Description JOURNAL WRITING 5 AND 6 - ON EPISTEMOLOGICAL IDEAS READ Epistemological Philosophers and Ideas(Text); Textbook: Ch 4 and 5 - Rationalism vs Empiricism, from Introduction to Philosophy. Lecture Notes: Survey on Epistemological Philosophers WRITE: Provide a summary of ideas based on the guide below ON RENE DESCARTES' EPISTEMOLOGY Discuss the Project and Method of Descartes? Explain its relevance today? Discuss how Descartes achieved the "indubitable truth" --the Truth that cannot be doubted again in his two meditations? (The "Cogito" or "I think, therefore, I am" in meditation2; and the "God exists" in meditation 3"? What makes him a rationalist? ON JOHN LOCKE'S EPISTEMOLOGY Discuss Locke’s empiricist view, like "Tabula Rasa" view of the mind? What does it mean by knowing through the experience of things we encounter? Is knowing always associated with experience? Explain the following in John Locke's philosophy: first, Locke's active role of the objects known; second, Locke's understanding of "representationalism"? What makes him an empiricist? ON DAVID HUME'S EPISTEMOLOGY Discuss Hume's basis of certitude of knowledge? Compare Impression vs Ideas? Which one is certain for Hume? Why? Discuss Matters of fact and Relation of ideas in establishing reliability? Which one for Hume is more objective and reliable? Why? What makes Hume a skeptic at the end in his empiricist perspective? ON GEORGE BERKELEY'S EPISTEMOLOGY Describe Berkeley's dialogue: MIND VS MATTER represented by Philonous vs Hylas? What is the argument about? What is Berkeley's view of existence? Explain Berkeley's epistemological argument: TO BE IS TO BE PERCEIVED? Who is the perceiving subject for Berkeley? Is this limited to human perceiving subject? Explain? ON IMMANUEL KANT'S EPISTEMOLOGY Explain Kant's epistemological goal? What kind of knowledge does Kant want to establish? Explain the rationalist side of Kant's philosophy and his empiricist view of knowing? What makes Kant's epistemology as a synthesis of rationalism and empiricism? Guide for Submission: Submit by day 7 to avoid deduction for late assignments and being locked out. Lock-out means there is an end date of the assignments. It is applied to assignments like discussion and quizzes with due and end dates. If assignments like vocabulary, journal, and extra credit have no end dates, then you can submit late, but late deduction points apply. You can submit late but with deduction applied according to the length of time submitted. Journal Writings are activities of learning how to synthesize or summarize ideas from readings and notes. All ideas, sentences, and paragraphs must be expressed in a correct grammar. Always elaborate your understanding by explaining the theme or topics discussed. If you need to answer a question, answer the questions with substance and can be sourced by the readings and notes.
Description For this assignment, you will write a 2–3-page paper (double-spaced, 1-inch margins) providing at least 1 example of how government has overstepped biblical principles in some form of economic policy. Be sure to adhere to the format specified in the Course Style Guidelines document. Options include the following topics: A specific piece of legislation relating to business regulation or taxation. The “party platform” of either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party (or both). The role of the Federal Reserve. The budget process. In discussing one of these topics, incorporate clear references from the required reading (link to book below). The required Reading & Study material for Module/Week 7 must be cited specifically, and you must include outsides sources as well. You must include at least 2 references in your essay; when citing them, you must adhere to the format specified in the Course Style Guidelines document (attached). Link to book: https://fee.org/media/14946/economicsinonelesson.p...
Description Chapter 4: Epicurus 1. Although Epicurus is a hedonist, he is clearly opposed to vulgar hedonism. Can you find additional arguments for or against the theory of vulgar hedonism? Is it not terribly “ judgmental” for us to claim that some pleasures are “higher” or “ lower” than others? Shouldn’t we just tolerate and accept differences of opinion in this area? Or does it make more sense to argue that there is a natural hierarchy of pleasures and pains? 2. Epicurus believes that fear of divine retribution is the greatest source of fear and anxiety. Do you agree with this assessment? Why or why not? 3. Epicurus argues that the best and happiest way of life is one in which one seeks to satisfy on the most basic, natural and necessary desires. Do you agree that embracing such a life of simplicity (no honor, fame, luxury or wealth) is really more conducive to happiness and tranquility than trying to “keep up with the Joneses”? If you said “yes,” then are you already taking measures to live in the Epicurean manner? Chapter 5: St. Thomas Aquinas 4. How would St. Thomas defend himself (if, indeed, such a defense is possible) against the charge of being “homophobic” (a word that did not exist in his time, but which is fairly common today)? Would you find his defense plausible? Why or why not? 5. If one is not at all religious, is it still possible to take St. Thomas’ natural law principle seriously? Could it still be relied upon as a guide to living well? Explain. Chapter 6: Thomas Hobbes 6. Do you think that being self-interested is a bad thing? If so, why? If not, why not? 7. Compare Christ’s Golden Rule with Hobbes’ Golden Rule. Which do you think is more effective in getting people to obey the laws, and why? 8. Do you agree with Hobbes that our natural condition is one of lawlessness and violence? How do you think you would behave if you knew you could get away with whatever you wanted to? Do we only obey the laws out of fear of punishment?
Description This week we're exploring causation and correlation. Why is it a fallacy to confuse causation and correlation? Provide an example of a statement that confuses causation with correlation. In addition to your main response, you must also post substantive responses to at least two of your classmates’ posts in this thread.
Description Part One Classroom Management Example Review the classroom management example and the SPD-540 Class Profile from this week's readings. Keeping the classroom management plan example in mind, identify three to four modifications you would make for students with disabilities who are listed in the SPD-540 Class Profile. In your submission, complete the following for each modification: List the modification; Identify the student(s) for whom the modification is designed; Provide a 1 page rationale explaining how the modification will meet the needs of the identified student(s); and Support your choices with references to the CEC Professional Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards. Part Two Create a new 750-1,000-word classroom management plan that could be used in a resource or self-contained classroom of eight students. Assume these students have a variety of exceptionalities including serious disruptive and sometimes unsafe behaviors. Consistent with The IRIS Center guidelines, your classroom management plan should include the following components: A statement of purpose Rules Procedures Consequences An action plan for implementation In addition, specifically address safe and appropriate student crisis intervention. Also, include a layout of the classroom that incorporates the guidelines and any additional classroom materials related to classroom management, such as signs, posters, etc. Support your classroom management plan with a minimum of three scholarly resources on best practices in classroom management for special education. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Description Critical Writing Assignment on Interview with the Dalai Lama Write a 1200-1500 word paper in which you critically analyze the perspective of the Dalai Lama as found in Module 7 of the course from the vantage point of John Hick’s pluralistic hypothesis, which is encountered in the same module. You need not agree with Hick’s position and you may role play if you choose, but your paper must take up and defend a clear thesis and the paper must include substantial engagement and specific references to both the Dalai Lama interview and the article by Hick. Before getting started, please be sure to review the requirements to be observed for this and all other PHI 110RS Critical Writing Assignments. Your paper must: Defend a thesis and should proceed according to the following format: Thesis, Argument, Objection(s), Response(s), and Conclusion. Include citations to the primary required class readings. These and any additional sources must be properly cited using MLA format. Fall within the following length requirements: 1200-1500 words. Use a standard 10-12 pt. font and be double-spaced
Description Geography is by and large the single biggest indicator of what religion one practices. E.g. if one is born in Saudi Arabia, it is highly likely that she will practice Islam; if one is born in Tibet, it is highly likely he will be a Buddhist, and so on. In light of this fact, do you think it is rational to be a religious exclusivist? Why or why not? Guidelines: Minimum of 200 words or more
Description Objectives: Analyze a current debate case. Explain an argument that supports a position for or against the case. Apply an ethical theory to your argument. Instructions: 1. Read case 2 "Why Suicide" from the 2017 Texas Regional Ethics Bowl Competition. QUESTION: Should Netflix broadcast the show "Thirteen reasons why?" Write three- five paragraphs evaluating the ethical issues of the case and arguing FOR or AGAINST a position from the question. Make sure to pick ONE position (for or against), identify the stakeholders, address various ethical issues (e.g., freedom of speech, violation of rights, happiness of society, autonomy, etc.), give at least 1 argument that supports your position, and explain and reply to a possible objection. FORMAT: Paragraph 1: Summarize the scenario briefly, focusing on the elements that you will address in your argument and state your thesis (pick a position either FOR or AGAINST) Paragraph 2: Give one argument that supports the thesis. Remember to explain your argument fully, using examples or scenarios. Paragraph 3: Give another argument that supports the thesis. Paragraph 4: Explain a possible objection to the thesis. Reply to that objection. --Your goal is to give objective arguments to support a thesis.Use the theories that we have studied to support your arguments. One of your arguments must explicitly address one of the ethical theories we covered (Utilitarianism, Deontology, Cultural Relativism, Social contract theory, Egoism, Divine command theory). Think about what Mill or Kant would say. --Make sure your arguments do not commit any obvious fallacy such as anecdotal evidence, emotional appeal, fallacy of assertion (stating beliefs or opinions), straw man, etc. --Make sure you give REASONS for the position. -- Explain your arguments fully, using examples or scenarios. Pretend that your reader doesn't know the case, and does not agree with you. Explain your argument fairly and sufficiently. --Your last paragraph (or two) should explain a possible objection against your argument, and then explain your reply. Thus, if your thesis is FOR a position, explain an argument AGAINST the position, and reply to that argument.
Description the papers should be at least 7 pages Do NoT use sources, it is only about what you think. The only sources you are allowed to use is the slides ( powerpoint) I will attach it. and the syllabus Use the slides and read and write the 7 pages based on your opinion and what you think ( philosophy) Use simple sentences and structures. No outside sources are allowed. please read the syllabus very well and see exam 1 in the syllabus ( Requirement )
Description Hi, this assignment includes 2 parts: First, I need someone who can answer the question below about 10- 15 sentences. Also, responds to my classmate's post( I can see my classmate's posts after I submit my response.) I attach all the files that you require to read and watch to use as your source. Question : Do you think it was unethical for Jennie Livingston to direct and create the film Paris is Burning? I.E., Do you agree with Bell Hooks that Jennie Livingston did not possess the right "credentials" to direct the film? Second, please answer the question below in 10-15 sentences. Question : What was your favorite scene from Paris is Burning? Who was your favorite character?
