ? Explore how the burden of property tax is shifted between residential and commercial property owners and the implications for different socioeconomic groups. Exam Essay Exam Essay Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord CountMust be complete sentences. 3 pts Full Marks Between 1000 - 851 words 2.57 pts Proficient Between 850 - 600 words 2.15 pts Moderate Between 599 - 300 words 0.43 pts Novice Between 299 - 185 words 0 pts No Marks less than 184 words 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammarNo missing punctuation, capitalizations, misspelled words, verb tense errors, etc. 3 pts Full Marks No missing punctuation, capitalizations, misspelled words, verb tense errors, etc. Less than 0.5% syntax errors. 2.7 pts Proficient Between 0.6 - 0.9% syntax errors 2.1 pts Moderate Between 1.0 - 1.4% syntax errors 0.9 pts Novice Between 1.5 - 1.9% syntax errors 0 pts No Marks more than 2.0% syntax errors 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization: Thesis/Topic SentenceContains a thorough topic sentence or argument. Sentence contained in the paragraph must have a strong (active voice) which clearly states the theme of the essay. 4 pts Full Marks Contains a thorough topic sentence or argument 3.6 pts Proficient Contains a thorough topic sentence or argument but a passive voice. 2.8 pts Moderate Contains a topic sentence but is inconclusive to the theme of the essay 1.4 pts Novice The sentence connects with the paragraph theme with emotional plea or personal sentiment. 0 pts No Marks Could not differentiate a theme to the essay 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization: SupportARGUMENT or COMPARISION needs to make logical reasoning with citations located in the bibliography. The facts may be passionate but not emotionally based. 4 pts Full Marks All facts are cited and noted in the bibliography. The body of the essay flows in a linear pattern 3.6 pts Proficient Missing 1 citation either in the body of the paper or in the bibliography. 2.8 pts Moderate Missing 2-3 citations or missing citations in the bibliography. The body of the essay is analytical, which flows logically to a concluding paragraph. 1.2 pts Novice Missing 4-7 citations or missing citation in the bibliography. The body of the essay has emotional pleas or personal sentiment as facts or the facts are in tangent of the theme of the topic. 0 pts No Marks Missing more than 8 citations or missing citation in the bibliography. The body of the essay is an emotional plea or personal sentiment as support or the facts divergent of the theme of the topic 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization: ConclusionContains a thorough and decisive conclusion without reiterating the support facts connecting the topic sentence with a logical and persuasive deduction. 4 pts Full Marks Contains a thorough and decisive conclusion without reiterating the support facts connecting the topic sentence with a logical and persuasive deduction. 3.6 pts Proficient Has a thorough and decisive conclusion with support facts reiteration connecting the topic sentence with a logical and persuasive deduction. 2.8 pts Moderate Contains an ambiguous or vague conclusion with reiteration of support facts or an emotional plea or personal sentiment. 1.4 pts Novice Reiterates the support facts and the topic sentence as the conclusion OR concludes with emotional plea or personal sentiment OR disconnected from either the topic or supporting evidence. 0 pts No Marks Could not differentiate a conclusion to the essay 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBibliographyAPA Format, your reference list should appear at the end of your paper. It provides the information necessary for a reader to locate and retrieve any source you cite in the body of the paper. Each source you cite in the paper must appear in your reference list; likewise, each entry in the reference list must be cited in your text. 2 pts Full Marks Your Reference List contains all the Basic Rules for the APA Format 1.8 pts Proficient Missing ONE element of the Basic APA Format Rules 1.4 pts Moderate Missing TWO elements of the Basic APA Format Rules 0.6 pts Novice Missing THREE elements of the Basic APA Format Rules 0 pts No Marks Missing FOUR or MORE elements of the Basic APA Format Rules 2 pts Total Points: 20

In 200 - 400 words, discuss one domestic and one international terrorist organization and explain how they use social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, and others to recruit individuals and promote propaganda. How can you protect your family and organization from this type of threat? Reflect on three recommendations that could be implemented by the federal government to minimize terrorist use of these platforms.

Guidelines for Online Discussion Each week we have an online discussion, and you are required to contribute twice. These contributions should be spread out over the week, allowing you time to review and respond to your classmates' posts. Make sure your second post is as thoughtful as your first. As a member of this class, you are responsible for fostering an online community that supports your learning and that of your classmates. Discussion is a key part of this process, helping us clarify our understanding, organize new knowledge, and articulate any confusion or future learning needs. Your comments should show that you have read the assigned readings and your classmates' posts. Just like in an in-person discussion, you should work together to build a shared understanding. In your responses to classmates, you can do several things: build on ideas, ask questions, clarify points, add complexity, provide context, give examples or counterexamples, respectfully argue or disagree, compare or connect ideas, identify patterns in others' ideas, and link ideas to course readings. In all your contributions, make sure you explain your ideas thoroughly and support all claims with evidence and reasoning. Refer to class readings as required in the discussion prompt. Tips for Online Discussion Posts: Present arguments, not opinions. Opinions are claims; arguments are claims backed by evidence and reasoning. When you answer the prompt be sure you answer the question, provide textual evidence AND citation in author-date style (ChicagoLinks to an external site.), and then provide your own analysis and views. Review the online etiquette guidelinesLinks to an external site. provided in the syllabus (e.g., only write what you would say face-to-face). Reference course readings and explain how the ideas in the readings relate to your points. Reference the ideas of others, current events, and/or personal experiences when relevant to the question or your claims. Grading of discussion posts will follow this rubric (click here)Links to an external site. Deadlines: Due 3/15 (midnight): Contribute once to the discussion. Due 3/17 (midnight): Contribute a second time to the discussion, responding to at least ONE of your peers' discussion prompts (responding twice or more in a constructive and substantial manner will earn more points on the rubric). Prompt: Drawing on both O'Brien (1989) and Foucault (1977), analyze Foucault's approach to writing cultural history and its implications for historical methodology. In your response, address the following points: According to O'Brien, how does Foucault's method of studying power through discourse differ from traditional historical approaches? Provide specific examples from her analysis. Examine Foucault's treatment of the body in "The Body of the Condemned." How does his focus on the body as a site of power relations challenge conventional historical narratives about punishment and social control? Evaluate Foucault's concept of "genealogy" as described by O'Brien. How does this method aim to uncover historical discontinuities and power relations? Using examples from both readings, discuss how Foucault's approach might be applied to a historical topic of your choice. What new insights might this method reveal? Critically assess the strengths and limitations of Foucault's historical methodology. How do O'Brien and other historians view Foucault's contribution to the field? Your response should be 500-750 words, written in an academic style, and supported with specific examples and quotes from both texts.

The country chosen will be Senegal (French West Africa. The period covered will be WWI and WWII. Please read the Assignment attachemnt for further instructions. Please only use Primary Sources for the assignemnt. No tertiary sources.