Need Help ?

Expert Answers

Description The case for your Final Writing Assignment is attached to this emai ...

Description The case for your Final Writing Assignment is attached to this email. It is due on May 5, is worth 20% of your final grade in this course, and should be submitted through the Week 14 module in Course Content in Blackboard. The Week 14 module contains instructions for the Final Writing Assignment, the place to submit the assignment, a rubric for the assignment, a Word document with the sample format for the assignment, and documents and a video describing the procedural nature of court cases and how to analyze them. It also contains a link to the Academic Honesty Quiz module. The Final Writing Assignment requires you to write a paper that mirrors all four of the Discussion Board Assignments; you should detail (1) the facts of the case in detail, (2) the legal issue(s) at stake, (3) the court's analysis of each issue in light of the facts and the law, and (4) your opinion of whether the court ruled correctly on each issue and why. Each section should be written in paragraph form, except for the legal issues section, which can be written as a list or bullet points. If you refer to any sources in writing your paper, including the textbook for the course or online material, you must cite to them and put in quotation marks anything that you quote. I do not care what format you put your citation in (MLA, APA, Bluebook, etc.) as long as it includes enough information to tell what the source is and, if it came from a website, the web address. (See the Academic Honesty quiz and related material or contact GSU's Writing Center if you are not sure how to do this.) Do not discuss your case or this assignment with anyone (other than me or the Writing Center) until after the due date -- to do so constitutes cheating and may result in a failing grade in the course. The Academic Honesty quiz is also due on May 5. To receive any credit for the Final Writing Assignment, you must complete the Academic Honesty quiz with a minimum grade of at least 15 out of 20 points. If you do not complete the Academic Honesty quiz you will not get any points for the Final Paper no matter how good it is. The Academic Honesty quiz can be taken at any time before May 5 and is in the first module in Course Content in Blackboard. There is a link to this quiz in the Week 14 module as well. Discussion 1 The court case of Wade v. Walmart was filed on September 24, 2015, after the plaintiff Leslie Wade sued Walmart for the injuries she had on Walmart property. Wade explained that on November 3rd, 2009, at around 6:50 P.M., she got to Walmart using her SUV to get to the Savoy, Illinois location. She then exited her car with her two young children (ages 8 and 9). Wade and her children were able to get in and out of the Walmart location after getting what they needed and began walking back to the SUV as they got closer to the vehicle at 7:33 P.M>, she got her left foot caught in a pothole and led her to hit her left knee on the pavement. As she was falling she was able to catch herself on her left hand hoping that would be the end of it, however, unfortunately resulted in a broken foot injury. Wade described herself in that moment as being silly and laughing while also reporting she had no difficulties seeing the parking lot nor did Wade have an issue walking in the shoes she was wearing at the time of the incident which was, leather boots with a one-inch heel. Unfortunately, video footage from Walmart cameras was unable to capture this fall due to it happening behind the SUV which blocked that section of the asphalt. Moving forward, after this statement was given, in 2011, Wade sued Walmart in the hope of getting compensation for the injuries from her fall. Later in September of 2014, Walmart filed a motion as a form of defense stating they didn’t owe Wade anything because the hole in the parking lot was “an open and obvious hazard”, as well as the argument of possible distractions. In November 2014 after hearing both the plaintiff and Walmarts argument the trial court granted the case in Walmart's favor. Discussion 2 1. Is the pothole open and obvious hazard? The court ruled in Walmart favour because the pothole seemed to be obvious for anyone looking to see it. 2. When wade walking back to her car was it her fault for being distracted and not seeing the pothole? This made the court question if it was wade fault for not paying attention and stepping in the pothole, when she could have easily avoided it. 3. Were the injuries wade suffered a result of Walmart fault? The problem for the court is, if they believe it’s Walmarts fault that there was a pothole that wade did not see. They do not know who to blame yet. 4. Will the distraction exemption work for the open and obvious rule. Since wade has pointed out she was distracted by people walking or cars in the parking lot, could this mean Walmart had nothing to do with this situation and wade should have payed attention to where she was going. Discussion 3 In my opinion I think the court ruled for Walmart because they were concluding the pothole was an open and obvious hazard that Wade should have easily seen and avoided. The court ruled that property owners aren't liable for injury caused by dangers that would be obvious to a reasonable person. Since the pothole was obvious to anyone with eyes open, Walmart was not obligated to provide additional warnings. The duty and data breach: First, the court considered whether Wal-Mart had a legal duty to protect Wade from the pothole and if the contract was broken. Wal-Mart had a responsibility to keep its property fairly secure and to notify customers to any hidden dangers because it is a business that welcomes the public into its property. The pothole in question was determined by the court to be clear and visible rather than a hidden or subtle hazard. The court highlighted that owners are not liable for the harm brought on by circumstances that are obvious and preventable with common sense. As a result, the court determined that Wal-Mart did not break its contract since, in accordance with Louisiana law, the pothole was not unreasonable. Unreasonably dangerous condition: The pothole's position as a "unreasonably dangerous" condition was another variable that the court took under consideration. The court determined the pothole did not meet the criteria by using the four-factor test: utility of the condition, likelihood of injury, cost of avoidance, and severity of harm. Wade sustained a serious injury, but the condition was neither hidden nor likely to hurt someone utilizing reasonable caution. In addition, it would be unreasonable to expect owners of commercial real estate to fix every small surface fault in large parking lots right now. The pothole was considered by the court to be an average imperfection that wasn't presenting an excessive danger. Open and Obvious doctorine: The court maintained that comparative fault is protected by the "open and obvious" doctrine. Wade stated that with the pothole being clearly obvious, she did not look down while walking. The court ruled that the hole should be easily noticed and avoided by any reasonable person using normal caution. Wade thereby received entire blame by the court, which came to its decision that her injury had been caused only by her own lack of attention. Discussion 4 In my view, the court in Wade v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accurately interpreted and applied the relevant legal principles. The decision thoughtfully addressed all three central legal issues: it determined that the plaintiff bore responsibility for her own safety, the pothole was an open and obvious hazard, and the distraction exception did not apply. By adhering to established Illinois law, the court delivered a clear and practical ruling that emphasized personal responsibility in cases involving avoidable, visible dangers. This outcome promotes fairness and consistency in premises liability matters. Issue 1: Open and Obvious Doctrine In Wade v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the court correctly applied the open and obvious doctrine. It found that an observant person would have noticed the pothole over which Wade tripped, as it was clearly visible and located in a parking lot where people had walked constantly on a daily basis. This had also seemed to be one of the first times Walmart was tried under the law about this issue. Under Illinois law, property owners are often not liable for injuries caused by hazards that are open and obvious. The court concluded that Wal-Mart had no duty to warn Wade of a danger she reasonably should have perceived. I believe this ruling is sound, as holding Wal-Mart liable in such circumstances would diminish the individual's responsibility to remain aware of their environment. Issue 2: Distraction and Exception to the Open and Obvious Doctrine The court also made the correct determination in concluding that the distraction exception did not apply in this case. Wade argued that she was distracted by maneuvering a wheeled cart and therefore did not notice the pothole. However, the court found that her distraction was minor and not reliant on Wal-Mart but instead herself for not paying attention to the ground in front of her, rather than significant or unexpected, and not caused by any action on Wal-Mart’s part. Under Illinois law, for the distraction exception to override the open and obvious doctrine, the distraction must be both unforeseeable and caused by the defendant. Wade’s attempt to invoke this exception was rightly rejected by the court, as her distraction did not meet the necessary legal standard. For Illinois courts to set aside the open and obvious doctrine, the distraction must be both unforeseen and caused by the defendant. Wade’s attempt to rely on the distraction exception was rightly rejected by the court, as there was no evidence to support such a claim. This decision upholds the legal standard while ensuring that the exception is not misapplied as a means to shift responsibility away from individuals for hazards they should reasonably avoid. In my opinion, knowing what we know about the case I felt that that final verdict was made reasonably as Wade had stated on multiple occasions that not only was she distracted and not paying attention but also had been skipping which in and of itself could be a hazard on its own especially when not paying attention. Although the parking lot wasn’t perfectly leveled by lay it states that business owners are not responsible for the incidents that happen outside of the premises and unfortunately even on flat ground when skipping or not walking with caution a potential injury can occur within seconds, with the blame being on the person doing the action. With further examination of the case, Walmart had went back and looked at the camera footage on that day and unfortunately hadn’t seen a fall due to the car blocking the view of Wade. This unfortunately made her case, weaker, as there had been no proof actual proof of the fall. Please don't use AI for this essay, let me know if you have any questions and also use the file, I sent you. The "Hess v. Estate of Klamm" article So just please follow the assignments instructions. Thank you

READ MORE >>

Description explain usa campaings.make it shorts ...

Description explain usa campaings.make it shorts

READ MORE >>

Assessment 1 Capstone Project Summary InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1av ...

Assessment 1 Capstone Project Summary InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 Create a 2–3 page (single-spaced) project summary that describes your chosen organization, defines the scope of a business problem or opportunity in that organization, and provides a strategy for how you will go about your capstone project. Include a discussion of the type of data you will need, and how your topic allows you to demonstrate each of the MBA program outcomes. Collapse All Introduction This course revolves around the creation of a single, significant capstone project. In other words, a project that caps off your learning and your program, allowing you to demonstrate the competencies of leadership and collaboration, ethical and evidence-based decision making, and innovative and strategic thinking. For your capstone, you will choose a real company and analyze it in a way that demonstrates your understanding of the MBA program outcomes. You will turn your analysis of that company into a written report with recommendations and a formal presentation for your intended audience. Having a solid, doable scope is an important part of creating a successful capstone project, and the exact scope is up to you. To help you establish a realistic scope, you will start with the project summary. Be careful to consider the scalability of your project scope, ensuring that it demonstrates your ability to lead in a business environment and showcases your achievement of all MBA program outcomes. Examples A scope that is poorly defined: I want to write a general analysis of the bookseller, Barnes & Noble. This topic is too broad, and it would probably require hundreds of pages to address all of the possible analyses. A scope that is better defined: I want to focus on how Barnes & Noble has managed to survive the Internet age while Borders has crumbled. What makes this a better scope? The scope is grounded in a problem (such as how to survive Internet competition) or opportunity (such as the area lacking a business that you plan to open), which allows you to focus the analysis. It must also allow for you to analyze and suggest evidence-based recommendations, takeaways, or actionable next steps as the crux of your project. Important note: You must be able to prove the problem with evidence. So in the above example, you would also provide data showing that Barnes & Noble is profitable, perhaps comparing Barnes & Noble income or profits to Borders in its last years. Preparation Read the MBA Capstone Project Description [PDF]. Instructions For this assessment, introduce the organization you have chosen to research, why you chose it, the scope of your project, and how it will allow you to demonstrate all of the MBA program outcomes. Write a 2–4 page paper, in professional writing style, that details the topic and scope of your capstone project. Your project summary should be clear and concise yet thorough enough for faculty to provide feedback and guidance. Your project summary should be well-organized and include the following sections: Organization: Describe the background of your chosen organization. Provide a brief background of your selected organization. For instance, discuss its product lines, number of years in business, organization structure, location, et cetera. If you choose an organization for which you work, your introduction must include a statement that you received permission to use the company from a supervisor. Scope: Describe a business topic, problem, or opportunity within that organization that you intend to research. Describe the problem or opportunity you see that makes this company a good choice. Explain the scope of your project by clearly identifying the topics or areas you intend to research. Provide a general action plan on how you will research, analyze, and identify recommendations or solutions to this business challenge or opportunity. Establish the premise of your paper (the problem or need) with evidence. For example, if your plan is to talk about how Dillard's department store can come back after a huge financial loss, you should include citations that establish its dramatic financial loss. Data: Explain the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine the chosen business topic, problem, or opportunity. Discuss the general type of data sources you will be using to inform your analysis. Provide at least two specific sources that you are considering. These resources should be from credible sources such as the Wall Street Journal, IBIS, et cetera. Use the excellent Research Guide – MBA for locating credible resources from the Capella library's business databases and article collections. Include the process or steps on how you will access the data necessary for analysis of a business topic or challenge. Identify any special requirements that you might need to meet to access the data you will need. Explain risks you think will be encountered and the mitigation plan to manage those risks. Demonstrating MBA program outcomes: Explain how your topic will allow you to showcase your leadership ability by demonstrating each MBA program outcome. List out each program outcome clearly, and then explain in 3–4 sentences how your topic will allow you to demonstrate each. The MBA program outcomes are listed in the MBA Capstone Project Description document. Identify specific items of your project summary that you believe demonstrates the outcome. Conclusion. Wrap up your paper with a clear, concise conclusion that summarizes your plan. Just a couple sentences is fine. Submission Requirements Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Style: Your paper should follow the corresponding MBA Academic and Professional Document guidelines (available in the MBA Program Resources) for academic style. It should be single-spaced, use subheadings, and be well-organized and well-written. Communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality. APA guidelines: Format citations according to current APA style and formatting. Resources: At least one resource should be a scholarly article or other content found in the Capella library, and one should be from the Wall Street Journal. If using Internet sources, evaluate them appropriately to make sure they are credible resources. Length: Your paper should be 2–4 pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. ePortfolio You should consider adding this to your ePortfolio and personal portfolio. This assessment demonstrates your ability to draft a project summary, which is necessary in a professional setting when you are trying to pitch an idea or potential project, or make recommendations. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 2: Integrate information across disciplines and from differing perspectives. Describe the background of the chosen organization. Competency 3: Think critically and analytically to provide evidence-based solutions to business challenges and opportunities. Describe an intended business topic, problem, or opportunity to research. Explain the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine the chosen business topic, problem, or opportunity. Explain how the topic will allow showcasing of leadership ability by demonstrating some MBA program outcomes. Competency 7: Communicate clearly and effectively in a business environment. Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional. Scoring Guide Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated. Collapse All Criterion 1 Describe the background of the chosen organization. Distinguished Describes the background of the chosen organization; includes factors or characteristics about the organization that makes it appropriate to use for the capstone project. Proficient Describes the background of the chosen organization. Basic Identifies an organization but does not describe sufficient details to gauge whether the organization is an appropriate selection for use in the capstone project. Non Performance Does not identify a specific, real organization. Criterion 2 Describe an intended business topic, problem, or opportunity to research. Distinguished Describes an intended business topic, problem, or opportunity to research; provides concrete examples and citations that support selection of the business and the scope of research. Proficient Describes an intended business topic, problem, or opportunity to research. Basic Identifies a business topic, problem, or opportunity, but the research intent and scope is unclear. Non Performance Does not identify a business topic, problem, or opportunity. Criterion 3 Explain the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine the chosen business topic, problem, or opportunity. Distinguished Explains the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine a business topic, problem, or opportunity; outlines the process for obtaining the data and mitigating risks in obtaining the data. Proficient Explains the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine the chosen business topic, problem, or opportunity. Basic Identifies the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine the chosen business topic, problem, or opportunity. Non Performance Does not identify the level of accessibility to data necessary to examine the chosen business topic, problem, or opportunity. Criterion 4 Explain how the topic will allow showcasing of leadership ability by demonstrating some MBA program outcomes. Distinguished Explains how the topic will allow showcasing of leadership ability by demonstrating some MBA program outcomes; the explanation includes specific details and examples. Proficient Explains how the topic will allow showcasing of leadership ability by demonstrating some MBA program outcomes. Basic Explains how the topic will allow demonstration of each MBA program outcome; however, the explanation does not support the alignment of topics to the program outcomes. Non Performance Does not explain how the topic will allow demonstration of MBA program outcomes. Criterion 5 Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional. Distinguished Writes coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional; writing is free from errors and formatted appropriately for the purpose or audience. Proficient Writes coherently with minimal or minor errors to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional. Basic Writes somewhat coherently to support ideas, but writing has some grammar, mechanics, or other errors that detract from credibility as a business professional. Non Performance Does not write coherently nor use grammar and mechanics as expected of a business professional; writing has major errors. WalkMeChat Assessment 2 Annotated Outline InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 Create a 2–5 page annotated outline that includes the sections to be analyzed, ethical decision making aspects of the topic, main points of the recommendation, and credible evidence you plan to use for supporting the analysis and recommendations. Collapse All Introduction While everyone has their own process for writing, creating an outline is often an important early step in the process in all types of writing, even for the most seasoned writers. By creating an outline, you draft a plan that organizes your thoughts, helps you see gaps in your thought process, and enables you to decide where in your paper you will address particular issues. An annotated outline is a document that organizes the main sections to be included in your paper. The annotations are based on thinking through your approach to the paper and developing enough detail that anyone who reads the outline can follow your thought process. The purpose of this assessment is as follows: To build an annotated outline that shows the key sections of your analysis, the ethical considerations, and the leadership and collaboration aspects that you intend to include in your capstone project. With this outline, faculty can understand the organization and purpose of your paper; upon approval, you may move forward to writing the capstone project (Assessment 3). To help you manage your work because you will need to start researching now (if you have not already) to create your annotated outline. To demonstrate that you know how to cite in APA format by including some quotations or paraphrases from researched sources. The sources you include in the outline may or may not be used in your actual paper. To demonstrate your ability to create a well-organized document, suitable for academic or business, that meets established criteria. Instructions For this assessment, create an annotated outline that provides a framework of your capstone project. Begin by reviewing the MBA Capstone Project Description [PDF]. Your annotated outline must state the name of your chosen organization and must include the following items: Identify the main sections to be developed in the paper and tie them to the project objectives. In your key sections, you should use at least four main headings; these sections make up the body of your outline. Each heading must have at least two sub-points to develop the detail required. Include a description of each major point. Identify where each supporting reference will be integrated. Include at least one reference to support each major point of the paper. Incorporate relevant quotes or paraphrases from a source that you might use for support, with an APA in-text citation. Identify main points that address ethical aspects associated with your chosen business. Ethical considerations/aspects should also be one of the headings of your outline. Use the program outcomes to help determine the areas of ethics that you might want to cover. Include at least one reference to elaborate on how you intend to cover ethics in your project. Identify main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with your chosen business. Leadership and collaboration considerations/aspects should also be one of the headings of your outline. Review the program outcomes to determine the areas of leadership and collaboration that you should consider. Include at least one reference to elaborate on how you intend to cover leadership and collaboration in your project. Identify main points of your recommendations. Your recommendations should also be one of the headings of your outline. Identify credible evidence to support an analysis. For the evidence you provide, include key points to clarify why it matters and how it will inform the analysis. Your annotated outline should have these sections: An executive summary. An introduction. The body of your outline should comprise at least four main headings with additional subheadings and points. (Never use the word Body as a heading or subheading.) A conclusion. References. Use APA style and formatting for all the sources you use in the annotated outline. Submission Requirements Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Style: This outline should be written in academic format; refer to the corresponding MBA Academic and Professional Document Guidelines (available in the MBA Program Resources). It should be double spaced, use subheadings, and be well-organized and well-written. Communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality. APA guidelines: Format your paper according to current APA style and formatting. Resources: Use at least four resources from credible resources. Length: Your outline should be 2–5 pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. ePortfolio You should consider adding this to your ePortfolio and personal portfolio. Being able to demonstrate the organization necessary to construct an outline is a valuable skill set. Additionally, your finished capstone project should be added to your ePortfolio, and by having the annotated outline, you can show how you arrived at the final deliverable. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Apply foundational knowledge and an understanding of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Identify the main sections to be developed in the paper and tie them to the project objectives. Competency 2: Integrate information across disciplines and from differing perspectives. Identify where each supporting reference will be integrated. Competency 3: Think critically and analytically to provide evidence-based solutions to business challenges and opportunities. Identify main points of recommendations. Competency 5: Lead and collaborate in virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Identify main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with the chosen business. Competency 6: Integrate principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions. Identify main points that address ethical aspects associated with the chosen business. Competency 7: Communicate clearly and effectively in a business environment. Cite sources and references in proper APA format. Scoring Guide Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated. Collapse All Criterion 1 Identify the main sections to be developed in the paper and tie them to the project objectives. Distinguished Identifies the main sections to be developed in the paper and ties them to the project objectives, taking care to clarify the importance of each section. Proficient Identifies the main sections to be developed in the paper and ties them to the project objectives. Basic Identifies some key sections to be developed in the paper and somewhat ties them to the project objectives. Non Performance Does not identify key sections to be developed in the paper. Criterion 2 Identify where each supporting reference will be integrated. Distinguished Identifies where each supporting reference will be integrated; incorporates relevant quotes or paraphrases from credible sources. Proficient Identifies where each supporting reference will be integrated. Basic Identifies where each supporting reference will be integrated; however, the quotes or paraphrases lack relevancy or credibility is suspect. Non Performance Does not identify where each supporting reference will be integrated. Criterion 3 Identify main points that address ethical aspects associated with the chosen business. Distinguished Identifies main points that address ethical aspects associated with the chosen business; includes specific details for conveying the ethical context, situation, or consideration. Proficient Identifies main points that address ethical aspects associated with the chosen business. Basic Identifies main points that address ethical aspects associated with the chosen business; however, the ethical aspects are not clear. Non Performance Does not identify main points that address ethical aspects associated with the chosen business. Criterion 4 Identify main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with the chosen business. Distinguished Identifies main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with the chosen business; includes specific details that address leadership and collaboration considerations. Proficient Identifies main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with the chosen business. Basic Identifies main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with the chosen business; however, the description is incomplete or somewhat aligns and sources are from questionable sources. Non Performance Does not identify main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with the chosen business. Criterion 5 Identify main points of recommendations. Distinguished Identifies main points of recommendations; includes specific details to connect analysis with recommendations. Proficient Identifies main points of recommendations. Basic Identifies some points of recommendations but lacks clarity. Non Performance Does not identify main points of recommendations. Criterion 6 Cite sources and references in proper APA format. Distinguished Cites sources and references in proper APA format with no errors. Proficient Cites sources and references in proper APA format. Basic Cites sources and references but not in proper APA format. Non Performance Does not cite sources and references. WalkMeChat Assessment 3 Capstone Project InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 Create a 15–20 page capstone paper that analyzes a business topic and provides recommendations and is supported with credible resources that demonstrate evidence-based thinking. Collapse All Introduction Throughout your MBA program, you have worked to develop as a business professional and prepare to meet future challenges as a business leader. Your program culminates in the capstone project, which forms the primary focus of this course, the final course you will take in the program. The capstone project is intended to provide for you the opportunity to demonstrate your MBA program outcomes in these ways: Planning and executing the strategic and tactical elements of a comprehensive project. Integrating and demonstrating the business leadership skills and techniques you have learned throughout the MBA program and your own growth as a business leader. Communicating your analysis and recommendations for a real organization both in written form and in a formal presentation. Completing your MBA program with an experience that reinforces what you have learned throughout your MBA program. Instructions For complete details, refer to the MBA Capstone Project Description [PDF] and scoring guide. Your capstone project should address these expectations: Apply foundational knowledge and an understanding of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Integrate information across disciplines from differing perspectives. Develop logical, well-supported, evidence-based solutions to business challenges and opportunities. Apply innovative, strategic, and sustainable approaches to business practice and planning. Apply leadership and collaboration principles and strategies for virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Integrate principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions. Communicate clearly and effectively in a business environment. Additional Expectations Include an executive summary following your cover page. Include various body sections that contain the analysis and recommendations. Include a conclusion that summarizes main points of the paper. As an MBA student, you have access to a free subscription to the Wall Street Journal. Take advantage of that subscription, and do some of your research in the Wall Street Journal. Try to include at least one source from the Wall Street Journal in your final draft. Submission Requirements Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Style: Your paper should follow the corresponding MBA Academic and Professional Document Guidelines (available in the MBA Program Resources), including single-spaced paragraphs. Use a professional writing style. Communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality. APA guidelines: Format your citations according to current APA style. Resources: Use at least six citations from credible sources. Length: Your paper should be 15–20 pages, not including front and back matter (cover page, executive summary, table of contents, references, appendices). Papers that do not meet this minimum will be immediately returned for revision. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. ePortfolio You should consider adding this to your ePortfolio and personal portfolio. Your completion of this comprehensive capstone project demonstrates your ability to identify a problem or opportunity to be researched, analyze the data, apply your own leadership abilities to suggest solutions, and then present your analysis and conclusions in a credible way. This key program deliverable will be an invaluable part of your portfolio. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Apply foundational knowledge (theories, models, practices) and an understanding of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Apply foundational knowledge and an understanding of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Competency 2: Integrate information across disciplines and from differing perspectives. Integrate most relevant supportive and conflicting information (data, insights, best practices) across disciplines from differing primary functional perspectives individually and holistically. Competency 3: Think critically and analytically to provide evidence-based solutions to business challenges and opportunities. Develop logical, well-supported solutions based on relevant, sound, logical, and credible evidence (data, insights, analyses, best practices) to solve business challenges and opportunities. Competency 4: Apply innovative, strategic, and sustainable approaches to business practice and planning. Apply innovative, strategic, and sustainable (long-term) approaches to business practice and planning. Competency 5: Lead and collaborate in virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Apply leadership and collaboration principles and strategies for virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Competency 6: Integrate principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions. Integrate principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions by assessing ethical implications and resolving ethical conflicts and dilemmas. Competency 7: Communicate clearly and effectively in a business environment. Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a business professional. Scoring Guide Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated. Collapse All Criterion 1 Apply foundational knowledge (theories, models, practices) and an understanding of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Distinguished Applies a balance of theoretical and practical foundational knowledge (theories, models, practices) and an in-depth understanding of a full range of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Justifies approach to integrating foundational knowledge, business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Proficient Applies foundational knowledge (theories, models, practices) and an understanding of business systems, processes, and technology within and across core disciplines. Basic Applies fundamental, practical foundational knowledge (theories, models, practices) and a functional understanding of a limited set of business systems, processes, and technology within but not across core disciplines. Non Performance References but does not apply fundamental, practical foundational knowledge (theories, models, practices) and a functional understanding of business systems, processes, and technology. Criterion 2 Integrate most relevant supportive and conflicting information (data, insights, best practices) across disciplines from differing primary functional perspectives individually and holistically. Distinguished Evaluates supportive and conflicting information (data, insights, best practices) integrating insights across disciplines from multiple diverse functional and strategic perspectives individually and holistically. Proficient Integrates most relevant supportive and conflicting information (data, insights, best practices) across disciplines from differing primary functional perspectives individually and holistically. Basic Analyzes but does not integrate limited information (data, insights, best practices) across disciplines from few differing primary functional perspectives individually but not holistically. Non Performance Analyzes information from a singular discipline or perspective or poorly analyzes information across disciplines from few differing primary functional perspectives. Criterion 3 Develop logical, well-supported solutions based on relevant, sound, logical, and credible evidence (data, insights, analyses, best practices) to solve business challenges and opportunities. Distinguished Develops logical, well-supported solutions based on relevant, sound, logical, and credible evidence (data, insights, analyses, best practices) to systematically solve business challenges and opportunities relevant to all applicable stakeholders and cross-functional departments. Proficient Develops logical, well-supported solutions based on relevant, sound, logical, and credible evidence (data, insights, analyses, best practices) to solve business challenges and opportunities. Basic Develops unsupported (emotional testimonials, anecdotes, or lacking in evidence) solutions or solutions that are not logically connected to business challenges and opportunities. Non Performance Develops unsupported (emotional testimonials, anecdotes, or lacking in evidence) solutions and solutions that are not logically connected to business challenges and opportunities. Criterion 4 Apply innovative, strategic, and sustainable (long-term) approaches to business practice and planning. Distinguished Integrates and justifies innovative, strategic, and sustainable approaches to business practice and planning that appropriately challenge the status quo while recognizing change management implications. Proficient Applies innovative, strategic, and sustainable (long-term) approaches to business practice and planning. Basic Applies some elements of innovative, strategic, and sustainable approaches to business practice and planning. Non Performance Does not apply or poorly applies elements of innovative, strategic, and sustainable approaches to business practice and planning. Criterion 5 Apply leadership and collaboration principles and strategies for virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Distinguished Assesses leadership and collaboration principles, strategies, and opportunities in virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments and integrates flexible perspectives and collaborative approaches in business. Proficient Applies leadership and collaboration principles and strategies for virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Basic Describes leadership and collaboration principles and strategies that may or may not be appropriate to virtual, global, and culturally diverse environments. Non Performance Does not describe or poorly describes leadership or collaboration strategies. Criterion 6 Integrate principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions by assessing ethical implications and resolving ethical conflicts and dilemmas. Distinguished Integrates principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions by assessing ethical implications, resolving ethical conflicts and dilemmas, and making right and just decisions for the organization and the larger business community. Proficient Integrates principles of ethics and integrity into business decisions by assessing ethical implications and resolving ethical conflicts and dilemmas. Basic Assesses principles of ethics and integrity by analyzing ethical implications but may overlook important ethical considerations. Non Performance Does not assess or poorly assesses principles of ethics and integrity. Criterion 7 Write coh

READ MORE >>

The paper identifies and clearly describes a business issue or problem related t ...

The paper identifies and clearly describes a business issue or problem related to finance, accounting, economics, statistics, or decision-making. Some examples are: Analyze the impact of rising inflation on consumer spending and business growth. Research current inflation rates, what's causing the increases, and the potential ramifications across industries. After introducing the problem, conduct an in-depth analysis using 2-3 of the significant concepts, analytical frameworks, or quantitative techniques. Use outside literature to support your problem diagnosis and recommended solutions. Reference at least 10 credible sources from the literature to inform and support your analysis. To conclude, summarize key findings, assess the implications of the analysis, and provide well-supported recommendations to address the business problem. You should also reflect on how the course concepts and tools connect back to the course competencies and how they could be applied to strengthen your personal, professional, and Christian worldview. The title page, abstract, and reference pages should be in addition to the eight pages of content. Please use the current edition of APA format

READ MORE >>

Instructions ASSIGNMENT #2: UNION REPRESENTATION MEMO Union Representation Me ...

Instructions ASSIGNMENT #2: UNION REPRESENTATION MEMO Union Representation Memo (Paper) (25%) 4 pages, not including cover or References pages. This assignment allows you to demonstrate mastery of course outcomes 1, 2 and 3: identify, interpret, and apply rules and policies governing the labor relations process. research and prepare background materials to support the labor relations process. differentiate between unionized and nonunionized environments in order to maintain legal compliance. You have recently joined an organization in an entry level HR position. The organization is now subject to union representation. You have been asked by your supervisor to write a brief memo for your HR colleagues that provides an overview of the expectations for managing human resources in a unionized environment. Your memo must address the following: The differences, from the organization’s perspective, in operating in a union-free environment versus a unionized environment. The rights of the union, management, and employees. The impacts of the union on human resource functions, including: Work restructuring Performance Management Employee Discipline and Job Security Wages and Benefits Health and Safety Any costs the organization may expect based upon these impacts. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS: Please submit your assignments on time as an attachment in your assignment dropbox in the course. Your assignments cannot be accepted via messages or email. Respond to all questions on a new, blank word processing document (such as MS Word). Develop each answer to the fullest extent possible, discussing the nuances of each topic and presenting your arguments logically. You are expected to demonstrate critical thinking skills, as well as an understanding of the issues identified. Some questions may also require personal reflection and practical application. Your responses will be evaluated for content as well as grammar and punctuation. All writing must be your original work. PLEASE do not copy or quote anything. Sources are just that, a reference. Once you locate the information, read and interpret the data. What does it mean to you? Type your own thoughts and own words. Then, include in-text citations to support your ideas. This is not a research paper. FORMAT: Use an approved professional writing format, such as MLA, APA, or Chicago style. Each response should include a cover page with name, date, and title of assignment. Do not include the original questions or assignment directions. Write in complete sentences, 12-point font, double-spaced and spell-checked. Add headings to define each section. Include both end and in-text citations with a minimum of 3 scholarly references and class content resources to support your arguments.

READ MORE >>

Formatting Guidelines 1. The color of front cover binding for the project repor ...

Formatting Guidelines 1. The color of front cover binding for the project report should be GREEN. 2. The text running on front cover should be GOLD in color. 3. The front cover of the report should be in printed form along with the MEC logo. The required print spacing on front cover page is as follows: Top: 1.0”, Left: 1.5”, Right: 1.0”, Bottom: 1.0” 4. Only one side of the page should be printed. The other side should be left blank. 5. The font used should be “Calibri”, 18 points for chapter title and number, 16 points for sections, 14 points for subsections and 12 points for the running text with 1.5” spacing between two consecutive lines. Footnotes shall be single spaced typing. 6. Use “Justify” alignment for the running text or body of the text. 7. Use “Center” alignment for chapter headings. 8. Use “Left” alignment for Section heading / sub-section headings. 9. The page number should be in the footer in the middle. Report Structure Guidelines The overall structure of the project report should be as follows: A. COVER PAGE (Refer Appendix 2) • Project title • Name of the student with ID • Name of the supervisor • MEC logo • Complete name of MEC at the bottom • Submission month and year B. TITLE PAGE (Refer Appendix 2) • Project title • Name of the student with ID • Submission month and year C. DECLARATION FORM (Refer Appendix 2) • Name of the student with ID and their signature D. APPROVAL FORM (Refer Appendix 2) • Project title • Name of the student with ID • Project supervisor name • Second examiner name E. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (Refer Appendix 2) It is useful to acknowledge your supervisor (and other faculty members, if any) and help given by technical support staff and others as appropriate at the start of your report. Project Guide (PROJECT 2) Page 11F. ABSTRACT (Refer Appendix 2) A short summary (100-250 words) distilled from an introduction, research methodology, findings, conclusion, and recommendation of your project after the report is written. G. TABLE OF CONTENTS (Refer Appendix 2) “Table of Contents” in bold upper-case size 16 font in the middle of page (centered). Acknowledgments, abstract, list of figures, list of tables must be in upper case with bold and use Roman numerals to number their pages. All chapter topics should be written in upper case without bold. Subtopics written in each chapter should be numbered using Arabic numerals and indented one tab as shown below. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Project 1.2 Statement of the Problem 1.3 Research Objectives The last chapter should be Summary of findings, conclusions, and recommendations in upper case, not in bold. H. LIST OF FIGURES I. LIST of TABLES J. LIST OF ABBREVIATION Upper case “List of Figures” with bold size 16 fonts in the middle of page (centered). Figure must be shown as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2 and so on. K. MAIN BODY Chapters from 1 to 5. Project Guide (PROJECT 2) Page 12L. REFERENCES (Refer Appendix 2) All references should follow APA referencing style 7th edition. M. APPENDICES The appendices should include the following: Appendix 1: Project diaries. Appendix 2: Interview/questionnaire questions. Appendix 3: Certificate of ethical approval Appendix 4: NDA/letter from the organisation And any other supporting documents if required. Final Project Submission and Presentation At this stage, based on the evaluation components, a final project report should be prepared followed by a presentation. Students must submit their final project report through MEC Future. Turnitin is used to check and report on similarities. Allotted time for final project presentation will be 60 minutes. Students will be informed of the project presentation schedule. Students are required to prepare slides for the presentation and submit the slides in MEC Future. A student that is not present during the presentation will be awarded an F (Fail) grade for the project. The project presentation should include: 1. Project title 2. Abstract 3. Statement of the research problem 4. Research objectives 5. Research questions Project Guide (PROJECT 2) Page 96. Research methodology 7. Data analysis and results 8. Recommendations and conclusion 9. Future research 10. References There will be a question/answer session one last thing i need you to check the spelling and grammar

READ MORE >>

Project Scope: Disruption 1: Digital Overload and Notification Fatigue Disrupti ...

Project Scope: Disruption 1: Digital Overload and Notification Fatigue Disruption 3: Social Media and Personal Distractions Disruption 2: Hybrid and Remote Work Challenges Disruption 4: Economic and Social Uncertainty Team Project Deliverables: Part 3 – Due 5/3, 11:59pm – Point Value: up to 150 points – TEAM ASSIGNMENT Guide for Managers and Teams: Compile a 5-page practical and educational toolkit that includes recommendations and frameworks for reducing workplace and team distractions, and maintaining efficiency and productivity. This document can be used for managers and teams for educational and other purposes. The Guide must be submitted in 12-point font, double spaced, with 1” margins around. Citations and references not required. Only one member of each team should download the Guide in Canvas. If you remember I did part 3 an 4

READ MORE >>

As a new manager at Learn-E-Now, you manage a team of four members, including yo ...

As a new manager at Learn-E-Now, you manage a team of four members, including yourself. Unfortunately, CEO Zenobia Xanthopoulos has been notified that your team is struggling with team dysfunction. Often, team issues in international situations are attributed to culture or diversity. In some instances, this is not the case. After speaking with the team, the following five areas surfaced as root causes for the team’s dysfunctions (Lencioni, 2002): Inattention to results Avoidance of accountability Lack of commitment Fear of conflict Absence of trust In your paper, Define inattention to results, avoidance of accountability, lack of commitment, fear of conflict, and absence of trust. Synthesize how each of the areas listed affect the team. Describe at least two solutions that could be developed to remedy the issues that the team is experiencing. The Team Dysfunction paper must be 3 to 4 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA StyleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site. resource. must include a separate title page with the following in title case: title of paper in bold font Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page. student’s name name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus) course name and number instructor’s name due date must utilize academic voice. Review the Academic VoiceLinks to an external site. resource for additional guidance. must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. For assistance in writing Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. and Writing a Thesis StatementLinks to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources. must use at least 5 scholarly or credible sources in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source. To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, refer to this Quick and Easy Library ResearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips. You may also refer to the How to Use Library OneSearchLinks to an external site. tutorial, which explains keyword searching process in the library to find scholarly articles, or the Advanced Internet Search TechniquesLinks to an external site. tip sheet, which provides some tips and strategies to make finding credible online research in a search engine such as Google easier and more efficient. must document any information used from sources in APA Style

READ MORE >>
QUICK ORDER

Place a Quick Order

Our verified writers got you covered. Let us help you balance between studies, work, and family.

We provide our assistance to the numerous clients looking for a professional writing service.

Order Now
Designed and developed by Brian Mubichi (mubix)
WhatsApp