Description After comprehensively reading Chapter 11 of your textbook, please respond to these questions. Your responses can be brief and informal, but do make sure that they are thoughtful and reflect a thorough and comprehensive reading of this chapter. 1. Reflect on your learning here at {Will tell you school once accepted} and use Bloom's Taxonomy to analyze your experience here. At what level of Bloom's Taxonomy do you believe most of your learning has occurred? Why? Is that positive or negative or mixed? Blooms Taxonomy videos that you have to plz watch: 2. Continuing to reflect on your leering at {Will tell you school once accepted}, at what level do you think your learning, at least part of the time, should be (in other words, what do you find the best, most useful, most desirable level on Bloom's Taxonomy)? Why do you think that? What could be changed at {Will tell you school once accepted} to move your learning more toward that level of Bloom's Taxonomy? 3. Finally, use the "Learning, Pedagogy, and Training Effectiveness" model discussed in Chapter 11 to continue to reflect on your learning here at {Will tell you school once accepted}. To what extent do you believe your "head," "heart," and "hand" has been engaged here? What is the balance between these three factors -- are they attended to equally or is there one or more that is more of a focus than others? Is that a good thing, bad thing, or mixed thing? Why? To what extent is creating a synthesis between head, heart, and had the responsibility of the educational institution and to what extent do you believe this is your responsibility? Why?
Description Student One - Autistic Student Two - ADHD Part 1 You are conducting Lesson 1. You can upload any lesson plan format that you are using in the schools. If you are annotating, please make sure that you are annotating keeping your success criteria in mind. Part 2: Please make sure to add in a section at the bottom how you are scaffolding for your two focus students and identifying how you will be informally assessing through the lesson in order to inform your instruction. Suggested Format: Part 1: Lesson Plan: Created and Informal Assessment (I suggest something simple such as a checklist with students name listed on the left and success criteria at the top that can be checked off)... Part 2: Scaffolding for 2 identified students - Student One - Autistic. Student Two - ADHD.
Description One properly formatted email (You can draft the email in Outlook and then save it as a PDF), no more than 1-2 paragraphs, with standard font and margins choose a company and retrieve their most recent 10-K from the SEC. You can access those reports at SEC.gov using the EDGARsearch tool. Carefully review the 10-K. While you will not read all of it, you should choose at least 3 tables or other data sets which you will use in your summary. Items and areas such as “Selected Financial Data” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” are good areas to investigate. Then, compose a concise (roughly 2-paragraph) email where you report your findings from reviewing the report and summarize the 3 (or more) data sets you have chosen. The audience for this email is your manager, who has requested that you review the report and send them a brief summary of the company, their financial picture, and their outlook. Your email should contain the standard elements of business correspondence, so you have limited space in which to offer your summary. Remember that you are taking pieces of a larger report and condensing them in your summary.
Description Give an example where culture can cause a misunderstanding through nonverbal communication. Think about gestures, proxemics, physical appearance and touch as areas of cultural differences. For your posts, you must: Demonstrate thoughtful well-formulated responses to a minimum of two peers and support your argument with at least one source other than the text. Support your work with in-text citations from your textbook and at least one outside source.
Description The research on cultural dimensions dates back over fifty years, but it is ongoing and demonstrates that our overall culture remains fairly consistent depsite that fact that our daily lifestyles differ quite a bit from when the research began. If the overall culture has remained consistent, then it clearly reflects the fact that we are all influenced by these dimensions: inidvidualism, low power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, masculinity, indulgence, low context, etc. However, individuals can differ from the overal culture as well based on their upbringing (for example, you can be a high uncertainty avoidant person or have a collectivistic mindset, etc.). Are there ways in which you feel that you differ from the cultural dimensions associated with the United States? If so, what influences do you think were stronger than the cultural dimensions? Have you traveled and noticed the differences in cultural dimensions of other countries? What are some reactions that you had to the information on cultural dimensions?
Description Below is a list of links to several letters from CEOs to their employees. Select one of the letters and answer the discussion questions. Andy Jassy, Amazon: Amazon offering teams more flexibility as we return to the office Michel Khalaf, MetLife: https://www.metlife.com/future-work-letter-from-ceo/ Howard Schultz, former CEO of Starbucks: https://stories.starbucks.com/stories/2022/letter-from-starbucks-ceo-howard-schultz-investing-in-our-shared-future/ For this discussion, answer the following questions: How relevant was the information the CEO shared with his audience? Provide examples. Was the tone of the message appropriate for the topic? Why or why not? Correlate principles from Chapters 4 & 7 of How to Win Friends in your response. Review the message for logical consistencies or inconsistencies, according to those outlined on pages 182 – 184 in the textbook. What made the message consistent or inconsistent?
Description OVERVIEW In order to help apply the content from the textbook, you will be asked to complete short papers that focus on the important aspects of branding through story. At the start of the class term, the professor will provide the brand that you will examine for these papers. Each member of the class will study the same brand. You will be asked to provide the brand’s backstory; the brand’s inner and outer layer; the obstacles the brand faces and the prospect’s inner and outer layer; and an assessment of whether the brand’s story connects to its prospect. Your paper is to be double spaced and your references page(s), title and abstract pages are not counted as a part of the two- or three-page total. Please note that your paper is to be two full pages (not one and part of a second) or three full pages (not two and part of a third). If, as a result, you go a bit longer than the page requirement the professor does not mind. These papers will be assessed on the quality of writing and sourcing (using APA style) and the quality of thought in applying the specific attributes of Storybranding that are relevant to each specific paper. You will want to closely follow the class text as you write each of these papers, since each paper is based on specific parts of the class text. Paper: The Brand’s Obstacles and Prospects Inner and Outer Layer Assignment will refer to Module 4: Week 4 Learn item, Read: Signorelli: Chapters 12 – 14. If you are interested in a visual representation of the parts of the Storybranding paradigm (which can help you get a sense of how all the parts fit together) please see Chapter 15 (The Storybrief; pp. 160 – 161) of the class text. INSTRUCTIONS Be sure you are familiar with the principles in our text. Use the text concepts LIBERALLY in your paper. Using the brand we are studying this term, please apply the lessons from our text that detail how brands need to view and deal with obstacles to help a prospect reach a Level IV connection. Also, detail the inner layer (values, beliefs, convictions) and outer layer (demographics) for the prospect of our brand. Remember the inner layer of the prospect is their soul, and the outer layer is the flat demographic description of the prospect. ? Three full pages (going over by a bit is encouraged)
Description 1. What went well? What could use improvement? 2. Were you prepared with convincing answers to obvious or common questions? How did you prepare? Describe at what points you realized and felt that you were unprepared. 3. Were your answers clear and specific? What were the best statements you made that were clear and specific? 4. Did you reference evidence and examples? What were they? 5. Look back at your Key Competencies assignment. Did you tell them everything you wanted them to know about you from these competencies? What do you wish you had covered that would have made you a stronger candidate? 6. Did you use your voice well, varying the tone and pace of your answers? 7. To which question do you feel you gave the strongest answer? Briefly summarize the question and answer here, and describe why it worked so well. 8. Similarly, which answer was your weakest? Briefly describe the question and answer. How could you improve this answer in the future? 9. Overall, how well do you feel you answered the questions, on a scale of 1 - 5, with 5 being the highest? Why? 10. Describe your positive body language. What was challenging about your body language? 11. Did you seem truly interested in the position? What made you seem so? 12. Did you smile? 13. Did you prepare interesting questions to ask the interviewer? What were they? 14. What surprised you about the interview? 15. Did you research the role and the organization well enough? 16. Did your nerves get in the way of your answering well? 17. Are there relaxation techniques you could use to help you? 18. What else happened before, during, or after the interview that may reflect on you in the interviewer's opinion? 19. What other preparation do you advise for yourself next time?
Description Packback Topic for Module 7 The topic for this Module's Packback Topic for your Questions is Taxes. To complete Packback, click on the How to Use Packback button on the left. Select the Packback that you are completing. A guide post with the topic for this Module is located at the top of the feed for this Packback assignment.
Description Read the Module 4 Case and scenario 1. After reviewing the module material, answer the following taken from the module: The acting head of software development advises you that she wants to develop an effective performance appraisal system for her department. She remembers, from having taken a human resource management class as an undergraduate, that there are a number of different ways to measure performance and she wants your guidance in selecting one. She also wants to make sure that the method chosen to measure performance fits the technical nature of the workers she supervises who work in teams. Knowing what an individualistic society the USA is, she suggests there be an individual and a team component. a) Discuss the different alternatives that you recommend as the most effective for measuring the performance of software developers working in teams. Share at least three alternatives with the pros and cons of each alternative you suggest. b) Answer/discuss the following: 1) What information will need to be gathered to develop the new appraisal system; 2) How you will make the performance appraisal job-related and valid; and 3) How you will mitigate the risk of rater errors when evaluating performance. Be sure to provide the references for the sources of the information you used including the material provided in the classroom.
